Internet-Draft nomcom-gender-representation November 2023
Knodel Expires 23 May 2024 [Page]
Workgroup:
Operation of the IESG/IAB Nominating and Recall Committees
Internet-Draft:
draft-knodel-nomcom-gender-representation-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Author:
M. Knodel
Center for Democracy and Technology

Gender Representation in the IETF Nominating Committees

Abstract

This document extends the existing limit on nomcom representation by company in order to improve gender diversity by ensuring that not all voting members of the IETF Nominating Committee (nomcom) belong to the same gender.

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

The latest revision of this draft can be found at https://mallory.github.io/nomcom-gender-representation/draft-knodel-nomcom-gender-representation.html. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-knodel-nomcom-gender-representation/.

Discussion of this document takes place on the Operation of the IESG/IAB Nominating and Recall Committees Working Group mailing list (mailto:ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com), which is archived at https://lists.elistx.com/archives/ietf-nomcom/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/mallory/nomcom-gender-representation.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 23 May 2024.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

The literature supports the claims that lack of gender diversity in hiring teams reinforce under representation of gender minorities in leadership positions and that lack of gender diversity in leadership perpetuates gender discrimination [Vervoe].

2. Gender Representation in the IETF Nomcom

The IETF considers influence and weaknesses in nomcom selection in [RFC8713]. Likewise, gender diversity in IETF leadership should be considered a community strengthening exercise insofar as gender diversity has been shown to lead to more productivity, creativity and reinforces a culture of respect and value for all participants. If we consider the nomcom as a "team", it will itself benefit from having more gender diversity among its voting members.

To address gender representation in the IETF nomcom, we need only ensure that all voting members are not of the same gender. All attempts to ensure gender representation in the nomcom should include: a. increase participation in the community from women and non-binary individuals so that the eligible pool is more gender diverse. b. encourage eligible women and non-binary members of the community to accept selection to the nomcom.

While the IETF does not routinely confirm the gender of volunteers, we have committed to improving gender diversity in the community by way of measuring it and identifying concrete steps to mitigate imbalance.

3. Suggested Remedy

The “two-per-organisation limit” can easily be extended to ensure a nomcom consisting of no more than n-1 members from any one gender (where n is the number of available volunteer slots), requiring skips for the nth slot until a gender minority volunteer is chosen.

This assumes that for any given pool therein contains at least one gender minority volunteer.

This short remedy might update [RFC8713].

4. Security Considerations

There are no security considerations for this document.

5. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA actions.

6. Informative References

[RFC8713]
Kucherawy, M., Ed., Hinden, R., Ed., and J. Livingood, Ed., "IAB, IESG, IETF Trust, and IETF LLC Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the IETF Nominating and Recall Committees", BCP 10, RFC 8713, DOI 10.17487/RFC8713, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8713>.
[RFC9389]
Duke, M., "Nominating Committee Eligibility", BCP 10, RFC 9389, DOI 10.17487/RFC9389, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9389>.
[Vervoe]
Vervo, "Gender Discrimination in Hiring Practices", , <https://vervoe.com/gender-discrimination-in-hiring-practices/>.

Appendix A. Acknowledgments

Thanks to Martin Thompson and Suresh Krishnan for informed initial thoughts on bringing this idea to the community.

Author's Address

Mallory Knodel
Center for Democracy and Technology