Network Working Group J. Gould Internet-Draft M. Pozun Intended status: Standards Track VeriSign, Inc. Expires: June 8, 2020 December 6, 2019 Login Security Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) draft-ietf-regext-login-security-07 Abstract The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) includes a client authentication scheme that is based on a user identifier and password. The structure of the password field is defined by an XML Schema data type that specifies minimum and maximum password length values, but there are no other provisions for password management other than changing the password. This document describes an EPP extension that allows longer passwords to be created and adds additional security features to the EPP login command and response. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on June 8, 2020. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 1] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Migrating to Newer Versions of This Extension . . . . . . . . 3 3. Object Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1. Event . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.2. "[LOGIN-SECURITY]" Password . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3. Dates and Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. EPP Command Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.1. Login Security Extension Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 6.1. XML Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 6.2. EPP Extension Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 7. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 7.1. Verisign EPP SDK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 10.3. URIs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Appendix A. Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 A.1. Change from 00 to 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 A.2. Change from 01 to 02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 A.3. Change from 02 to 03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 A.4. Change from 03 to REGEXT 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.5. Change from REGEXT 00 to REGEXT 01 . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.6. Change from REGEXT 01 to REGEXT 02 . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.7. Change from REGEXT 02 to REGEXT 03 . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A.8. Change from REGEXT 03 to REGEXT 04 . . . . . . . . . . . 22 A.9. Change from REGEXT 04 to REGEXT 05 . . . . . . . . . . . 22 A.10. Change from REGEXT 05 to REGEXT 06 . . . . . . . . . . . 23 A.11. Change from REGEXT 06 to REGEXT 07 . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 1. Introduction This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) extension for enhancing the security of the EPP login command in EPP [RFC5730]. The enhancements include supporting longer passwords (or passphrases) than the 16-character maximum and providing a list of Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 2] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 security events in the login response. The password (current and new) in EPP [RFC5730] can be overridden by the password included in the extension to extend past the 16-character maximum. The security events supported include: password expiry, client certificate expiry, insecure cipher, insecure TLS protocol, new pasword complexity, login security statistical warning, and a custom event. The attributes supported by the security events include identifying the event type or sub-type, indicating the security level of warning or error, a future or past-due expiration date, the value that resulted in the event, the duration of the statistical event, and a free-form description with an optional language. 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. XML is case sensitive. Unless stated otherwise, XML specifications and examples provided in this document MUST be interpreted in the character case presented in order to develop a conforming implementation. In examples, "C:" represents lines sent by a protocol client and "S:" represents lines returned by a protocol server. Indentation and white space in examples are provided only to illustrate element relationships and are not a required feature of this protocol. "loginSec-1.0" is used as an abbreviation for "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-1.0". The XML namespace prefix "loginSec" is used, but implementations MUST NOT depend on it and instead employ a proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to interpret and output the XML documents. 2. Migrating to Newer Versions of This Extension Servers which implement this extension SHOULD provide a way for clients to progressively update their implementations when a new version of the extension is deployed. Servers SHOULD (for a temporary migration period up to server policy) provide support for older versions of the extension in parallel to the newest version, and allow clients to select their preferred version via the element of the command. Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 3] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 If a client requests multiple versions of the extension at login, then, when preparing responses to commands which do not include extension elements, the server SHOULD only include extension elements in the namespace of the newest version of the extension requested by the client. When preparing responses to commands which do include extension elements, the server SHOULD only include extension elements for the extension versions present in the command. 3. Object Attributes This extension adds additional elements to [RFC5730] login command and response. Only those new elements are described here. 3.1. Event A security event, using the element, represents either a warning or error identified by the server after the client has connected and submitted the login command. There MAY be multiple events returned that provide information for the client to address. The MAY include a free-form description. All of the security events use a consistent set of attributes, where the exact set of applicable attributes is based on the event type. The supported set of element attributes include: "type": A REQUIRED attribute that defines the type of security event. The enumerated list of "type" values includes: "password": Identifies a password expiry event, where the password expires in the future or has expired based on the "exDate" date and time. "certificate": Identifies a client certificate expiry event, where the client certificate will expire at the "exDate" date and time. "cipher": Identifies the use of an insecure or deprecated TLS cipher suite. "tlsProtocol": Identifies the use of an insecure or deprecated TLS protocol. "newPW": The new password does not meet the server password complexity requirements. "stat": Provides a login security statistical warning that MUST set the "name" attribute to the name of the statistic sub- type. "custom": Custom event type that MUST set the "name" attribute with the custom event type name. Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 4] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 "name": Used to define a sub-type when the "type" attribute is not "custom" or the full type name when the "type" attribute is "custom". The "name" attribute MUST be set when the "type" attribute is "stat" or "custom". "level": Defines the level of the event as either "warning" for a warning event that needs action, or "error" for an error event that requires immediate action. "exDate": Contains the date and time that a "warning" level has or will become an "error" level. At expiry there MAY be an error to connect or MAY be an error to login. An example is an expired certificate that will result in an error to connect or an expired password that may result in a failed login. "value": Identifies the value that resulted in the login security event. An example is the negotiated insecure cipher suite or the negotiated insecure TLS protocol. "duration": Defines the duration that a statistical event is associated with, ending when the login command was received. The format of the duration is defined by the duration primitive datatype in [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028]. "lang": Identifies the negotiated language of the free-form description. The default is "en" (English). Example login security event for password expiration, where the current date is 2018-03-25: Password expiration soon Example login security event for identifying 100 failed logins over the last day, using the "stat" sub-type of "failedLogins": Excessive invalid daily logins Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 5] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 3.2. "[LOGIN-SECURITY]" Password The element MUST override the [RFC5730] element only if the contains the predefined value of "[LOGIN-SECURITY]", which is a constant value for the server to use the element for the password. Similarly, the element MUST override the [RFC5730] element only if the contains the predefined value of "[LOGIN-SECURITY]", which is a constant value for the server to use the element for the new password. The "[LOGIN-SECURITY]" pre-defined string MUST be supported by the server for the client to explicitly indicate to the server whether to use element in place of the [RFC5730] element or to use the in place of the [RFC5730] element. The server MUST NOT allow the client to set the password to the value "[LOGIN-SECURITY]". 3.3. Dates and Times Date and time attribute values MUST be represented in Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) using the Gregorian calendar. The extended date-time form using upper case "T" and "Z" characters defined in [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] MUST be used to represent date-time values, as XML Schema does not support truncated date-time forms or lower case "T" and "Z" characters. 4. EPP Command Mapping A detailed description of the EPP syntax and semantics can be found in the EPP core protocol specification [RFC5730]. 4.1. EPP Command This extension defines additional elements to extend the EPP command and response to be used in conjunction with [RFC5730]. The EPP command is used to establish a session with an EPP server. This extension overrides the password that is passed with the [RFC5730] or the element as defined in Section 3.2. A element is sent along with the [RFC5730] command and MUST contain at least one of the following child elements: : OPTIONAL client user agent that identifies the client application software, technology, and operating system used by the server to identify functional or security constraints, current security issues, and potential future functional or security issues for the client. The Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 6] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 element MUST contain at least one of the following child elements: : OPTIONAL name of the client application software with version if available, such as the name of the client SDK "EPP SDK 1.0.0". : OPTIONAL technology used for the client software with version if available, such as "Java 11.0.2". : OPTIONAL client operating system used with version if available, such as "x86_64 Mac OS X 10.11.6". : OPTIONAL plain text password that is case sensitive, has a minimum length of 6 characters, and has a maximum length that is up to server policy. All leading and trailing whitespace is removed, and all internal contiguous whitespace that includes #x9 (tab), #xA (linefeed), #xD (carriage return), and #x20 (space) is replaced with a single #x20 (space). This element MUST only be used if the [RFC5730] element is set to the "[LOGIN-SECURITY]" value. : OPTIONAL plain text new password that is case sensitive, has a minimum length of 6 characters, and has a maximum length that is up to server policy. All leading and trailing whitespace is removed, and all internal contiguous whitespace that includes #x9 (tab), #xA (linefeed), #xD (carriage return), and #x20 (space) is replaced with a single #x20 (space). This element MUST only be used if the [RFC5730] element is set to the "[LOGIN-SECURITY]" value. It is recommended that the plain text password in the and elements use printable ASCII characters #x20 (space) - #x7E (~), with high entropy, such as 128 bits. If non- ASCII characters are supported with the plain text password, then use a standard for passwords with international characters, such as the OpaqueString PRECIS profile in [RFC8265]. Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 7] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 Example login command that uses the element instead of the [RFC5730] element to establish the session and includes the element: C: C: C: C: C: ClientX C: [LOGIN-SECURITY] C: C: 1.0 C: en C: C: C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:obj1 C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:obj2 C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:obj3 C: C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-1.0 C: C: C: C: C: C: C: EPP SDK 1.0.0 C: Java 11.0.2 C: x86_64 Mac OS X 10.11.6 C: C: this is a long password C: C: C: ABC-12345 C: C: Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 8] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 Example login command that uses the element instead of the [RFC5730] element to establish the session, and uses the element instead of the [RFC5730] element to set the new password: C: C: C: C: C: ClientX C: [LOGIN-SECURITY] C: [LOGIN-SECURITY] C: C: 1.0 C: en C: C: C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:obj1 C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:obj2 C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:obj3 C: C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-1.0 C: C: C: C: C: C: this is a long password C: C: new password that is still long C: C: C: C: ABC-12345 C: C: Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 9] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 Example login command that uses the [RFC5730] element to establish the session, and uses the element instead of the [RFC5730] element to set the new password: C: C: C: C: C: ClientX C: shortpassword C: [LOGIN-SECURITY] C: C: 1.0 C: en C: C: C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:obj1 C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:obj2 C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:obj3 C: C: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-1.0 C: C: C: C: C: C: new password that is still long C: C: C: C: ABC-12345 C: C: Upon a completed login command (success or failed), the extension MUST be included in the response based on both of the following conditions: Client supports extension: The client supports the extension based on the element of the command. At least one login security event: The server has identified at least one login security event to communicate to the client. The extension to the EPP response uses the element that contains the following child elements: Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 10] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 : One or more elements defined in Section 3.1. Example EPP response to a successful login command on 2018-03-25, where the password will expire in a week: S: S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully S: S: S: S: S: Password expiring in a week S: S: S: S: S: ABC-12345 S: 54321-XYZ S: S: S: Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 11] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 Example EPP response to a failed login command where the password has expired and the new password does not meet the server complexity requirements: S: S: S: S: S: Authentication error S: S: S: S: S: Password has expired S: S: S: New password does not meet complexity requirements S: S: S: S: S: ABC-12345 S: 54321-XYZ S: S: S: Example EPP response to a successful login command where there is a set of login security events: S: S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully S: S: S: S: S: Password expiration soon S: S: S: S: Non-PFS Cipher negotiated S: S: S: Insecure TLS protocol negotiated S: S: S: Excessive invalid daily logins S: S: S: A custom login security event occured S: S: S: S: S: ABC-12345 S: 54321-XYZ S: S: S: Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 13] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 5. Formal Syntax One schema is presented here that is the EPP Login Security Extension schema. The formal syntax presented here is a complete schema representation of the object mapping suitable for automated validation of EPP XML instances. The BEGIN and END tags are not part of the schema; they are used to note the beginning and ending of the schema for URI registration purposes. 5.1. Login Security Extension Schema BEGIN Extensible Provisioning Protocol v1.0 Login Security Extension Schema. Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 14] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 15] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 END 6. IANA Considerations 6.1. XML Namespace This document uses URNs to describe XML namespaces and XML schemas conforming to a registry mechanism described in [RFC3688]. The following URI assignment is requested of IANA: Registration request for the loginSec namespace: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-1.0 Registrant Contact: IESG XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification. Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 16] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 Registration request for the loginSec XML schema: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:loginSec-1.0 Registrant Contact: IESG XML: See the "Formal Syntax" section of this document. 6.2. EPP Extension Registry The EPP extension described in this document should be registered by the IANA in the EPP Extension Registry described in [RFC7451]. The details of the registration are as follows: Name of Extension: "Login Security Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" Document status: Standards Track Reference: (insert reference to RFC version of this document) Registrant Name and Email Address: IESG, TLDs: Any IPR Disclosure: None Status: Active Notes: None 7. Implementation Status Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section and the reference to RFC 7942 [RFC7942] before publication. This section records the status of known implementations of the protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in RFC 7942 [RFC7942]. The description of implementations in this section is intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors. This is not intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their features. Readers are advised to note that other implementations may exist. Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 17] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 According to RFC 7942 [RFC7942], "this will allow reviewers and working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as they see fit". 7.1. Verisign EPP SDK Organization: Verisign Inc. Name: Verisign EPP SDK Description: The Verisign EPP SDK includes both a full client implementation and a full server stub implementation of draft-ietf- regext-login-security. Level of maturity: Development Coverage: All aspects of the protocol are implemented. Licensing: GNU Lesser General Public License Contact: jgould@verisign.com URL: https://www.verisign.com/en_US/channel-resources/domain- registry-products/epp-sdks 8. Security Considerations The extension leaves the password ( element) and new password ( element) minimum length beyond 6 characters and the maximum length up to sever policy. The server SHOULD enforce minimum and maximum length requirements that are appropriate for their operating environment. One example of a guideline for password length policies can be found in section 5 of NIST Special Publication 800-63B [1]. The client SHOULD NOT decrease the security of a new password by decreasing the length of the current password. For example, a client with a 20 character password set using the extension, should not use the login command in [RFC5730] without using the extension, to set a new password that is less than or equal to 16 characters. The extension provides an extensible list of login security events to inform clients of connection and login warnings and errors. Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 18] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 9. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the following persons for their feedback and suggestions: o Martin Casanova o Scott Hollenbeck o Barry Leiba o Patrick Mevzek o Joseph Yee 10. References 10.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC5730] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", STD 69, RFC 5730, DOI 10.17487/RFC5730, August 2009, . [RFC7942] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section", BCP 205, RFC 7942, DOI 10.17487/RFC7942, July 2016, . [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] Biron, P. and A. Malhotra, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004, . 10.2. Informative References [RFC7451] Hollenbeck, S., "Extension Registry for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol", RFC 7451, DOI 10.17487/RFC7451, February 2015, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 19] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 [RFC8265] Saint-Andre, P. and A. Melnikov, "Preparation, Enforcement, and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Representing Usernames and Passwords", RFC 8265, DOI 10.17487/RFC8265, October 2017, . 10.3. URIs [1] https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/sp800-63b.html Appendix A. Change History [[RFC Editor: Please remove this section.]] A.1. Change from 00 to 01 1. Based on the feedback from Patrick Mevzek and a proposal from Scott Hollenbeck, changed the minimum length of the password from 8 to 6, revised the description of the password, and added text in the Security Considerations section for the server password length policy. A.2. Change from 01 to 02 1. Changed the XML namespace from urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:loginSec- 0.3 to urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-0.3, and changed the XML schema registration from urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:loginSec-0.3 to urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:loginSec-0.3 based on a request from IANA with draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token. A.3. Change from 02 to 03 1. Updates based on the review by Patrick Mevzek, that include: 1. Fix the inconsistent case for newPW, that required a global change in the draft text and an update to the XML schema to "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:loginSec-0.3". 2. Changed "contains the following child elements" to "MUST contain at least one of the following child elements", section "EPP Command" to ensure that an empty element is not passed. 3. Add "The client SHOULD NOT decrease the security of a new password by decreasing the length of the current password." along with an example to the "Security Considerations" section. Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 20] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 A.4. Change from 03 to REGEXT 00 1. Changed to regext working group draft by changing draft-gould- regext-login-security to draft-ietf-regext-login-security. A.5. Change from REGEXT 00 to REGEXT 01 1. Changed the element to be structured with the , , and sub- elements. This was based on the feedback from Martin Casanova. This resulted in the need to change the XML namespace from urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-0.3 to urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-0.4. A.6. Change from REGEXT 01 to REGEXT 02 1. Updated the Implementation Status section from "TBD" to include the Verisign EPP SDK implementation. A.7. Change from REGEXT 02 to REGEXT 03 1. Revised the description of the "duration" attribute to clarify that it ends when the login command was received and to clarify the format, based on the feedback from Martin Casanova. 2. Revised the sentence 'Upon a completed login command (success or failed), the extension MUST be included in the response based on the following conditions:' to 'Upon a completed login command (success or failed), the extension MUST be included in the response based on both of the following conditions:' based on the feedback from Patrick Mevzek. 3. Updates based on the review by Joseph Yee, that include: 1. Revised the description of the "name" attribute read 'Used to define a sub-type when the "type" attribute is not "custom" or the full type name when the "type" attribute is "custom"'. The definition of the "stat" type was updated to 'Provides a login security statistical warning that MUST set the "name" attribute to the name of the statistic.' 2. Added the following sentence 'The server MUST NOT allow the client to set the password to the value "[LOGIN-SECURITY]".' to address the corner case where the constant is used as the password. 3. Revised the description of the element to read 'The element MUST contain at least one of the following child elements:'. 4. Revised the description of the to match the child elements that can be passed, by changing "client software" Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 21] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 to "client application software" and change "language" to "technology". 5. Changed the XML namespace from urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-0.4 to urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:loginSec-1.0. A.8. Change from REGEXT 03 to REGEXT 04 Updates based on the review by Joseph Yee, that include: 1. Update the definition of the "stat" security event type to reference sub-type to match the language for the "name" attribute. 2. Added the sentence 'The "name" attribute MUST be set when the "type" attribute is "stat" or "custom".' to the definition of the "name" attribute for clarity. 3. Update the definition of the "userAgentType" in the XML schema to require at least one sub-element using a element. A.9. Change from REGEXT 04 to REGEXT 05 Updates based on the review by Barry Leiba, that include: 1. In section 1.1, updated to use BCP 14 boilerplate and references as defined in RFC 8174. 2. In section 1.1, change "REQUIRED" to "required". 3. Keep the "Migration to Newer Versions of This Extension" section by removing the note for removal to the RFC Editor. 4. In section 3.1, change "MAY be multiple events returned that provides information" to "MAY be multiple events returned that provide information". 5. In section 3.1, change "free form" to "free-form". 6. In section 3.1, change "The enumerated list of "type" values include:" to "The enumerated list of "type" values includes:". 7. In section 3.1, change "Identifies the language of the free-form description if the negotiated language is something other than the default value of "en" (English)." to "Identifies the negotiated language of the free-form description. The default is "en" (English). 8. In section 3.1, change example description from "Example login security event for a password expiring in a week:" to "Example login security event for password expiration, where the current date is 2018-03-25:". 9. In section 4.1, change "Example EPP response to a successful login command where the password will expire in a week:" to "Example EPP response to a successful login command on 2018-03-25, where the password will expire in a week:". Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 22] Internet-Draft loginSec December 2019 A.10. Change from REGEXT 05 to REGEXT 06 Updates based on the review by Brian Carpenter, that include: 1. In section 1, change the references to RFC 5730 to use links. 2. In section 2, change "(for a temporary migration period)" to "(for a temporary migration period up to server policy)". A.11. Change from REGEXT 06 to REGEXT 07 1. Based on feedback from Barry Leiba, added recommendations on the characters used for the plain text password. Recommended the use of printable ASCII passwords and if non-ASCII characters are supported, to use a standard for passwords with international characters, such as the OpaqueString PRECIS profile in [RFC8265]. 2. Based on the feedback from Carlos Pignataro, added "[[RFC Editor: Please remove this section.]]" to the "Change History" section. Authors' Addresses James Gould VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 US Email: jgould@verisign.com URI: http://www.verisign.com Matthew Pozun VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 US Email: mpozun@verisign.com URI: http://www.verisign.com Gould & Pozun Expires June 8, 2020 [Page 23]