Network Working GroupD. Evans
Internet-DraftARRIS International, Inc.
Intended status: InformationalR. Droms
Expires: May 17, 2008Cisco Systems, Inc.
 November 14, 2007


Rebind Capability in DHCPv6 Reconfigure Messages
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind-02.txt

Status of this Memo

By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

This Internet-Draft will expire on May 17, 2008.

Abstract

This document updates RFC 3315 to allow the Rebind message type to appear in the Reconfigure Message option of a Reconfigure message, which allows DHCPv6 servers to instruct clients to perform a Rebind operation as well as a Renew operation.



1.  Introduction

DHCPv6 (Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” July 2003.) [RFC3315] allows a server to send an unsolicited Reconfigure message to a client. The client's response to a Reconfigure message, according to [RFC3315] (Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” July 2003.) is either a Renew or an Information-Request message, depending on the contents of the msg-type field in the Reconfigure Message option of the Reconfigure message.

In a network with multiple DHCPv6 servers, the Reconfigure message may not be sent by the same server as the one from which the client last obtained configuration and/or addressing information. If the Reconfigure message commands the client to perform a Renew, [RFC3315] (Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” July 2003.) does not specify to which server the client should send the Renew. This difficulty is avoided if the server commands the client to perform an Information-Request, since such messages are multicast. However, Information-Request messages do not cause addressing configuration to be returned.

This document expands the allowed values of the msg-type field to allow the server to indicate that the client is to attempt to perform a Rebind; since Rebind messages are multicast, this avoids the necessity of the client contacting a particular server. Rebind messages also cause all configuration information, including addresses, to be returned from a server.

This document updates section 19 of RFC 3315.



2.  Terminology

The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).



3.  The Reconfigure Message option of the DHCPv6 Reconfigure Message

A server includes a Reconfigure Message option in a Reconfigure message to indicate to the client whether the client responds with a Renew, an Information-request, or a Rebind message.

The format of this option is:

     0                   1                   2                   3
     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |      OPTION_RECONF_MSG        |         option-len            |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |    msg-type   |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

option-code
OPTION_RECONF_MSG (19).
option-len
1.
msg-type
5 for Renew message, 6 for Rebind, 11 for Information-request message.


4.  Security Considerations

This document adds no new security considerations beyond those present in [RFC3315] (Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” July 2003.).



5.  IANA Considerations

There are no actions for IANA associated with this document.



6. Normative References

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML).
[RFC3315] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” RFC 3315, July 2003 (TXT).


Authors' Addresses

  D. R. Evans
  ARRIS International, Inc.
  7912 Fairview Road
  Boulder, CO 80303
  USA
Phone:  +1 303.494.0394
Email:  N7DR@arrisi.com
  
  Ralph Droms
  Cisco Systems, Inc.
  1414 Massachusetts Avenue
  Boxborough, MA 01719
  USA
Phone:  +1 978.936.1674
Email:  rdroms@cisco.com


Full Copyright Statement

Intellectual Property