| Internet Engineering Task Force | S. Pallagatti, Ed. |
| Internet-Draft | B. Saji |
| Intended status: Standards Track | S. Paragiri |
| Expires: January 7, 2016 | Juniper Networks |
| V. Govindan | |
| M. Mudigonda | |
| Cisco | |
| G. Mirsky | |
| Ericsson | |
| July 6, 2015 |
BFD for VXLAN
draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-01
This document describes use of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) protocol for VXLAN . Comments on this draft should be directed to nvo3@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 7, 2016.
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
"Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN)" has been defined in [RFC7348] that provides an encapsulation scheme which allows VM's to communicate in data centre network.
VXLAN is typically deployed in data centres on virtualized hosts, which may be spread across multiple racks. The individual racks may be parts of a different Layer 3 network or they could be in a single Layer 2 network. The VXLAN segments/overlay networks are overlaid on top of these Layer 2 or Layer 3 networks.
A VM can communicate with a VM in other host only if they are on same VXLAN. VM's are unaware of VXLAN tunnels as VXLAN tunnel terminates on VTEP (hypervisor/TOR). VTEP (hypervisor/TOR) are responsible for encapsulating and decapsulating frames sent from VM's.
Since underlay is a L3 network, connectivity check for these tunnels becomes important. BFD as defined in [RFC5880] can be used to monitor the VXLAN tunnels.
This draft addresses requirements outlined in [I-D.ashwood-nvo3-operational-requirement]. Specifically with reference to the OAM model to Figure 3 of [I-D.ashwood-nvo3-operational-requirement], this draft outlines proposal to implement the OAM mechanism between the NV Edges using BFD.
Main use case of BFD for VXLAN is for tunnel connectivity check. There are other use cases such as
+------------+-------------+
| Server 1 |
| |
| +----+----+ +----+----+ |
| |VM1-1 | |VM1-2 | |
| |VNI 100 | |VNI 200 | |
| | | | | |
| +---------+ +---------+ |
| Hypervisor VTEP (IP1) |
+--------------------------+
|
|
|
| +-------------+
| | Layer 3 |
|---| Network |
| |
+-------------+
|
|
+-----------+
|
|
+------------+-------------+
| Hypervisor VTEP (IP2) |
| +----+----+ +----+----+ |
| |VM2-1 | |VM2-2 | |
| |VNI 100 | |VNI 200 | |
| | | | | |
| +---------+ +---------+ |
| Server 2 |
+--------------------------+
Figure 1
Figure 1 illustrates a scenario where we have two servers, each of them hosting two VMs. These VTEPs terminate two VXLAN tunnels with VNI number 100 and 200 between them. Separate BFD sessions can be established between the VTEPs (IP1 and IP2) for monitoring each of the VXLAN tunnels (VNI 100 and 200). No BFD packet intended to Hypervisor VTEP should be forwarded to VM's as VM's may drop this leading to false negative. This method is also applicable VTEP which are either software or physical device.
VxLAN packet format has been defined in Section 5 of [RFC7348]. The Outer IP/UDP and VXLAN headers MUST be encoded by the sender as per [RFC7348].
If VTEP is equipped with GPE header capitalises and decides to use GPE instead of VXLAN then GPE header MUST be encoded as per Section 3.3 of [I-D.quinn-vxlan-gpe]. Next Protocol Field in GPE header MUST be set to IPv4 or IPv6.
Details of how VTEP decides to use VXLAN or GPE header is outside the scope of this document.
The BFD packet MUST be carried inside the inner MAC frame of the VxLAN packet. The inner MAC frame carrying the BFD payload has the following format:
Once a packet is received, VTEP MUST validate the packet as described in Section 4.1 of [RFC7348]. If the Destination MAC of the inner MAC frame matches the well-known MAC or the MAC address of the VTEP the packet MUST be processed further.
The UDP destination port and the TTL of the inner MAC frame MUST be validated to determine if the received packet can be processed by BFD. BFD packet with inner MAC set to VTEP or well-known MAC address MUST not be forwarded to VM's.
Demux of IP BFD packet has been defined in Section 3 of [RFC5881]. Since multiple BFD sessions may be running between two VTEPs, there needs to be a mechanism for demultiplexing received BFD packets to the proper session. The procedure for demultiplexing packets with Your Discriminator = 0 is different from [RFC5880]. For such packets, the BFD session is identified using the VNID, the source IP and the destination IP of the packet. If BFD packet is received with non-zero your discriminator then BFD session should be demultiplexed only with your discriminator as the key.
Support for echo BFD is outside the scope of this document.
The well-known MAC to be used for the Destination MAC address of the inner MAC frame needs to be defined
Document recommends setting of inner IP TTL to 1 which could lead to DDoS attack, implementation MUST have throttling in place. Throttling MAY be relaxed for BFD packeted based on port number.
Other than inner IP TTL set to 1 this specification does not raise any additional security issues beyond those of the specifications referred to in the list of normative references.
Reshad Rahman rrahman@cisco.com Cisco
Authors would like to thank Jeff Hass of Juniper Networks for his reviews and feedback on this material.