Network Working Group O. Finkelman Internet-Draft Qwilt Intended status: Standards Track S. Mishra Expires: April 20, 2019 Verizon October 17, 2018 CDNI Request Routing Extensions draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-00 Abstract The Open Caching working group of the Streaming Video Alliance is focused on the delegation of video delivery requests from commercial CDNs to a caching layer at the ISP. In that aspect, Open Caching is a specific use case of CDNI, where the commercial CDN is the upstream CDN (uCDN) and the ISP caching layer is the downstream CDN (dCDN). The extensions specified in this document to the CDNI Metadata and FCI interfaces are derived from requirements raised by Open Caching but are applicable to CDNI use cases in general. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on April 20, 2019. Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 1] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Redirect Target Address Capability Object . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. DnsTarget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2. HttpTarget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3. Fallback Target Address Metadata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1. CDNI Payload Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.1. CDNI FCI RedirectTarget Payload Type . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.2. CDNI MI FallbackTarget Payload Type . . . . . . . . . 9 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1. Introduction This document defines objects needed for Open Caching request routing. For that purpose it extends CDNI metadata [RFC8006] and CDNI Footprint and Capabilities [RFC8008]. For consistency, this document follows the CDNI notation of uCDN (the commercial CDN) and dCDN (the ISP caching layer). This document also registers CDNI Payload Types [RFC7736] for the defined objects: o Redirect Target Capability (for dCDN advertising redirect target address) Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 2] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 o Fallback Target Metadata (for uCDN configuring fallback target address) 1.1. Terminology This document reuses the terminology defined in [RFC6707], [RFC8006], [RFC8007], and [RFC8008]. Additionally, the following terms are used throughout this document and are defined as follows: o RR - Request Router o CP - Content Provider 2. Redirect Target Address Capability Object Iterative request redirect as defined in section 1.1 of [RFC7336] requries the provisioning of a redirect target address to be used by the uCDN in order to redirect to the dCDN. Redirect target addresses can vary between different footprints, for example between different regions, and they may also change over time, for example due to scaling issues a dCDN may need to split different regions over multiple targets, or due to network problems the dCDN may have to change the target address. Due to this variable and dynamic nature of the redirect target, it may not be suitable to advertise it during bootstrap, and a more dynamic, and footprint oriented interface is required. Therefore, we have chosen to use the CDNI Footprint and Capabilities interface for redirect target advertisement. Use cases o Footprint: The dCDN may want to have a different target per footprint. Note that a dCDN may spread across multiple geographies. This makes it easier to route client requests to a nearby request router. Though this can be achieved using a single canonical name and Geo DNS, that approach has limitations; for example a client may be using third party DNS resolver, making it impossible for the redirector to detect where the client is located, or Geo DNS granularity may be too rough for the requirement of the application. o Scaling: The dCDN may choose to scale its request routing service by deploying more request routers in new locations and advertise them via an updatable interface like the FCI. The Redirect Target capability object is used to indicate the target address the uCDN should use in order to redirect a client to the Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 3] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 dCDN. A target may be attached to a specific uCDN host, a list of uCDN hosts, or it can be set globally for all the hosts of the uCDN. When dCDN is attaching the redirect target to a specific uCDN host or a list of uCDN hosts, the dCDN MUST advertise the hosts within the Redirect Target Capability object as "redirecting-hosts". In that case, the uCDN can redirect to that dCDN address, only if the request is of one of these uCDN hosts. A redirect target for DNS redirection is the FQDN to be used as a CNAME for the uCDN host (see [RFC1034]). A redirect target for HTTP redirection is the hostname to be used as the first path segment in an absolute URI which is used as the Location header of the HTTP rediret response (see section 7.1.2 of [RFC7231]). Property: redirecting-hosts Description: One or more uCDN hosts to which this redirect target is attached. A redirecting host SHOULD be a host that was published in a HostMatch object by the uCDN as defined in section 4.1.2 of [RFC8006]. Type: A list of Endpoint objects (see section 4.3.3 of [RFC8006]) Mandatory-to-Specify: No. If not present, or empty, the redirect target applies to all hosts of the redirecting uCDN. Property: dns-target Description: Target address for DNS CNAME delegation. Type: DnsTarget object (see Section 2.1) Mandatory-to-Specify: No. but at least one of "dns-target" or "http-target" MUST be present and non empty. Property: http-target Description: Target URL for HTTP redirect. Type: HttpTarget object (see Section 2.2) Mandatory-to-Specify: No. but at least one of "dns-target" or "http-target" MUST be present and non empty. Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 4] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 Example of Redirect Target Capability object that advertises a dCDN target address that is attached to a specific list of uCDN "redirecting-hosts". A uCDN host that is included in that list can redirect to the advertised dCDN redirect target. { "capabilities": [ { "capability-type": "FCI.RedirectTarget", "capability-value": { "redirecting-hosts": [ "a.service123.ucdn.example.com", "b.service123.ucdn.example.com" ] "dns-target": { "host": "service123.ucdn.example.dcdn.com" } "http-target": { } }, "footprints": [ ] } ] } 2.1. DnsTarget The DnsTarget object is the target address for CNAME delegation from the uCDN to the dCDN. Property: host Description: The host property is a hostname, without a port number. Type: Endpoint object as defined in section 4.3.3 of [RFC8006] with the limitation that it MUST only be a hostname, and it MUST NOT include a port number. Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Example of DnsTarget object: Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 5] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 { "host": "service123.ucdn.example.dcdn.com" } Example of a DNS query for uCDN address "a.service123.ucdn.example.com" and the corresponding CNAME redirection response: Query: a.service123.ucdn.example.com: type A, class IN Response: a.service123.ucdn.example.com: type CNAME, class IN, cname service123.ucdn.example.dcdn.com 2.2. HttpTarget The HttpTarget object is the target address for http redirection from the uCDN to the dCDN. Property: host Description: Hostname or IP address and optional port, i.e., the host and port as described in section 3.2 of [RFC3986]. Type: Endpoint object as defined in section 4.3.3 of [RFC8006]. Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: path-prefix Description: A path prefix for the HTTP redirect. The original path is appended after this prefix. Type: A prefix of a path-absolute as defined in section 3.3 of [RFC3986]. The prefix MUST end with a trailing slash, to indicate the end of the last path segment in the prefix. Mandatory-to-Specify: No. If this property is absent or empty, the uCDN MUST NOT prepend a path prefix to the original content path. Property: include-redirecting-host Description: A flag indicating whether or not to include the redirecting host as the first path segment after the path- prefix. In case this flag is true and a "path-prefix" is used, Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 6] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 the uCDN redirecting host MUST be added as a separate path segment after the path-prefix and before the original URL path. In case this flag is true and there is no path-prefix, the uCDN redirecting host MUST be perpended as the first path segment in the redirect URL. Type: Boolean. Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default value is False. Example of HttpTarget object with a path-prefix and include- redirecting-host: { "host": "us-east1.dcdn.com", "path-prefix": "/cache/1/", "include-redirecting-host": true } Example of a HTTP request for content at uCDN host "a.service123.ucdn.example.com" and the corresponding HTTP response with Location header used for redirecting the client to the dCDN using the the http-target in the above example: Request: GET /vod/1/movie.mp4 HTTP/1.1 Host: a.service123.ucdn.example.com Response: HTTP/1.1 302 Found Location: http://us-east1.dcdn.com/cache/1/ a.service123.ucdn.example.com/vod/1/movie.mp4 3. Fallback Target Address Metadata Open Caching requires that the uCDN should provide fallback target server to the dCDN to be used in cases where the dCDN cannot properly handle the request. To avoid redirect loops, the fallback target server's address at the uCDN MUST be differnet than the original address at the uCDN from which the client was redirected to the dCDN. The uCDN MUST avoid further redirection when receiving the client request at the fallback target. The fallback target is defined as a generic metadata object (see section 3.2 of [RFC8006]) Use cases o Failover: A dCDN request router receives a request but has no caches to which it can route the request. This can happen in the Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 7] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 case of failures or temporary network overload. In these cases, the router may choose to redirect the request back to the uCDN fallback address. o Error: A cache may receive a request that it cannot properly serve, for example, some of the metadata objects for that service were not properly acquired. In this case, the cache may resolve to redirect back to uCDN. The Fallback target metadata object is used to indicate the target address the dCDN should use in order to redirect a client back to the uCDN. Fallback target is represented as endpoint objects as defined in section 4.3.3 of [RFC8006]. The uCDN fallback target address may be used as a DNS CNAME in case of DNS redirection mode or a host name for HTTP redirect. When using HTTP redirect to route a client request back to the uCDN, it is the dCDN's responsibility to use the original URL path as the client would have used for the original uCDN request, stripping, if needed, the dCDN path-prefix and the uCDN host name from the redirect URL that may have been used to request the content from the dCDN. Property: host Description: Target address to which the dCDN can redirect the client. Type: Endpoint object as defined in section 4.3.3 of [RFC8006] with the limitation that in case of DNS delegation, it MUST only be a hostname, and it MUST NOT include a port number. Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Example of a MI.FallbackTarget Metadata object that designates the host address the dCDN should use as fallback address to redirect back to the uCDN. { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.FallbackTarget", "generic-metadata-value": { "host": "fallback-a.service123.ucdn.example" } } Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 8] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 4. IANA Considerations 4.1. CDNI Payload Types This document requests the registration of the following CDNI Payload Types under the IANA CDNI Payload Type registry defined in [RFC7736]: +--------------------+---------------+ | Payload Type | Specification | +--------------------+---------------+ | FCI.RedirectTarget | RFCthis | | MI.FallbackTarget | RFCthis | +--------------------+---------------+ [RFC Editor: Please replace RFCthis with the published RFC number for this document.] 4.1.1. CDNI FCI RedirectTarget Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this payload type is to distinguish RedirectTarget FCI objects Interface: FCI Encoding: see Section 2 4.1.2. CDNI MI FallbackTarget Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this payload type is to distinguish FallbackTarget MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: see Section 3 5. Security Considerations This specification is in accordance with the CDNI Metadata Interface and the CDNI Request Routing: Footprint and Capabilities Semantics. As such, it is subject to the security considerations as defined in [RFC8006] and [RFC8008] respectively. 6. Acknowledgements TBD. Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 9] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 7. Contributors TBD. 8. References 8.1. Normative References [RFC1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities", STD 13, RFC 1034, DOI 10.17487/RFC1034, November 1987, . [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005, . [RFC7231] Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content", RFC 7231, DOI 10.17487/RFC7231, June 2014, . [RFC8006] Niven-Jenkins, B., Murray, R., Caulfield, M., and K. Ma, "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Metadata", RFC 8006, DOI 10.17487/RFC8006, December 2016, . [RFC8007] Murray, R. and B. Niven-Jenkins, "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Control Interface / Triggers", RFC 8007, DOI 10.17487/RFC8007, December 2016, . [RFC8008] Seedorf, J., Peterson, J., Previdi, S., van Brandenburg, R., and K. Ma, "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Request Routing: Footprint and Capabilities Semantics", RFC 8008, DOI 10.17487/RFC8008, December 2016, . 8.2. Informative References Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 10] Internet-Draft CDNI Request Routing Extensions October 2018 [RFC6707] Niven-Jenkins, B., Le Faucheur, F., and N. Bitar, "Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Problem Statement", RFC 6707, DOI 10.17487/RFC6707, September 2012, . [RFC7336] Peterson, L., Davie, B., and R. van Brandenburg, Ed., "Framework for Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI)", RFC 7336, DOI 10.17487/RFC7336, August 2014, . [RFC7736] Ma, K., "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Media Type Registration", RFC 7736, DOI 10.17487/RFC7736, December 2015, . Authors' Addresses Ori Finkelman Qwilt 6, Ha'harash Hod HaSharon 4524079 Israel Phone: +972-72-2221647 Email: orif@qwilt.com Sanjay Mishra Verizon 13100 Columbia Pike Silver Spring, MD 20904 USA Email: sanjay.mishra@verizon.com Finkelman & Mishra Expires April 20, 2019 [Page 11]