| NETMOD Working Group | R. Tao |
| Internet-Draft | Q. Wu |
| Intended status: Standards Track | Huawei |
| Expires: December 3, 2020 | B. Claise |
| Cisco | |
| L. Geng | |
| Z. Du | |
| China Mobile | |
| June 1, 2020 |
YANG Data Node Self Explanation Tags
draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-02
This document defines a method to tag data node associated with telemetry data in YANG Modules. This YANG data node tagging method can be used to provide input, instruction, indication to selection filter and filter queries of operational state on a server during a "pub/sub" service for YANG datastore updates and provide multiple dimensional network visibility analysis when the state of all subscriptions of a particular Subscriber to be fetched is huge, so that the amount of data to be streamed out to the destination can be greatly reduced and only targeted to the characteristics data.
An extension statement to be used to indicate YANG data node self explanation tags that SHOULD be added by the module implementation automatically (i.e., outside of configuration).
A YANG module [RFC7950] is defined, which augments Module tag model and provides a list of data node entries to allow for adding or removing of data node self explanation tags as well as viewing the set of self explanation tags associated with a YANG module.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 3, 2020.
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
As described [I.D-ietf-netmod-module-tags], the use of tags for classification and organization is fairly ubiquitous not only within IETF protocols, but in the internet itself (e.g., "#hashtags"). A module tag defined in [I.D-ietf-netmod-module-tags] is a string associated only with a module name at module level.
At the time of writing this document (2020), there are many data models that have been specified or are being specified by the IETF. They cover many of the networking protocols and techniques. However data objects defined by these technology specific data models might represent a portion of fault, configuration, accounting, performance, security management categories information (e.g., performance metric associated with specific data object type) in various different way, lack the same classification criteria and granularity,e.g., sensor data in hardware model is defined with fine granularity with value scale and value precision while interface model only provides statistics data for specific interface type.
This document defines data node self explanation tags and associates them with data nodes within YANG module, which
The data node self explanation tags can be used by the client to provide input, instruction, indication to selection filter and filter queries of configuration or operational state on a server based on these data node tags,.e.g.,return specific object type operational state related to system-management. NETCONF clients can discover data models with data node self explanation tags supported by a NETCONF server via <get-schema> operation. The data node self explanation tag capability can also be advertised via capability notification Model [I-D.netconf-notification-capabilities] by the NETCONF server or some place where offline document are kept. These self explanation tags may be registered as well as assigned during the module definition; assigned by implementations; or dynamically defined and set by users.
This document defines a YANG module [RFC7950] which augments module tag model and provides a list of data node entries to allow for adding or removing of self explanation tags as well as viewing the set of self explanation tags associated with a data node within YANG modules.
This document defines an extension statement to be used to indicate self explanation tags that SHOULD be added by the module implementation automatically (i.e., outside of configuration).
The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture defined in [RFC8342].
The following is a list of already implemented and potential use cases.
Data node tags can be used to express multiple dimensional performance metric and properties associated with YANG data nodes or data objects modelled with YANG (See Figure 1).
----- -----
// \\ // \\
| Property+------+ +-------+ Property|
\\ A // | | \\ B //
-----+ +--V----------------V---+ -----
| YANG Data Node |
| /Data Object |
/---\ +--^----------------^---+ /---\
/ \ | | / \
|Metric +-------+ +--------|Metric |
\ A / +-------------+ \ B /
\-+-/ | | \-+-/
| | Metric Group| |
-------------| |---------------
+-------------+
Figure 1
The use of data node tags would be to help filter different discrete categories of YANG data nodes across YANG modules supported by a device. If data nodes across YANG modules are suitably tagged and learnt by the client from a live server, then an XPath query can be used by the client to list all related data nodes supported by a device with the same characteristics. Data node tags can also be used to help coordination when clients are interacting with various different devices with the same categories of YANG data node across different YANG modules. For example, one management client could mark some specific data node across modules implemented in various different devices with the same metric group tag, so consistent representation and reporting can be provided for YANG data nodes belonging to the same metric group (see Figure 2).
+-----------+---------------+-----------+-----------------------+ | Object | Property | Metric | Metric Module | | Name | Name | Group | Name | | | | | | |tunnel-svc | name | - | - tunnel | | | | | | |tunnel-svc | create-time | - | - tunnel | | | | | | |tunnel-svc | modified-time | - | - | | | | | | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| avg-latency tunnel-pm| | | | | | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| packet-loss tunnel-pm| | | | | | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| min-latency tunnel-pm| | | | | | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| max-latency tunnel-pm| | | | |transmitted | |tunnel-svc | - |lsp-ping-pm| -packet tunnel-pm| +-----------+---------------+-----------+-----------------------+ +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Metric Metric Metric Metric Metric | | Group Name Precision Scale Unit | | | | lsp-ping-pm avg- 1 1 ms | | latency | | | | lsp-ping-pm packet- 1 1 percentile | | loss | | | | | | lsp-ping-pm min- 1 1 ms | | latency | | | | | | lsp-ping-pm max- 1 1 ms | | latency | | | | | | lsp-ping-pm transmitted 1 1 | +---------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 2
Another example is the management client could mark some data node across different level of YANG modules implemented in the device, the management system with the same service tag (e.g., L3VPN Service), so root cause can be identified efficiently during service-level agreements and performance monitoring or network failure troubleshooting.
+--------------+
| Parent object|
+-------^------+
|
----- +-----+-----+ -----
// \\ |Service Tag| // \\
| Property+------+ ++--------+-+ +-------+ Property|
\\ A // | | | | \\ B //
-----+ +--V---V-+ +-V---V--+ -----
| Child | | Child |
|ObjectA | |ObjectB |
/---\ +--^-----+ +-----^--+ /---\
/ \ | | / \
|Metric +-------+ +--------|Metric |
\ A / \ B /
\---/ \---/
+-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Service Metric Metric Module Level | | Tag Group Name | | | | L3VPN L3VPN maximum L3VPN Service | | -routes | | | | L3VPN OSPF-Process total-active OSPF Device | | routes | | | | total-active | | L3VPN RIP-Process routes RIP Device | | | | total-active | | L3VPN BGP-Process routes BGP Device | | | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
All data node tags SHOULD begin with a prefix indicating who owns their definition. An IANA registry (Section 7.1) is used to support registering data node tag prefixes. Currently 3 prefixes are defined.
No further structure is imposed by this document on the value following the registered prefix, and the value can contain any YANG type 'string' characters except carriage-returns, newlines and tabs. Therefore, designers, implementers, and users are free to add or not add any structure they may require to their own tag values.
An IETF tag is a data node tag that has the prefix "ietf:". All IETF data node tags are registered with IANA in a registry defined later in this document (Section 7.2).
A vendor tag is a tag that has the prefix "vendor:". These tags are defined by the vendor that implements the module, and are not registered; however, it is RECOMMENDED that the vendor include extra identification in the tag to avoid collisions such as using the enterpise or organization name following the "vendor:" prefix (e.g., vendor:vendor-defined-classifier).
A user tag is any tag that has the prefix "user:". These tags are defined by the user/administrator and are not meant to be registered. Users are not required to use the "user:" prefix; however, doing so is RECOMMENDED as it helps avoid prefix collisions.
Any tag not starting with the prefix "ietf:", "vendor:" or "user:" is reserved for future use. These tag values are not invalid, but simply reserved in the context of specifications (e.g., RFCs).
Tags can become associated with a data node within YANG module in a number of ways. Tags may be defined and associated at module design time, at implementation time without the need of live server, or via user administrative control . As the main consumer of data node tags are users, users may also remove any tag from a live server, no matter how the tag became associated with a data node within a YANG module.
A data node definition MAY indicate a set of data node tags to be added by the module implementer. These design time tags are indicated using the node-tag extension statement.
If the data node is defined in an IETF standards track document, the data node tags MUST be IETF Tags (2.1). Thus, new data node can drive the addition of new IETF tags to the IANA registry defined in Section 7.2, and the IANA registry can serve as a check against duplication.
An implementation MAY include additional tags associated with data node within a YANG module. These tags SHOULD be IETF Tags (i.e., registered) or vendor specific tags.
Data node tags of any kind, with or without a prefix, can be assigned and removed by the user from a live server using normal configuration mechanisms. In order to remove a data node tag from the operational datastore, the user adds a matching "masked-tag" entry for a given data node within the ietf-data-node-tags Module.
The tree associated with the "ietf-data-node-tags" module follows. The meaning of the symbols can be found in [RFC8340].
module: ietf-data-node-tags
augment /tags:module-tags/tags:module:
+--rw self-explanation-node-tags
+--rw self-explanation-node* [node-name]
+--rw node-name nacm:node-instance-identifier
+--rw opm-tag tags:tag
+--rw metric-precision tags:tag
+--rw metric-scale tags:tag
+--rw operation-type tags:tag
+--rw service-tag* tags:tag
+--rw task-tag* tags:tag
+--rw parent-tag tags:tag
+--rw data-source tags:tag
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-self-explanation-node-tags@2019-05-03.yang"
module ietf-self-explanation-node-tags {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-self-explanation-node-tags";
prefix ntags;
import ietf-netconf-acm { prefix nacm; }
import ietf-module-tags { prefix tags; }
organization
"IETF NetMod Working Group (NetMod)";
contact
"WG Web: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
Editor: Ran Tao <mailto:taoran20@huawei.com>
Editor: Qin Wu <mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com>
Editor: Benoit Claise <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>
Editor: Liang Geng <mailto:gengliang@chinamobile.com>
Editor: Zongpeng Du <mailto:duzongpeng@chinamobile.com>";
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and
// remove this note.
description
"This module describes a mechanism associating self-explanation
tags with YANG data node within YANG modules. Tags may be IANA
assigned or privately defined.
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for
full legal notices.";
// RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC publication
// and RFC number and remove this note.
revision 2019-05-03 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: YANG Data Node Tags";
}
typedef tag {
type string {
length "1..max";
pattern '[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9\-_]*:[\S ]+';
}
description
"A tag value is composed of a standard prefix followed by any type
'string' value that does not include carriage return, newline or
tab characters.";
}
typedef metric-precision {
type int8 {
range "-8 .. 9";
}
description
"A node using this data type represents a sensor value
precision range.
A node of this type SHOULD be defined together with nodes of
type measurement-units and type measurement-scale. Together,
associated nodes of these three types are used to identify the
semantics of a node of type sensor-value.
If a node of this type contains a value in the range 1 to 9,
it represents the number of decimal places in the fractional
part of an associated sensor-value fixed-point number.
If a node of this type contains a value in the range -8 to -1,
it represents the number of accurate digits in the associated
sensor-value fixed-point number.
The value zero indicates the associated sensor-value node is
not a fixed-point number.
Server implementers must choose a value for the associated
sensor-value-precision node so that the precision and accuracy
of the associated sensor-value node is correctly indicated.
For example, a component representing a temperature sensor
that can measure 0 to 100 degrees C in 0.1 degree
increments, +/- 0.05 degrees, would have a
sensor-value-precision value of '1', a sensor-value-scale
value of 'units', and a sensor-value ranging from '0' to
'1000'. The sensor-value would be interpreted as
'degrees C * 10'.";
reference
"RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base -
EntitySensorPrecision";
}
typedef metric-scale {
type enumeration {
enum yocto {
value 1;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^-24.";
}
enum zepto {
value 2;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^-21.";
}
enum atto {
value 3;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^-18.";
}
enum femto {
value 4;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^-15.";
}
enum pico {
value 5;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^-12.";
}
enum nano {
value 6;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^-9.";
}
enum micro {
value 7;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^-6.";
}
enum milli {
value 8;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^-3.";
}
enum units {
value 9;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^0.";
}
enum kilo {
value 10;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^3.";
}
enum mega {
value 11;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^6.";
}
enum giga {
value 12;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^9.";
}
enum tera {
value 13;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^12.";
}
enum peta {
value 14;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^15.";
}
enum exa {
value 15;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^18.";
}
enum zetta {
value 16;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^21.";
}
enum yotta {
value 17;
description
"Measurement scaling factor of 10^24.";
}
}
description
"A node using this data type represents a data scaling factor,
represented with an International System of Units (SI) prefix.
The actual data units are determined by examining a node of
this type together with the associated sensor-value-type.
A node of this type SHOULD be defined together with nodes of
type sensor-value-type and type sensor-value-precision.
Together, associated nodes of these three types are used to
identify the semantics of a node of type sensor-value.";
reference
"RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base -
EntitySensorDataScale";
}
identity metric-unit {
description
"Base identity for measurement unit.";
}
identity ac-volts {
base metric-unit;
description
"Identity for a measure of electric potential (alternating current).";
}
identity dc-volts {
base metric-unit;
description
"Identity for a measure of electric potential (direct current).";
}
identity amperes {
base metric-unit;
description
"Identity for a measure of electric current.";
}
identity power {
base metric-unit;
description
"Identity for a measure of power.";
}
identity hertz {
base metric-unit;
description
"Identity for a measure of frequency.";
}
identity celsius {
base metric-unit;
description
"Identity for a measure of temperature.";
}
identity rpm {
base metric-unit;
description
"Identity for a measure of shaft revolutions per minute.";
}
extension opm-tag {
argument tag;
description
"The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'. This extension statement
is used by module authors to indicate the opm tags that SHOULD be
added automatically by the system. As such the origin of the
value for the pre-defined tags should be set to 'system'
[RFC8342].";
}
extension metric-scale{
argument tag;
description
"The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The metric-scale can be
used to provide an additional metric scale (e.g., Measurement
scaling factor of 10^0, 10^-3,10^3) information associated with
the performance metric data node tag.";
}
extension metric-precision {
argument tag;
description
"The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The metric-precision can be
used to provide an additional metric precision (e.g., the range -8 to -1,
0, the range 1 to 9) information associated with the performance metric
data node tag.";
}
extension statistics-operation {
argument tag;
description
"The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The statistics-operation can be
used to provide an additional statistics operation type(e.g., sum,
min, max,last) information associated with the performance metric
data node tag.";
}
extension service-tag {
argument tag;
description
"The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The service-tag can be
used to provide a service classification information (e.g., tunnel,
l3vpn,l2vpn) information associated with YANG data node.";
}
extension task-tag {
argument tag;
description
"The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The task-tag can be
used to provide a task classification information (e.g., fault management,
performance measurement) information associated with YANG data node.";
}
extension data-source {
argument tag;
description
"The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The data-source-type can be
used to provide an additional data source type (e.g., connectivity,
resource, hardware,qos,policy) information associated with
the performance metric data node tag.";
}
extension parent-tag {
argument tag;
description
"The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The parent-tag can be
used to provide an additional multiple source aggregation
information associated with the performance metric data node
or interface related data node.";
}
augment "/tags:module-tags/tags:module" {
description
"Augment the Tags module with data node tag attributes";
container self-explanation-node-tags {
description
"Contains the list of data nodes and their associated tags";
list self-explanation-node {
key "node-name";
description
"A list of self-explanation nodes and their associated tags";
leaf node-name {
type nacm:node-instance-identifier;
mandatory true;
description
"The YANG data node name.";
}
leaf opm-tag {
type tags:tag;
description
"Tags associated with the data node within YANG module. See
the IANA 'YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes' registry for reserved
prefixes and the IANA'IETF YANG Data Node Tags' registry for
IETF tags.
The 'operational' state [RFC8342] view of this list is
constructed using the following steps:
1) System tags (i.e., tags of 'system' origin) are added.
2) User configured tags (i.e., tags of 'intended' origin)
are added.
3) Any tag that is equal to a masked-tag is removed.";
}
leaf metric-precision {
type tags:tag;
description
"The numeric expression precision of performance
metric related data node.";
}
leaf metric-scale {
type tags:tag;
description
"The measurement scale of performance
metric related data node.";
}
leaf operation-type{
type tags:tag;
description
"Statistics operation of performance metric related
data node.";
}
leaf service-tag {
type tags:tag;
description
"The node-service-tag can be used to provide a service
classification information (e.g., tunnel, l3vpn,l2vpn)
information associated with YANG data node.";
}
leaf task-tag {
type tags:tag;
description
"The node-task-tag can be used to provide a task
classification information (e.g., fault management,
performance measurement) information associated with
YANG data node.";
}
leaf parent-tag {
type tags:tag;
description
"The parent tag can be used to identify multiple source
aggregation tye(e.g., line card,member link in an aggregated
Ethernet interface) related to performance metric related
data node or interface related to data node). Two source
aggregation source types are supported, one is aggregation
which groups data from two or multiple different data objects,
the other is membership which identitfy each data object(e.g.,
linecard, member link from multiple source aggregation.";
}
leaf data-source {
type tags:tag;
description
"The data source type (e.g., connectivity,resource, hardware
,qos,policy) associated with the performance metric data node
within YANG module.";
}
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
This section updates [RFC8407].
A module MAY indicate, using node-tag extension statements, a set of tags that are to be automatically associated with it (i.e., not added through configuration).
module example-module-A {
//...
import ietf-data-node-tags { prefix ntags; }
container top {
ntags:opm-tag "ietf:object-type";
list X {
leaf foo {
ntags:opm-tag "ietf:property";
}
}
container Y {
ntags:opm-tag "ietf:metric";
leaf bar {
ntags:statistics-operation "ietf:avg";
ntags:metric-scale "ietf:milli";
}
}
}
// ...
}
The module writer can use existing standard tags, or use new tags defined in the model definition, as appropriate. For IETF standardized modules new data node tags MUST be assigned in the IANA registry defined below, see Section Section 7.2.
IANA is asked to create a new registry "YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes" grouped under a new "Protocol" category named "YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes".
This registry allocates tag prefixes. All YANG data node tags SHOULD begin with one of the prefixes in this registry.
Prefix entries in this registry should be short strings consisting of lowercase ASCII alpha-numeric characters and a final ":" character.
The allocation policy for this registry is Specification Required [RFC8126]. The Reference and Assignee values should be sufficient to identify and contact the organization that has been allocated the prefix.
The initial values for this registry are as follows.
+----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+ | Prefix | Description | Reference | Assignee | +----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+ | ietf: | IETF Tags allocated in the IANA | [This | IETF | | | IETF YANG Data Node Tags registry| document] | | | | | | | |vendor: | Non-registered tags allocated by | [This | IETF | | | the module implementer. | document] | | | | | | | | user: | Non-registered tags allocated by | [This | IETF | | | and for the user. | document] | | +----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+
Other standards organizations (SDOs) wishing to allocate their own set of tags should allocate a prefix from this registry.
IANA is asked to create four new registries "IETF YANG Data Node Tags","IETF Metric Precision Tags","IETF Statistics Operation Tags","Node Service Tag" grouped under a new "Protocol" category "IETF YANG Data Node Tags". These four registries should be included below "YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes" when listed on the same page.
Four registries allocate tags that have the registered prefix "ietf:". New values should be well considered and not achievable through a combination of already existing IETF tags.
The allocation policy for these four registries is IETF Review [RFC8126].
The initial values for these eight registries are as follows.
+----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Data Node Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | | | | | ietf:object-type | Relates to object type | [This | | | (e.g., interfaces). | document] | | | | | | ietf:metric | Relates to performance | [This | | | metric info | document] | | | (e.g., ifstatistics). | | | | | | | ietf:metric-group | Represent metric group | [This | | | (e.g., flow statistics). | document] | | | | | | ietf:property | Represents a object | [This | | | property | document] | | | (e.g.,ifindex). | | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Metric Precision | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:minus-eight |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-seven |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-sixe |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-five |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-four |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-three |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-two |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:minus-one |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:zero |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:one |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:two |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:three |Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:four | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:five | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:six | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:seven | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:eight | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:nine | Relates to metric precision [This | | | of performance metric | document] | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Metric scale | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:yocto | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:zepto | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf:atto | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: femto | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: pico | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: nano | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: micro | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: milli | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: units | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: kilo | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: mega | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: giga | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: tera | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: peta | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: exa | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: zetta | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | | | | | |ietf: yotta | Relates to metric scale | [This | | | of performance metric | document] | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Statistics Operation Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:avg | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, sum,etc) | | |ietf:sum | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, sum,etc) | | |ietf:min | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, sum,etc) | | |ietf:max | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, sum,etc) | | |ietf:threshold | Relates to statistics | [This | | | operation(e.g.,average, | document] | | | min, max, threshold,etc) | | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Parent Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:member |Relates to multiple source| [This | | |aggregation type(e.g., | document] | | |lag, linecard, sub inf) | | | | | | |ietf:agg |Relates to multiple source| [This | | |aggregation type(e.g.,agg)| document] | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Data Source | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | | | | | ietf:service-flow | Relates to data source | [This | | | type(e.g., microburst). | document] | | | | | | ietf:topo | Relates to data source | [This | | | type(e.g., topology). | document] | | | | | | ietf:resource | Relates to data source | [This | | | type info | document] | | | (e.g., interface,queue). | | | | | | | ietf:policy | Relates to data source | [This | | | type info | document] | | |(e.g., acl, routing policy| | | | | | | ietf:hardware | Relates to data source | [This | | | type | document] | | | (e.g.,optical module). | | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Service Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:l3vpn | Relates to service | [This | | | offering(e.g.,l3vpn | document] | | | l2vpn,tunnel,etc) | | |ietf:l2vpn | Relates to service | [This | | | offering(e.g.,l3vpn | document] | | | l2vpn,tunnel,etc) | | |ietf:te-tunnel | Relates to service | [This | | | offering(e.g.,l3vpn | document] | | | l2vpn,tunnel,etc) | | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Task Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:vpn-diag | Relates to vpn serivce | [This | | | diagonostic function | document] | | | | | |ietf:vpn-fullfilment | Relates to vpn service | [This | | | fullfillment function | document] | | | | | |ietf:vpn-assurance | Relates to vpn service | [This | | | assurance function | document] | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+
This document registers a URI in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]. Following the format in [RFC3688], the following registration has been made:
URI:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-self-explaination-node-tags
Registrant Contact:
The IESG.
XML:
N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers one YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC6020]. Following the format in [RFC6020], the following registration has been made:
name:
ietf-self-explaination-node-tags
namespace:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-self-explaination-node-tags
prefix:
ntags
reference:
RFC XXXX (RFC Ed.: replace XXX with actual RFC number and remove
this note.)
The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is SSH [RFC6242].
This document adds the ability to associate data node tag meta-data with YANG modules. This document does not define any actions based on these associations, and none are yet defined, and therefore it does not by itself introduce any new security considerations.
Users of the data node tag-meta data may define various actions to be taken based on the data node tag meta-data. These actions and their definitions are outside the scope of this document. Users will need to consider the security implications of any actions they choose to define.
| [RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
| [RFC7950] | Bjorklund, M., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016. |
| [RFC8126] | Cotton, M., Leiba, B. and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017. |
| [RFC8174] | Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017. |
| [RFC8342] | Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K. and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018. |
| [RFC8407] | Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", BCP 216, RFC 8407, DOI 10.17487/RFC8407, October 2018. |
| [RFC3688] | Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004. |
| [RFC6020] | Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010. |
| [RFC6241] | Enns, R., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J. and A. Bierman, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011. |
| [RFC6242] | Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011. |
| [RFC8340] | Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018. |