Network Working Group J.M. Snell
Internet-Draft July 09, 2013
Intended status: Informational
Expires: January 10, 2014

HTTP/2.0 Discussion: Stored Header Encoding
draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-11

Abstract

This memo describes a proposed alternative encoding for headers that combines the best concepts from the proposed Delta and HeaderDiff options with the typed value codecs introduced by previous versions of this draft.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on January 10, 2014.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.


Table of Contents

1. Stored Header Encoding

The Stored Header Encoding is an alternative "binary header encoding" for HTTP/2.0 that combines the best elements from three other proposed encodings, including:

The Stored Header Encoding seeks to find an elegant, efficient and simple marriage of the best concepts from each of these separate proposals.

2. Model

A "header" is a (name,value) pair. The name is a sequence of lower-case ASCII characters. The value is either a UTF-8 string, an integer, a Date-Time, or an arbitrary sequence of binary octets.

The compressor and decompressor each maintain a synchronized cache of up to 256 headers. Every header in the cache is referenced by an 8-bit identifier. Note that the Nil byte (0x00) is a valid identifier.

The cache is managed in a "least recently written" style, that is, as the cache fills to capacity in both number of entries and maximum stored byte size, the least recently written items are cleared and their index positions are reused.

Index positions from the cache are assigned in "encounter order", beginning from 0x00 and increasing monotonically to 0xFF. That is to say, the positions are assigned in precisely the same order that they are serialized, and thereby encountered by the decompressor upon reading and processing the block.

The available size of the stored compression state can be capped by the decompressor using the SETTINGS_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE setting. Each stored header contributes to the accumulated size of the storage state. As new haeder pairs are assigned positions in the cache, the least-recently assigned items must be cleared, if necessary, to free up the required space. Clearing existing items does not change the index positions of the other items in the cache.

The size of a header is calculated as: The number of ASCII octets required for the name plus the number of octets required for the value plus 32-bytes to account for any internal storage overhead. The number of octets required for the value depends on the value type:

3. Header Encoding and Decoding

The set of headers is encoded for transmission using the following process:

  1. For each header, determine if the (name,value) pair already exists in the table.

  2. Determine if a header (name,value) pair with the same name already exists in the table. If a matching name is found, make note of the indexed position of the matching name and continue to step #3.
  3. Determine whether the new header (name,value) pair ought to be added to the header table or not.

  4. If an existing indexed header using the same name was found in the header table in step #2, determine if the new header (name,value) pair ought to replace that existing entry or if it ought to be added as a new entry.

Following these steps, headers are serialized into one of four representation types, each represented by a two-bit prefix code. The types and their codes are:

Each representation type is encoded into groups of up to 64 instances. Each group is prefixed by a single octet prefix. The two most significant bits identify the representation type, the six least significant bits specify the number of instances in the group, with 000000 indicating a single instance and 111111 indicating 64.

If a particular serialization block requires more than 64 intances of a given type, then multiple instances of the group type can be encoded. For instance, if a given message contains 65 Indexed Representations, the encoded block would contain two separate Indexed Representation groups.

Decoding simply reverses the encoding steps:

  1. First initialize an empty working set of headers.
  2. Begin iterating through each representation group:

  3. Continue with each representation group until the complete block has been decoded.

3.1. Literal (name,value) Representation

The structure of an encoded (name,value) pair consists of:

The three most-sigificant bits of the first octet identify the value type.

This design allows for a maximum of 7 value types, only four of which are defined by this specification. The three remaining value types are reserved for future use. The currently defined value types are:

If the name is encoded using an index reference to another existing (name,value) pair in the header table, the remaining five least significant bits of the first octet are set to zero and the next byte identifies the referenced header table index position.

If the name is encoded as a literal string, the number of ASCII bytes required to represent the name is encoded as a unsigned variable length integer with a five-bit prefix, filling the 5-remaining least significant bits of the first octet.

The encoding of the value depends on the value type.

UTF-8 Text:

First, the number of UTF-8 encoded bytes required to represent the value is encoded as an unsigned variable length integer with a 0-bit prefix, followed by the full sequence of UTF-8 bytes.
Integer

The integer's value is encoded as an unsigned variable length integer with a 0-bit prefix. Negative or fractional numbers cannot be represented.
Timestamp

The timestamp is represented as the number of milliseconds ellapsed since the standard Epoch (1970-01-01T00:00:00 GMT), encoded as an unsigned variable length integer with a 0-bit prefix. Timestamps that predate the Epoch cannot be represented.
Raw Binary

The number of octets in the sequence is encoded as an unsigned variable length integer with a 0-bit prefix, followed by the full sequence of octets.

3.2. Indexed Representation

The serialization of an Indexed Representation group consists of the one-octet header group prefix followed by up to 64 single-octet header table index references.

  +--------+--------+--------+--------+---+
  |10xxxxxx| Index positions (1...64)  ...|
  +--------+--------------------------+---+
      

For instance:

0x80 0x00

References item #0 from the header table.
0x81 0x00 0x01

References items #0 and #1 from the header table.

Indexed Representations do not modify the header table state in any way. If an Indexed References specifies a header index that has not yet been allocated or whose value has been cleared, decoding MUST terminate with an error.

3.3. Non-Indexed Literal Representation

The serialization of a group of Non-Indexed Literal representations consists of the one-octet header prefix followed by up to 64 Literal (name,value) Representations.

  +--------+--------+--------+--------+---+
  |00xxxxxx| (name,value)'s (1...64)    ...
  +--------+--------------------------+---+
      

For instance:

0x00 0x01 0x61 0x01 0x62

Specifies a single header with name "a" and a UTF-8 String value of "b" is to be handled as a Non-Indexed header (it is not added to the header table).

3.4. Indexed Literal Representation

The serialization of a group of Indexed Literal representations consists of the one-octet header prefix followed by up to 64 Literal (name,value) Representations.

  +--------+--------+--------+--------+---+
  |01xxxxxx| (name,value)'s (1...64)    ...
  +--------+--------------------------+---+
      

For instance:

0x40 0x01 0x61 0x01 0x62

Specifies a single header with name "a" and a UTF-8 String value of "b" is to be handled as an Indexed header (it will be added to the header table).
0x40 0x21 0x61 0x03

Specifies a single header with name "a" and Integer value of 3 is to be handled as an Indexed header (it will be added to the header table).

3.5. Indexed Literal Replacement Representation

The serialization of a group of Indexed Literal representations consists of the one-octet header prefix followed by up to 64 single octet index references identifying an existing header table entry followed by the new Literal (name,value) representation meant to replace it.

  +--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
  |11xxxxxx| (INDEX | (name,value)(1...64))  ...
  +--------+--------------------------+--------+
      

For instance:

0xC0 0x03 0x01 0x61 0x01 0x62

Specifies that a single header with name "a" and a UTF-8 String value of "b" is to replace the existing (name,value) entry in the header table located at index position #3.
0xC0 0x03 0x21 0x61 0x03

Specifies that a single header with name "a" and Integer value of 3 is to replace the existing (name,value) entry in the header table located at index position #3.

4. Unsigned Variable Length Integer Syntax

Unsigned integers are encoded as defined in [I-D.ietf-httpbis-header-compression].

5. Security Considerations

TBD

6. References

6.1. Normative References

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[I-D.ietf-httpbis-header-compression] Peon, R. and H. Ruellan, "HTTP/2.0 Header Compression", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-01, July 2013.

6.2. Informational References

[RFC6265] Barth, A., "HTTP State Management Mechanism", RFC 6265, April 2011.

Appendix A. Initial Header Table Entries

Index Name Value Type
0 :scheme http Text
1 :scheme https Text
2 :host
3 :path /
4 :method GET Text
5 accept
6 accept-charset
7 accept-encoding
8 accept-language
9 cookie
10 if-modified-since
11 keep-alive
12 user-agent
13 proxy-connection
14 referer
15 accept-datetime
16 authorization
17 allow
18 cache-control
19 connection
20 content-length
21 content-md5
22 content-type
23 date
24 expect
25 from
26 if-match
27 if-none-match
28 if-range
29 if-unmodified-since
30 max-forwards
31 pragma
32 proxy-authorization
33 range
34 te
35 upgrade
36 via
37 warning
38 :status 200 Integer
39 age
40 cache-control
41 content-length
42 content-type
43 date
44 etag
45 expires
46 last-modified
47 server
48 set-cookie
49 vary
50 via
51 access-control-allow-origin
52 accept-ranges
53 allow
54 connection
55 content-disposition
56 content-encoding
57 content-language
58 content-location
59 content-md5
60 content-range
61 link
62 location
63 p3p
64 pragma
65 proxy-authenticate
66 refresh
67 retry-after
68 strict-transport-security
69 trailer
70 transfer-encoding
71 warning
72 www-authenticate
73 user-agent

Appendix B. Updated Standard Header Definitions

In order to properly deal with the backwards compatibility concerns for HTTP/1, there are several important rules for use of Typed Codecs in HTTP headers:

A Note of warning: Individual header fields MAY be defined such that they can be represented using multiple types. Numeric fields, for instance, can be represented using either the uvarint encoding or using the equivalent sequence of ASCII numbers. Implementers will need to be capable of supporting each of the possible variations. Designers of header field definitions need to be aware of the additional complexity and possible issues that allowing for such alternatives can introduce for implementers.

Based on an initial survey of header fields currently defined by the HTTPbis specification documents, the following header field definitions can be updated to make use of the new types

Field Type Description
content-length Numeric or Text Can be represented as either an unsigned, variable-length integer or a sequence of ASCII numbers.
date Timestamp or Text Can be represented as either a uvarint encoded timestamp or as text (HTTP-date).
max-forwards Numeric or Text Can be represented as either an unsigned, variable-length integer or a sequence of ASCII numbers.
retry-after Timestamp, Numeric or Text Can be represented as either a uvarint encoded timestamp, an unsigned, variable-length integer, or the text equivalents of either (HTTP-date or sequence of ASCII numbers)
if-modified-since Timestamp or Text Can be represented as either a uvarint encoded timestamp or as text (HTTP-date).
if-unmodified-since Timestamp or Text Can be represented as either a uvarint encoded timestamp or as text (HTTP-date).
last-modified Timestamp or Text Can be represented as either a uvarint encoded timestamp or as text (HTTP-date).
age Numeric or Text Can be represented as either an unsigned, variable-length integer or a sequence of ASCII numbers.
expires Timestamp or Text Can be represented as either a uvarint encoded timestamp or as text (HTTP-date).
etag Binary or Text Can be represented as either a sequence of binary octets or using the currently defined text format. When represented as binary octets, the Entity Tag MUST be considered to be a Strong Entity tag. Weak Entity Tags cannot be represented using the binary octet option.

Appendix C. Example

C.1. First Header Set:

The first header set to represent is the following:

  :path: /my-example/index.html
  user-agent: my-user-agent
  x-my-header: first
        

The header table is prefilled as defined in Appendix A, however, none of the values represented in the initial set can be found in the header table. All headers, then, are encoding using the Indexed Literal Representation:

  43 00 03 16 2f 6d 79 2d 65 78 
  61 6d 70 6c 65 2f 69 6e 64 65 
  78 2e 68 74 6d 6c 00 49 6d 79 
  2d 75 73 65 72 2d 61 67 65 6e 
  74 0b 78 2d 6d 79 2d 68 65 61 
  64 65 72 05 66 69 72 73 74 
        

Three new entries are added to the header table:

Index Name Value
74 :path /my-example/index.html
75 user-agent my-user-agent
76 x-my-header first

C.2. Second Header Set:

The second header set to represent is the following:

  :path: /my-example/resources/script.js
  user-agent: my-user-agent
  x-my-header: second
        

Comparing this second header set to the first, we see that the :path and x-my-header headers have new values, while the user-agent value remains unchanged. For the sake of the example let's encode the :path and x-my-header headers using Indexed Literal Replacement representations. The user-agent header will be encoded as an Indexed Representation.

  80 4b a3 4a 00 4a 1f 2f 6d 79 
  2d 65 78 61 6d 70 6c 65 2f 72 
  65 73 6f 75 72 63 65 73 2f 73 
  63 72 69 70 74 2e 6a 73 00 4c
  06 73 65 63 6f 6e 64
        

Items #74 and #76 added by the previous header set are replaced:

Index Name Value
74 :path /my-example/resources/script.js
75 user-agent my-user-agent
76 x-my-header second

C.3. Third Header Set:

Let's suppose a third header set that is identical to the second is sent:

  82 4b 4c 4d
        

Author's Address

James M Snell EMail: jasnell@gmail.com