Internet-Draft LDACS March 2020
Maeurer, et al. Expires 7 September 2020 [Page]
Workgroup:
RAW
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Authors:
N. Maeurer, Ed.
German Aerospace Center (DLR)
T. Graeupl, Ed.
German Aerospace Center (DLR)
C. Schmitt, Ed.
Research Institute CODE, UniBwM

L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System (LDACS)

Abstract

This document provides an overview of the architecture of the L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System (LDACS), which provides a secure, scalable and spectrum efficient terrestrial data link for civil aviation. LDACS is a scheduled, reliable multi-application cellular broadband system with support for IPv6.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 7 September 2020.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

One of the main pillars of the modern Air Traffic Management (ATM) system is the existence of a communication infrastructure that enables efficient aircraft control and safe separation in all phases of flight. Current systems are technically mature but suffering from the VHF band's increasing saturation in high-density areas and the limitations posed by analogue radio communications. Therefore, aviation globally and the European Union (EU) in particular, strives for a sustainable modernization of the aeronautical communication infrastructure.

In the long-term, ATM communication shall transition from analogue VHF voice and VDL2 communication to more spectrum efficient digital data communication. The European ATM Master Plan foresees this transition to be realized for terrestrial communications by the development (and potential implementation) of the L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System (LDACS). LDACS shall enable IPv6 based air- ground communication related to the aviation safety and regularity of flight. The particular challenge is that no additional spectrum can be made available for terrestrial aeronautical communication. It was thus necessary to develop co-existence mechanism/procedures to enable the interference free operation of LDACS in parallel with other aeronautical services/systems in the same frequency band.

2. Terminology

2.1. Terms used in this document

The following terms are used in the context of DetNet in this document:

A/A
Air-To-Air
AeroMACS
Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communication System
A/G
Air-To-Ground
AM(R)S
Aeronautical Mobile (Route) Service
ANSP
Air traffic Network Service Provider
AOC
Aeronautical Operational Control
AS
Aircraft Station
ATC
Air-Traffic Control
ATM
Air-Traffic Management
ATN
Aeronautical Telecommunication Network
ATS
Air Traffic Service
CCCH
Common Control Channel
DCCH
Dedicated Control Channel
DCH
Data Channel
DLL
Data Link Layer
DLS
Data Link Service
DME
Distance Measuring Equipment
DSB-AM
Double Side-Band Amplitude Modulation
FAA
Federal Aviation Administration
FCI
Future Communication Infrastructure
FDD
Frequency Division Duplex
FL
Forward Link
GANP
Global Air Navigation Plan
GNSS
Global Navigation Satellite System
GS
Ground Station
GSC
Ground-Station Controller
HF
High Frequency
ICAO
International Civil Aviation Organization
IWF
Interworking Function
kbit/s
kilobit per secong
LDACS
L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System
LLC
Logical Link Layer
LME
LDACS Management Entity
MAC
Medium Access Layer
MF
Multi Frame
MIMO
Multiple Input Multiple Output
OFDM
Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing
OFDMA
Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing Access
PDU
Protocol Data Units
PHY
Physical Layer
QoS
Quality of Service
RL
Reverse Link
SARPs
Standards And Recommended Practices
SESAR
Single European Sky ATM Research
SF
Super-Frame
SNP
Sub-Network Protocol
SSB-AM
Single Side-Band Amplitude Modulation
SNDCF
Sub-Network Dependent Convergence Function
TBO
Trajectory-Based Operations
TDM
Time Division Multiplexing
TDMA
Time-Division Multiplexing-Access
VDL2
VHF Data Link mode 2
VHF
Very High Frequency
VI
Voice Interface

3. Motivation and Use Cases

Aircraft are currently connected to Air-Traffic Control (ATC) and Airline Operational Control (AOC) via voice and data communications systems through all phases of a flight. Within the airport terminal, connectivity is focused on high bandwidth communications, while during en-route high reliability, robustness, and range is the main focus. Voice communications may use the same or different equipment as data communications systems. In the following the main differences between voice and data communications capabilities are summarized. The assumed use cases for LDACS completes the list of use cases stated in [RAW-USE-CASES] and the list of reliable and available wireless technologies presented in [RAW-TECHNOS].

3.1. Voice Communications Today

Voice links are used for Air-To-Ground (A/G) and Air-To-Air (A/A) communications. The communication equipment is either ground-based working in the High Frequency (HF) or Very High Frequency (VHF) frequency band or satellite-based. All VHF and HF voice communications is operated via open broadcast channels without any authentication, encryption or other protective measures. The use of well-proven communication procedures via broadcast channels helps to enhance the safety of communications by taking into account that other users may encounter communication problems and may be supported, if required. The main voice communications media is still the analogue VHF Double Side-Band Amplitude Modulation (DSB-AM) communications technique, supplemented by HF Single Side-Band Amplitude Modulation (SSB-AM) and satellite communications for remote and oceanic areas. DSB-AM has been in use since 1948, works reliably and safely, and uses low-cost communication equipment. These are the main reasons why VHF DSB-AM communications is still in use, and it is likely that this technology will remain in service for many more years. This however results in current operational limitations and becomes impediments in deploying new Air-Traffic Management (ATM) applications, such as flight-centric operation with point-to-point communications.

3.2. Data Communications Today

Like for voice, data communications into the cockpit is currently provided by ground-based equipment operating either on HF or VHF radio bands or by legacy satellite systems. All these communication systems are using narrowband radio channels with a data throughput capacity of some kilobits per second. While the aircraft is on ground some additional communications systems are available, like Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communication System (AeroMACS; as of now not widely used) or public cellular networks, operating in the Airport (APT) domain and able to deliver broadband communication capability.

The data communication networks used for the transmission of data relating to the safety and regularity of the flight must be strictly isolated from those providing entertainment services to passengers. This leads to a situation that the flight crews are supported by narrowband services during flight while passengers have access to inflight broadband services. The current HF and VHF data links cannot provide broadband services now or in the future, due to the lack of available spectrum. This technical shortcoming is becoming a limitation to enhanced ATM operations, such as Trajectory-Based Operations (TBO) and 4D trajectory negotiations.

Satellite-based communications are currently under investigation and enhanced capabilities are under development which will be able to provide inflight broadband services and communications supporting the safety and regularity of flight. In parallel, the ground-based broadband data link technology LDACS is being standardized by ICAO and has recently shown its maturity during flight tests [SCH191]. The LDACS technology is scalable, secure and spectrum efficient and provides significant advantages to the users and service providers. It is expected that both - satellite systems and LDACS - will be deployed to support the future aeronautical communication needs as envisaged by the ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP).

4. Provenance and Documents

The development of LDACS has already made substantial progress in the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) framework, and is currently being continued in the follow-up program, SESAR2020 [RIH18]. A key objective of the SESAR activities is to develop, implement and validate a modern aeronautical data link able to evolve with aviation needs over long-term. To this end, an LDACS specification has been produced [GRA19] and is continuously updated; transmitter demonstrators were developed to test the spectrum compatibility of LDACS with legacy systems operating in the L-band [SAJ14]; and the overall system performance was analyzed by computer simulations, indicating that LDACS can fulfil the identified requirements [GRA11].

LDACS standardization within the framework of the ICAO started in December 2016. The ICAO standardization group has produced an initial Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) document [ICAO18]. The SARPs document defines the general characteristics of LDACS. The ICAO standardization group plans to produce an ICAO technical manual - the ICAO equivalent to a technical standard - within the next years. Generally, the group is open to input from all sources and develops LDACS in the open.

Up to now the LDACS standardization has been focused on the development of the physical layer and the data link layer, only recently have higher layers come into the focus of the LDACS development activities. There is currently no "IPv6 over LDACS" specification publicly available; however, SESAR2020 has started the testing of IPv6-based LDACS testbeds.

The IPv6 architecture for the aeronautical telecommunication network is called the Future Communications Infrastructure (FCI). FCI shall support quality of service, diversity, and mobility under the umbrella of the "multi-link concept". This work is conducted by ICAO Communication Panel working group WG-I.

In addition to standardization activities several industrial LDACS prototypes have been built. One set of LDACS prototypes has been evaluated in flight trials confirming the theoretical results predicting the system performance [GRA18] [SCH191].

5. Characteristics

LDACS will become one of several wireless access networks connecting aircraft to both Aeronautical Telecommunications Network (ATN, IPS as well as OSI) and ACARS/FANS networks [FAN19].

5.1. LDACS Sub-Network

An LDACS sub-network contains an Access Router (AR), a Ground-Station Controller (GSC), and several Ground-Stations (GS), each of them providing one LDACS radio cell serving up to 512 aircraft stations (AS). User plane interconnection to the ATN is facilitated by the Access Router (AR) peering with an Air/Ground Router (A/G Router) connected to the ATN. It is up to implementor's choice to keep Access Router and Air-Ground Router functions separated, or to merge them. The internal control plane of an LDACS sub-network is managed by the Ground-Station Controller (GSC). An LDACS sub-network is illustrated in Figure 1.



wireless      user
link          plane
  A--------------G-------------Access---A/G-----ATN
  S..............S             Router   Router
                 . control      . |
                 . plane        . |
                 .              . |
                 GSC.............. |
                 .                |
                 .                |
                 GS----------------+



Figure 1: LDACS sub-network with two GSs and one AS

The LDACS wireless link protocol stack defines two layers, the physical layer and the data link layer.

5.2. LDACS Physical Layer

The physical layer provides the means to transfer data over the radio channel. The LDACS GS supports bi-directional links to multiple aircraft under its control. The forward link direction (FL; ground-to-air) and the reverse link direction (RL; air-to-ground) are separated by frequency division duplex. Forward link and reverse link use a 500 kHz channel each. The ground-station transmits a continuous stream of Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM) symbols on the forward link. In the reverse link different aircraft are separated in time and frequency using a combination of Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiple-Access (OFDMA) and Time-Division Multiple-Access (TDMA). Aircraft thus transmit discontinuously on the reverse link with radio bursts sent in precisely defined transmission opportunities allocated by the ground-station.

The data-link layer provides the necessary protocols to facilitate concurrent and reliable data transfer for multiple users. The LDACS data link layer is organized in two sub-layers: The medium access sub-layer and the logical link control sub-layer. The medium access sub-layer manages the organization of transmission opportunities in slots of time and frequency. The logical link control sub-layer provides acknowledged point-to-point logical channels between the aircraft and the ground-station using an automatic repeat request protocol. LDACS supports also unacknowledged point-to-point channels and ground-to-air broadcast.

5.4. LDACS Data Rates

The user data rate of LDACS is 315 kbit/s to 1428 kbit/s on the forward link, and 294 kbit/s to 1390 kbit/s on the reverse link, depending on coding and modulation.

5.5. Reliability and Availability

LDACS has been designed with applications related to the safety and regularity of flight in mind. It has therefore been designed as a deterministic wireless data link (as far as possible).

5.5.1. LDACS Medium Access

LDACS medium access is always under the control of the ground-station of a radio cell. Any medium access for the transmission of user data has to be requested with a resource request message stating the requested amount of resources and class of service. The ground- station performs resource scheduling on the basis of these requests and grants resources with resource allocation messages. Resource request and allocation messages are exchanged over dedicated contention-free control channels.

LDACS has two mechanisms to request resources from the scheduler in the ground-station.

Resources can either be requested "on demand" with a given class of service. On the forward link, this is done locally in the ground-station, on the reverse link a dedicated contention-free control channel is used called Dedicated Control Channel (DCCH; roughly 83 bit every 60 ms). A resource allocation is always announced in the control channel of the forward link (Common Control Channel (CCCH); variable sized). Due to the spacing of the reverse link control channels every 60 ms, a medium access delay in the same order of magnitude is to be expected.

Resources can also be requested "permanently". The permanent resource request mechanism supports requesting recurring resources in given time intervals. A permanent resource request has to be canceled by the user (or by the ground-station, which is always in control).

User data transmissions over LDACS are therefore always scheduled by the ground-station, while control data uses statically (i.e. at cell entry) allocated recurring resources (DCCH and CCCH). The current specification documents specify no scheduling algorithm. However performance evaluations so far have used strict priority scheduling and round robin for equal priorities for simplicity. In the current prototype implementations LDACS classes of service are thus realized as priorities of medium access and not as flows. Note that this can starve out low priority flows. However, this is not seen as a big problem since safety related message always go first in any case. Scheduling of reverse link resources is done in physical Protocol Data Units (PDU) of 112 bit (or larger if more aggressive coding and modulation is used). Scheduling on the forward link is done Byte-wise since the forward link is transmitted continuously bythe ground-station.

The LDACS data link layer protocol running on top of the medium access sub-layer uses ARQ to provide reliable data transmission.

5.5.2. LDACS Mobility

The LDACS mobility service manages in the GSC and LME cell entry, cell exit and handover between cells.

LDACS supports internal handovers to different RF channels. Handovers may be initiated by the aircraft (break-before-make) or by the ground- station (make-before-break). Make-before-break handovers are only supported for ground-stations connected to the same ground-station controller.

External handovers between non-connected LDACS deployments or different aeronautical data links shall be handled by the FCI multi-link concept.

5.5.3. LDACS Incremental Deployment

The LDACS data link provides enhanced capabilities to the future IPv6 based ATN enabling it to better support user needs and new applications. The deployment scalability of LDACS allows its implementation to start in areas where most needed to improve immediately the performance of already fielded infrastructure. Later the deployment is extended based on operational demand.

6. Protocol Stack

The protocol stack of LDACS is implemented in the AS, GS, and GSC: It consists of the Physical Layer (PHY) with five major functional blocks above it. Four are placed in the Data Link Layer (DLL) of the AS and GS: (1) Medium Access Layer (MAC), (2) Voice Interface (VI), (3) Data Link Service (DLS), (4) LDACS Management Entity (LME). The last entity resides within the sub-network layer: Sub-Network Protocol (SNP). The LDACS network is externally connected to voice units, radio control units, and the ATN network layer.

Figure 2 shows the protocol stack of LDACS as implemented in the AS and GS.



         IPv6                   network layer
          |
          |
+------------------+  +----+
|        SNP       |--|    |   sub-network
|                  |  |    |   layer
+------------------+  |    |
          |           | LME|
+------------------+  |    |
|        DLS       |  |    |   logical link
|                  |  |    |   control layer
+------------------+  +----+
          |             |
         DCH         DCCH/CCCH
          |          RACH/BCCH
          |             |
+--------------------------+
|           MAC            |   medium access
|                          |   layer
+--------------------------+
             |
+--------------------------+
|           PHY            |   physical layer
+--------------------------+
             |
             |
           ((*))
           FL/RL              radio channels
                              separated by FDD


Figure 2: LDACS protocol stack in AS and GS

6.1. Medium Access Control (MAC) Entity Services

The MAC time framing service provides the frame structure necessary to realize slot-based Time Division Multiplex (TDM) access on the physical link. It provides the functions for the synchronization of the MAC framing structure and the PHY layer framing. The MAC time framing provides a dedicated time slot for each logical channel.

The MAC sub-layer offers access to the physical channel to its service users. Channel access is provided through transparent logical channels. The MAC sub-layer maps logical channels onto the appropriate slots and manages the access to these channels. Logical channels are used as interface between the MAC and LLC sub-layers.

The LDACS framing structure for FL and RL is based on Super-Frames (SF) of 240 ms duration. Each SF corresponds to 2000 OFDM symbols. The FL and RL SF boundaries are aligned in time (from the view of the GS).

In the FL, an SF contains a Broadcast Frame of duration 6.72 ms (56 OFDM symbols) for the Broadcast Control Channel (BCCH), and four Multi-Frames (MF), each of duration 58.32 ms (486 OFDM symbols).

In the RL, each SF starts with a Random Access (RA) slot of length 6.72 ms with two opportunities for sending reverse link random access frames for the Random Access Channel (RACH), followed by four MFs. These MFs have the same fixed duration of 58.32 ms as in the FL, but a different internal structure

Figure 3 and Figure 2 illustrates the LDACS frame structure.


^
|     +------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
|  FL | BCCH |     MF     |     MF     |     MF     |     MF     |
F     +------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
r     <---------------- Super-Frame (SF) - 240ms ---------------->
e
q     +------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
u  RL | RACH |     MF     |     MF     |     MF     |     MF     |
e     +------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
n     <---------------- Super-Frame (SF) - 240ms ---------------->
c
y
|
----------------------------- Time ------------------------------>
|

Figure 3: LDACS super-frame structure

^
|     +-------------+------+-------------+
|  FL |     DCH     | CCCH |     DCH     |
F     +-------------+------+-------------+
r     <---- Multi-Frame (MF) - 58.32ms -->
e
q     +------+---------------------------+
u  RL | DCCH |             DCH           |
e     +------+---------------------------+
n     <---- Multi-Frame (MF) - 58.32ms -->
c
y
|
----------------------------- Time ------------------------------>
|

Figure 4: LDACS multi-frame (MF) structure

The DLS provides acknowledged and unacknowledged (including broadcast and packet mode voice) bi-directional exchange of user data. If user data is transmitted using the acknowledged data link service, the sending DLS entity will wait for an acknowledgement from the receiver. If no acknowledgement is received within a specified time frame, the sender may automatically try to retransmit its data. However, after a certain number of failed retries, the sender will suspend further retransmission attempts and inform its client of the failure.

The data link service uses the logical channels provided by the MAC:

1.
A ground-stations announces its existence and access parameters in the Broadcast Channel (BC).
2.
The Random Access Channel (RA) enables AS to request access to an LDACS cell.
3.
In the Forward Link (FL) the Common Control Channel (CCCH) is used by the GS to grant access to data channel resources.
4.
The reverse direction is covered by the Reverse Link (RL), where aircraft-stations need to request resources before sending. This happens via the Dedicated Common Control Channel (DCCH).
5.
User data itself is communicated in the Data Channel (DCH) on the FL and RL.

This is illustrated in Figure 2.

6.3. Voice Interface (VI) Services

The VI provides support for virtual voice circuits. Voice circuits may either be set-up permanently by the GS (e.g. to emulate voice party line) or may be created on demand. The creation and selection of voice circuits is performed in the LME. The VI provides only the transmission services.

6.4. LDACS Management Entity (LME) Services

The mobility management service in the LME provides support for registration and de-registration (cell entry and cell exit), scanning RF channels of neighbouring cells and handover between cells. In addition, it manages the addressing of aircraft/ ASs within cells. It is controlled by the network management service in the GSC.

The resource management service provides link maintenance (power, frequency and time adjustments), support for adaptive coding and modulation (ACM), and resource allocation.

6.5. Sub-Network Protocol (SNP) Services

The data link service provides functions required for the transfer of user plane data and control plane data over the LDACS sub-network.

The security service provides functions for secure communication over the LDACS sub-network. Note that the SNP security service applies cryptographic measures as configured by the ground station controller.

7. Security Considerations

Aviation will require secure exchanges of data and voice messages for managing the air-traffic flow safely through the airspaces all over the world. The main communication method for ATC today is still an open analogue voice broadcast within the aeronautical VHF band. Currently, the information security is purely procedural based by using well-trained personnel and proven communications procedures. This communication method has been in service since 1948. Future digital communications waveforms will need additional embedded security features to fulfill modern information security requirements like authentication and integrity. These security features require sufficient bandwidth which is beyond the capabilities of a VHF narrowband communications system. For voice and data communications, sufficient data throughput capability is needed to support the security functions while not degrading performance. LDACS is a mature data link technology with sufficient bandwidth to support security.

Security considerations for LDACS are defined by the official ICAO SARPS [ICAO18]:

1.
LDACS shall provide a capability to protect the availability and continuity of the system.
2.
LDACS shall provide a capability including cryptographic mechanisms to protect the integrity of messages in transit.
3.
LDACS shall provide a capability to ensure the authenticity of messages in transit.
4.
LDACS should provide a capability for nonrepudiation of origin for messages in transit.
5.
LDACS should provide a capability to protect the confidentiality of messages in transit.
6.
LDACS shall provide an authentication capability.
7.
LDACS shall provide a capability to authorize the permitted actions of users of the system and to deny actions that are not explicitly authorized.
8.
If LDACS provides interfaces to multiple domains, LDACS shall provide capability to prevent the propagation of intrusions within LDACS domains and towards external domains.

The cybersecurity architecture of LDACS [ICAO18], [MAE18] and its extensions [MAE191], [MAE192] regard all of the aforementioned requirements, since LDACS has been mainly designed for air traffic management communication. Thus it supports mutual entity authentication, integrity and confidentiality capabilities of user data messages and some control channel protection capabilities [MAE192].

8. Privacy Considerations

LDACS provides a Quality of Service (QoS), and the generic considerations for such mechanisms apply.

9. IANA Considerations

This memo includes no request to IANA.

10. Acknowledgements

Thanks to all contributors to the development of LDACS and ICAO PT-T.

Thanks to Klaus-Peter Hauf, Bart Van Den Einden, and Pierluigi Fantappie for further input to this draft.

Further, thanks to SBA Research Vienna for fruitful discussions on aeronautical communications concerning security incentives for industry and potential economic spillovers.

11. Normative References

12. Informative References

[MAE191]
Maeurer, N., Graeupl, T., and C. Schmitt, "Evaluation of the LDACS Cybersecurity Implementation", IEEE 38th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DACS), pp. 1-10, New York, NY, USA , .
[MAE192]
Maeurer, N. and C. Schmitt, "Towards Successful Realization of the LDACS Cybersecurity Architecture: An Updated Datalink Security Threat- and Risk Analysis", IEEE Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), pp. 1-13, New York, NY, USA , .
[GRA19]
Graeupl, T., Rihacek, C., and B. Haindl, "LDACS A/G Specification", German Aerospace Center (DLR), Germany, SESAR2020 PJ14-02-01 D3.3.010 , .
[FAN19]
Pierattelli, S., Fantappie, P., Tamalet, S., van den Einden, B., Rihacek, C., and T. Graeupl, "LDACS Deployment Options and Recommendations", German Aerospace Center (DLR), Germany, SESAR2020 PJ14-02-01 D3.4.020 , .
[MAE18]
Maeurer, N. and A. Bilzhause, "A Cybersecurity Architecture for the L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System (LDACS)", IEEE 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), pp. 1-10, New York, NY, USA , .
[GRA11]
Graeupl, T. and M. Ehammer, "L-DACS1 Data Link Layer Evolution of ATN/IPS", 30th IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), pp. 1-28, New York, NY, USA , .
[GRA18]
Graeupl, T., Schneckenburger, N., Jost, T., Schnell, M., Filip, A., Bellido-Manganell, M.A., Mielke, D.M., Maeurer, N., Kumar, R., Osechas, O., and G. Battista, "L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System (LDACS) flight trials in the national German project MICONAV", Integrated Communications, Navigation, Surveillance Conference (ICNS), pp. 1-7, New York, NY, USA , .
[SCH191]
Schnell, M., "DLR Tests Digital Communications Technologies Combined with Additional Navigation Functions for the First Time", .
[ICAO18]
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), "L-Band Digital Aeronautical Communication System (LDACS)", International Standards and Recommended Practices Annex 10 - Aeronautical Telecommunications, Vol. III - Communication Systems , .
[RIH18]
Rihacek, C., Haindl, B., Fantappie, P., Pierattelli, S., Graeupl, T., Schnell, M., and N. Fistas, "LDACS A/G Specification", Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), pp. 1-8, New York, NY, USA , .
[RAW-TECHNOS]
Thubert, P., Cavalcanti, D., Vilajosana, X., and C. Schmitt, "Reliable and Available Wireless Technologies", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-thubert-raw-technologies-04, , <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-raw-technologies-04>.
[RAW-USE-CASES]
Papadopoulos, G., Thubert, P., Theoleyre, F., and C. Bernardos, "RAW use cases", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-bernardos-raw-use-cases-01, , <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-raw-use-cases-01>.

Authors' Addresses

Nils Maeurer (editor)
German Aerospace Center (DLR)
Muenchner Strasse 20
82234 Wessling
Germany
Thomas Graeupl (editor)
German Aerospace Center (DLR)
Muenchner Strasse 20
82234 Wessling
Germany
Corinna Schmitt (editor)
Research Institute CODE, UniBwM
Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 28
85577 Neubiberg
Germany