NETMOD Working Group Q. Wu Internet-Draft B. Claise Updates: 8407 (if approved) Huawei Intended status: Standards Track P. Liu Expires: 14 August 2022 Z. Du China Mobile M. Boucadair Orange 10 February 2022 Self-Describing Data Object Tags draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-05 Abstract This document defines a method to tag data objects associated with operation and management data in YANG modules. The expectation is for this YANG data object tagging method to be used to classify data objects from different YANG modules and identify their characteristics data. Tags may be registered as well as assigned during the module definition, assigned by implementations, or dynamically defined and set by users. This document also provides guidance to future model writers; as such, this document updates RFC 8407. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 14 August 2022. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. Requirements Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2. Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Self-Describing Data Object Tags: Massive Data Object Collection Use Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Data Object Tag Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.1. IETF Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.2. Vendor Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.3. User Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.4. Reserved Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5. Data Object Tag Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.1. Module Design Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.2. Implementation Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5.3. User Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6. Data Object Tags Module Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6.1. Data Object Tags Module Tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8. Guidelines to Model Writers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 8.1. Define Standard Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 9.1. YANG Data Object Tag Prefixes Registry . . . . . . . . . 14 9.2. IETF YANG Data Object Tags Registry . . . . . . . . . . . 14 9.3. Updates to the IETF XML Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 9.4. Updates to the YANG Module Names Registry . . . . . . . . 17 10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 12. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 13. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 13.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 13.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Appendix A. NETCONF Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Appendix B. Non-NMDA State Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Appendix C. Targeted data object collection example . . . . . . 25 Appendix D. Changes between Revisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 1. Introduction As described in [RFC8819], the use of tags for classification and organization is fairly ubiquitous not only within IETF protocols, but in the Internet itself (e.g., "#hashtags"). As a reminder, a module tag defined in [RFC8819] is a string associated with a module name at the module level. Many data models have been specified by various SDOs and the Open Source community and it is likely that many more will be specified. These models cover many of the networking protocols and techniques. However, data objects defined by these technology-specific data models might represent a portion of fault, configuration, accounting, performance, and security (FCAPS) management information at different locations and categorised in various different ways. Further, there is no consistent classification criteria or representation for a specific service, feature, or data source. This document defines self-describing data object tags and associates them with data objects within a YANG module, which: * Provide dictionary meaning for specific targeted data objects. * Indicate a relationship between data objects within the same YANG module or from different YANG modules. * Identify key performance metric data objects and the absolute XPath expression identifying the element path to the node. The self-describing data object tags can be used by the NETCONF/ RESTCONF client to classify data objects from different YANG modules and identify characteristic data. In addition, they can provide input, instructions, indications to selection filters and filter queries of configuration or operational state on a server based on these data object tags, e.g., return specific objects containing operational state related to system-management. NETCONF clients can discover data objects with self-describing data object tags supported by a NETCONF server by means of the operation. The self-describing data object tag capability can also be advertised using the capability notification model [I-D.netconf-notification- capabilities] by the NETCONF server or some websites where offline documents are kept. Similar to YANG module tags defined [RFC8819], these data object tags may be registered or assigned during the module definition, assigned by implementations, or dynamically defined and set by users. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 This document defines a YANG module [RFC7950] which augments the module tag model [RFC8819] and provides a list of data object entries to allow for adding or removing of self-describing tags as well as viewing the set of self-describing tags associated with specific data objects within YANG modules. This document defines three extension statements to be used to indicate self-describing tags that should be added by the module implementation automatically (i.e., outside of configuration). This document also defines an IANA registry for tag prefixes as well as a set of globally assigned tags (Section 9). Section 8 provides guidelines for authors of YANG data models. This document updates [RFC8407]. The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture defined in [RFC8342]. The meaning of the symbols can be found in [RFC8340]. 2. Terminology 2.1. Requirements Notation The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 2.2. Glossary OPM Object, Property, Metric FCAPS Fault, Capability, Accouting, Performance and Security 3. Self-Describing Data Object Tags: Massive Data Object Collection Use Case Among data object tags, the 'opm' (object, property, metric) tags can be used to tackle massive data object collections, indicate relationships between data objects, and capture YANG data objects associated with performance metrics data modelled with YANG (as shown in Figure 1). Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 /----\ /Object\ | Tag | \- +-/ | +---------V--------+ contain | YANG Data Node <----------------+ | /Data Object 1 | | +--^-------------^-+ | |contain |contain | | | | +-----------+---+ +- -----+-------+ +-----+---------+ | YANG Data Node| | YANG Data Node| | YANG Data Node| |/Sub Object 2 | | /Sub Object 3 | | /Sub Object 4 | +-^-------------+ +^------^-------+ +^------^-----^-+ | | | | | | | | /-+-\ | /-+-\ | /-+--\ | /Metric \ | /Metric \ | Property | | Tag | | | Tag | | \ Tag / | \- -/ | \- -/ | \----/ | | | | | | | | | /----\ | | /Metric\ /-+--\ /-----\ | Type | /Metric\ // Multi\\ \ Tag / | Type | | Source | \- --/ \ Tag / \\ Tag // \- --/ \-----/ Figure 1: The Relation between Object, Property, and Metric In Figure 1, data objects can contain other data objects called subobjects. Both object and subobjects can be modeled as YANG data nodes [RFC7950]. Data objects that contain other data objects can be one of type 'container', 'leaf-list', and 'list' and are tagged with the object tag. A subobject tagged with the property tag is a 'leaf' node. Subobjects tagged with the metric tag can be one of 'container', 'leaf-list', 'list', or 'leaf' data node. A data object may contain one single object tag, or one single property tag, or one single metric tag. The data object tagged with the metric tag also can have one or multiple Metric Type tags and/or one single multi-source tag. The use of 'opm' tags is meant to help filter discrete categories of YANG data objects scattered across the same or different YANG modules supported by a device and capture all network performance data or all Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 property data in a single view of the data. In Figure 2, the 'tunnel-svc' data object is a container node defined in the 'tunnel- pm' module and can be seen as the root object for property tagged subobjects (e.g., 'tunnel-svc'/'create-time') and metric tagged subobjects (e.g., 'tunnel-svc'/'avg-latency'). The 'name', 'create- time', and 'modified-time' are property tagged subobjects under 'tunnel-svc' container. The 'avg-latency' and 'packet-loss' metrics are tagged subobjects under 'tunnel-svc' container node. Consider the 'tunnel-svc' data object and the tunnel-svc/name data object as an example: the 'tunnel-svc' data object has one single object tag (i.e., 'ietf:object') while the tunnel-svc/name data object has one single property subobject tag (i.e., 'ietf:property'). In addition, not all metric subobjects need to be tagged, e.g., specific categories, such as loss-related metric subobjects, need to be tagged with a metric-type tag which can further reduce amount data to be fetched. +------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------+ | Data | Object Property Metric | Multi- | | Object | Tag Tag Tag |Source Tag | +------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------+ | | ietf: | | |tunnel-svc | object | | | | ietf: | | |tunnel-svc/name | property | | | | ietf: | | |tunnel-svc/create-time | property | | | | ietf: | | |tunnel-svc/modified-time| property | | | | | | |tunnel-svc/avg-latency | ietf: | non-agg | | | metric | | |tunnel-svc/packet-loss | ietf: | non-agg | | | metric | | |tunnel-svc/min-latency | ietf: | non-agg | | | metric | | |tunnel-svc/max-latency | ietf: | non-agg | | | metric | | +------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------+ Figure 2: Example of OPM Tags Used in the YANG Module If data objects in YANG modules are suitably tagged and learnt by the client from a live server, the client can retrieve paths to all targeted data objects and then use an XPath query defined [RFC8639][RFC8641] to list all tagged data objects which reflect network characteristics. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 4. Data Object Tag Values All data object tags SHOULD begin with a prefix indicating who owns their definition. An IANA registry (Section 9.1) is used to support registering data object tag prefixes. Currently, three prefixes are defined. No further structure is imposed by this document on the value following the registered prefix, and the value can contain any YANG type 'string' characters except carriage returns, newlines, tabs and spaces. Again, except for the conflict-avoiding prefix, this document is purposefully not specifying any structure on (i.e., restricting) the tag values. The intent is to avoid arbitrarily restricting the values that designers, implementers, and users can use. As a result of this choice, designers, implementers, and users are free to add or not add any structure they may require to their own tag values. 4.1. IETF Tags An IETF tag is a data object tag that has the prefix "ietf:". All IETF data object tags are registered with IANA in a registry defined Section 9.2 later in this document (Section 9.2). 4.2. Vendor Tags A vendor tag is a tag that has the prefix "vendor:". These tags are defined by the vendor that implements the module, and are not registered. However, it is RECOMMENDED that the vendor includes extra identification in the tag to avoid collisions such as using the enterprise or organization name following the "vendor:" prefix (e.g., vendor:example.com:vendor-defined-classifier). 4.3. User Tags A user tag is any tag that has the prefix "user:". For the avoidance of confusion, the colon (":") when it appears for the first time, is always assumed to be the separator between a prefix and the rest of the tag. And so, when a user tag does not have a prefix, it MUST NOT contain a colon. These tags are defined by the user/administrator and are not meant to be registered. Users are not required to use the "user:" prefix; however, doing so is RECOMMENDED as it helps avoid collisions. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 4.4. Reserved Tags Any tag not starting with the prefix "ietf:", "vendor:" or "user:" (Section 9.1 ) is reserved for future use. These tag values are not invalid, but simply reserved in the context of specifications (e.g., RFCs). 5. Data Object Tag Management Tags may be associated with a data object within a YANG module in a number of ways. Typically, tags may be defined and associated at the module design time, at implementation time without the need of a live server, or via user administrative control. As the main consumers of data object tags are users, users may also remove any tag from a live server, no matter how the tag became associated with a data object within a YANG module. 5.1. Module Design Tagging A data object definition MAY indicate a set of data object tags to be added by a module's implementer. These design time tags are indicated using a set of extension statements which include: opm-tag extension statement: Classifies management and operation data into object, property subobject, and metric subobject categories. Both object and subobjects can be modeled as YANG data nodes [RFC7950]. Data objects that contain other data objects can be one of type 'container', 'leaf-list', and 'list' and are tagged with object tag. A subobject tagged with the property tag is a 'leaf' node. Subobjects tagged with the metric tag can be one of 'container', 'leaf-list', 'list', or 'leaf' data node. A data object contains one single object tag, one single property tag, or one single metric tag. A data object tagged with metric tag also can have one or multiple Metric type tag and/or one single multi-source tag. See the examples depicted in Figure 2 and Figure 4. metric-type extension statement: Provides metric data objects classifications (e.g., loss, jitter, delay, counter, gauge, summary, unknown) within the YANG module. multi-source-tag extension statement: Identifies multi-source aggregation type (e.g., aggregated, non-aggregated) related to a metric subobject. The 'aggregated' multi-source aggregation type allows a large number of measurements on metric subobjects from different sources of the same type (e.g., line card, each subinterface of aggregated Ethernet interface) to be combined into aggregated statistics and report as one metric subobject. The Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 'non-aggregated' multi-source aggregation type allows measurement from each source of the same type (e.g., line card, each subinterface of aggregated Ethernet interface) to be reported separately. Among these extension statements, the metric-type and multi-source tag extension statements are context information that can be used to correlate data objects from the different modules. If the data node is defined in an IETF standards track document, the data object tags MUST be IETF Tags (Section 4.1). Thus, new data object can drive the addition of new IETF tags to the IANA registry defined in Section 9.2, and the IANA registry can serve as a check against duplication. 5.2. Implementation Tagging An implementation MAY include additional tags associated with data object within a YANG module. These tags SHOULD be IETF Tags (i.e., registered) or vendor tags. 5.3. User Tagging Data object tags of any kind, with or without a prefix, can be assigned and removed by the user from a live server using normal configuration mechanisms. In order to remove a data object tag from the operational datastore, the user adds a matching "masked-tag" entry for a given data object within the 'ietf-data-object-tags' module. 6. Data Object Tags Module Structure 6.1. Data Object Tags Module Tree The tree associated with the "ietf-data-object-tags" module is as follows: module: ietf-data-object-tags augment /tags:module-tags/tags:module: +--rw data-object-tags +--rw data-object* [name] +--rw name nacm:node-instance-identifier +--rw tag* tags:tag +--rw masked-tag* tags:tag Figure 3: YANG Module Tags Tree Diagram Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 7. YANG Module This module imports types from [RFC8819],[RFC8341]. file "ietf-data-object-tags@2022-02-04.yang" module ietf-data-object-tags { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-data-object-tags"; prefix ntags; import ietf-netconf-acm { prefix nacm; reference "RFC 8341: Network Configuration Access Control Model"; } import ietf-module-tags { prefix tags; reference "RFC 8819: YANG Module Tags "; } organization "IETF NetMod Working Group (NetMod)"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editor: Qin Wu Editor: Benoit Claise Editor: Peng Liu Editor: Zongpeng Du Editor: Mohamed Boucadair"; description "This module describes a mechanism associating self-describing tags with YANG data object within YANG modules. Tags may be IANA assigned or privately defined. Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2022-02-04 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: Self-Describing Data Object Tags"; } extension opm-tag { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'. This extension statement is used by module authors to indicate the opm tags that should be added automatically by the system. 'opm-tag' is used to classify operation and management data objects into the three categories, object, property, and metric. Data Object can contain other data objects called subobjects. Both object and subobjects can be modeled as data nodes. The Data Object tagged with object tag can be one of container, leaf-list and list. The Data Object tagged with the Property tag is a leaf node. The Data Object tagged with the Metric tag can be one of container, leaf-list, list, leaf. The Data objects tagged with either property tag or metric tag are subobjects belonging to a specific root data object. Each Data Object may contain one single object tag, or one single property tag, or one single metric tag (these tags are mutually exclusive). As such, the origin of the value for the pre-defined tags should be set to 'system'."; } extension metric-type { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'. The metric type can be used to provide metric data object classification (e.g., loss, jitter, packet loss,counter, gauge, summary, unknown) within the YANG module."; } extension multi-source-tag { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'. The multi-source-tag can be used to identify multi-source aggregation type(e.g.,aggregated, non-aggregated) related to a metric subobject. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 The 'aggregated' multi-source aggregation type allows a large number of measurements on metric subobjects from different sources of the same type (e.g., line card, each subinterface of aggregated Ethernet interface) to be combined into aggregated statistics and reported as one metric subobject value. The 'non-aggregated' multi-source aggregation type allows measurement from each source of the same type (e.g., line card, each subinterface of aggregated Ethernet interface) to be reported separately."; } augment "/tags:module-tags/tags:module" { description "Augment the Module Tags module with data object tag attributes"; container data-object-tags { description "Contains the list of data objects and their associated data object tags"; list data-object { key "name"; description "A list of data objects and their associated data object tags"; leaf name { type nacm:node-instance-identifier; mandatory true; description "The YANG data object name."; } leaf-list tag { type tags:tag; description "Tags associated with the data object within the YANG module. See the IANA 'YANG Data Object Tag Prefixes' registry for reserved prefixes and the IANA 'IETF YANG Data Object Tags' registry for IETF tags. The 'operational' state view of this list is constructed using the following steps: 1) System tags (i.e., tags of 'system' origin) are added. 2) User configured tags (i.e., tags of 'intended' origin) are added. 3) Any tag that is equal to a masked-tag is removed."; } leaf-list masked-tag { type tags:tag; description "The list of tags that should not be associated with the data object within the YANG module. The user can remove (mask) Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 tags from the operational state datastore by adding them to this list. It is not an error to add tags to this list that are not associated with the data object within YANG module, but they have no operational effect."; } } } } } 8. Guidelines to Model Writers This section updates [RFC8407]. 8.1. Define Standard Tags A module MAY indicate, using data object tag extension statements, a set of data object tags that are to be automatically associated with data object within the module (i.e., not added through configuration). module example-module-A { //... import ietf-data-node-tags { prefix ntags; } container top { ntags:opm-tag "ietf:object"; list X { leaf foo { ntags:opm-tag "ietf:property"; } leaf bar { ntags:opm-tag "ietf:metric"; } } } // ... } Figure 4: Data object tag example The module writer can use existing standard data object tags, or use new data object tags defined in the data object definition, as appropriate. For IETF standardized modules, new data object tags MUST be assigned in the IANA registry defined in Section Section 9.2. 9. IANA Considerations Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 9.1. YANG Data Object Tag Prefixes Registry This document requests IANA to create "YANG Data Object Tag Prefixes" subregistry in "YANG Data Object Tag" registry. This registry allocates tag prefixes. All YANG Data Object Tags should begin with one of the prefixes in this registry. Prefix entries in this registry should be short strings consisting of lowercase ASCII alpha-numeric characters and a final ":" character. The allocation policy for this registry is Specification Required [RFC8126]. The Reference and Assignee values should be sufficient to identify and contact the organization that has been allocated the prefix. There is no specific guidance for the Designated Expert and there is a presumption that a code point should be granted unless there is a compelling reason to the contrary. The initial values for this registry are as follows: +----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+ | Prefix | Description | Reference | Assignee | +----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+ | ietf: | IETF Tags allocated in the IANA | [This | IETF | | | IETF YANG Data Object Tags | document] | | | | registry | | | | | | | | | vendor: | Non-registered tags allocated by | [This | IETF | | | the module's implementer. | document] | | | | | | | | user: | Non-registered tags allocated by | [This | IETF | | | and for the user. | document] | | +----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+ Figure 5: Table 1 Other standards organizations (SDOs) wishing to allocate their own set of tags should request the allocation of a prefix from this registry. 9.2. IETF YANG Data Object Tags Registry This document requests IANA to create "IETF OPM Tags","IETF Metric Type Tags","IETF Multiple Source Tags" three subregistries in "YANG Data Object Tag" registry. These 3 subregistries appear below "YANG Data Object Tag Prefixes" registry. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 Three subregistries allocate tags that have the registered prefix "ietf:". New values should be well considered and not achievable through a combination of already existing IETF tags. The allocation policy for these three subregistries is IETF Review [RFC8126]. The Designated Expert is expected to verify that IANA assigned tags conform to Net-Unicode as defined in [RFC5198], and shall not need normalization. The initial values for these three subregistries are as follows: +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | OPM Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | | | | | ietf:object |Represents Root object | [This | | |containing other data |document] | | |objects (e.g., interfaces)| | | | | | | ietf:property |Represents a property | [This | | |data object(e.g., ifindex)| document] | | |associated with a specific| | | |root object (e.g., | | | |interfaces) | | | | | | | ietf:metric |Represent metric data | [This | | |object(e.g., ifstatistics)| document] | | |associated with specific | | | |root object(e.g., | | | |interfaces) | | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Metric Type Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | ietf:delay |Represents the delay metric | | |group to which the metric | [This | | |data objects belong to. | document] | | | | | | ietf:jitter |Represents the jitter metric [This | | |group to which the metric |document] | | |data objects belong to. | | | | | | | ietf:loss |Represents the loss metric| [This | | |group to which the metric | document] | | |data objects belong to. | | | | | | | ietf:counter |Represents any metric value | | |associated with a metric | | Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 | |data object that monotonically[This | | |increases over time, | document] | | |starting from zero. | | | | | | | ietf:gauge |Represents current | | | |measurements associated | [This | | |with a metric data object |document] | | |that may increase, | | | |decrease or stay constant.| | | | | | | ietf:summary |Represents the metric value [This | | |associated with a metric | document | | |data object that measures | | | |distributions of discrete | | | |events without knowing | | | |predefined range. | | | | | | | ietf:unknown |Represents the metric value [This | | |associated with metric | document | | |data object that can not | | | |determine the type of metric. | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | Multiple Source Tag | Description | Reference | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ |ietf:agg |Relates to multiple sources [This | | |aggregation type (i.e., | document] | | |aggregated statistics) | | | | | | |ietf:non-agg |Relates to multiple sources [This | | |aggregation type (i.e., | document] | | |non-aggregated statistics)| | +----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ Figure 6: Table 2 9.3. Updates to the IETF XML Registry This document requests IANA to register a new URI in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]. Following the format in [RFC3688], the following registration has been requested: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-data-object-tags Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 9.4. Updates to the YANG Module Names Registry This document requests IANA to register one YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC6020]. Following the format in [RFC6020], the following registration has been requested: name: ietf-data-object-tags namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-data-object-tags prefix: ntags reference: RFC XXXX maintained by IANA: N 10. Security Considerations The YANG module specified in this document defines schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446]. The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content, e.g., the presence of tags may reveal information about the way in which data objects are used and therefore providing access to private information or revealing an attack vector should be restricted. Note that appropriate privilege and security levels need to be applied to the addition and removal of user tags to ensure that a user receives the correct data. This document adds the ability to associate data object tag meta-data with data object within the YANG modules. This document does not define any actions based on these associations, and none are yet defined, and therefore it does not by itself introduce any new security considerations. Users of the data object tag meta-data may define various actions to be taken based on the data object tag meta-data. These actions and their definitions are outside the scope of this document. Users will need to consider the security implications of any actions they choose to define, including the potential for a tag to get 'masked' by another user. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 11. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Ran Tao for his major contributions to the initial modeling and use cases. The authors would also like to acknowledge the comments and suggestions received from Juergen Schoenwaelder, Andy Bierman, Lou Berger,Jaehoon Paul Jeong, Wei Wang, Yuan Zhang, Ander Liu, YingZhen Qu, Boyuan Yan, Adrian Farrel,Mahesh Jethanandani. 12. Contributors Liang Geng China Mobile 32 Xuanwumen West St, Xicheng District Beijing 10053 Email: gengliang@chinamobile.com 13. References 13.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, . [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, . [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, . [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, . Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, . [RFC8407] Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", BCP 216, RFC 8407, DOI 10.17487/RFC8407, October 2018, . [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, . [RFC8819] Hopps, C., Berger, L., and D. Bogdanovic, "YANG Module Tags", RFC 8819, DOI 10.17487/RFC8819, January 2021, . 13.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities] Lengyel, B., Clemm, A., and B. Claise, "YANG Modules describing Capabilities for Systems and Datastore Update Notifications", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft- ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities-21, 15 October 2021, . [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format] Lengyel, B. and B. Claise, "YANG Instance Data File Format", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- netmod-yang-instance-file-format-21, 8 October 2021, . [RFC5198] Klensin, J. and M. Padlipsky, "Unicode Format for Network Interchange", RFC 5198, DOI 10.17487/RFC5198, March 2008, . [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, . [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, . [RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, . [RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications", RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019, . [RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641, September 2019, . Appendix A. NETCONF Example The following is a NETCONF example result from a query of the data object tags list. For the sake of brevity only a few module and associated data object results are provided. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 ietf-interfaces /if:interfaces/if:interface ietf:object /if:interfaces/if:interface/if:last-change ietf:property /if:interfaces/if:interface/if:statistics/if:in-errors ietf:metric ietf:loss ietf:non-agg ietf-ip /if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4 ietf:object /if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:enable\ ietf:property /if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:mtu ietf:metric ietf:non-agg Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 Figure 7: Example NETCONF Query Output Appendix B. Non-NMDA State Module As per [RFC8407], the following is a non-NMDA module to support viewing the operational state for non-NMDA compliant servers. file "ietf-data-object-tags-state@2022-02-03.yang" module ietf-data-object-tags-state { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-data-object-tags-state"; prefix ntags-s; import ietf-netconf-acm { prefix nacm; reference "RFC 8341: Network Configuration Access Control Model"; } import ietf-module-tags { prefix tags; reference "RFC 8819: YANG Module Tags "; } organization "IETF NetMod Working Group (NetMod)"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editor: Qin Wu Editor: Benoit Claise Editor: Peng Liu Editor: Zongpeng Du Editor: Mohamed Boucadair"; description "This module describes a mechanism associating self-describing tags with YANG data object within YANG modules. Tags may be IANA assigned or privately defined. Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX (https://datatracker.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2022-02-04 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: Self-Describing Data Object Tags"; } extension opm-tag { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'. This extension statement is used by module authors to indicate the opm tags that should be added automatically by the system. 'opm-tag' is used to classify operation and management data objects into the three categories, object, property, and metric. Data Object can contain other data objects called subobjects. Both object and subobjects can be modeled as data nodes. The Data Object tagged with object tag can be one of container, leaf-list and list. The Data Object tagged with the Property tag is a leaf node. The Data Object tagged with the Metric tag can be one of type container, leaf-list, list, leaf. The Data objects tagged with either property tag or metric tag are subobjects belonging to a specific root data object. Each Data Object may contain one single object tag, or one single property tag, or one single metric tag (these tags are mutually exclusive). As such, the origin of the value for the pre-defined tags should be set to 'system'."; } extension metric-type { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The metric-type can be used to provide metric subobject classification (e.g., loss, jitter, packet loss, guage, counter, histogram, unknow, etc.) within the YANG module."; } extension multi-source-tag { argument tag; description "The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'.The multi-source tag can be used to identify multi-source aggregation type(e.g., aggregated, non-aggregated) related to a metric subobject. The 'aggregated' multi-source aggregation type allows a large Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 number of measurements on metric subobjects from different sources of the same type (e.g., line card, each subinterface of aggregated Ethernet interface) to be combined into aggregated statistics and reported as one metric subobject value. The 'non-aggregated'multi-source aggregation type allows measurement from each source of the same type (e.g., line card, each subinterface of aggregated Ethernet interface) to be reported separately."; } augment "/tags:module-tags/tags:module" { description "Augment the Module Tags module with data object tag attributes."; container data-object-tags { config false; status deprecated; description "Contains the list of data objects and their associated self describing tags."; list data-object { key "name"; status deprecated; description "A list of data objects and their associated self describing tags."; leaf name { type nacm:node-instance-identifier; mandatory true; status deprecated; description "The YANG data object name."; } leaf-list tag { type tags:tag; status deprecated; description "Tags associated with the data object within the YANG module. See the IANA 'YANG Data Object Tag Prefixes' registry for reserved prefixes and the IANA 'IETF YANG Data Object Tags'registry for IETF tags. The 'operational' state view of this list is constructed using the following steps: 1) System tags (i.e., tags of 'system' origin) are added. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 2) User configured tags (i.e., tags of 'intended' origin)are added. 3) Any tag that is equal to a masked-tag is removed."; } leaf-list masked-tag { type tags:tag; status deprecated; description "The list of tags that should not be associated with the data object within the YANG module. The user can remove (mask) tags from the operational state datastore by adding them to this list. It is not an error to add tags to this list that are not associated with the data object within YANG module, but they have no operational effect."; } } } } } Appendix C. Targeted data object collection example The following provides targeted data object collection example which helps reduce amount of data to be fetched. The subscription "id" values of 22 used below is just an example. In production, the actual values of "id" might not be small integers. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 +-----------+ +-----------+ | Subscriber| | Publisher | +------+----+ +-----+-----+ | | | | |Telemery data Tagging Advertisement | (data object name, opm-tag = metric) |<---------------------------------| | | | establish-subscription | |--------------------------------->| | | | | | RPC Reply: OK, id = 22 | |<---------------------------------| | | | | | Notification Message (for 22) | | <--------------------------------| | | | | The publisher advertises telemetry data object capability to the subscriber to instruct the receiver to subscribe tagged data object (e.g., performance metric data object) using standard subscribed notification mechanism [RFC8639]. The corresponding telemetry data object capability model is created based on ietf-data-object-tags module defined in this document. The following XML example [W3C.REC-xml-20081126] illustrates the advertisment of the list of available target objects using YANG instance file format [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format]: Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 acme-router-notification-capabilities ietf-system-capabilities@2020-03-23 ietf-notification-capabilities@2020-03-23 ietf-data-export-capabilities@2020-03-23 Defines the notification capabilities of an acme-router.The router only has running, and operational datastores. Every change can be reported on-change from running, but only config=true nodes and some config=false data from operational. Statistics are not reported based on timer based trigger and counter threshold based trigger. ds:operational \ /if:interfaces/if:interface/if:statistics/if:in-errors\ metric loss With telemetry data tagging information carried in the telemetry data tagging Advertisement, the subscriber identifies targeted data object and associated data path to the datastore node and sends a standard establish-subscription RPC [RFC8639] to subscribe tagged data objects that are interests to the client application from the publisher. Alternatively, the subscriber can query data object tag list from somewhere (e.g., the network device, or offline document) using ietf- data-object-tags module defined in this document and fetch tagged Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 data objects and associated data path to the datastore node and sends a standard establish-subscription RPC [RFC8639] to subscribe tagged data objects that are interests to the client application from the publisher. ds:operational /if:interfaces/if:interface/if:statistics/if:in-errors 500 The publisher returns specific object type of operational state (e.g., in-errors statistics data) subscribed by the client. Appendix D. Changes between Revisions Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) v04 - v05 * Add user tag formating clarification; * Provide guidance to the Designated Expert for evaluation of YANG Data Object Tag registry and YANG Data Object Tag prefix registry. * Update the figure 1 and figure 2 with additional tags. * Security section enhancement for user tag managment. * Change data object name into name in the module. * Other Editorial changes to address Adrian's comments and comments during YANG docotor review. Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 * Open issue: Are there any risks associated with an attacker adding or removing tags so that a requester gets the wrong data? v03 - v04 * Remove histogram metric type tag from metric type tags. * Clarify the object tag and property tag,metric tag are mutual exlusive. * Clarify to have two optional node tags (i.e.,object tag and property tag) to indicate relationship between data objects. * Update targeted data object collection example. v02 - v03 * Additional Editorial changes. * Security section enhancement. * Nits fixed. v01 - v02 * Clarify the relation between data object, object tag, property tag and metric tag in figure 1 and figure 2 and related description; * Change Metric Group into Metric Type in the YANG model; * Add 5 metric types in section 7.2; v00 - v01 * Merge self-describing data object tag use case section into introduction section as a subsection; * Add one glossary section; * Clarify the relation between data object, object tag, property tag and metric tag in Self-Describing Data Object Tags Use Case section; * Add update to RFC8407 in the front page. Authors' Addresses Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Data Object Tags February 2022 Qin Wu Huawei 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing Jiangsu, 210012 China Email: bill.wu@huawei.com Benoit Claise Huawei De Kleetlaan 6a b1 1831 Diegem Belgium Email: benoit.claise@huawei.com Peng Liu China Mobile 32 Xuanwumen West St, Xicheng District Beijing Email: liupengyjy@chinamobile.com Zongpeng Du China Mobile 32 Xuanwumen West St, Xicheng District Beijing Email: duzongpeng@chinamobile.com Mohamed Boucadair Orange Rennes 35000 France Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Wu, et al. Expires 14 August 2022 [Page 30]