BFD Working Group G. Mirsky Internet-Draft Ericsson Updates: 5798 (if approved) J. Tantsura Intended status: Standards Track Microsoft Expires: 22 September 2022 G. Mishra Verizon Inc. 21 March 2022 Applicability of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multi- point Networks in Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd-01 Abstract This document discusses the applicability of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for multipoint networks to provide Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) with sub-second Active convergence and defines the extension to bootstrap point-to-multipoint BFD session. This draft updates RFC 5798. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 22 September 2022. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights Mirsky, et al. Expires 22 September 2022 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Applicability of BFD P2MP in VRRP March 2022 and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1.2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Applicability of p2mp BFD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1. Multipoint BFD Encapsulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1. Introduction The [RFC5798] is the current specification of the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) for IPv4 and IPv6 networks. VRRPv3 allows for a faster switchover to a Backup router. Using such capability with the software-based implementation of VRRP may prove challenging. But it still may be possible to deploy VRRP and provide sub-second detection of Active router failure by Backup routers. Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) [RFC5880] had been originally defined detect failure of point-to-point (p2p) paths: single-hop [RFC5881], multihop [RFC5883]. Single-hop BFD may be used to enable Backup routers to detect a failure of the Active router within 100 msec or faster. [RFC8562] extends [RFC5880] for multipoint and multicast networks, which matches the deployment scenarios for VRRP over the LAN segment. This document demonstrates how point-to-multipoint (p2mp) BFD can enable faster detection of Active failure and thus minimize service disruption in a VRRP domain. The document also defines the extension to VRRP [RFC5798] to bootstrap a VRRP Backup router to join in p2mp BFD session. Mirsky, et al. Expires 22 September 2022 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Applicability of BFD P2MP in VRRP March 2022 1.1. Conventions used in this document 1.1.1. Terminology BFD: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection p2mp: Pont-to-Multipoint VRRP: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol 1.1.2. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 2. Problem Statement A router may be part of several Virtual Router Redundancy groups, as Active in some and as Backup in others. Supporting sub-second mode for VRRPv3 [RFC5798] for all these roles without specialized support in the data plane may prove challenging. BFD already has many implementations based on HW that are capable of supporting multiple sub-second sessions concurrently. 3. Applicability of p2mp BFD [RFC8562] may provide an efficient and scalable solution for fast- converging environment that uses the default route rather than dynamic routing. Each redundancy group presents itself as a p2mp BFD session, with its Active being the root and Backup routers being the tails of the p2mp BFD session. Figure 1 displays the extension of VRRP [RFC5798] to bootstrap a tail of the p2mp BFD session. Mirsky, et al. Expires 22 September 2022 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Applicability of BFD P2MP in VRRP March 2022 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |Version| Type | Virtual Rtr ID| Priority |Count IPvX Addr| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |Rsvd |B| Max Adver Int | Checksum | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | + + | IPvX Address(es) | + + + + + + + + | | + + | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Active Router Discriminator | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: VRRP Extension to Bootstrap P2MP BFD session The new fields are interpreted as follows: B(FD) - a one-bit flag that indicates that the Active Router Discriminator field is appended to VRRP packet defined in [RFC5798]; Active Router Discriminator - the four-octet field. The value MUST NOT be zero, and it equals the My Discriminator value allocated by the root of the p2mp BFD session. The Active router, configured to use p2mp BFD to support faster convergence of VRRP, starts transmitting BFD control packets with VRID as a source IP address and the locally allocated value as the value of the My Discriminator field ([RFC5880]). The same non-zero value of My Discriminator MUST be set as the value of the Active Router Discriminator field. The BFD flag MUST be set in the VRRP packet. A Backup router demultiplexes p2mp BFD test sessions based on VRID that it has been configured with and the non-zero My Discriminator value it learns from the received VRRP packet. When a Backup router detects the failure of the Active router, it re- evaluates its role in the VRID. As a result, the Backup router may become the Active router of the given VRID or continue as a Backup router. If the former is the case, then the new Active router MUST select My Discriminator and start transmitting p2mp BFD control packets using Active IP address as the source IP address for p2mp BFD Mirsky, et al. Expires 22 September 2022 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Applicability of BFD P2MP in VRRP March 2022 control packets. If the latter is the case, then the Backup router MUST wait for the VRRP packet from the new VRRP Active router that will bootstrap the new p2mp BFD session. 3.1. Multipoint BFD Encapsulation The MultipointHead of p2mp BFD session when transmitting BFD control packet: MUST set TTL or Hop Limit value to 255 (Section 5 [RFC5881]). Similarly, all received BFD Control packets that are demultiplexed to the session MUST be discarded if the received TTL or Hop Limit is not equal to 255; SHOULD use group address VRRP ('224.0.0.18' for IPv4 and 'FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:12' for IPv6) as destination IP address MAY use network broadcast address for IPv4 or link-local all nodes multicast group for IPv6 as destination IP address; MUST set destination UDP port value to 3784 when transmitting BFD control packets, as defined in [RFC8562]; MUST use the Active IP address as the source IP address. 4. IANA Considerations This document makes no requests for IANA allocations. This section may be deleted by RFC Editor. 5. Security Considerations This document defines an alternative way, to the one defined in [RFC5798], to accelerate detecting a failure that affects VRRP functionality using p2mp BFD. The operation of either protocol is not changed. Security considerations discussed in [RFC5798], [RFC5880], [RFC5881], and [RFC8562], apply to this document. 6. Acknowledgements 7. Normative References Mirsky, et al. Expires 22 September 2022 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Applicability of BFD P2MP in VRRP March 2022 [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC5798] Nadas, S., Ed., "Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6", RFC 5798, DOI 10.17487/RFC5798, March 2010, . [RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010, . [RFC5881] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for IPv4 and IPv6 (Single Hop)", RFC 5881, DOI 10.17487/RFC5881, June 2010, . [RFC5883] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multihop Paths", RFC 5883, DOI 10.17487/RFC5883, June 2010, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8562] Katz, D., Ward, D., Pallagatti, S., Ed., and G. Mirsky, Ed., "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multipoint Networks", RFC 8562, DOI 10.17487/RFC8562, April 2019, . Authors' Addresses Greg Mirsky Ericsson Email: gregimirsky@gmail.com Jeff Tantsura Microsoft Email: jefftant.ietf@gmail.com Gyan Mishra Verizon Inc. Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com Mirsky, et al. Expires 22 September 2022 [Page 6]