Network Working Group J. Reschke
Internet-Draft greenbytes
Expires: April 3, 2002 October 3, 2001
Computing the CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning
draft-reschke-deltav-compute-checkin-uri-00
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://
www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 3, 2002.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
In many cases, a versioning-aware client might want to display/
include the URI of the version it's editing while it's being edited.
For instance, an editor might include this as meta information, or
the author of a document might want to know the URI of the version
before it's checked in. A well-known example is the W3C way of
referring to document versions in recommendations: it contains
references to "the current version", to "this version" and to the
"previous version". Something like this is currently impossible with
the current draft version of WebDAV deltaV [deltaV], as the version
URI is determined at the time of CHECKIN.
Distribution of this document is unlimited. Please send comments to
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
the WebDAV versioning (delta-V) working group at ietf-dav-
versioning@w3.org[1], which may be joined by sending a message with
subject "subscribe" to ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org[2].
Discussions of the delta-V working group are archived at URL: http://
lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-dav-versioning/.
Table of Contents
1. Notational Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Changes for CHECKOUT method (when applied to a
version-controlled resource) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1 Example for successful CHECKOUT with computed-checkin-URI . . 5
3.2 Example for successful CHECKOUT without computed-checkin-URI . 6
4. Changes for CHECKIN method (when applied to a
version-controlled resource) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1 Example for successful CHECKIN with computed-checkin-URI . . . 7
4.2 Example for failed CHECKIN with computed-checkin-URI . . . . . 8
5. Compatibility Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6. Internationalization Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8. Copyright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
9. Intellectual Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
1. Notational Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
2. Introduction
In many cases, a versioning-aware client might want to display/
include the URI of the version it's editing while it's being edited.
For instance, an editor might include this as meta information, or
the author of a document might want to know the URI of the version
before it's checked in. A well-known example is the W3C way of
referring to document versions in recommendations: it contains
references to "the current version", to "this version" and to the
"previous version". Something like this is currently impossible with
the current draft version of WebDAV deltaV [deltaV], as the version
URI is determined at the time of CHECKIN.
This specification builds on the infrastructure provided by the
WebDAV Versioning Protocol, adding support for servers willing to
compute an "expected CHECKIN URI" upon CHECKOUT, and using this URI
at time of CHECKIN.
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
3. Changes for CHECKOUT method (when applied to a version-controlled
resource)
A client may ask for an "expected CHECKIN URI" upon CHECKOUT. This
is done by placing DAV:compute-expected-checkin-URI as top-level
element into the request body. The server is free to either ignore
the request, or to return it's best guess about what the URI for a
version resource created upon CHECKIN would be.
The client can detect the "expected CHECKIN URI" by parsing the
response body for a top-level element called DAV:expected-checkin-
URI.
3.1 Example for successful CHECKOUT with computed-checkin-URI
>>Request
CHECKOUT /foo.html HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx
>>Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: no-cache
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx
http://repo.webdav.org/his/23/ver/32
In this example, the server was able to compute the "expected CHECKIN
URI" and returned it in the DAV:expected-version-URI element.
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
3.2 Example for successful CHECKOUT without computed-checkin-URI
>>Request
CHECKOUT /foo.html HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx
>>Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: no-cache
In this case, no response body was returned, and thus no "expected
CHECKIN URI" is available. Simarily, the server may also return
>>Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: no-cache
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx
...other content...
where a response body is available, but it doesn't contain the
DAV:expected-checkin-URI element.
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
4. Changes for CHECKIN method (when applied to a version-controlled
resource)
A client may submit the "expected CHECKIN URI" (obtained during
CHECKOUT) upon a CHECKIN by placing it into a top-level DAV:expected-
checkin-URI element in the request body. A server may
o simply ignore the presence of this information or
o use the information and try to checkin the resource using the
"expected checkin URI" as location for the version resource. A
failure to create a version resource at the "expected checkin URI"
MUST cause the operation to fail with a status code of 403
(forbidden) and a response body containing the top-level element
DAV:cannot-assign-expected-version-URI. In addition, a server MAY
return a new "expected checkin URI" in it's response body.
4.1 Example for successful CHECKIN with computed-checkin-URI
>>Request
CHECKIN /foo.html HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx
http://repo.webdav.org/his/23/ver/32
>>Response
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Location: http://repo.webdav.org/his/23/ver/32
Cache-Control: no-cache
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
4.2 Example for failed CHECKIN with computed-checkin-URI
>>Request
CHECKIN /foo.html HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx
http://repo.webdav.org/his/23/ver/32
>>Response
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Cache-Control: no-cache
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxxx
http://repo.webdav.org/his/23/ver/33
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
5. Compatibility Considerations
This specification does introduce new protocol elements for the
request and response bodies for CHECKIN and CHECKOUT.
Clients not aware of this specification will never submit the new
protocol elements in a request and therefore never will see the new
response elements.
Servers not aware of this specification will ignore the additional
two request body elements which is legal behaviour according to this
protocol (indicating that the protocol extension is not available).
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
6. Internationalization Considerations
This proposal builds on [deltaV], and inherits its
internationalizability.
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
7. IANA Considerations
This proposal does not introduce any new IANA considerations, since
it does not specify any new namespaces (in the general sense), but
merely uses existing ones.
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
8. Copyright
To be supplied by the RFC Editor.
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
9. Intellectual Property
To be supplied by the RFC Editor.
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2518] Goland, Y., Whitehead, E., Faizi, A., Carter, S. and D.
Jensen, "HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring --
WEBDAV", RFC 2518, February 1999.
[deltaV] Clemm, G., Amsden, J., Ellison, T., Kaler, C. and J.
Whitehead, "Versioning Extensions to WebDAV", ID draft-
ietf-deltav-versioning-18, September 2001, .
[1]
[2]
Author's Address
Julian F. Reschke
greenbytes GmbH
Salzmannstrasse 152
Muenster, NW 48159
Germany
EMail: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft CHECKIN URI in WebDAV versioning October 2001
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Reschke Expires April 3, 2002 [Page 15]