Internet-Draft ICMP E-Impact Extensions February 2024
Pignataro, et al. Expires 8 August 2024 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-pignataro-eimpact-icmp-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Experimental
Expires:
Authors:
C. Pignataro
NC State University
J. Parikh
NC State University
R. Bonica
Juniper

ICMP Extensions for Environmental Impact

Abstract

This document defines a data structure that can be appended to selected ICMP messages. The ICMP extension defined herein can be used to gain visibility on environmental impact information on the Internet by providing per-hop (i.e., per topological network node) power metrics and other current or future sustainability metrics. This will contribute to achieving an objective mentioned in the IAB E-Impact workshop.

The techniques presented are useful not only in a transactional setting (e.g., a user-issued traceroute or a ping request), but also in a scheduled automated setting where they may be run periodically in a mesh across an administrative domain to map out environmental-impact metrics.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 8 August 2024.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

IP devices use the Internet Control Message Protocol ICMPv4 [RFC0792] and ICMPv6 [RFC4443] to convey control information to source hosts. In particular, when an IP device receives a datagram that it cannot process, it may send an ICMP message to the datagram's originator or source. Network operators and higher-level protocols use these ICMP messages to detect and diagnose network issues.

As the world transitions towards sustainability in technology, the focus is shifting not only on creating modern technologies infused with sustainability but also on bridging gaps in the tools that are already available, to enhance visibility, measurement, and quantification of their impact. Consequently, tools which have been foundational for control and management for decades now encounter new requirements including enhancing them to cater to a significantly increasing demand for monitoring the sustainability and environmental impact. This document serves that need by defining an ICMP extension object that appends environmental impact information to ICMP messages.

Using the extension defined herein, a device can explicitly append these exemplary environmental impact metrics:

2. Conventions

2.1. Definition of Terms

This document uses the following terms:

ICMP:

Generically referring to ICMPv4 [RFC0792] and ICMPv6 [RFC4443] messages.
ICMP Extension:

Extended ICMP to support multi-part messages through an ICMP extension structure, as defined in [RFC4884].

2.2. Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Application

The IAB held a workshop on "Environmental Impact of Internet Applications and Systems (eimpactws)" [IAB-EIMPACTWS], in which the need for visibility into environmental impact metrics within traditional Internet tools such as traceroute was highlighted (see WebVTT cue identifiers 139 and 140 of [IAB-EIMPACTWS-Minutes].)

The Environmental Impact ICMP Extensions defined in this document allow for augmenting the traceroute output with environmental metrics from each reported node.

4. ICMP Environmental Impact Extension

This section defines the Environmental Impact Object, an ICMP extension object with a Class-Num (Object Class Value) of TBA that can be appended to the following messages, as per [RFC4884] and [RFC8335]:

The ICMP extension defined in this document MAY be appended to any of the above listed messages based on policy and following security considerations.

These extensions are preceded by an ICMP Extension Structure Header, and include an ICMP Object Header. Both are defined in [RFC4884]. The same backward compatibility issues that apply to [RFC4884] apply to this extension.

A single ICMP message can contain zero, one, or multiple instances of the Environmental Impact Object. The C-Type further identifies the information fields carried.

A single instance of the Environmental Impact Object can convey the following information from each reporting node: TODO FROM C-TYPE DEFINITION.

4.1. Extension Format

The ICMP Environmental Impact Extension has the following format.

                     1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...
|Version|       Reserved        |           Checksum            |(1)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...
|             Length            |   Class-Num   |   C-Type      |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+(2)
~                        Object payload                         ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...
Figure 1: ICMP Environmental Impact Extension Format
(1) ICMP Extension Header
Version:

2 [RFC4884].
Reserved:

0 [RFC4884].
Checksum:

The one's complement checksum of the ICMP extension [RFC4884].
(2) Environmental Impact Object
Length:

Length of the object, including header and payload, in octets.
Class-Num:

TBA (Environmental Impact)
C-Type:

C-Type as explained in Section 4.2.

4.2. C-Type Definition

The 8-bit C-Type defined in the Section 8 of [RFC4884] allows to carry different information elements within this Class-Num (TBA). The techniques herein defined can be used with any specific e-impact metric in use, current or future.

The ICMP Environmental Impact Extension Object header has the following format:

                     1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|             Length            | Class-Num=TBA | C-Type=1-255  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: Environmental Impact Extension Object Header

The following C-Type values are currently defined.

  1. Power Consumption Sub-Object

                         1                   2                   3
     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |                Power (32-bit unsigned word)                   |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    
    Figure 3: Power Extension Sub-Object

    A Class-Num of TBA and a C-Type of 1 are specified. The returned power metric is a magnitude that may be directly displayed, and is expressed in Watts; one of the uses is having a traceroute or ping facility that shows per-hop power metrics.

  2. Other metrics to be provided in subsequent revisions.

5. Security Considerations

The security considerations of [RFC4884] and of [RFC8335] apply to these extensions.

Upon receipt of an ICMP message, application software must check it for syntactic correctness. The extension checksum MUST be verified. Care should be taken, as improperly specified length attributes and other syntax problems may result in buffer overruns.

This document does not define the conditions under which a router sends an ICMP message. Therefore, it does not expose routers to any new denial-of-service attacks. Routers may need to limit the rate at which ICMP messages are sent.

This document defines an extension that allows a router to append environmental impact information to multi-part ICMP messages, and therefore can provide the user of the traceroute and ping applications with additional metrics.

The intended field of use for the extensions defined in this document is administrative debugging and troubleshooting and operational facilities. The extensions herein defined supply additional information in ICMP responses. These mechanisms are not initially intended for other uses.

Some of the additional metrics provided, as e.g., power draw information, have privacy considerations. For example, behavioral considerations of the devices, or estimating other node and network attributes from the power or energy data.

This document does not specify an authentication mechanism for the extension that it defines. Application developers should be aware of various ICMP attacks [RFC5927].

6. IANA Considerations

IANA is requested to assign the following object Class-num in the ICMP Extension Object Classes and Class Sub-types registry [IANA-ICMP-Extended]:

Table 1: Class-num for Environmental Impact Extensions
Class Value Class name Reference
TBA Environmental Impact Object This document

IANA is requested to establish a registry for the corresponding class sub-type (C-Type) space, as follows:

Table 2: C-Types for Environmental Impact Extensions
C-Type Value Description Reference
0 Reserved This document
1 Power This document
2-246 Unassigned  
247-255 Reserved for Experimentation This document

C-Type values are assignable on a first-come-first-serve (FCFS) basis.

7. Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Michael Welzl for his thorough review and most useful set of comments and suggestions.

8. References

8.1. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4884]
Bonica, R., Gan, D., Tappan, D., and C. Pignataro, "Extended ICMP to Support Multi-Part Messages", RFC 4884, DOI 10.17487/RFC4884, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4884>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8335]
Bonica, R., Thomas, R., Linkova, J., Lenart, C., and M. Boucadair, "PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces", RFC 8335, DOI 10.17487/RFC8335, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8335>.

8.2. Informative References

[IAB-EIMPACTWS]
"IAB workshop on Environmental Impact of Internet Applications and Systems (eimpactws)", , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/eimpactws/>.
[IAB-EIMPACTWS-Minutes]
"Minutes for the IAB E-Impact Workshop Session 4: Next Steps", eimpactws Session 4, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-interim-2022-eimpactws-04-202212121400/>.
[IANA-ICMP-Extended]
"Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) Parameters, ICMP Extension Object Classes and Class Sub-types", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters/icmp-parameters.xhtml#icmp-parameters-ext-classes>.
[RFC0792]
Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", STD 5, RFC 792, DOI 10.17487/RFC0792, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc792>.
[RFC4443]
Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, Ed., "Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", STD 89, RFC 4443, DOI 10.17487/RFC4443, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4443>.
[RFC5927]
Gont, F., "ICMP Attacks against TCP", RFC 5927, DOI 10.17487/RFC5927, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5927>.

Authors' Addresses

Carlos Pignataro
North Carolina State University
United States of America
Jainam Parikh
North Carolina State University
United States of America
Ron Bonica
Juniper Networks
United States of America