Network Working Group J. Scudder Internet-Draft Juniper Networks Updates: 5492 (if approved) May 8, 2020 Intended status: Standards Track Expires: November 9, 2020 Revision to Capability Codes Registration Procedures draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-09 Abstract This document updates RFC 5492 by making a change to the registration procedures for BGP Capability Codes. Specifically, the range formerly designated "Reserved for Private Use" is divided into three new ranges, respectively designated as "First Come First Served", "Experimental Use" and "Reserved". Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on November 9, 2020. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of Scudder Expires November 9, 2020 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Capability Codes Registration Procedures May 2020 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1. Introduction The Border Gateway Protocol uses a mechanism called "Capability Advertisement" [RFC5492] to enable BGP peers to tell one another about their optional protocol extensions. These so-called "Capabilities" are signaled using code points called "Capability Codes". [RFC5492] designates the range of Capability Codes 128-255 as "Reserved for Private Use". Subsequent experience has shown this to be not only useless, but actively confusing to implementors. Accordingly, this document revises the registration procedures for the range 128-255, as follows, using the terminology defined in [RFC8126]: o 128-238: First Come First Served o 239-254: Experimental Use o 255: Reserved The procedures for the ranges 1-63 and 64-127 are unchanged, remaining "IETF Review" and "First Come First Served" respectively. 2. Discussion The reason for providing an Experimental Use range is to preserve a range for use during early development. Although there are few practical differences between Experimental and Private Use, the change both makes it clear that code points from this space should not be used long-term or in shipping products, and reduces the consumption of the scarce Capability Code space expended for this purpose. Once classified as Experimental, it should be considered Scudder Expires November 9, 2020 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Capability Codes Registration Procedures May 2020 difficult to reclassify the space for some other purpose in the future. The reason for reserving the maximum value is that it may be useful in the future if extension of the number space is needed. Since the range 128-255 was formerly designated Private Use, implementors may have chosen to use code points within that range prior to publication of this document. For this reason, a survey was conducted beginning August 14, 2015 (version 01 of the individual draft) to find any such uses. A number were contributed and were used to seed Table 2. Of course there can be no guarantee that all uses were discovered, however the likelihood seems high that remaining uses, if any, genuinely do fall under the intended use of "Private Use" and are restricted to some special deployment, and are not in wide use. Furthermore, any remaining uses would be no worse than any other code point collision, such as occasionally occurs with code point "squatting", and could be dealt with in the same manner. 3. IANA Considerations IANA is requested to revise the "Capability Codes" registry in the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Parameters" group as follows. Reference: [RFC5492] and this document. Registration procedures: +---------+-------------------------+ | Range | Registration Procedures | +---------+-------------------------+ | 1-63 | IETF Review | | 64-238 | First Come First Served | | 239-254 | Experimental | +---------+-------------------------+ Table 1 IANA is requested to perform the following new allocations within the "Capability Codes" registry: Scudder Expires November 9, 2020 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Capability Codes Registration Procedures May 2020 +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+------------+ | Value | Description | Reference | Change | | | | | Controller | +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+------------+ | 128 | Prestandard Route Refresh | (this | IETF | | | (deprecated) | document) | | +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+------------+ | 129 | Prestandard Outbound Route | (this | IETF | | | Filtering (deprecated), | document) | | | | prestandard Routing Policy | | | | | Distribution (deprecated) | | | +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+------------+ | 130 | Prestandard Outbound Route | (this | IETF | | | Filtering (deprecated) | document) | | +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+------------+ | 131 | Prestandard Multisession | (this | IETF | | | (deprecated) | document) | | +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+------------+ | 184 | Prestandard FQDN (deprecated) | (this | IETF | | | | document) | | +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+------------+ | 185 | Prestandard OPERATIONAL message | (this | IETF | | | (deprecated) | document) | | +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+------------+ | 255 | Reserved | (this | IETF | | | | document) | | +-------+----------------------------------+-----------+------------+ Table 2 4. Security Considerations This revision to registration procedures does not change the underlying security issues inherent in the existing [RFC5492] and [RFC4271]. 5. Acknowledgements Thanks to Alia Atlas, Bruno Decraene, Martin Djernaes, Jie Dong, Jeff Haas, Sue Hares, Acee Lindem, Thomas Mangin, and Tom Petch for review and comments. 6. References Scudder Expires November 9, 2020 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Capability Codes Registration Procedures May 2020 6.1. Normative References [RFC5492] Scudder, J. and R. Chandra, "Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4", RFC 5492, DOI 10.17487/RFC5492, February 2009, . [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, . 6.2. Informative References [RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006, . Author's Address John Scudder Juniper Networks 1194 N. Mathilda Ave Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Email: jgs@juniper.net Scudder Expires November 9, 2020 [Page 5]