Network Working GroupD. Evans
Internet-DraftARRIS International, Inc.
Intended status: InformationalR. Droms
Expires: May 13, 2010Cisco Systems, Inc.
 November 09, 2009


Rebind Capability in DHCPv6 Reconfigure Messages
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-07.txt

Abstract

This document updates RFC 3315 to allow the Rebind message type to appear in the Reconfigure Message option of a Reconfigure message, which extends the Reconfigure message to allow a DHCPv6 server to cause a DHCPv6 client to send a Rebind message. The document also clarifies how a DHCPv6 client responds to a received Reconfigure message.

Status of this Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

This Internet-Draft will expire on May 13, 2010.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the BSD License.



1.  Introduction

DHCPv6 (Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” July 2003.) [RFC3315] allows a server to send an unsolicited Reconfigure message to a client. The client's response to a Reconfigure message, according to section 19 of RFC 3315 is either a Renew or an Information-Request message, depending on the contents of the msg-type field in the Reconfigure Message option of the Reconfigure message.

If the client sends a Renew message, it includes a Server Identifier option in the Renew message to specify the server that should respond to the Renew message. Under some circumstances, it may be desirable for the client to communicate with a different server; for example, if the server that the client most recently communicated with is no longer available, the network administrator may want the client to communicate with a different server. This document expands the allowed values of the msg-type field to allow the server to indicate that the client is to send a Rebind message, which does not include a Server Identifier option and allows any server to respond to the client.

RFC 3315 does not specify that a Reconfigure message must be sent from the server with which the client most recently communicated, and it does not specify which server the client should identify with a Server Identifier option when the client responds to the Reconfigure message. This document clarifies that the client should send a Renew message in response to a Reconfigure message with a Server Identifier option identifying the same server that the client would have identified if the client had sent the Renew message after expiration of T1.



2.  Terminology

The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).

This document uses IPv6 and DHCPv6 terms as defined in section 4 of RFC 3315.



3.  The Reconfigure Message option of the DHCPv6 Reconfigure Message

This section modifies section 22.19 of RFC 3315 to allow the specification of the Rebind message in a Reconfigure message.

A server includes a Reconfigure Message option in a Reconfigure message to indicate to the client whether the client responds with a Renew, an Information-request, or a Rebind message.

The format of this option is:

     0                   1                   2                   3
     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |      OPTION_RECONF_MSG        |         option-len            |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |    msg-type   |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

option-code
OPTION_RECONF_MSG (19).
option-len
1.
msg-type
5 for Renew message, 6 for Rebind, 11 for Information-request message.


4.  Server Behavior

This section updates specific text in sections 19.1, 19.2 and 19.3 of RFC 3315.

The server MUST include a Reconfigure Message option (as defined in Section 3 (The Reconfigure Message option of the DHCPv6 Reconfigure Message)) to select whether the client responds with a Renew message, a Rebind message or an Information-Request message.

The Reconfigure message causes the client to initiate a Renew/Reply, a Rebind/Reply message exchange or an Information-request/Reply message exchange. The server interprets the receipt of a Renew, a Rebind or an Information-request message (whichever was specified in the original Reconfigure message) from the client as satisfying the Reconfigure message request.

The server retransmits a Reconfigure message specifying a Rebind message in the same way as described in section 19.1.2 of RFC 3315.

In response to a Rebind message, the server generates and sends a Reply message to the client as described in sections 18.2.4 and 18.2.8, including options for configuration parameters.

The server MAY include options containing the IAs and new values for other configuration parameters in the Reply message, even if those IAs and parameters were not requested in the Renew message from the client.



4.1.  Client Behavior

This section updates specific text in section 19.4 of RFC 3315.

Upon receipt of a valid Reconfigure message, the client responds with a Renew message, a Rebind message or an Information-request message as indicated by the Reconfigure Message option (as defined in Section 3 (The Reconfigure Message option of the DHCPv6 Reconfigure Message)). The client ignores the transaction-id field in the received Reconfigure message. While the transaction is in progress, the client silently discards any Reconfigure messages it receives.

When responding to a Reconfigure, the client creates and sends the Rebind message in exactly the same manner as outlined in section 18.1.4 of RFC 3315, with the exception that the client copies the Option Request option and any IA options from the Reconfigure message into the Rebind message.

If a client is currently sending Rebind messages, as described in section 18.1.4 of RFC 3315, the client ignores any received Reconfigure messages.

The client uses the same variables and retransmission algorithm as it does with Renew, Rebind or Information-request messages generated as part of a client-initiated configuration exchange. See sections 18.1.3, 18.1.4 and 18.1.5 of RFC 3315 for details. If the client does not receive a response from the server by the end of the retransmission process, the client ignores and discards the Reconfigure message.



5.  Clarification of section 19.4.2, RFC 3315

When sending a Renew message in response to the receipt of a Reconfigure message, the client MUST include a Server Identifier option identifying the server the client most recently communicated with.



6.  Security Considerations

This document adds no new security considerations beyond those present in RFC 3315.



7.  IANA Considerations

There are no actions for IANA associated with this document.



8.  Change log

This section MUST be removed before publication.



8.1.  Revision -05

Clarified description of this feature in introduction.

Clarified action of client if it receives a Reconfigure while sending Rebind messages.



8.2.  Revision -06

Corrected a minor typo, changing "RFC3315" to "RFC 3315" in section 1.



8.3.  Revision -07

Refreshed expired draft, no material changes.



9. Normative References

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML).
[RFC3315] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” RFC 3315, July 2003 (TXT).


Authors' Addresses

  D. R. Evans
  ARRIS International, Inc.
  7912 Fairview Road
  Boulder, CO 80303
  USA
Phone:  +1 303.494.0394
Email:  N7DR@arrisi.com
  
  Ralph Droms
  Cisco Systems, Inc.
  1414 Massachusetts Avenue
  Boxborough, MA 01719
  USA
Phone:  +1 978.936.1674
Email:  rdroms@cisco.com