Network Working Group P. Saint-Andre
Internet-Draft Jabber Software Foundation
Expires: July 15, 2005 J. Hildebrand
Jabber, Inc.
B. Wyman
PubSub.com
January 14, 2005
Transporting Atom Notifications over the Extensible Messaging and
Presence Protocol (XMPP)
draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-02
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions
of section 3 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, each
author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of
which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of
which he or she become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
RFC 3668.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 15, 2005.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This memo describes a method for notifying interested parties about
changes in syndicated information encapsulated in the Atom feed
format, where such notifications are delivered via an extension to
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) for
publish-subscribe functionality.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3 Discussion Venue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Process Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1 Notification of Entry Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2 Notification of Entry Modification . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.3 Notification of Entry Deletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3. Implementation Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.1 Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.2 Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 13
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
1. Introduction
1.1 Overview
The Atom Publishing Format and Protocol Working Group has been
chartered to develop two technologies relevant to content
syndication:
1. A data format for syndication of information about
periodically-updated resources (such as weblog entries and news
stories) available on the World Wide Web.
2. A protocol for publishing, editing, deleting, and otherwise
managing such resources.
Content syndication follows a classic "observer" or
"publish-subscribe" design pattern: a person or application publishes
information to a "channel", and an event notification (or the data
itself) is broadcasted to all those who are interested in knowing
when information is published or modified for that channel. On the
Internet today, publication of periodically-updated resources is
handled by means of standard technologies such as [HTTP], and it is
not envisioned that this will change since [ATOM-PROTOCOL] specifies
the use of HTTP for publication. However, existing methods for
learning that a resource has been updated are currently limited to
"polling" for changes via HTTP, which is inherently inefficient.
What is needed is a technology that can be relied on to "push"
information only when a resource undergoes a state change, and only
to those who are interested in learning about such state changes.
One possible technology for doing so is email, since [SMTP] provides
a way to initiate the sending of information from "publishers" to
"subscribers" (think, for example, of email lists such as those used
to announce newly-published RFCs). While email is one possible
solution, it is not necessarily the best solution for Atom; in
particular, [ATOM-FORMAT] defines an XML data format for content
syndication, which implies that it might be beneficial to use a
native XML delivery mechanism rather than to attach a special XML
media type to email messages. Thankfully, a specialized XML delivery
protocol has been developed through the IETF: the Extensible
Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) as specified in [XMPP-CORE].
XMPP has the added benefit of being optimized for near-real-time data
delivery, which may be important in applications of Atom that require
subscribers to be notified about syndicated content in a highly
timely manner.
While the semantics of a normal XMPP element may be
suitable for Atom content notifications, there also exists an XMPP
extension that provides more structured communications in the context
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
of information "channels" or "nodes" of the kind that are used in
content syndication. This extension is specified in [XMPP-PUBSUB]
and may be especially useful for delivering notifications related to
changes in Atom resources. Therefore, this memo describes a method
for notifying interested parties about changes in syndicated
information encapsulated in the Atom feed format, where such
notifications are delivered via the XMPP publish-subscribe extension.
1.2 Terminology
This document inherits terminology from [ATOM-FORMAT],
[ATOM-PROTOCOL], [XMPP-CORE], and [XMPP-PUBSUB].
The capitalized key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
"SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC
2119 [TERMS].
1.3 Discussion Venue
The authors welcomes discussion and comments related to the topics
presented in this document. The preferred forum is the
mailing list, for which subscription
information and archive links are available at
.
2. Process Flows
The following process flows demonstrate how Atom-formatted data
(specifically, feed entries) can be delivered using the XMPP pubsub
extension. The actors in these process flows are an application and
one or more XMPP users. The application acts as a translator between
HTTP and XMPP, since it generates XMPP pubsub requests when certain
events occur at an Atom-aware HTTP service (e.g., an HTTP POST to
create a new dynamic resource). The XMPP pubsub service then
translates those pubsub requests into notifications that are sent to
a potentially large number of XMPP users who have subscribed to such
events (e.g., who have asked to receive an XMPP notification whenever
a new dynamic resource is created for a certain Atom "channel"). Of
course, an XMPP user is not necessarily a human, and could represent
another application on the XMPP network (e.g., a chatroom, a bot, or
a content management system).
Note well that an HTTP user (e.g., a weblog author) would still
publish information using the methods defined in [ATOM-PROTOCOL]; the
process flows described herein enable the HTTP service with which an
HTTP user interacts to generate notifications that are delivered via
an XMPP pubsub service to a potentially large number of XMPP users
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
who want to receive such information.
We can visualize the architecture as follows:
+-----------+
| HTTP User |
+-----------+
|
| [Atom API]
|
+--------------+
| HTTP Service |
+--------------+
|
| [XMPP Pubsub]
|
+---------------------+
| XMPP Pubsub Service |
+---------------------+
|
| [XMPP Pubsub]
|
+-----------+
| XMPP User |
+-----------+
2.1 Notification of Entry Creation
When a content author publishes a new dynamic resource, many entities
may be interested in learning that the resource is now available.
The process flow is as follows:
o Author publishes a new entry to the HTTP service via the Atom API.
o The HTTP service sends data for the new Atom entry in an XMPP
pubsub "publish" request to a specific node at the XMPP pubsub
service. (Note: If the entry may be copied from one feed to
another, e.g., in the generation of "synthetic" feeds, the entry
SHOULD contain an atom:head element to ensure consistent
metadata.)
o The XMPP pubsub service sends an XMPP message notification to each
XMPP entity that is subscribed to the pubsub node.
The result is that the XMPP subscribers will receive something close
to real-time notification whenever a new feed entry has been
published.
Obviously the first step is out of scope for this memo, since it is
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
described in [ATOM-PROTOCOL]. The XMPP protocols for the last two
steps are shown below.
First the HTTP service sends an XMPP pubsub "publish" request to the
XMPP pubsub service:
Example Feed2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run Amuckvemmi://example.org/2003/323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:30:02Z
The XMPP pubsub service then sends a pubsub notification to each XMPP
subscriber; depending on pubsub node configuration, the notification
may or may not contain the Atom payload (we assume here that the
payload will be delivered).
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
Example Feed2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run Amuckvemmi://example.org/2003/323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:30:02Z
2.2 Notification of Entry Modification
When a content author updates an existing dynamic resource, many
entities may be interested in learning that the resource has been
modified. The process flow is as follows:
o Author updates an existing entry at the HTTP service via the Atom
API.
o The HTTP service sends data for the updated Atom entry in an XMPP
pubsub "publish" request to a specific node at the XMPP pubsub
service, specifying the same Item ID as previously supplied.
(Note: If the entry may be copied from one feed to another, e.g.,
in the generation of "synthetic" feeds, the entry SHOULD contain
an atom:head element to ensure consistent metadata.)
o The XMPP pubsub service sends an XMPP message notification to each
XMPP entity that is subscribed to the pubsub node.
First the HTTP service sends an XMPP pubsub "publish" request to the
XMPP pubsub service (note the modified title and time):
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
Example Feed2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run Amokvemmi://example.org/2003/323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:31:03Z
Subject to node configuration and/or subscription options, each XMPP
subscriber would then receive a pubsub notification, which may or may
not contain the Atom payload.
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
Example Feed2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run Amokvemmi://example.org/2003/32397
2003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:31:03Z
2.3 Notification of Entry Deletion
If a content author deletes an existing dynamic resource, many
entities may be interested in learning that the resource is no longer
available. The process flow is as follows:
o Author deletes an existing entry at the HTTP service via the Atom
API.
o The HTTP service sends an XMPP pubsub "retract" request to a
specific node at the XMPP pubsub service, specifying the same Item
ID as previously supplied.
o The XMPP pubsub service sends an XMPP message notification to each
XMPP entity that is subscribed to the pubsub node.
First the HTTP service sends an XMPP pubsub "retract" request to the
XMPP pubsub service:
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
Subject to node configuration and/or subscription options, each XMPP
subscriber would then receive a pubsub notification that the item was
deleted.
3. Implementation Notes
The pubsub ItemIDs MUST conform to the rules defined in
[XMPP-PUBSUB]. One possible method for generating a unique ItemID is
to concatenate the XMPP address of the pubsub service, the pubsub
node to which the item is published, and the atom:id of the feed
entry, then hash the resulting string using the [SHA1] algorithm.
It is the responsibility of the receiving application to remove or
ignore duplicate entries that might be received from multiple feeds.
4. Security Considerations
Detailed security considerations for the relevant protocols profiled
in this memo are given in [ATOM-FORMAT], [ATOM-PROTOCOL],
[XMPP-CORE], and [XMPP-PUBSUB]; this memo introduces no new security
concerns above and beyond those described in the foregoing
specifications.
5. References
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
5.1 Normative References
[ATOM-FORMAT]
Nottingham, M., "The Atom Syndication Format",
draft-ietf-atompub-format-04 (work in progress), January
2005.
[ATOM-PROTOCOL]
Gregorio, J., "The Atom Publishing Protocol",
draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-02 (work in progress), October
2004.
[TERMS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[XMPP-CORE]
Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 3920, October 2004.
[XMPP-PUBSUB]
Millard, P., "Publish-Subscribe", JSF JEP 0060, July 2004.
5.2 Informative References
[HTTP] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter,
L., Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer
Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
[SMTP] Klensin, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 2821, April
2001.
[SHA1] Eastlake, D. and P. Jones, "US Secure Hash Algorithm 1
(SHA1)", RFC 3174, September 2001.
Authors' Addresses
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
EMail: stpeter@jabber.org
Joe Hildebrand
Jabber, Inc.
EMail: jhildebrand@jabber.com
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
Bob Wyman
PubSub.com
EMail: bob@wyman.us
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB January 2005
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires July 15, 2005 [Page 13]