Internet-Draft I-D update December 2023
Levine Expires 8 June 2024 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-levine-iduse-00
Updates:
2026 (if approved)
Published:
Intended Status:
Best Current Practice
Expires:
Author:
J. Levine
Standcore LLC

Update to the use of Internet-Drafts in the Internet Standards Process

Abstract

This memo updates the way that Internet-Drafts are used in the Internet Standards Process.

Rather than expiring, Internet-Drafts are marked active or inactive. Also, the rules for referencing Internet-Drafts in other documents are clarified.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 8 June 2024.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

Section 2 of [RFC2026] describes the way that Internet-Drafts are used in the standards process. It says that after six months, an I-D "is simply removed from the Internet-Drafts directory." It also says in a highlighted box "Under no circumstances should an Internet-Draft be referenced by any paper, report, or Request-for-Proposal." In practice, neither of those have turned out to be true.

This memo creates an Active flag to indicate whether an I-D is currently active. It also updates the advice about referencing I-Ds to reflect existing practice.

[[ please remove this section before publication ]]

This memo does not use RFC2119 keywords because it's not about technical interoperation.

The no-draft-expiry@ietf.org mailing list would be a good place to argue about this draft.

2. Active and Inactive Drafts

Drafts will no longer expire, and instead are marked active or inactive to indicate whether the authors are still likely to be working on them.

2.1. How Drafts Expire Now

When the xmlrfc version of an I-D is rendered into text, HTML, or PDF, the headings in the rendered version include an an "Expired:" line with a date six months after the date that the I-D was rendered. The "Status of This Memo" boilerplate states that the draft is valid for a maximum of six months, and "It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or other than 'work in progress'".

Currently, Internet-Drafts are stored in the IETF's Datatracker indefinitely. If more than six months have passed since the I-D was submitted and the I-D has not been superseded, the Datatracker shows an orange warning box saying "This Internet-Draft is no longer active" but still contains the same links to display the I-D. The rsync server at rsync.ietf.org contains one collection "internet-drafts" with currently active I-Ds, i.e., ones that are less than six months old and have not been superseded, and another collection "id-archive" which contains drafts as far back as 1992.

Once an I-D has expired, the only way to get it out of expired status is to submit a new version of the I-D, which may be identical other than the version number.

2.2. Making Drafts Active or Inactive

Internet-Drafts will no longer have an expiration date. When a draft is submitted, it is marked Active in the Datatracker. After six months, if the I-D has not been superseded, it normally changes to Inactive. At any time, any of the I-D's authors can log into the Datatracker and mark the draft as Active. If it is Inactive. it becomes Active again. The timer is reset and the draft will remain Active for six months from each time it is marked Active. There is no limit to how many times a draft can be marked Active.

The Active flag exists only in the Datatracker; it is not placed in the draft itself since there would be no way to change the Active flag in a draft once it has been published and downloaded.

3. Referencing an Internet-Draft

In some cases it is acceptable to use an Internet-Draft as a reference in another document.

Internet-Drafts can reference other I-Ds without limit. RFCs can use Internet-Drafts as informative references but not as normative ones.

4. Changes to the boilerplate text

The "Status of This Memo" boilerplate inserted into rendered versions of Internet-Drafts will be changed to reflect the changes in Section 2 and Section 3. The new text is:

TBD

5. Security considerations

This memo only changes some details of the Internet Standards editorial process and should have no effect on the security of the Internet.

6. Informative References

[RFC2026]
Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2026>.

Author's Address

John Levine
Standcore LLC