INTERNET-DRAFT Geoffrey Clemm, Rational Software
draft-ietf-webdav-acl-08 Anne Hopkins, Microsoft Corporation
Eric Sedlar, Oracle Corporation
Jim Whitehead, U.C. Santa Cruz
Expires November 7, 2002 May 7, 2002
WebDAV Access Control Protocol
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract
This document specifies a set of methods, headers, and message bodies
that define Access Control extensions to the WebDAV Distributed
Authoring Protocol. This protocol permits a client to read and modify
access control lists that instruct a server whether to allow or deny
operations upon a resource (such as HTTP method invocations) by a
given principal.
This document is a product of the Web Distributed Authoring and
Versioning (WebDAV) working group of the Internet Engineering Task
Force. Comments on this draft are welcomed, and should be addressed
to the acl@webdav.org mailing list. Other related documents can be
found at http://www.webdav.org/acl/, and
http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/webdav/.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION...................................................4
1.1 Terms........................................................7
1.2 Notational Conventions.......................................8
2 PRINCIPALS.....................................................8
3 PRIVILEGES.....................................................9
3.1 DAV:read Privilege...........................................10
3.2 DAV:write Privilege..........................................10
3.3 DAV:write-properties.........................................11
3.4 DAV:write-content............................................11
3.5 DAV:unlock...................................................11
3.6 DAV:read-acl Privilege.......................................12
3.7 DAV:read-current-user-privilege-set Privilege................12
3.8 DAV:write-acl Privilege......................................12
3.9 DAV:all Privilege............................................12
3.10 Aggregation of Predefined Privileges........................12
4 PRINCIPAL PROPERTIES...........................................13
4.1 DAV:alternate-URI-set........................................13
4.2 DAV:principal-URL............................................14
4.3 DAV:group-membership.........................................14
5 ACCESS CONTROL PROPERTIES......................................14
5.1 DAV:owner....................................................14
5.1.1 Example: Retrieving DAV:owner............................15
5.1.2 Example: An Attempt to Set DAV:owner.....................16
5.2 DAV:supported-privilege-set..................................17
5.2.1 Example: Retrieving a List of Privileges Supported on a
Resource.......................................................18
5.3 DAV:current-user-privilege-set...............................20
5.3.1 Example: Retrieving the User's Current Set of Assigned
Privileges.....................................................21
5.4 DAV:acl......................................................22
5.4.1 ACE Principal............................................22
5.4.2 ACE Grant and Deny.......................................23
5.4.3 ACE Protection...........................................24
5.4.4 ACE Inheritance..........................................24
5.4.5 Example: Retrieving a Resource's Access Control List.....24
5.5 DAV:inherited-acl............................................26
5.6 DAV:acl-semantics............................................26
5.6.1 Example: Retrieving DAV:acl-semantics....................26
5.7 DAV:principal-collection-set.................................28
5.7.1 Example: Retrieving DAV:principal-collection-set.........29
5.8 Example: PROPFIND to retrieve access control properties......30
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
6 ACL SEMANTICS.................................................34
6.1 ACE Combination.............................................34
6.1.1 DAV:first-match ACE Combination.........................34
6.1.2 DAV:all-grant-before-any-deny ACE Combination...........34
6.1.3 DAV:specific-deny-overrides-grant ACE Combination.......34
6.2 ACE Ordering................................................35
6.2.1 DAV:deny-before-grant ACE Ordering......................35
6.3 Allowed ACE.................................................35
6.3.1 DAV:principal-only-one-ace ACE Constraint...............35
6.3.2 DAV:grant-only ACE Constraint...........................35
6.3.3 DAV:no-invert ACE Constraint............................35
6.3.4 DAV:no-acl-inherit ACE Constraint.......................36
6.4 Required Principals.........................................36
7 ACCESS CONTROL AND EXISTING METHODS...........................36
7.1 OPTIONS.....................................................36
7.1.1 Example - OPTIONS.......................................36
7.2 MOVE........................................................37
7.3 COPY........................................................37
7.4 DELETE......................................................37
7.5 LOCK........................................................37
8 ACCESS CONTROL METHODS........................................37
8.1 ACL.........................................................37
8.1.1 ACL Preconditions.......................................38
8.1.2 Example: the ACL method.................................40
8.1.3 Example: ACL method failure due to protected ACE conflict
.....41
8.1.4 Example: ACL method failure due to an inherited ACE conflict
.....42
8.1.5 Example: ACL method failure due to an attempt to set grant
and deny in a single ACE......................................43
9 ACCESS CONTROL REPORTS........................................44
9.1 REPORT Method...............................................44
9.2 DAV:acl-principal-prop-set Report...........................44
9.2.1 Example: DAV:acl-principal-prop-set Report..............45
9.3 DAV:principal-match REPORT..................................46
9.3.1 Example: DAV:principal-match REPORT.....................47
9.4 DAV:principal-property-search REPORT........................48
9.4.1 Matching................................................50
9.4.2 Example: successful DAV:principal-property-search REPORT
.....51
9.4.3 Example: Unsuccessful DAV:principal-property-search REPORT
.....53
9.5 DAV:principal-search-property-set REPORT....................54
9.5.1 Example: DAV:principal-search-property-set REPORT.......55
10 XML PROCESSING..............................................56
11 INTERNATIONALIZATION CONSIDERATIONS.........................56
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
12 SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS......................................57
12.1 Increased Risk of Compromised Users.........................57
12.2 Risks of the DAV:read-acl and DAV:current-user-privilege-set
Privileges.......................................................57
12.3 No Foreknowledge of Initial ACL.............................58
13 AUTHENTICATION...............................................58
14 IANA CONSIDERATIONS..........................................59
15 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY........................................59
16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................59
17 REFERENCES...................................................60
17.1 Normative References........................................60
17.2 Informational References....................................61
18 AUTHORS' ADDRESSES...........................................61
19 APPENDICES...................................................62
19.1 WebDAV XML Document Type Definition Addendum................62
1 INTRODUCTION
The goal of the WebDAV access control extensions is to provide an
interoperable mechanism for handling discretionary access control
for content and metadata managed by WebDAV servers. WebDAV access
control can be implemented on content repositories with security as
simple as that of a UNIX file system, as well as more sophisticated
models. The underlying principle of access control is that who you
are determines what operations you can perform on a resource. The
"who you are" is defined by a "principal" identifier; users, client
software, servers, and groups of the previous have principal
identifiers. The "operations you can perform" are determined by a
single "access control list" (ACL) associated with a resource. An
ACL contains a set of "access control entries" (ACEs), where each
ACE specifies a principal and a set of privileges that are either
granted or denied to that principal. When a principal submits an
operation (such as an HTTP or WebDAV method) to a resource for
execution, the server evaluates the ACEs in the ACL to determine if
the principal has permission for that operation.
Since every ACE contains the identifier of a principal, client
software operated by a human must provide a mechanism for selecting
this principal. This specification uses http(s) scheme URLs to
identify principals, which are represented as WebDAV-capable
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
resources. There is no guarantee that the URLs identifying
principals will be meaningful to a human. For example,
http://www.dav.org/u/256432 and
http://www.dav.org/people/Greg.Stein are both valid URLs that could
be used to identify the same principal. To remedy this, every
principal resource has the DAV:displayname property containing a
human-readable name for the principal.
Since a principal can be identified by multiple URLs, it raises the
problem of determining exactly which principal's operations are
being described in a given ACE. It is impossible for a client to
determine that an ACE granting the read privilege to
http://www.dav.org/people/Greg.Stein also affects the principal at
http://www.dav.org/u/256432. That is, a client has no mechanism for
determining that two URLs identify the same principal resource. As
a result, this specification requires clients to use just one of
the many possible URLs for a principal when creating ACEs. A client
can discover which URL to use by retrieving the DAV:principal-URL
property (Section 4.2) from a principal resource. No matter which
of the principal's URLs is used with PROPFIND, the property always
returns the same URL.
Once a system has hundreds to thousands of principals, the problem
arises of how to allow a human operator of client software to
select just one of these principals. One approach is to use broad
collection hierarchies to spread the principals over a large number
of collections, yielding few principals per collection. An example
of this is a two level hierarchy with the first level containing 36
collections (a-z, 0-9), and the second level being another 36,
creating collections /a/a/, /a/b/, ..., /a/z/, such that a
principal with last name "Stein" would appear at /s/t/Stein. In
effect, this pre-computes a common query, search on last name, and
encodes it into a hierarchy. The drawback with this scheme is that
it handles only a small set of predefined queries, and drilling
down through the collection hierarchy adds unnecessary steps
(navigate down/up) when the user already knows the principal's
name. While organizing principal URLs into a hierarchy is a valid
namespace organization, users should not be forced to navigate this
hierarchy to select a principal.
This specification provides the capability to perform substring
searches on a small set of properties on the resources representing
principals. This permits searches based on last name, first name,
user name, job title, etc. Two separate searches are supported,
both via the REPORT method, one to search principal resources, the
other to determine which properties may be searched at all.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
Once a principal has been identified in an ACE, a server evaluating
that ACE must know the identity of the principal making a protocol
request, and must validate that that principal is who they claim to
be, a process known as authentication. This specification
intentionally omits discussion of authentication, as the HTTP
protocol already has a number of authentication mechanisms
[RFC2617]. Some authentication mechanism (such as HTTP Digest
Authentication, which all WebDAV compliant implementations are
required to support) must be available to validate the identity of
a principal.
The following issues are out of scope for this document:
* Access control that applies only to a particular property
on a resource (excepting the access control properties
DAV:acl and DAV:current-user-privilege-set), rather than
the entire resource,
* Role-based security (where a role can be seen as a
dynamically defined group of principals),
* Specification of the ways an ACL on a resource is
initialized,
* Specification of an ACL that applies globally to all
resources, rather than to a particular resource.
* Creation and maintenance of resources representing people
or computational agents (principals), and groups of these.
This specification is organized as follows. Section 1.1 defines key
concepts used throughout the specification, and is followed by a
more in-depth discussion of principals (Section 2), and privileges
(Section 3). Properties defined on principals are specified in
Section 4, and access control properties for content resources are
specified in Section 5. The semantics of access control lists are
described in Section 6, including sections on ACE combination
(Section 6.1), ACE ordering (Section 6.2), and principals required
to be present in an ACE (Section 6.3.2). Client discovery of access
control capability using OPTIONS is described in Section 7.1.
Interactions between access control functionality and existing HTTP
and WebDAV methods are described in the remainder of Section 7. The
access control setting method, ACL, is specified in Section 8. Four
reports that provide limited server-side searching capabilities are
described in Section 9. Sections on XML processing (Section 10),
Internationalization considerations (Section 11), security
considerations (Section 12), and authentication (Section 13) round
out the specification. An appendix (Section 19.1) provides an XML
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
Document Type Definition (DTD) for the XML elements defined in the
specification.
1.1 Terms
This draft uses the terms defined in HTTP [RFC2616] and WebDAV
[RFC2518]. In addition, the following terms are defined:
principal
A "principal" is a distinct human or computational actor that
initiates access to network resources. In this protocol, a
principal is an HTTP resource that represents such an actor.
group
A "group" is a principal that represents a set of other principals.
privilege
A "privilege" controls access to a particular set of HTTP
operations on a resource.
aggregate privilege
An "aggregate privilege" is a privilege that contains a set of
other privileges.
abstract privilege
The modifier "abstract", when applied to a privilege, means the
privilege cannot be set in an access control element (ACE).
access control list (ACL)
An "ACL" is a list of access control elements that define access
control to a particular resource.
access control element (ACE)
An "ACE" either grants or denies a particular set of (non-abstract)
privileges for a particular principal.
inherited ACE
An "inherited ACE" is an ACE that is dynamically shared from the
ACL of another resource. When a shared ACE changes on the primary
resource, it is also changed on inheriting resources.
protected property
A "protected property" is one whose value cannot be updated except
by a method explicitly defined as updating that specific property.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
In particular, a protected property cannot be updated with a
PROPPATCH request.
1.2 Notational Conventions
The augmented BNF used by this document to describe protocol
elements is described in Section 2.1 of [RFC2616]. Because this
augmented BNF uses the basic production rules provided in Section
2.2 of [RFC2616], those rules apply to this document as well.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Definitions of XML elements in this document use XML element type
declarations (as found in XML Document Type Declarations),
described in Section 3.2 of [REC-XML]. When an XML element type in
the "DAV:" namespace is referenced in this document outside of the
context of an XML fragment, the string "DAV:" will be prefixed to
the element type.
2 PRINCIPALS
A principal is a network resource that represents a distinct human
or computational actor that initiates access to network resources.
Users and groups are represented as principals in many
implementations; other types of principals are also possible. A URI
of any scheme MAY be used to identify a principal resource.
However, servers implementing this specification MUST expose
principal resources at an http(s) URL, which is a privileged scheme
that points to resources that have additional properties, as
described in Section 4. So, a principal resource can have multiple
URIs, one of which has to be an http(s) scheme URL. Although an
implementation SHOULD support PROPFIND and MAY support PROPPATCH to
access and modify information about a principal, it is not required
to do so.
A principal resource may be a group. A group is represented as a
WebDAV collection, where the members of the group are members of
the WebDAV collection. If a person or computational agent matches
a principal resource that is a member of a group, they also match
the group. Membership in a group is recursive, so if a principal is
a member of group GRPA, and GRPA is a member of group GRPB, then
the principal is also a member of GRPB.
Implementer's Note: It is possible for the collection that
represents a group to have non-principals as collection members.
When enumerating the membership of a group, it is necessary to
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
retrieve the DAV:resourcetype property of a collection member,
and check it for the DAV:principal XML element (described in
Section 4). If the DAV:principal XML element is not present, the
resource is not a principal and may be ignored for the purposes
of determining group membership.
For example, the collection /FOO/, representing a group, has two
members, Bar and Baz. Bar is a principal but Baz is not.
Therefore when determining which principals belong to the group,
a client would enumerate the membership using PROPFIND while
asking for the DAV:resourcetype property, and see that only Bar
has the DAV:principal XML element. Therefore, Bar is the only
principal that is a member of the group represented by /FOO/.
3 PRIVILEGES
Ability to perform a given method on a resource SHOULD be
controlled by one or more privileges. Authors of protocol
extensions that define new HTTP methods SHOULD specify which
privileges (by defining new privileges, or mapping to ones below)
are required to perform the method. A principal with no privileges
to a resource SHOULD be denied any HTTP access to that resource,
unless the principal matches an ACE constructed using the DAV:all,
DAV:authenticated, or DAV:unauthenticated pseudo-principals (see
Section 5.4.1).
Privileges may be containers of other privileges, in which case
they are termed aggregate privileges. If a principal is granted or
denied an aggregate privilege, it is semantically equivalent to
granting or denying each of the aggregated privileges individually.
For example, an implementation may define add-member and remove-
member privileges that control the ability to add and remove an
internal member of a group. Since these privileges control the
ability to update the state of a group, these privileges would be
aggregated by the DAV:write privilege on a group, and granting the
DAV:write privilege on a group would also grant the add-member and
remove-member privileges.
Privileges may have the quality of being abstract, in which case
they cannot be set in an ACE. Aggregate and non-aggregate
privileges are both capable of being abstract. Abstract privileges
are useful for modeling privileges that otherwise would not be
exposed via the protocol. Abstract privileges also provide server
implementations with flexibility in implementing the privileges
defined in this specification. For example, if a server is
incapable of separating the read resource capability from the read
ACL capability, it can still model the DAV:read and DAV:read-acl
privileges defined in this specification by declaring them
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 9]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
abstract, and containing them within a non-abstract aggregate
privilege (say, read-all) that holds DAV:read, and DAV:read-acl. In
this way, it is possible to set the aggregate privilege, read-all,
thus coupling the setting of DAV:read and DAV:read-acl, but it is
not possible to set DAV:read, or DAV:read-acl individually. Since
aggregate privileges can be abstract, it is also possible to use
abstract privileges to group or organize non-abstract privileges.
Privilege containment loops are not allowed, hence a privilege MUST
NOT contain itself. For example, DAV:read cannot contain DAV:read.
The set of privileges that apply to a particular resource may vary
with the DAV:resourcetype of the resource, as well as between
different server implementations. To promote interoperability,
however, this specification defines a set of well-known privileges
(e.g. DAV:read, DAV:write, DAV:read-acl, DAV:write-acl, DAV:read-
current-user-privilege-set, and DAV:all), which can at least be
used to classify the other privileges defined on a particular
resource. The access permissions on null resources (defined in
[RFC2518], Section 3) are solely those they inherit (if any), and
they are not discoverable (i.e., the access control properties
specified in Section 5 are not defined on null resources). On the
transition from null to stateful resource, the initial access
control list is set by the server's default ACL value policy (if
any).
Server implementations MAY define new privileges beyond those
defined in this specification. Privileges defined by individual
implementations MUST NOT use the DAV: namespace, and instead should
use a namespace that they control, such as an http scheme URL.
3.1 DAV:read Privilege
The read privilege controls methods that return information about
the state of the resource, including the resource's properties.
Affected methods include GET and PROPFIND. Any implementation-
defined privilege that also controls access to GET and PROPFIND
must be aggregated under dav:readùif an ACL grants access to
dav:read, the client may expect that no other privilege needs to be
granted to have access to GET and PROPFIND. Additionally, the read
privilege MAY control the OPTIONS method.
3.2 DAV:write Privilege
The write privilege controls methods that lock a resource or modify
the content, dead properties, or (in the case of a collection)
membership of the resource, such as PUT and PROPPATCH. Note that
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 10]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
state modification is also controlled via locking (see section 5.3
of [WEBDAV]), so effective write access requires that both write
privileges and write locking requirements are satisfied. Any
implementation-defined privilege that also controls access to
methods modifying content, dead properties or collection membership
must be aggregated under dav:write, e.g. if an ACL grants access to
dav:write, the client may expect that no other privilege needs to
be granted to have access to PUT and PROPPATCH.
3.3 DAV:write-properties
The DAV:write-properties privilege controls methods that modify the
dead properties of the resource, such as PROPPATCH. Whether this
privilege may be used to control access to any live properties is
determined by the implementation. Any implementation-defined
privilege that also controls access to methods modifying dead
properties must be aggregated under dav:write-propertiesùe.g. if an
ACL grants access to dav:write-properties, the client can safely
expect that no other privilege needs to be granted to have access
to PROPPATCH.
3.4 DAV:write-content
The DAV:write-content privilege controls methods that modify the
content or (in the case of a collection) membership of the
resource, such as PUT and DELETE. Any implementation-defined
privilege that also controls access to content or alteration of
collection membership must be aggregated under dav:write-contentù
e.g. if an ACL grants access to dav:write-content, the client can
safely expect that no other privilege needs to be granted to have
access to PUT or DELETE.
3.5 DAV:unlock
The dav:unlock privilege controls the use of the UNLOCK method to
unlock a resource. (Note that while the set of users who may lock
a resource is most commonly the same set of users who may modify a
resource, servers may allow various kinds of administrators to
unlock resources locked by others.) Any privilege controlling
access to UNLOCK must be aggregated under dav:unlock.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 11]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
3.6 DAV:read-acl Privilege
The DAV:read-acl privilege controls the use of PROPFIND to retrieve
the DAV:acl property of the resource.
3.7 DAV:read-current-user-privilege-set Privilege
The DAV:read-current-user-privilege-set privilege controls the use
of PROPFIND to retrieve the DAV:current-user-privilege-set property
of the resource.
Clients are intended to use this property to visually indicate in
their UI items that are dependent on the permissions of a resource,
for example, by graying out resources that are not writeable.
This privilege is separate from DAV:read-acl because there is a
need to allow most users access to the privileges permitted the
current user (due to its use in creating the UI), while the full
ACL contains information that may not be appropriate for the
current authenticated user. As a result, the set of users who can
view the full ACL is expected to be much smaller than those who can
read the current user privilege set, and hence distinct privileges
are needed for each.
3.8 DAV:write-acl Privilege
The DAV:write-acl privilege controls use of the ACL method to
modify the DAV:acl property of the resource.
3.9 DAV:all Privilege
DAV:all is an aggregate privilege that contains the entire set of
privileges that can be applied to the resource.
3.10Aggregation of Predefined Privileges
Server implementations are free to aggregate the predefined
privileges (defined above in Sections 3.1-3.9) subject to the
following limitations:
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 12]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
DAV:read-acl MUST NOT contain DAV:read, DAV:write, DAV:write-acl,
DAV:write-properties, DAV:write-content, or DAV:read-current-user-
privilege-set.
DAV:write-acl MUST NOT contain DAV:write, DAV:read, DAV:read-acl,
or DAV:read-current-user-privilege-set.
DAV:read-current-user-privilege-set MUST NOT contain DAV:write,
DAV:read, DAV:read-acl, or DAV:write-acl.
DAV:write MUST NOT contain DAV:read, DAV:read-acl, or DAV:read-
current-user-privilege-set.
DAV:read MUST NOT contain DAV:write, DAV:write-acl, DAV:write-
properties, or DAV:write-content.
DAV:write MUST contain DAV:write-properties and DAV:write-content.
4 PRINCIPAL PROPERTIES
Principals are manifested to clients as a WebDAV resource,
identified by a URL. A principal MUST have a DAV:displayname
property (defined in Section 13.2 of [RFC2518]), and a
DAV:resourcetype property (defined in Section 13.9 of [RFC2518]).
Additionally, a principal MUST report the DAV:principal empty XML
element in the value of the DAV:resourcetype property in addition
to all other reported elements. For example, a group would report
DAV:collection and DAV:principal elements. The element type
declaration for DAV:principal is:
This protocol defines the following additional property for a
principal. Since it is expensive, for many servers, to retrieve
access control information, the name and value of this property
SHOULD NOT be returned by a PROPFIND allprop request (as defined in
Section 12.14.1 of [RFC2518]).
4.1 DAV:alternate-URI-set
This protected property, if non-empty, contains the URIs of network
resources with additional descriptive information about the
principal. This property identifies additional network resources
(i.e., it contains one or more URIs) that may be consulted by a
client to gain additional knowledge concerning a principal. One
expected use for this property is the storage of an ldap [RFC2255]
scheme URL. A user-agent encountering an ldap URL could use LDAP
[RFC2589] to retrieve additional machine-readable directory
information about the principal, and display that information in
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 13]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
its user interface. Support for this property is REQUIRED, and the
value is empty if no alternate URI exists for the principal.
4.2 DAV:principal-URL
A principal may have many URLs, but there must be one primary URL
that clients can use to uniquely identify a principalùthe
principal-URL. This protected property contains the URL that MUST
be used to identify this principal in an ACL request.
4.3 DAV:group-membership
This protected property identifies the groups in which the
principal is directly a member. Note that a server may allow a
group to be a member of another group, in which case the DAV:group-
membership of those other groups would need to be queried in order
to determine the groups in which the principal is indirectly a
member.
5 ACCESS CONTROL PROPERTIES
This specification defines a number of new properties for WebDAV
resources. Access control properties may be retrieved just like
other WebDAV properties, using the PROPFIND method. Since it is
expensive, for many servers, to retrieve access control
information, a PROPFIND allprop request (as defined in Section
12.14.1 of [RFC2518]) SHOULD NOT return the names and values of the
properties defined in this section.
HTTP resources that support the WebDAV Access Control Protocol MUST
contain the following properties. Null resources (described in
Section 3 of [RFC2518]) MUST NOT contain the following properties:
5.1 DAV:owner
This protected property identifies a particular principal as being
the "owner" of the resource. Since the owner of a resource often
has special access control capabilities (e.g., the owner frequently
has permanent DAV:write-acl privilege), clients might display the
resource owner in their user interface.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 14]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
5.1.1 Example: Retrieving DAV:owner
This example shows a client request for the value of the DAV:owner
property from a collection resource with URL
http://www.webdav.org/papers/. The principal making the request is
authenticated using Digest authentication. The value of DAV:owner
is the URL http://www.webdav.org/_acl/users/gstein, wrapped in the
DAV:href XML element.
>> Request <<
PROPFIND /papers/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Depth: 0
Authorization: Digest username="jim",
realm="jim@webdav.org", nonce="...",
uri="/papers/", response="...", opaque="..."
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
http://www.webdav.org/papers/
http://www.webdav.org/_acl/users/gstein
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 15]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
5.1.2 Example: An Attempt to Set DAV:owner
The following example shows a client request to modify the value of
the DAV:owner property on the resource with URL
. Since DAV:owner is a protected
property, the server responds with a 207 (Multi-Status) response
that contains a 403 (Forbidden) status code for the act of setting
DAV:owner. Section 8.2.1 of [RFC2518] describes PROPPATCH status
code information, and Section 11 of [RFC2518] describes the Multi-
Status response.
>> Request <<
PROPPATCH /papers/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Depth: 0
Authorization: Digest username="jim",
realm="jim@webdav.org", nonce="...",
uri="/papers/", response="...", opaque="..."
http://www.webdav.org/_acl/users/jim
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
http://www.webdav.org/papers/
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 16]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Failure to set protected property (DAV:owner)
5.2 DAV:supported-privilege-set
This is a protected property that identifies the privileges
defined for the resource.
Each privilege appears as an XML element, where aggregate
privileges list as sub-elements all of the privileges that they
aggregate.
An abstract privilege MUST NOT be used in an ACE for that resource.
Servers MUST fail an attempt to set an abstract privilege.
A description is a human-readable description of what this
privilege controls access to. Servers MUST indicate the human
language of the description using the xml:lang attribute and SHOULD
consider the HTTP Accept-Language request header when selecting one
of multiple available languages.
It is envisioned that a WebDAV ACL-aware administrative client
would list the supported privileges in a dialog box, and allow the
user to choose non-abstract privileges to apply in an ACE. The
privileges tree is useful programmatically to map well-known
privileges (defined by WebDAV or other standards groups) into
privileges that are supported by any particular server
implementation. The privilege tree also serves to hide complexity
in implementations allowing large number of privileges to be
defined by displaying aggregates to the user.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 17]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
5.2.1 Example: Retrieving a List of Privileges Supported on a
Resource
This example shows a client request for the DAV:supported-
privilege-set property on the resource
http://www.webdav.org/papers/. The value of the DAV:supported-
privilege-set property is a tree of supported privileges (using
"[XML Namespace , localname]" to identify each privilege):
[DAV:, all] (aggregate, abstract)
|
+-- [DAV:, read] (aggregate)
|
+-- [DAV:, read-acl] (abstract)
+-- [DAV:, read-current-user-privilege-set]
(abstract)
|
+-- [DAV:, write] (aggregate)
|
+-- [DAV:, write-acl] (abstract)
+-- [DAV:, write-properties]
+-- [DAV:, write-content]
|
+-- [DAV:, unlock]
This privilege tree is not normative (except that it reflects the
normative aggregation rules given in Section 3.10), and many
possible privilege trees are possible.
>> Request <<
PROPFIND /papers/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Depth: 0
Authorization: Digest username="gclemm",
realm="gclemm@webdav.org", nonce="...",
uri="/papers/", response="...", opaque="..."
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 18]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
http://www.webdav.org/papers/
Any
operation
Read any
object
Read
ACL
Read current user
privilege set property
Write any
object
Write
ACL
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 19]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
Write
properties
Write resource
content
Unlock
resource
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
5.3 DAV:current-user-privilege-set
DAV:current-user-privilege-set is a protected property containing
the exact set of privileges (as computed by the server) granted to
the currently authenticated HTTP user. Aggregate privileges and
their contained privileges are listed. A user-agent can use the
value of this property to adjust its user interface to make actions
inaccessible (e.g., by graying out a menu item or button) for which
the current principal does not have permission. This is
particularly useful for an access control user interface, which can
be constructed without knowing the ACE combining semantics of the
server. This property is also useful for determining what
operations the current principal can perform, without having to
actually execute an operation.
If the current user is granted a specific privilege, that privilege
must belong to the set of privileges that may be set on this
resource. Therefore, each element in the DAV:current-user-
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 20]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
privilege-set property MUST identify a non-abstract privilege from
the DAV:supported-privilege-set property.
5.3.1 Example: Retrieving the User's Current Set of Assigned
Privileges
Continuing the example from Section 5.2.1, this example shows a
client requesting the DAV:current-user-privilege-set property from
the resource with URL http://www.webdav.org/papers/. The username
of the principal making the request is "khare", and Digest
authentication is used in the request. The principal with username
"khare" has been granted the DAV:read privilege. Since the DAV:read
privilege contains the DAV:read-acl and DAV:read-current-user-
privilege-set privileges (see Section 5.2.1), the principal with
username "khare" can read the ACL property, and the DAV:current-
user-privilege-set property. However, the DAV:all, DAV:read-acl,
DAV:write-acl and DAV:read-current-user-privilege-set privileges
are not listed in the value of DAV:current-user-privilege-set,
since (for this example) they are abstract privileges. DAV:write is
not listed since the principal with username "khare" is not listed
in an ACE granting that principal write permission.
>> Request <<
PROPFIND /papers/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Depth: 0
Authorization: Digest username="khare",
realm="khare@webdav.org", nonce="...",
uri="/papers/", response="...", opaque="..."
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 21]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
http://www.webdav.org/papers/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
5.4 DAV:acl
This is a protected property that specifies the list of access
control entries (ACEs), which define what principals are to get
what privileges for this resource.
Each DAV:ace element specifies the set of privileges to be either
granted or denied to a single principal. If the DAV:acl property
is empty, no principal is granted any privilege.
5.4.1 ACE Principal
The DAV:principal element identifies the principal to which this
ACE applies.
The current user matches DAV:href only if that user is
authenticated as being (or being a member of) the principal
identified by the URL contained by that DAV:href.
The current user always matches DAV:all.
The current user matches DAV:authenticated only if authenticated.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 22]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
The current user matches DAV:unauthenticated only if not
authenticated.
DAV:all is the union of DAV:authenticated, and DAV:unauthenticated.
For a given request, the user matches either DAV:authenticated, or
DAV:unauthenticated, but not both (that is, DAV:authenticated and
DAV:unauthenticated are disjoint sets).
The current user matches a DAV:property principal in a DAV:acl
property of a resource only if the value of the identified property
of that resource contains at most one DAV:href XML element, the URI
value of DAV:href identifies a principal, and the current user is
authenticated as being (or being a member of) that principal. For
example, if the DAV:property element contained , the
current user would match the DAV:property principal only if the
current user is authenticated as matching the principal identified
by the DAV:owner property of the resource.
Alternately, some servers may support ACEs applying to those users
NOT matching the current principal, e.g. all users not in a
particular group. This can be done by wrapping the dav:principal
element with dav:invert.
The current user matches DAV:self in a DAV:acl property of the
resource only if that resource is a principal and that principal
matches the current user or, if the principal is a group, a member
of that group matches the current user.
5.4.2 ACE Grant and Deny
Each DAV:grant or DAV:deny element specifies the set of privileges
to be either granted or denied to the specified principal. A
DAV:grant or DAV:deny element of the DAV:acl of a resource MUST
only contain non-abstract elements specified in the DAV:supported-
privilege-set of that resource.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 23]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
5.4.3 ACE Protection
A server indicates an ACE is protected by including the
DAV:protected element in the ACE. If the ACL of a resource contains
an ACE with a DAV:protected element, an attempt to remove that ACE
from the ACL MUST fail.
5.4.4 ACE Inheritance
The presence of a DAV:inherited element indicates that this ACE is
inherited from another resource that is identified by the URL
contained in a DAV:href element. An inherited ACE cannot be
modified directly, but instead the ACL on the resource from which
it is inherited must be modified.
Note that ACE inheritance is not the same as ACL initialization.
ACL initialization defines the ACL that a newly created resource
will use (if not specified). ACE inheritance refers to an ACE that
is logically shared - where an update to the resource containing an
ACE will affect the ACE of each resource that inherits that ACE.
The method by which ACLs are initialized or by which ACEs are
inherited is not defined by this document.
5.4.5 Example: Retrieving a Resource's Access Control List
Continuing the example from Sections 5.2.1 and 5.3.1, this example
shows a client requesting the DAV:acl property from the resource
with URL http://www.webdav.org/papers/. There are two ACEs defined
in this ACL:
ACE #1: The group identified by URL
http://www.webdav.org/_acl/groups/maintainers/ (the group of site
maintainers) is granted DAV:write privilege. Since (for this
example) DAV:write contains the DAV:write-acl privilege (see
Section 5.2.1), this means the "maintainers" group can also modify
the access control list.
ACE #2: All principals (DAV:all) are granted the DAV:read
privilege. Since (for this example) DAV:read contains DAV:read-acl
and DAV:read-current-user-privilege-set, this means all users
(including all members of the "maintainers" group) can read the
DAV:acl property and the DAV:current-user-privilege-set property.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 24]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
>> Request <<
PROPFIND /papers/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Depth: 0
Authorization: Digest username="masinter",
realm="masinter@webdav.org", nonce="...",
uri="/papers/", response="...", opaque="..."
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
http://www.webdav.org/papers/
http://www.webdav.org/_acl/groups/maintainers/
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 25]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
5.5 DAV:inherited-acl
This is a protected property that lists a set of other resources
whose ACLs also control the access to this resource. To have a
privilege on a resource, not only must the ACEs defined in the ACL
on that resource grant the privilege, but so must each ACL in a
dav:inherited-acl tag. Effectively, the privileges granted by the
current ACL are ANDÆed with the privileges granted by each
inherited ACL. The order in which the inherited-acl tag appears in
an ACL is relevant, regardless of the ACL semantics (see below).
5.6 DAV:acl-semantics
This is a protected property that defines the ACL semantics. These
semantics define how multiple ACEs that match the current user are
combined, what are the constraints on how ACEs can be ordered, and
which principals must have an ACE. A client user interface could
use the value of this property to provide feedback to a human
operator concerning the impact of proposed changes to an ACL.
Alternately, a client can use this property to help it determine,
before submitting an ACL method invocation, what ACL changes it
needs to make to accomplish a specific goal (or whether that goal
is even achievable on this server).
Since it is not practical to require all implementations to use the
same ACL semantics, the DAV:acl-semantics property is used to
identify the ACL semantics for a particular resource. The DAV:acl-
semantics element is defined in Section 6.
5.6.1 Example: Retrieving DAV:acl-semantics
In this example, the client requests the value of the DAV:acl-
semantics property. Digest authentication provides credentials for
the principal operating the client. In this example, the ACE
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 26]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
combination semantics are DAV:first-match, described in Section
6.1.1, the ACE ordering semantics are not specified (some value
other than DAV:deny-before-grant, described in Section 6.2.1), the
DAV:allowed-ace element states that only one ACE is permitted for
each principal, and an ACE describing the privileges granted the
DAV:all principal must exist in every ACL.
>> Request <<
PROPFIND /papers/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Depth: 0
Authorization: Digest username="srcarter",
realm="srcarter@webdav.org", nonce="...",
uri="/papers/", response="...", opaque="..."
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
http://www.webdav.org/papers/
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 27]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
5.7 DAV:principal-collection-set
This protected property of a resource contains a set of URLs that
identify the root collections that contain the principals that are
available on the server that implements this resource. An access
control protocol user agent could use the contents of
DAV:principal-collection-set to retrieve the DAV:displayname
property (specified in Section 13.2 of [RFC2518]) of all principals
on that server, thereby yielding human-readable names for each
principal that could be displayed in a user interface.
Since different servers can control different parts of the URL
namespace, different resources on the same host MAY have different
DAV:principal-collection-set values. The collections specified in
the DAV:principal-collection-set MAY be located on different hosts
from the resource. The URLs in DAV:principal-collection-set SHOULD
be http or https scheme URLs. For security and scalability reasons,
a server MAY report only a subset of the entire set of known
principal collections, and therefore clients should not assume they
have retrieved an exhaustive listing. Additionally, a server MAY
elect to report none of the principal collections it knows about,
in which case the property value would be empty.
The value of DAV:principal-collection-set gives the scope of the
DAV:principal-property-search REPORT (defined in Section 9.4).
Clients use the DAV:principal-property-search REPORT to populate
their user interface with a list of principals. Therefore, servers
that limit a client's ability to obtain principal information will
interfere with the client's ability to manipulate access control
lists, due to the difficulty of getting the URL of a principal for
use in an ACE.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 28]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
5.7.1 Example: Retrieving DAV:principal-collection-set
In this example, the client requests the value of the
DAV:principal-collection-set property on the collection resource
identified by URL http://www.webdav.org/papers/. The property
contains the two URLs, http://www.webdav.org/_acl/users/ and
http://www.webdav.org/_acl/groups/, both wrapped in XML
elements. Digest authentication provides credentials for the
principal operating the client.
The client might reasonably follow this request with two separate
PROPFIND requests to retrieve the DAV:displayname property of the
members of the two collections (/_acl/users/ and /_acl_groups/).
This information could be used when displaying a user interface for
creating access control entries.
>> Request <<
PROPFIND /papers/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Depth: 0
Authorization: Digest username="yarong",
realm="yarong@webdav.org", nonce="...",
uri="/papers/", response="...", opaque="..."
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
http://www.webdav.org/papers/
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 29]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
http://www.webdav.org/_acl/users/
http://www.webdav.org/_acl/groups/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
5.8 Example: PROPFIND to retrieve access control properties
The following example shows how access control information can be
retrieved by using the PROPFIND method to fetch the values of the
DAV:owner, DAV:supported-privilege-set, DAV:current-user-privilege-
set, and DAV:acl properties.
>> Request <<
PROPFIND /top/container/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.foo.org
Content-type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Depth: 0
Authorization: Digest username="ejw",
realm="users@foo.org", nonce="...",
uri="/top/container/", response="...", opaque="..."
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 30]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
http://www.foo.org/top/container/
http://www.foo.org/users/gclemm
Any
operation
Read any
object
Write any
object
Create an
object
Update an
object
Delete an
object
Read the
ACL
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 31]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
Write the
ACL
http://www.foo.org/users/esedlar
http://www.foo.org/groups/marketing/
http://www.foo.org/top/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 32]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
The value of the DAV:owner property is a single DAV:href XML
element containing the URL of the principal that owns this
resource.
The value of the DAV:supported-privilege-set property is a tree of
supported privileges (using "[XML Namespace , localname]" to
identify each privilege):
[DAV:, all] (aggregate, abstract)
|
+-- [DAV:, read]
+-- [DAV:, write] (aggregate, abstract)
|
+-- [http://www.webdav.org/acl/, create]
+-- [http://www.webdav.org/acl/, update]
+-- [http://www.webdav.org/acl/, delete]
+-- [DAV:, read-acl]
+-- [DAV:, write-acl]
The DAV:current-user-privilege-set property contains two
privileges, DAV:read, and DAV:read-acl. This indicates that the
current authenticated user only has the ability to read the
resource, and read the DAV:acl property on the resource.
The DAV:acl property contains a set of four ACEs:
ACE #1: The principal identified by the URL
http://www.foo.org/users/esedlar is granted the DAV:read,
DAV:write, and DAV:read-acl privileges.
ACE #2: The principals identified by the URL
http://www.foo.org/groups/marketing/ are denied the DAV:read
privilege. In this example, the principal URL identifies a group.
ACE #3: In this ACE, the principal is a property principal,
specifically the DAV:owner property. When evaluating this ACE, the
value of the DAV:owner property is retrieved, and is examined to
see if it contains a DAV:href XML element. If so, the URL within
the DAV:href element is read, and identifies a principal. In this
ACE, the owner is granted DAV:read-acl, and DAV:write-acl
privileges.
ACE #4: This ACE grants the DAV:all principal (all users) the
DAV:read privilege. This ACE is inherited from the resource
http://www.foo.org/top/, the parent collection of this resource.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 33]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
6 ACL SEMANTICS
The ACL semantics define how multiple ACEs that match the current
user are combined, what are the constraints on how ACEs can be
ordered, and which principals must have an ACE.
6.1 ACE Combination
The DAV:ace-combination element defines how privileges from
multiple ACEs that match the current user will be combined to
determine the access privileges for that user. Multiple ACEs may
match the same user because the same principal can appear in
multiple ACEs, because multiple principals can identify the same
user, and because one principal can be a member of another
principal.
6.1.1 DAV:first-match ACE Combination
The ACEs are evaluated in the order in which they appear in the
ACL. If the first ACE that matches the current user does not grant
all the privileges needed for the request, the request MUST fail.
6.1.2 DAV:all-grant-before-any-deny ACE Combination
The ACEs are evaluated in the order in which they appear in the
ACL. If an evaluated ACE denies a privilege needed for the
request, the request MUST fail. If all ACEs have been evaluated
without the user being granted all privileges needed for the
request, the request MUST fail.
6.1.3 DAV:specific-deny-overrides-grant ACE Combination
All ACEs in the ACL are evaluated. An "individual ACE" is one
whose principal matches the current user. A "group ACE" is one
whose principal is a group that has a member that matches the
current user. A privilege is granted if it is granted by an
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 34]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
individual ACE and not denied by an individual ACE, or if it is
granted by a group ACE and not denied by an individual or group
ACE. A request MUST fail if any of its needed privileges are not
granted.
6.2 ACE Ordering
The DAV:ace-ordering element defines a constraint on how the ACEs
can be ordered in the ACL.
6.2.1 DAV:deny-before-grant ACE Ordering
This element indicates that all deny ACEs must precede all grant
ACEs.
6.3 Allowed ACE
The DAV:allowed-ace XML element specifies constraints on what kinds
of ACEs are allowed in an ACL.
6.3.1 DAV:principal-only-one-ace ACE Constraint
This element indicates that a principal can appear in only one ACE
per resource.
6.3.2 DAV:grant-only ACE Constraint
This element indicates that ACEs with deny clauses are not allowed.
6.3.3 DAV:no-invert ACE Constraint
This element indicates that ACEs with the element are not
allowed.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 35]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
6.3.4 DAV:no-acl-inherit ACE Constraint
This element indicates that ACLs with the element
are not allowed.
6.4 Required Principals
The required principal elements identify which principals must have
an ACE defined in the ACL.
For example, the following element requires that the ACL contain a
DAV:owner property ACE:
7 ACCESS CONTROL AND EXISTING METHODS
This section defines the impact of access control functionality on
existing methods.
7.1 OPTIONS
If the server supports access control, it MUST return "access-
control" as a field in the DAV response header from an OPTIONS
request on any resource implemented by that server.
7.1.1 Example - OPTIONS
>> Request <<
OPTIONS /foo.html HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-Length: 0
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
DAV: 1, 2, access-control
Allow: OPTIONS, GET, PUT, PROPFIND, PROPPATCH, ACL
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 36]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
In this example, the OPTIONS response indicates that the server
supports access control and that /foo.html can have its access
control list modified by the ACL method.
7.2 MOVE
When a resource is moved from one location to another due to a MOVE
request, the non-inherited and non-protected ACEs in the DAV:acl
property of the resource MUST NOT be modified, or the MOVE request
fails. Handling of inherited and protected ACEs is intentionally
undefined to give server implementations flexibility in how they
implement ACE inheritance and protection.
7.3 COPY
The DAV:acl property on the resource at the destination of a COPY
MUST be the same as if the resource was created by an individual
resource creation request (e.g. MKCOL, PUT). Clients wishing to
preserve the DAV:acl property across a copy need to read the
DAV:acl property prior to the COPY, then perform an ACL operation
on the new resource at the destination to restore, insofar as this
is possible, the original access control list.
7.4 DELETE
The precise combination of privileges and resources necessary to
permit the DELETE method is intentionally left to the discretion of
each server implementation. It is envisioned that on some servers,
DELETE will require write permission on the collection containing
the resource to be deleted. On other servers, it might also
require write permission on the resource being deleted.
7.5 LOCK
A lock on a resource ensures that only the lock owner can modify
ACEs that are not inherited and not protected (these are the only
ACEs that a client can modify with an ACL request). A lock does not
protect inherited or protected ACEs, since a client cannot modify
them with an ACL request on that resource.
8 ACCESS CONTROL METHODS
8.1 ACL
The ACL method modifies the access control list (which can be read
via the DAV:acl property) of a resource. Specifically, the ACL
method only permits modification to ACEs that are not inherited,
and are not protected. An ACL method invocation modifies all non-
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 37]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
inherited and non-protected ACEs in a resource's access control
list to exactly match the ACEs contained within in the DAV:acl XML
element (specified in Section 5.4) of the request body. An ACL
request body MUST contain only one DAV:acl XML element. Unless the
non-inherited and non-protected ACEs of the DAV:acl property of the
resource can be updated to be exactly the value specified in the
ACL request, the ACL request MUST fail.
It is possible that the ACEs visible to the current user in the
DAV:acl property may only be a portion of the complete set of ACEs
on that resource. If this is the case, an ACL request only modifies
the set of ACEs visible to the current user, and does not affect
any non-visible ACE.
In order to avoid overwriting DAV:acl changes by another client, a
client SHOULD acquire a WebDAV lock on the resource before
retrieving the DAV:acl property of a resource that it intends on
updating.
Implementation Note: Two common operations are to add or remove
an ACE from an existing access control list. To accomplish this,
a client uses the PROPFIND method to retrieve the value of the
DAV:acl property, then parses the returned access control list
to remove all inherited and protected ACEs (these ACEs are
tagged with the DAV:inherited and DAV:protected XML elements).
In the remaining set of non-inherited, non-protected ACEs, the
client can add or remove one or more ACEs before submitting the
final ACE set in the request body of the ACL method.
8.1.1 ACL Preconditions
An implementation MAY enforce one or more of the following
constraints on an ACL request. If the constraint is violated, a
403 (Forbidden) or 409 (Conflict) response MUST be returned and the
indicated XML element MUST be returned as a child of a top level
DAV:error element in an XML response body.
(DAV:no-ace-conflict): The ACEs submitted in the ACL request MUST
NOT conflict with each other. What is considered a conflict
depends on the ACL semantics of that resource.
(DAV:no-protected-ace-conflict): The ACEs submitted in the ACL
request MUST NOT conflict with the protected ACEs on the resource.
For example, if the resource has a protected ACE granting DAV:write
to a given principal, then it would not be consistent if the ACL
request submitted an ACE denying DAV:write to the same principal.
(DAV:no-inherited-ace-conflict): The ACEs submitted in the ACL
request MUST NOT conflict with the inherited ACEs on the resource.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 38]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
For example, if the resource inherits an ACE from its parent
collection granting DAV:write to a given principal, then it would
not be consistent if the ACL request submitted an ACE denying
DAV:write to the same principal. Note that reporting of this error
will be implementation-dependent. Implementations have the choice
to either report this error, or to allow the ACE to be set, and
then let normal ACE evaluation rules determine whether the new ACE
has any impact on the privileges available to a specific principal.
(DAV:limited-number-of-aces): The number of ACEs submitted in the
ACL request MUST NOT exceed the number of ACEs allowed on that
resource. However, ACL-compliant servers MUST support at least one
ACE granting privileges to a single principal, and one ACE granting
privileges to a group.
(DAV:deny-before-grant): All non-inherited deny ACEs MUST precede
all non-inherited grant ACEs.
(DAV:principal-only-one-ace): The ACL request MUST NOT result in
more than one ACE for a given principal. This precondition applies
only when the ACL semantics of the resource includes the
DAV:principal-only-one-ace constraint (defined in Section 6.3.1).
(DAV:grant-only): The ACEs submitted in the ACL request MUST NOT
include a deny ACE. This precondition applies only when the ACL
semantics of the resource includes the DAV:grant-only constraint
(defined in Section 6.3.2).
(DAV:no-invert): The ACL request MUST NOT include a
element. This precondition applies only when the ACL semantics of
the resource includes the DAV:no-invert constraint (defined in
Section 6.3.4).
(DAV:no-acl-inherit): The ACL request MUST NOT include a
element. This precondition applies only when
the ACL semantics of the resource includes the DAV:no-acl-inherit
constraint (defined in Section 6.3.4).
(DAV:no-abstract): The ACL request MUST NOT attempt to grant or
deny an abstract privilege (see Section 5.2).
(DAV:not-supported-privilege): The ACEs submitted in the ACL
request MUST be supported by the resource.
(DAV:missing-required-principal): The result of the ACL request
MUST have at least one ACE for each principal identified in a
DAV:required-principal XML element in the ACL semantics of that
resource (see Section 6.3.2).
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 39]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
(DAV:recognized-principal): Every principal URL in the ACL request
MUST identify a principal resource.
(DAV:allowed-principal): The principals specified in the ACEs
submitted in the ACL request MUST be allowed as principals for the
resource. For example, a server where only authenticated principals
can access resources would not allow the DAV:all or
DAV:unauthenticated principals to be used in an ACE, since these
would allow unauthenticated access to resources.
8.1.2 Example: the ACL method
In the following example, user "fielding", authenticated by
information in the Authorization header, grants the principal
identified by the URL http://www.foo.org/users/esedlar (i.e., the
user "esedlar") read and write privileges, grants the owner of the
resource read-acl and write-acl privileges, and grants everyone
read privileges.
>> Request <<
ACL /top/container/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.foo.org
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Authorization: Digest username="fielding",
realm="users@foo.org", nonce="...",
uri="/top/container/", response="...", opaque="..."
http://www.foo.org/users/esedlar
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 40]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
8.1.3 Example: ACL method failure due to protected ACE conflict
In the following request, user "fielding", authenticated by
information in the Authorization header, attempts to deny the
principal identified by the URL http://www.foo.org/users/esedlar
(i.e., the user "esedlar") write privileges. Prior to the request,
the DAV:acl property on the resource contained a protected ACE (see
Section 5.4.3) granting DAV:owner the DAV:read and DAV:write
privileges. The principal identified by URL
http://www.foo.org/users/esedlar is the owner of the resource. The
ACL method invocation fails because the submitted ACE conflicts
with the protected ACE, thus violating the semantics of ACE
protection.
>> Request <<
ACL /top/container/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.foo.org
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Authorization: Digest username="fielding",
realm="users@foo.org", nonce="...",
uri="/top/container/", response="...", opaque="..."
http://www.foo.org/users/esedlar
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 41]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
8.1.4 Example: ACL method failure due to an inherited ACE conflict
In the following request, user "ejw", authenticated by information
in the Authorization header, tries to change the access control
list on the resource http://www.foo.org/top/index.html. This
resource has two inherited ACEs.
Inherited ACE #1 grants the principal identified by URL
http://www.foo.org/users/ejw (i.e., the user "ejw")
http://www.foo.org/privs/write-all and DAV:read-acl privileges. On
this server, http://www.foo.org/privs/write-all is an aggregate
privilege containing DAV:write, and DAV:write-acl.
Inherited ACE #2 grants principal DAV:all the DAV:read privilege.
The request attempts to set a (non-inherited) ACE, denying the
principal identified by the URL http://www.foo.org/users/ejw (i.e.,
the user "ejw") DAV:write permission. This conflicts with inherited
ACE #1. Note that the decision to report an inherited ACE conflict
is specific to this server implementation. Another server
implementation could have allowed the new ACE to be set, and then
used normal ACE evaluation rules to determine whether the new ACE
has any impact on the privileges available to a principal.
>> Request <<
ACL /top/index.html HTTP/1.1
Host: www.foo.org
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Authorization: Digest username="ejw",
realm="users@foo.org", nonce="...",
uri="/top/index.html", response="...", opaque="..."
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 42]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
http://www.foo.org/users/ejw
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
8.1.5 Example: ACL method failure due to an attempt to set grant and
deny in a single ACE.
In this example, user "ygoland", authenticated by information in
the Authorization header, tries to change the access control list
on the resource http://www.foo.org/diamond/engagement-ring.gif. The
ACL request includes a single, syntactically and semantically
incorrect ACE, which attempts to grant the group identified by the
URL http://www.foo.org/users/friends/ DAV:read privilege and deny
the principal identified by URL http://www.foo.org/users/ygoland-so
(i.e., the user "ygoland-so") DAV:read privilege. However, it is
illegal to have multiple principal elements, as well as both a
grant and deny element in the same ACE, so the request fails due to
poor syntax.
>> Request <<
ACL /diamond/engagement-ring.gif HTTP/1.1
Host: www.foo.org
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Authorization: Digest username="ygoland",
realm="users@foo.org", nonce="...",
uri="/diamond/engagement-ring.gif", response="...",
opaque="..."
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 43]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
http://www.foo.org/users/friends/
http://www.foo.org/users/ygoland-so
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Content-Length: 0
Note that if the request had been divided into two ACEs, one to
grant, and one to deny, the request would have been syntactically
well formed.
9 ACCESS CONTROL REPORTS
9.1 REPORT Method
The REPORT method (defined in Section 3.6 of [RFC3253]) provides an
extensible mechanism for obtaining information about a resource.
Unlike the PROPFIND method, which returns the value of one or more
named properties, the REPORT method can involve more complex
processing. REPORT is valuable in cases where the server has access
to all of the information needed to perform the complex request
(such as a query), and where it would require multiple requests for
the client to retrieve the information needed to perform the same
request.
9.2 DAV:acl-principal-prop-set Report
The DAV:acl-principal-prop-set report returns, for all principals
in the DAV:acl property that are identified by http(s) URLs or by a
DAV:property principal, the value of the properties specified in
the REPORT request body. In the case where a principal URL appears
multiple times, the DAV:acl-principal-prop-set report MUST return
the properties for that principal only once.
Marshalling
The request body MUST be a DAV:acl-principal-prop-set XML element.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 44]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
ANY value: a sequence of one or more elements, with at most one
DAV:prop element.
prop: see RFC 2518, Section 12.11
The response body for a successful request MUST be a
DAV:multistatus XML element (i.e., the response uses the same
format as the response for PROPFIND).
multistatus: see RFC 2518, Section 12.9
The response body for a successful DAV:acl-principal-prop-set
REPORT request MUST contain a DAV:response element for each
principal identified by an http(s) URL listed in a DAV:principal
XML element of an ACE within the DAV:acl property of the resource
identified by the Request-URI.
9.2.1 Example: DAV:acl-principal-prop-set Report
Resource http://www.webdav.org/index.html has an ACL with three
ACEs:
ACE #1: All principals (DAV:all) have DAV:read and DAV:read-
current-user-privilege-set access.
ACE #2: The principal identified by
http://www.webdav.org/people/gstein (the user "gstein") is granted
DAV:write, DAV:write-acl, DAV:read-acl privileges.
ACE #3: The group identified by
http://www.webdav.org/groups/authors/ (the "authors" group) is
granted DAV:write and DAV:read-acl privileges.
The following example shows a DAV:acl-principal-prop-set report
requesting the DAV:displayname property. It returns the value of
DAV:displayname for resources http://www.webdav.org/people/gstein
and http://www.webdav.org/groups/authors/ , but not for DAV:all,
since this is not an http(s) URL.
>> Request <<
REPORT /index.html HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 45]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
http://www.webdav.org/people/gstein
Greg Stein
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
http://www.webdav.org/groups/authors/
Site authors
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
9.3 DAV:principal-match REPORT
The DAV:principal-match REPORT is used to identify all members of a
collection that match the current user. In particular, if the
collection contains principals, the report can be used to identify
all members of the collection that match the current user.
Alternatively, if the collection contains resources that have a
property that identifies a principal (e.g. DAV:owner), then the
report can be used to identify all members of the collection whose
property identifies a principal that matches the current user. For
example, this report can return all of the resources in a
collection hierarchy that are owned by the current user.
Marshalling:
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 46]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
The request body MUST be a DAV:principal-match XML element.
ANY value: an element whose value identifies a property. The
expectation is the value of the named property typically
contains an href element that contains the URI of a principal
prop: see RFC 2518, Section 12.11
The response body for a successful request MUST be a
DAV:multistatus XML element.
multistatus: see RFC 2518, Section 12.9
The response body for a successful DAV:principal-match REPORT
request MUST contain a DAV:response element for each member of the
collection that matches the current user. When the DAV:principal-
property element is used, a match occurs if the current user is
matched by the principal identified by the URI found in the
DAV:href element of the property identified by the DAV:principal-
property element. When the DAV:self element is used in a
DAV:principal-match report issued against a group, it matches a
member of the group if that child (a principal resource) identifies
the same principal as the current user.
If DAV:prop is specified in the request body, the properties
specified in the DAV:prop element MUST be reported in the
DAV:response elements.
9.3.1 Example: DAV:principal-match REPORT
The following example identifies the members of the collection
identified by the URL http://www.webdav.org/doc/ that are owned by
the current user. The current user ("gclemm") is authenticated
using Digest authentication.
>> Request <<
REPORT /doc/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webdav.org
Authorization: Digest username="gclemm",
realm="gclemm@webdav.org", nonce="...",
uri="/papers/", response="...", opaque="..."
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Depth: infinity
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 47]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
http://www.webdav.org/doc/foo.html
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
http://www.webdav.org/doc/img/bar.gif
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
9.4 DAV:principal-property-search REPORT
The DAV:principal-property-search REPORT performs a substring
search on the character data value of specified properties. The
server may perform caseless matching of substrings. Only properties
defined on principal resources are searched. For implementation
efficiency, servers do not typically support substring searching on
all properties. A client can discover the set of searchable
properties by using the DAV:principal-search-property-set REPORT,
defined in Section 9.5.
Implementation Note: The value of a WebDAV property is a
sequence of well-formed XML, and hence can include any character
in the Unicode/ISO-10646 standard, that is, most known
characters in human languages. Due to the idiosyncrasies of case
mapping across human languages, implementation of caseless
matching is non-trivial. Implementors are strongly encouraged to
consult [CaseMap], especially Section 2.3 ("Caseless Matching"),
for guidance when implementing their caseless matching
algorithms.
Marshalling:
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 48]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
The scope of the DAV:principal-property-search REPORT is all
principal resources that are members of a collection identified in
DAV:principal-collection-set. If a group is in the scope of the
DAV:principal-property-search REPORT, all members of that group are
also in the scope.
Servers MUST support the DAV:principal-property-search REPORT on
all principal collections identified in the value of a
DAV:principal-collection-set property.
The request body MUST be a DAV:principal-property-search XML
element containing a search specification and an optional list of
properties. For every principal that matches the search
specification, the response will contain the value of the
properties on that principal.
The DAV:property-search element contains a prop element enumerating
the properties to be searched and a substring element, containing
the search string, and an optional tag indicating whether or not
case-insensitive string matching should be done (the default is
implementation-dependent).
prop: see RFC 2518, Section 12.11
Multiple property-search elements or multiple elements within a
DAV:prop element will be interpreted with a logical AND. An empty
DAV:substring element will match all properties specified in its
parent DAV:property-search element.
The response body for a successful request MUST be a
DAV:multistatus XML element.
multistatus: see RFC 2518, Section 12.9
The response body for a successful DAV:principal-property-search
REPORT request MUST contain a DAV:response element for each
principal whose property values satisfy the search specification
given in DAV:principal-property-search.
If DAV:prop is specified in the request body, the properties
specified in the DAV:prop element MUST be reported in the
DAV:response elements.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 49]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
Preconditions:
(DAV:non-searchable-property): All properties specified in the
DAV:principal-property-search REPORT must be searchable.
9.4.1 Matching
There are several cases to consider when matching strings. The
easiest case is when a property value is "simple" and has only
character information item content (see [REC-XML-INFOSET]). For
example, the search string "julian" would match the DAV:displayname
property with value "Julian Reschke". Note that the on-the-wire
marshalling of DAV:displayname in this case is:
Julian Reschke
The name of the property is encoded into the XML element
information item, and the character information item content of the
property is "Julian Reschke".
The more complicated case occurred when properties have mixed
content (that is, compound values consisting of multiple child
element items, other types of information items, and character
information item content). Consider the property
http://www.webdav.org/props/aprop, marshalled as:
{cdata 0}{cdata 1}
{cdata 2}{cdata 3}
In this case, substring matching is performed on each individual
contiguous sequence of character information items. In the example
above, a search string would be compared to the four following
strings:
{cdata 0}
{cdata 1}
{cdata 2}
{cdata 3}
That is, four individual substring matches would be performed, one
each for {cdata 0}, {cdata 1}, {cdata 2}, and {cdata 3}.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 50]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
9.4.2 Example: successful DAV:principal-property-search REPORT
In this example, the client requests the principal URLs of all
users whose DAV:displayname property contains the substring "doE"
and whose http://BigCorp.com/ns/title property (that is, their
professional title) contains "Sales". In addition, the client
requests five properties to be returned with the matching
principals:
In the DAV: namespace: displayname
In the http://www.BigCorp.com/ns/ namespace: department, phone,
office, salary
The response shows that two principal resources meet the search
specification, "John Doe" and "Zygdoebert Smith". The property
"salary" in namespace "http://www.BigCorp.com/ns/" is not returned,
since the principal making the request does not have sufficient
access permissions to read this property.
>> Request <<
REPORT /users/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.BigCorp.com
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: xxxx
doE
Sales
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 51]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: xxxx
http://www.BigCorp.com/users/jdoe
John Doe
Widget Sales
234-4567
209
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
http://www.BigCorp.com/users/zsmith
Zygdoebert Smith
Gadget Sales
234-7654
114
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 52]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
9.4.3 Example: Unsuccessful DAV:principal-property-search REPORT
In this example, the client requests a search on the non-searchable
property "phone" in the namespace "http://www.BigCorp.com/ns/".
The response is a 403 (Forbidden), with a response body containing
a DAV:non-searchable-property XML element as the value of a
DAV:error XML element.
>> Request <<
REPORT /users/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.BigCorp.com
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: xxxx
232
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 403 FORBIDDEN
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: xxxx
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 53]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
9.5 DAV:principal-search-property-set REPORT
The DAV:principal-search-property-set REPORT identifies those
properties that may be searched using the DAV:principal-property-
search REPORT (defined in Section 9.4).
Servers MUST support the DAV:principal-search-property-set REPORT
on all principal collections identified in the value of a
DAV:principal-collection-set property.
An access control protocol user agent could use the results of the
DAV:principal-search-property-set REPORT to present a query
interface to the user for retrieving principals.
Marshalling:
The request body MUST be an empty DAV:principal-search-property-set
XML element.
The response body MUST bea DAV:principal-search-property-set XML
element, containing a DAV:principal-search-property XML element for
each property that may be searched with the DAV:principal-property-
search REPORT. A server MAY limit its response to just a subset of
the searchable properties, such as those likely to be useful to an
interactive access control client.
Each DAV:principal-search-property XML element contains exactly one
searchable property, and a description of the property.
The DAV:prop element contains one principal property on which the
server is able to perform a DAV:principal-property-search REPORT.
prop: see RFC 2518, Section 12.11
The description element is a human-readable description of what
information this property represents. Servers MUST indicate the
human language of the description using the xml:lang attribute and
SHOULD consider the HTTP Accept-Language request header when
selecting one of multiple available languages.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 54]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
9.5.1 Example: DAV:principal-search-property-set REPORT
In this example, the client determines the set of searchable
principal properties by requesting the DAV:principal-search-
property-set REPORT on the root of the server's principal URL
collection set, identified by http://www.BigCorp.com/users/.
>> Request <<
REPORT /users/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.BigCorp.com
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Accept-Language: en, de
Authorization: BASIC d2FubmFtYWs6cGFzc3dvcmQ=
>> Response <<
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxx
Full name
Job title
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 55]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
10 XML PROCESSING
Implementations of this specification MUST support the XML element
ignore rule, as specified in Section 23.3.2 of [RFC2518], and the
XML Namespacerecommendation [REC-XML-NAMES].
Note that use of the DAV namespace is reserved for XML elements and
property names defined in a standards-track or Experimental IETF
RFC.
11 INTERNATIONALIZATION CONSIDERATIONS
In this specification, the only human-readable content can be found
in the description XML element, found within the DAV:supported-
privilege-set property. This element contains a human-readable
description of the capabilities controlled by a privilege. As a
result, the description element must be capable of representing
descriptions in multiple character sets. Since the description
element is found within a WebDAV property, it is represented on-
the-wire as XML [REC-XML], and hence can leverage XML's language
tagging and character set encoding capabilities. Specifically, XML
processors must, at minimum, be able to read XML elements encoded
using the UTF-8 [UTF-8] encoding of the ISO 10646 multilingual
plane. XML examples in this specification demonstrate use of the
charset parameter of the Content-Type header, as defined in
[RFC3023], as well as the XML "encoding" attribute, which together
provide charset identification information for MIME and XML
processors. Futhermore, this specification requires server
implementations to tag description fields with the xml:lang
attribute (see Section 2.12 of [REC-XML]), which specifies the
human language of the description. Additionally, server
implementations should take into account the value of the Accept-
Language HTTP header to determine which description string to
return.
For XML elements other than the description element, it is expected
that implementations will treat the property names, privilege
names, and values as tokens, and convert these tokens into human-
readable text in the user's language and character set when
displayed to a person. Only a generic WebDAV property display
utility would display these values in their raw form to a human
user.
For error reporting, we follow the convention of HTTP/1.1 status
codes, including with each status code a short, English description
of the code (e.g., 200 (OK)). While the possibility exists that a
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 56]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
poorly crafted user agent would display this message to a user,
internationalized applications will ignore this message, and
display an appropriate message in the user's language and character
set.
Further internationalization considerations for this protocol are
described in the WebDAV Distributed Authoring protocol
specification [RFC2518].
12 SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
Applications and users of this access control protocol should be
aware of several security considerations, detailed below. In
addition to the discussion in this document, the security
considerations detailed in the HTTP/1.1 specification [RFC2616],
the WebDAV Distributed Authoring Protocol specification [RFC2518],
and the XML Media Types specification [RFC3023] should be
considered in a security analysis of this protocol.
12.1 Increased Risk of Compromised Users
In the absence of a mechanism for remotely manipulating access
control lists, if a single user's authentication credentials are
compromised, only those resources for which the user has access
permission can be read, modified, moved, or deleted. With the
introduction of this access control protocol, if a single
compromised user has the ability to change ACLs for a broad range
of other users (e.g., a super-user), the number of resources that
could be altered by a single compromised user increases. This risk
can be mitigated by limiting the number of people who have write-
acl privileges across a broad range of resources.
12.2 Risks of the DAV:read-acl and DAV:current-user-privilege-set
Privileges
The ability to read the access privileges (stored in the DAV:acl
property), or the privileges permitted the currently authenticated
user (stored in the DAV:current-user-privilege-set property) on a
resource may seem innocuous, since reading an ACL cannot possibly
affect the resource's state. However, if all resources have world-
readable ACLs, it is possible to perform an exhaustive search for
those resources that have inadvertently left themselves in a
vulnerable state, such as being world-writeable. In particular, the
property retrieval method PROPFIND, executed with Depth infinity on
an entire hierarchy, is a very efficient way to retrieve the
DAV:acl or DAV:current-user-privilege-set properties. Once found,
this vulnerability can be exploited by a denial of service attack
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 57]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
in which the open resource is repeatedly overwritten. Alternately,
writeable resources can be modified in undesirable ways.
To reduce this risk, read-acl privileges should not be granted to
unauthenticated principals, and restrictions on read-acl and read-
current-user-privilege-set privileges for authenticated principals
should be carefully analyzed when deploying this protocol. Access
to the current-user-privilege-set property will involve a tradeoff
of usability versus security. When the current-user-privilege-set
is visible, user interfaces are expected to provide enhanced
information concerning permitted and restricted operations, yet
this information may also indicate a vulnerability that could be
exploited. Deployment of this protocol will need to evaluate this
tradeoff in light of the requirements of the deployment
environment.
12.3 No Foreknowledge of Initial ACL
In an effort to reduce protocol complexity, this protocol
specification intentionally does not address the issue of how to
manage or discover the initial ACL that is placed upon a resource
when it is created. The only way to discover the initial ACL is to
create a new resource, then retrieve the value of the DAV:acl
property. This assumes the principal creating the resource also has
been granted the DAV:read-acl privilege.
As a result, it is possible that a principal could create a
resource, and then discover that its ACL grants privileges that are
undesirable. Furthermore, this protocol makes it possible (though
unlikely) that the creating principal could be unable to modify the
ACL, or even delete the resource. Even when the ACL can be
modified, there will be a short period of time when the resource
exists with the initial ACL before its new ACL can be set.
Several factors mitigate this risk. Human principals are often
aware of the default access permissions in their editing
environments and take this into account when writing information.
Furthermore, default privilege policies are usually very
conservative, limiting the privileges granted by the initial ACL.
13 AUTHENTICATION
Authentication mechanisms defined for use with HTTP and WebDAV
also apply to this WebDAV Access Control Protocol, in particular
the Basic and Digest authentication mechanisms defined in
[RFC2617].
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 58]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
14 IANA CONSIDERATIONS
This document uses the namespace defined by [RFC2518] for XML
elements. All other IANA considerations mentioned in [RFC2518]
also applicable to WebDAV ACL.
15 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The following notice is copied from RFC 2026, section 10.4, and
describes the position of the IETF concerning intellectual property
claims made against this document.
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use other technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on
the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances
of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made
to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification
can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF
Executive Director.
16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This protocol is the collaborative product of the WebDAV ACL design
team: Bernard Chester, Geoff Clemm, Anne Hopkins, Barry Lind, Sean
Lyndersay, Eric Sedlar, Greg Stein, and Jim Whitehead. The authors
are grateful for the detailed review and comments provided by Jim
Amsden, Gino Basso, Murthy Chintalapati, Dennis Hamilton, Laurie
Harper, Ron Jacobs, Chris Knight, Remy Maucherat, Larry Masinter,
Yaron Goland, Lisa Dusseault, Joe Orton, Stefan Eissing, Julian
Reschke, Keith Wannamaker, Tim Ellison, Peter Raymond, and Dylan
Barrell. We thank Keith Wannamaker for the initial text of the
principal property search sections. Prior work on WebDAV access
control protocols has been performed by Yaron Goland, Paul Leach,
Lisa Dusseault, Howard Palmer, and Jon Radoff. We would like to
acknowledge the foundation laid for us by the authors of the
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 59]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
DeltaV, WebDAV and HTTP protocols upon which this protocol is
layered, and the invaluable feedback from the WebDAV working group.
17 REFERENCES
17.1 Normative References
[RFC2119] S.Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels." RFC 2119, BCP 14, March, 1997.
[REC-XML] T. Bray, J. Paoli, C.M. Sperberg-McQueen, "Extensible
Markup Language (XML)." World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation
REC-xml.http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml
[REC-XML-NAMES] T. Bray, D. Hollander, A. Layman, "Name Spaces in
XML" World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xml-names.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/
[RFC3253] G. Clemm, J. Amsden, T. Ellison, C. Kaler, J. Whitehead,
"Versioning Extensions to WebDAV." RFC 3253, March 2002.
[REC-XML-INFOSET] J. Cowan, R. Tobin, "XML Information Set." World
Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xml-infoset.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/
[RFC2616] R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J. C. Mogul, H. Frystyk, L.
Masinter, P. Leach, and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer
Protocol -- HTTP/1.1." RFC 2616, June, 1999.
[RFC2617] J. Franks, P. Hallam-Baker, J. Hostetler, S. Lawrence, P.
Leach, A. Luotonen, L. Stewart, "HTTP Authentication: Basic and
Digest Access Authentication." RFC 2617, June, 1999.
[RFC2518] Y. Goland, E. Whitehead, A. Faizi, S. R. Carter, D.
Jensen, "HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring -- WEBDAV." RFC
2518, February, 1999.
[RFC2368] P. Hoffman, L. Masinter, J. Zawinski, "The mailto URL
scheme." RFC 2368, July, 1998.
[RFC3023] M. Murata, S. St.Laurent, D. Kohn, "XML Media Types." RFC
3023, January, 2001.
[UTF-8] F. Yergeau, "UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode and
ISO 10646." RFC 2279, January, 1998.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 60]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
17.2 Informational References
[RFC2026] S.Bradner, "The Internet Standards Process - Revision 3."
RFC 2026, BCP 9. Harvard, October, 1996.
[RFC2255] T. Howes, M. Smith, "The LDAP URL Format." RFC 2255.
Netscape, December, 1997.
[RFC2251] M. Wahl, T. Howes, S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory
Access Protocol (v3)." RFC 2251. Critical Angle, Netscape, Isode,
December, 1997.
[CaseMap] M. Davis, "Case Mappings", Unicode Standard Annex #21,
March 26, 2001. http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr21
18 AUTHORS' ADDRESSES
Geoffrey Clemm
Rational Software
20 Maguire Road
Lexington, MA 02421
Email: geoffrey.clemm@rational.com
Anne Hopkins
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
Email: annehop@microsoft.com
Eric Sedlar
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Email: esedlar@us.oracle.com
Jim Whitehead
U.C. Santa Cruz
Dept. of Computer Science
Baskin Engineering
1156 High Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Email: ejw@cse.ucsc.edu
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 61]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
19 APPENDICES
19.1 WebDAV XML Document Type Definition Addendum
All XML elements defined in this Document Type Definition (DTD)
belong to the DAV namespace. This DTD should be viewed as an
addendum to the DTD provided in [RFC2518], section 23.1.
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 62]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 63]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
ANY value: a sequence of one or more elements, with at most one
DAV:prop element.
ANY value: an element whose value identifies a property. The
expectation is the value of the named property typically
contains an href element that contains the URI of a principal
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 64]
INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV ACL May 7, 2002
Clemm, Hopkins, Sedlar, Whitehead [Page 65]