| Internet Architecture Board (IAB) | K. Watsen |
| Internet-Draft | Juniper Networks |
| Intended status: Best Current Practice | June 6, 2018 |
| Expires: December 8, 2018 |
Handling Long Lines in Artwork in Drafts
draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-01
This document introduces a simple and yet time-proven strategy for handling long lines in artwork in drafts using a backslash ('\') character where line-folding has occurred. The strategy works on any text based artwork, producing consistent results regardless the artwork content. Using a per-artwork notice, the strategy is both self-documenting and enables automated reconstitution of the original artwork.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 8, 2018.
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Internet drafts many times contain artwork that exceed the 72 character limit specified by RFC 7994 [RFC7994]. The "xml2rfc" utility, in an effort to maintain clean formatting, issues a warning whenever artwork lines exceed 69 characters. According to RFC Editor, there is currently no convention in place for how to handle long lines, other than clearly indicating that some manipulation has occurred.
This document introduces a simple and yet time-proven strategy for handling long lines using a backslash ('\') character where line-folding has occurred. The strategy works on any text based artwork, producing consistent results regardless the artwork content. Using a per-artwork notice, the strategy is both self-documenting and enables automated reconstitution of the original artwork.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
Automated folding of long lines is needed in order to support draft compilations that entail a) validation of source input files (e.g., YANG, XML, JSON, ABNF, ASN.1) and/or b) dynamic generation of output (e.g., tree diagrams) that are stitched into the final draft to be submitted.
Generally, in order for tooling to be able to process input files, the files must be in their original/natural state, which may include having some long lines. Thus, these source files need to be modified before inclusion in the draft in order to satisfy the line length limits. This modification SHOULD be automated to reduce effort and errors resulting from manual effort.
Similarly, dynamically generated output (e.g., tree diagrams) must also be modified, if necessary, in order for the resulting I-D to satisfy the line length limits. When needed, this effort again SHOULD be automated to reduce effort and errors resulting from manual effort.
Automated reconstitution of the original artwork is needed to support validation of artwork extracted from drafts. Already YANG modules are extracted from drafts and validated as part of the draft-submission process. Additionally, there has been some discussion regarding needing to do the same for examples contained within drafts ([yang-doctors-list]). Thus, it SHOULD be possible to mechanically reconstitute artwork in order to satisfy the tooling input parsers.
While the solution presented in this document will work on any kind of text-based artwork, it is most useful on artwork that represents sourcecode (e.g., YANG, XML, JSON, etc.) or, more generally, on artwork that has not been laid out in two dimensions (e.g., diagrams).
The issue regards the readability of the folded artwork in the draft. Artwork that is unpredictable is especially susceptible is looking bad when folded; falling into this category are most UML diagrams. Artwork that is somewhat structured (e.g., YANG tree diagrams [RFC8340]) fair better when folded, as the eyes seem to be able to still see the vertical lines, even when they are interrupted.
It is thus NOT RECOMMENDED to use the solution presented in this document on graphical artwork.
The solution presented in this document works generically for all artwork, as it only views artwork as plain text. However, various formats sometimes have mechanisms that can be used to prevent long lines.
For instance, some source formats allow any quoted string to be broken up into substrings separated by a concatenation character ('+'), any of which can by on a different line.
In another example, some languages allow factoring out chucks of code out into "functions" or "groupings". Using such call outs is especially helpful when in some deeply-nested code, as it typically resets the indentation back to the first column.
As such, it is RECOMMENDED that authors do as much as possible within the selected format to avoid long lines.
The following two sections provide the folding and unfolding algorithms that MUST be implemented to align with this BCP.
Scan the artwork to see if any line exceeds the desired maximum. If no line exceeds the desired maximum, exit (this artwork does not need to be folded).
Scan the artwork to ensure no existing lines already end with a '\' character on the desired maximum column, as this would be ambiguous. If such a line is found, exit (this artwork cannot be folded)
\n[Note: '\' line wrapping added per BCP XX]\n\n
\n[Note: '\' line wrapping added on <col> per BCP XX]\n\n
Otherwise, as it is determined the artwork needs to be folded, prepend one of the following two 3-line headers as follows:
For each line in the artwork, from top-to-bottom, if the line exceeds the desired maximum, then fold the line at the desired maximum column by inserting the string "\\n" at the column before the maximum column. Note that the column before needs to be used in order to enable the '\' character to be placed on the desired maximum column.
Continue in this manner until reaching the end of the artwork. Note that this algorithm naturally addresses the case where the remainder of a folded line is still longer than the desired maximum, and hence needs to be folded again.
Scan the artwork for one of the above-mentioned headers. If neither header is present in the artwork, exit (this artwork does not need to be unfolded).
If the header is the variant that specifies on which column the folding occurs, extract the folding-column value from the header.
Remove the 3-line header from the artwork.
For each line in the artwork, from top-to-bottom, if the line has a '\' on the folding-column followed by a '\n' character, then remove both the '\' and '\n' characters and then scan the remainder of the line to see if it again has a '\' after folding-column characters followed by a '\n' character, and so on.
Continue in this manner until reaching the end of the artwork.
This BCP has no Security Considerations.
This BCP has no IANA Considerations.
| [RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997. |
| [RFC8174] | Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017. |
| [RFC7994] | Flanagan, H., "Requirements for Plain-Text RFCs", RFC 7994, DOI 10.17487/RFC7994, December 2016. |
| [RFC8340] | Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018. |
| [yang-doctors-list] | "[yang-doctors] automating yang doctor reviews" |
This non-normative appendix section includes a shell script that can both fold and unfold artwork based on the solution presented in this document.
For folding:
gsed "/.\{$testcol\}/s/\(.\{$foldcol\}\)/\1\\\\\n/g"
For unfolding:
gsed ":x; /[^\t]\\{$foldcol\\}\\\\\$/N; s/\\\\\n/\t/; tx; s/\t//g"
As a testament for the simplicity of this solution, note that at the core of the script are the following two one-liners:
Disclaimer: this script has the limitation of disallowing the input file from containing any TAB ('\t') characters.
=====START SCRIPT=====
[Note: '\' line wrapping per BCP XX]
#!/bin/bash
#
# the only reason why /bin/sh isn't being used
# is because "echo -n" is broken on the Mac.
print_usage() {
echo
echo "Folds the text file, only if needed, at the specified"
echo "column, according to BCP XX."
echo
echo "Usage: $0 [-c <col>] [-r] -i <infile> -o <outfile>"
echo
echo " -c: column to fold on (default: 69)"
echo " -r: reverses the operation"
echo " -i: the input filename"
echo " -o: the output filename"
echo " -d: show debug messages"
echo " -h: show this message"
echo
echo "Exit status code: zero on success, non-zero otherwise."
echo
}
# global vars, do not edit
degug=0
reversed=0
infile=""
outfile=""
maxcol=69 # default, may be overridden by param
header="\n[Note: '\' line wrapping per BCP XX]\n\n"
fold_it() {
# since upcomming tests are >= (not >)
testcol=`expr "$maxcol" + 1`
# check if file needs folding
grep ".\{$testcol\}" $infile >> /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
if [[ $debug -eq 1 ]]; then
echo "nothing to do"
fi
cp $infile $outfile
return 0
fi
foldcol=`expr "$maxcol" - 1` # for the inserted '\' char
# ensure file doesn't have any '\' char on $maxcol already
# - as this would lead to false positives...
grep "^.\{$foldcol\}\\\\$" $infile >> /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo
echo "Error: infile has a '\' on colomn $maxcol already."
echo
exit 1
fi
if [ $maxcol -ne 69 ]; then
header="\n[Note: '\' line wrapping on $maxcol per BCP XX]\n\n"
fi
echo -ne "$header" > $outfile
gsed "/.\{$testcol\}/s/\(.\{$foldcol\}\)/\1\\\\\n/g" < $infile >> \
$outfile
return 0
}
unfold_it() {
# check if it looks like a BCP XX header
result=`cat $infile | awk 'NR == 2' | grep "\\[Note: \'\\\\\' line\
wrapping .*per BCP XX]" 2>&1`
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
if [[ $debug -eq 1 ]]; then
echo "nothing to do"
fi
cp $infile $outfile
return 0
fi
# determine what maxcol value was used
grep "\[Note: '\\\' line wrapping per BCP XX\]" $infile >> /dev/n\
ull 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
maxcol=69
else
maxcol=`echo "$result" | sed 's/.*on \([0-9]*\) per.*/\1/'`
fi
# count lines in header
numlines=`echo -ne "$header" | wc -l`
awk "NR>$numlines" $infile > /tmp/wip
foldcol=`expr "$maxcol" - 1` # for the inserted '\' char
gsed ":x; /[^\t]\\{$foldcol\\}\\\\\$/N; s/\\\\\n/\t/; tx; s/\t//g"\
/tmp/wip > $outfile
rm /tmp/wip
return 0
}
process_input() {
while [ "$1" != "" ]; do
if [ "$1" == "-h" -o "$1" == "--help" ]; then
print_usage
exit 1
fi
if [ "$1" == "-d" ]; then
debug=1
fi
if [ "$1" == "-c" ]; then
maxcol="$2"
shift
fi
if [ "$1" == "-r" ]; then
reversed=1
fi
if [ "$1" == "-i" ]; then
infile="$2"
shift
fi
if [ "$1" == "-o" ]; then
outfile="$2"
shift
fi
shift
done
if [ -z "$infile" ]; then
echo
echo "Error: infile parameter missing (use -h for help)"
echo
exit 1
fi
if [ -z "$outfile" ]; then
echo
echo "Error: outfile parameter missing (use -h for help)"
echo
exit 1
fi
}
main() {
if [ "$#" == "0" ]; then
print_usage
exit 1
fi
process_input $@
if [[ $reversed -eq 0 ]]; then
fold_it
code=$?
else
unfold_it
code=$?
fi
exit $code
}
main "$@"
=====END SCRIPT=====
The authors thank the RFC Editor for confirming that there are no set convention today for handling long lines in artwork.