Netmod B. Lengyel
Internet-Draft Ericsson
Intended status: Standards Track B. Claise
Expires: August 17, 2020 Cisco Systems, Inc.
February 14, 2020

YANG Instance Data File Format
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-07

Abstract

There is a need to document data defined in YANG models when a live server is not available. Data is often needed already at design or implementation time or needed by groups that do not have a live running server available. This document specifies a standard file format for YANG instance data, which follows the syntax and semantics of existing YANG models, and annotates it with metadata.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on August 17, 2020.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.


Table of Contents

1. Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 RFC 2119 RFC 8174 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

Instance Data: A collection of instantiated data nodes.

Instance Data Set: A named set of data items annotated with metadata that can be used as instance data in a YANG data tree.

Instance Data File: A file containing an instance data set formatted according to the rules described in this document.

Content-schema: A set of YANG modules with their revision, supported features, and deviations for which the instance data set contains instance data.

Content defining YANG module: an individual YANG module that is part of the content-schema.

The term Server is used as defined in [RFC8342].

2. Introduction

There is a need to document data defined in YANG models when a live server is not available. Data is often needed already at design or implementation time or needed by groups that do not have a live running server available. To facilitate this offline delivery of data, this document specifies a standard format for YANG instance data sets and YANG instance data files.

The following is a list of already implemented and potential use cases.

UC1
Documentation of server capabilities
UC2
Preloading default configuration data
UC3
Documenting Factory Default Settings
UC4
Storing the configuration of a device, e.g., for backup, archive or audit purposes
UC5
Storing diagnostics data
UC6
Allowing YANG instance data to potentially be carried within other IPC message formats
UC7
Default instance data used as part of a templating solution
UC8
Providing data examples in RFCs or internet drafts

In Appendix C we describe the first three use cases in detail.

There are many and varied use cases where YANG instance data could be used. We do not want to limit future uses of instance data sets, so specifying how and when to use YANG instance data is out of scope for this document. It is anticipated that other documents will define specific use cases. Use cases are listed here only to indicate the need for this work.

2.1. Principles

The following is a list of the basic principles of the instance data format:

P1
Two standard formats shall be defined based on the XML and JSON encodings.
P2
Instance data shall reuse existing encoding rules for YANG defined data. Its format will be similar to the response of a NETCONF <get> operation or the RESTCONF response to a GET method invocation on the (unified) datastore resource.
P3
Metadata about the instance data set (Section 3, Paragraph 9) shall be defined.
P4
A YANG instance data set shall be allowed to contain data for multiple YANG modules.
P5
Instance data shall be allowed to contain configuration data, state data, or a mix of the two.
P6
Partial data sets shall be allowed.
P7
The YANG instance data format shall be usable for any data for which YANG module(s) are defined and available to the reader, independent of whether the module is actually implemented by a server.

2.2. Delivery of Instance Data

Instance data sets that are produced as a result of some sort of specification or design effort may be available without the need for a live server e.g., via download from the vendor's website, or in any other way that product documentation is distributed.

Other instance data sets may be read from or produced by the YANG server itself e.g., UC5 documenting diagnostic data.

2.3. Data Life cycle

YANG instance data is always a snapshot of information at a specific point of time. If the data changes afterwards, this is not represented in the instance data set anymore. The current values may be retrieved at run-time via NETCONF/RESTCONF or received e.g., in YANG-Push notifications.

Whether the instance data changes and if so, when and how, should be described either in the instance data set's description statement or in some other implementation specific manner.

3. Instance Data File Format

A YANG instance data file MUST contain a single instance data set and no additional data.

The format of the instance data set is defined by the ietf-yang-instance-data YANG module. It is made up of a header part and content-data. The header part carries metadata for the instance data set. The content-data, defined as an anydata data node, carries the instance data that we want to document/provide. The syntax and semantics of content-data is defined by the content-schema.

Two formats are specified based on the XML and JSON YANG encodings. Later as other YANG encodings (e.g., CBOR) are defined, further instance data formats may be specified.

The content-data part MUST conform to the content-schema, while allowing for the exceptions listed below. The content-data part SHALL follow the encoding rules defined in [RFC7950] for XML and [RFC7951] for JSON and MUST use UTF-8 character encoding. Content-data MAY include:

An instance data set MAY contain data for any number of YANG modules; if needed it MAY carry the complete configuration and state data set for a server. Default values SHOULD NOT be included.

Config=true and config=false data MAY be mixed in the instance data file.

Instance data files MAY contain partial data sets. This means mandatory, min-elements, require-instance=true, must and when constrains MAY be violated.

The name of the instance data file SHOULD take one of the following two forms:

The revision date or timestamp is optional. ".filetype" SHALL be ".json" or ".xml" according to the format used.

Metadata, information about the data set itself SHOULD be included in the instance data set. Some metadata items are defined in the YANG module ietf-yang-instance-data, but other items MAY also be used. Metadata MUST include:

Metadata SHOULD include:

3.1. Specifying the Content Schema

To properly understand and use an instance data set, the user needs to know the content-schema. One of the following methods SHOULD be used:

Additional methods e.g., a YANG-package based solution may be added later.

Note, the specified content-schema only indicates the set of modules that were used to define this YANG instance data set. Sometimes instance data may be used for a server supporting a different YANG module set. (e.g., for "UC2 Preloading Data" the instance data set may not be updated every time the YANG modules on the server are updated) Whether an instance data set originally defined using a specific content-schema is usable with a different other schema depends on many factors including the amount of differences and the compatibility between the original and the other schema, considering modules, revisions, features, deviations, the scope of the instance data, etc.

3.1.1. Inline Method

One or more inline-module elements define YANG module(s) used to specify the content defining YANG modules. Section 3.2.

The anydata inline-schema carries instance data (conforming to the inline-modules) that actually specifies the content defining YANG modules including revision, supported features, deviations and any relevant additional data (e.g., revision labels). See

3.1.2. Simplified-Inline Method

The instance data set contains a list of content defining YANG modules including the revision date for each. Usage of this method implies that the modules are used without any deviations and with all features supported.

3.1.3. URI Method

The same-schema-as-file leaf SHALL contain a URI that references another YANG instance data file. The current instance data file will use the same content schema as the referenced file.

The referenced instance data file MAY have no content-data if it is used solely for specifying the content-schema.

If a referenced instance data file is not available, content-schema is unknown.

The URI method is advantageous when the user wants to avoid the overhead of specifying the content-schema in each instance data file: E.g., In Use Case 6, when the system creates a diagnostic file every minute to document the state of the server.

3.2. Examples

The following example is based on "UC1, Documenting Server Capabilities". It provides (a shortened) list of supported YANG modules and NETCONF capabilities for a server. It uses the inline method to specify the content-schema.

 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<instance-data-set xmlns=
    "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-instance-data">
  <name>acme-router-modules</name>
  <yid-version>1</yid-version>
  <content-schema>
    <inline-module>
      ietf-yang-library@2016-06-21
    </inline-module>
    <inline-schema>
      <modules-state 
        xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-library">
        <module>
          <name>ietf-yang-library</name>
          <revision>2016-06-21</revision>
        </module>
        <module>
          <name>ietf-netconf-monitoring</name>
          <revision>2010-10-04</revision>
        </module>
      </modules-state>
    </inline-schema>
  <content-schema>
  <revision>
    <date>1956-10-23</date>
    <description>Initial version</description>
  </revision>
  <description>Defines the minimal set of modules that any acme-router
      will contain.</description>
  <contact>info@acme.com</contact>
  <content-data>
    <!-- The example lists only 4 modules, but it could list the 
      full set of supported modules for a server, potentially many 
      dozens of modules --> 
    <modules-state 
        xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-library">
      <module>
        <name>ietf-yang-library</name>
        <revision>2016-06-21</revision>
        <namespace>
          urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-library
        </namespace>
        <conformance-type>implement</conformance-type>
      </module>
      <module>
        <name>ietf-system</name>
        <revision>2014-08-06</revision>
        <namespace>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-system</namespace>
        <feature>sys:authentication</feature>
        <feature>sys:local-users</feature>
        <deviation>
          <name>acme-system-ext</name>
          <revision>2018-08-06</revision>
        </deviation>
        <conformance-type>implement</conformance-type>
      </module>
      <module>
        <name>ietf-yang-types</name>
        <revision>2013-07-15</revision>
        <namespace>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-types
          </namespace>
        <conformance-type>import</conformance-type>
      </module>
      <module>
        <name>acme-system-ext</name>
        <revision>2018-08-06</revision>
        <namespace>urn:rdns:acme.com:oammodel:acme-system-ext
          </namespace>
        <conformance-type>implement</conformance-type>
      </module>
    </modules-state>
    <netconf-state 
        xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-monitoring">
      <capabilities>
        <capability>
          urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:validate:1.1
        </capability>
      </capabilities>
    </netconf-state>
  </content-data>
</instance-data-set>
          

Figure 1: XML Instance Data Set - Use case 1, Documenting server capabilities

The following example is based on "UC2, Preloading Default Configuration". It provides a (shortened) default rule set for a read-only operator role. It uses the inline method for specifying the content-schema.

 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<instance-data-set xmlns=
    "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-instance-data">
  <name>read-only-acm-rules</name>
  <yid-version>1</yid-version>
  <content-schema>
    <inline-module>ietf-yang-library@2019-01-04</inline-module>
    <inline-schema>
      <yang-library 
          xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-library">
        <module-set>
          <name>all</name>
          <module>
            <name>ietf-netconf-acm</name>
            <revision>2012-02-22</revision>
          </module>
        </module-set>
      </yang-library>
    </inline-schema>
  </content-schema>
  <revision>
    <date>1776-07-04</date>
    <description>Initial version</description>
  </revision>
  <description>Access control rules for a read-only role.</description>
  <content-data>
    <nacm xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-acm">
      <enable-nacm>true</enable-nacm>
      <read-default>deny</read-default>
      <exec-default>deny</exec-default>
      <rule-list>
        <name>read-only-role</name>
        <group>read-only-group</group>
        <rule>
          <name>read-all</name>
          <module-name>*</module-name>
          <access-operation>read</access-operation>
          <action>permit</action>
        </rule>
      </rule-list>
    </nacm>
  </content-data>
</instance-data-set>
          

Figure 2: XML Instance Data Set - Use case 2, Preloading access control data

The following example is based on UC5 Storing diagnostics data. An instance data set is produced by the server every 15 minutes that contains statistics about NETCONF. As a new set is produced periodically many times a day a revision-date would be useless; instead a timestamp is included.

 
{
  "ietf-yang-instance-data:instance-data-set": {
    "name": "acme-router-netconf-diagnostics", 
    "yid-version": "1",
    "content-schema": {
      "same-schema-as-file": "file:///acme-diagnostics-schema.json",
    },
    "timestamp": "2018-01-25T17:00:38Z",
    "description":  
      "NETCONF statistics", 
    "content-data": {
      "ietf-netconf-monitoring:netconf-state": {
        "statistics": {
          "netconf-start-time ": "2018-12-05T17:45:00Z",
          "in-bad-hellos ": "32",
          "in-sessions ": "397",
          "dropped-sessions ": "87",
          "in-rpcs ": "8711",
          "in-bad-rpcs ": "408",
          "out-rpc-errors ": "408",
          "out-notifications": "39007"
        }
      } 
    }   
  }  
}
        

Figure 3: JSON Instance Data File example - UC5 Storing diagnostics data

4. Backwards Compatibility

The concept of backwards compatibility and what changes are backwards compatible are not defined for instance data sets as it is highly dependent on the specific use case and the content-schema.

For instance data that is the result of a design or specification activity, some changes that may be good to avoid are listed. YANG uses the concept of managed entities identified by key values; if the connection between the represented entity and the key value is not preserved during an update, this may lead to problems.

5. YANG Instance Data Model

5.1. Tree Diagram

The following tree diagram [RFC8340] provides an overview of the data model.

module: ietf-yang-instance-data
  structure instance-data-set:
     +--rw name?                         string
     +--rw yid-version                   uint8
     +--rw content-schema
     |  +--rw (content-schema-spec)?
     |     +--:(simplified-inline)
     |     |  +--rw module*                 string
     |     +--:(inline)         {inline-content-schema}?
     |     |  +--rw inline-module*           string
     |     |  +--rw inline-schema            <anydata>
     |     +--:(uri)
     |        +--rw same-schema-as-file?     inet:uri
     +--rw description?          string
     +--rw contact?              string
     +--rw organization?         string
     +--rw datastore?            ds:datastore-ref
     +--rw revision* [date]
     |  +--rw date               string
     |  +--rw description?       string
     +--rw timestamp?            yang:date-and-time
     +--rw content-data?         <anydata>

5.2. YANG Model

<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-yang-instance-data@2019-11-17.yang"                
module ietf-yang-instance-data {
  yang-version 1.1;
  namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-instance-data";
  prefix yid;

  import ietf-yang-structure-ext {
    prefix sx;
  }
  import ietf-datastores {
    prefix ds;
  }
  import ietf-inet-types {
    prefix inet;
  }
  import ietf-yang-types {
    prefix yang;
  }

  organization
    "IETF NETMOD Working Group";
  contact
    "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netmodf/>
     WG List:  <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>

     Author:  Balazs Lengyel
        <mailto:balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>";
  description
    "The module defines the structure and content of YANG
     instance data sets.

     The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL',
     'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED',
     'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document
     are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119)
     (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
     capitals, as shown here.

     Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
     authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

     Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
     without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
     to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
     set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
     Relating to IETF Documents
     (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

     This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
     the RFC itself for full legal notices.";

  revision 2019-11-17 {
    description
      "Initial revision.";
    reference
      "RFC XXXX: YANG Instance Data Format";
  }

  feature inline-content-schema {
    description
      "This feature indicates that inline content-schema  
          option is supported.";
  }
  
  sx:structure "instance-data-set" {
    description
      "A data structure to define a format for
       YANG instance data sets. Consists of meta-data about
       the instance data set and the real content-data.";
    leaf name {
      type string;
      description
        "Name of the YANG instance data set.";
    }
    leaf yid-version {
      type uint8;
      mandatory true;
      description
        "Version number of the 'YANG Instance Data format'.
         It MUST contain the value '1' for instance data
         based on this specification.";
    }
    container content-schema {
      description
        "The content schema used to create the instance data set";
      choice content-schema-spec {
        description
          "Specification of the content-schema";
        case simplified-inline {
          leaf-list module {
            type string ;
            description
              "The list of content defining YANG modules. 
               The value SHALL start with the module name. 
               If the module contains a revision statement the  
               revision date SHALL be included in the leaf-list 
               entry. 
               If other methods (e.g., revision-label) are 
               defined to identify individual module revisions 
               those MAY be used instead of using a revision date.
               
               E.g., ietf-yang-library@2016-06-21
               
               Usage of this leaf-list implies the modules are
               used without any deviations and with all features
               supported. Multiple revisions of the same module 
               MUST NOT be specified.";
          }
        }
        case inline {
          if-feature inline-content-schema;
          leaf-list inline-module {
            type string ;
            min-elements 1;
            ordered-by user;
            description
              "Indicates that content defining YANG modules
               are specified inline.
               The value SHALL start with the module name. 
               If the module contains a revision statement the  
               revision date SHALL be included in the leaf-list 
               entry. 
               If other methods (e.g., revision-label) are 
               defined to identify individual module revisions 
               those MAY be used instead of using a revision date.
  
               E.g., ietf-yang-library@2016-06-21
  
               The first item is either ietf-yang-library or some other
               YANG module that contains a list of YANG modules with
               their name, revision-date, supported-features, and
               deviations.
               As some versions of ietf-yang-library MAY contain
               different module-sets for different datastores, if
               multiple module-sets are included, the instance data 
               set's meta-data MUST contain the datastore information 
               and instance data for the ietf-yang-library MUST also 
               contain information specifying the module-set for the 
               relevant datastore.
  
               Subsequent items MAY specify YANG modules augmenting the
               first module with useful data (e.g., revision label).";
          }
          anydata inline-schema {
            mandatory true;
            description
              "Instance data corresponding to the YANG modules
               specified in the inline-module nodes defining the set
               of content defining YANG modules for this
               instance-data-set.";
          }
        }
        case uri {
          leaf same-schema-as-file {
            type inet:uri;
            description
              "A reference to another YANG instance data file.
               This instance data file uses the same
               content schema as the referenced file.";
          }
        }
      }
    }
    leaf-list description {
      type string;
      description
        "Description of the instance data set.";
    }
    leaf contact {
      type string;
      description
        "Contact information for the person or
         organization to whom queries concerning this
         instance data set should be sent.";
    }
    leaf organization {
      type string;
      description
        "Organization responsible for the instance
         data set.";
    }
    leaf datastore {
      type ds:datastore-ref;
      description
        "The identity of the datastore with which the
         instance data set is associated, e.g., the datastore from
         where the data was read or the datastore into which the data
         may be loaded or the datastore which is being documented.
         If a single specific datastore cannot be specified, the
         leaf MUST be absent.

         If this leaf is absent, then the datastore to which the
         instance data belongs is undefined.";
    }
    list revision {
      key "date";
      description
        "Instance data sets that are produced as
         a result of some sort of specification or design effort
         SHOULD have at least one revision entry.  For every
         published editorial change, a new one SHOULD be added
         in front of the revisions sequence so that all
         revisions are in reverse chronological order.

         For instance data sets that are read from
         or produced by a server or otherwise
         subject to frequent updates or changes, revision
         SHOULD NOT be present";
      leaf date {
        type string {
          pattern '\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}';
        }
        description
          "Specifies the date the instance data set
           was last modified. Formatted as YYYY-MM-DD";
      }
      leaf description {
        type string;
        description
          "Description of this revision of the instance data set.";
      }
    }
    leaf timestamp {
      type yang:date-and-time;
      description
        "The date and time when the instance data set
         was last modified.

         For instance data sets that are read from or produced
         by a server or otherwise subject to frequent
         updates or changes, timestamp SHOULD be present";
    }
    anydata content-data {
      description
        "Contains the real instance data.
         The data MUST conform to the relevant YANG Modules specified
         either in the content-schema-spec or in some other
         implementation specific manner.";
    }
  }
}
<CODE ENDS>
               

6. Security Considerations

The YANG module defined in this document is designed as a wrapper specifying a format and a metadata header for YANG instance data defined by the content-schema. The data is designed to be accessed as a stored file or over any file access method or protocol.

The document does not specify any method to influence the behavior of a server.

Instance data files may contain sensitive data.

The header part is not security sensitive.

The security sensitivity of the instance data in the content part is completely dependent on the content schema. Depending on the nature of the instance data, instance data files MAY need to be handled in a secure way. The same kind of handling should be applied, that would be needed for the result of a read operation returning the same data.

Instance data files should be protected against modification or unauthorized access using normal file handling mechanisms. Care should be taken, when copying the original files or providing file access for additional users, not to reveal information unintentionally.

7. IANA Considerations

This document registers one URI and one YANG module.

7.1. URI Registration

This document registers one URI in the IETF XML registry. Following the format in RFC 3688, the following registration is requested to be made:

URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-instance-data
        

Registrant Contact: The IESG.

XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.

7.2. YANG Module Name Registration

This document registers one YANG module in the YANG Module Names registry [RFC6020].

name: ietf-yang-instance-data
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-instance-data
prefix: yid
reference: RFC XXXX
        

8. Acknowledgments

For their valuable comments, discussions, and feedback, we wish to acknowledge Andy Bierman, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Rob Wilton, Joe Clarke, Kent Watsen Martin Bjorklund, Ladislav Lhotka, Qin Wu and other members of the Netmod WG.

9. References

9.1. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M. and K. Watsen, "YANG Data Structure Extensions", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-05, December 2019.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010.
[RFC6243] Bierman, A. and B. Lengyel, "With-defaults Capability for NETCONF", RFC 6243, DOI 10.17487/RFC6243, June 2011.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016.
[RFC7951] Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG", RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, August 2016.
[RFC7952] Lhotka, L., "Defining and Using Metadata with YANG", RFC 7952, DOI 10.17487/RFC7952, August 2016.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M. and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K. and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018.
[RFC8526] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K. and R. Wilton, "NETCONF Extensions to Support the Network Management Datastore Architecture", RFC 8526, DOI 10.17487/RFC8526, March 2019.
[RFC8527] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K. and R. Wilton, "RESTCONF Extensions to Support the Network Management Datastore Architecture", RFC 8527, DOI 10.17487/RFC8527, March 2019.

9.2. Informative References

[I-D.ietf-netmod-factory-default] WU, Q., Lengyel, B. and Y. Niu, "Factory Default Setting", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-11, February 2020.
[I-D.verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning] Claise, B., Clarke, J., Rahman, R., Wilton, R., Lengyel, B., Sterne, J. and K. D'Souza, "Updated YANG Module Revision Handling", Internet-Draft draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01, October 2019.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017.
[RFC8525] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Watsen, K. and R. Wilton, "YANG Library", RFC 8525, DOI 10.17487/RFC8525, March 2019.
[RFC8632] Vallin, S. and M. Bjorklund, "A YANG Data Model for Alarm Management", RFC 8632, DOI 10.17487/RFC8632, September 2019.
[RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641, September 2019.

Appendix A. Open Issues

Appendix B. Changes between revisions

v06 - v07

v05 - v06

v04 - v05

v03 - v04

v02 - v03

v01 - v02

v00 - v01

Appendix C. Detailed Use Cases - Non-Normative

C.1. Use Cases

We present a number of use cases were YANG instance data is needed.

C.1.1. Use Case 1: Early Documentation of Server Capabilities

A server has a number of server-capabilities that are defined in YANG modules and can be retrieved from the server using protocols like NETCONF or RESTCONF. Server capabilities include:

While it is good practice to allow a client to query these capabilities from the live server, that is often not possible.

Often when a network node is released, an associated NMS (network management system) is also released with it. The NMS depends on the capabilities of the server. During NMS implementation, information about server capabilities is needed. If the information is not available early in some offline document, but only as instance data from the live network node, the NMS implementation will be delayed, because it has to wait until the network node is ready. Also assuming that all NMS implementors will have a correctly configured network nodes from which data can be retrieved, is a very expensive proposition. (An NMS may handle dozens of node types.)

Network operators often build their own home-grown NMS systems that need to be integrated with a vendor's network node. The operator needs to know the network node's server capabilities in order to do this. Moreover, the network operator's decision to buy a vendor's product may even be influenced by the network node's OAM feature set documented as the server's capabilities.

Beside NMS implementors, system integrators and many others also need the same information early. Examples could be model driven testing, generating documentation, etc.

Most server-capabilities are relatively stable and change only during upgrade or due to licensing or the addition or removal of hardware. They are usually defined by a vendor at design time, before the product is released. It is feasible and advantageous to define/document them early e.g., in a YANG instance data File.

It is anticipated that a separate IETF document will define in detail how and which set of server capabilities should be documented.

C.1.2. Use Case 2: Preloading Data

There are parts of the configuration that must be fully configurable by the operator. However, often a simple default configuration will be sufficient.

One example is access control groups/roles and related rules. While a sophisticated operator may define dozens of different groups, often a basic (read-only operator, read-write system administrator, security-administrator) triplet will be enough. Vendors will often provide such default configuration data to make device configuration easier for an operator.

Defining access control data is a complex task. To help, the device vendor predefines a set of default groups (/nacm:nacm/groups) and rules for these groups to access specific parts of common models (/nacm:nacm/rule-list/rule).

YANG instance data files are used to document and/or preload the default configuration.

C.1.3. Use Case 3: Documenting Factory Default Settings

Nearly every server has a factory default configuration. If the system is really badly misconfigured or if the current configuration is to be abandoned, the system can be reset the default factory configuration.

In NETCONF, the <delete-config> operation can already be used to reset the startup datastore. There are ongoing efforts to introduce a new, more generic factory-reset operation for the same purpose [I-D.ietf-netmod-factory-default]

The operator currently has no way to know what the default configuration actually contains. YANG instance data can also be used to document the factory default configuration.

Authors' Addresses

Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Magyar Tudosok korutja 11 1117 Budapest, Hungary Phone: +36-70-330-7909 EMail: balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com
Benoit Claise Cisco Systems, Inc. De Kleetlaan 6a b1 1831 Diegem, Belgium Phone: +32 2 704 5622 EMail: bclaise@cisco.com