CCAMP Working Group H. Zheng Internet-Draft I. Busi Intended status: Standards Track Huawei Technologies Expires: November 14, 2020 May 13, 2020 A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-06 Abstract This document defines a collection of common data types and groupings in YANG data modeling language for layer 1 networks. These derived common types and groupings are intended to be imported by modules that specifies the OTN networks, including the topology, tunnel, client signal adaptation and service. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on November 14, 2020. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 1] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Terminology and Notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Prefix in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Layer 1 Types Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4.1. Relationship with other Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4.2. Content in Layer 1 Type Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4.3. OTN Label and Label Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.4. ODUflex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.4.1. Resizable ODUflex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5. YANG Code for Layer1 Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 9. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Appendix A. Examples of OTN Label Ranges . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 1. Introduction This document introduces a collection of common data types which would be used in Layer 1 networks. The derived types and groupings are designed to be the common types applicable for modeling Traffic Engineering (TE) features for Layer 1 networks. Typical Layer 1 network, the Optical Transport Networking, was specified in [RFC7062]. Corresponding routing and signaling protocol have been specified in [RFC7138] and [RFC7139]. The types and groupings defined in this document is consistent to these document, and will be imported in other Layer 1 data models, including but not restrictive to, [I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang], [I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-tunnel-model], [I-D.ietf-ccamp-client-signal-yang] and [I-D.ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang]. The data model in this draft has only types defined including groupings, typedef and identities. There is no need to include configuration and state data according to the new Network Management Datastore Architecture [RFC8342]. The content in this draft is in consistent with other specifications, including [MEF63] for Layer 1 service attributes, [ITU-Tg709] and [ITU-Tgsup43] for OTN data plane definitions. Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 2] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 2. Terminology and Notations Refer to [RFC7062] for the key terms used in this document, and the terminology for describing YANG data models can be found in [RFC7950]. 3. Prefix in Data Node Names In this document, names of data nodes and other data model objects are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the corresponding YANG imported modules. +-------------+---------------------------+----------------------+ | Prefix | YANG module | Reference | +-------------+---------------------------+----------------------+ | l1-types | ietf-layer1-types | This Document | +-------------+---------------------------+----------------------+ 4. Layer 1 Types Overview 4.1. Relationship with other Modules This document defines one YANG module for common Layer 1 types. The objective is to specifies common Layer 1 TE types that can be imported by layer 1 specific technology, for example OTN, in its technology-specific modules such as topology and tunnels. It is worth noting that the generic traffic-engineering (TE) types module is specified in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types] as ietf-te-types, and both the module ietf-te-types and ietf-layer1-types are needed to be imported when the OTN is configured. Generic attributes such as te- bandwidth and te-label, are indicated in ietf-te-types in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types], while the OTN-specific attributes, such as odu-type, are indicated in ietf-layer1-types in this document. 4.2. Content in Layer 1 Type Module The module ietf-layer1-types contains the following YANG reusable types and groupings: tributary-slot-granularity: This is to define the granularity of the server layer ODU Link (HO ODUk or ODUCn) supporting a client layer ODU LSP (LO ODUj or ODUk, respectively). Three granularities, 1.25G/2.5G/5G, have been specified. Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 3] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 odu-type: This is to specify the type of ODUk LSP, including the types specified in [RFC7139] and [RFC7963]. client-signal: This is to specify the client signal types of OTN networks. The initial input was the G-PID specified in [RFC7139]. Identities about a few categories of client signal types, including ETH, STM-n, OC [Telcordia] and Fiber Channel have been specified. otn-label-range-type: The label range type of OTN has two different representations, tributary slots (TS) and tributary port number (TPN), according to [RFC7139]. Respective representation is specified under this same base type. otn-link-bandwidth: This grouping defines the link bandwidth information and could be used in OTN topology model for bandwidth representation. All the bandwidth related sections in generic module, [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types], need to be augmented with this grouping for the usage of Layer 1. otn-path-bandwidth: This grouping defines the path bandwidth information and could be used in OTN topology model for bandwidth representation. All the bandwidth related sections in generic module, [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types], need to be augmented with this grouping for the usage of Layer 1. This grouping is also applicable to set up the OTN tunnel. otn-label-range-info and otn-label-step: These groupings are used for the augmentation of OTN label in a specific way. otn-label-start-end and otn-label-hop: These groupings are used for the augmentation of label for OTN link and path respectively. optical-interface-func: Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 4] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 The optical interface function is specified in [MEF63]. This grouping describes the functionality which encodes bits for transmission and the corresponding decode upon reception. service-performance-metric: The service performance metric is a quantitative characterization of Layer 1 characteristic information delivery quality experienced by the Layer 1 subscriber. 4.3. OTN Label and Label Range As described in [RFC7139], the OTN label usually represents the Tributary Port Number (TPN) and the related set of Tributary Slots (TS) assigned to a client layer ODU LSP (LO ODUj or ODUk) on a given server layer ODU (HO-ODU or ODUCn, respectively) Link (e.g., ODU2 LSP over ODU3 Link). Some special OTN label values are also defined for an ODUk LSP being setup over an OTUk Link. The same OTN label shall be assigned to the same ODUk LSP at the two ends of an OTN Link. As described in [RFC7139], TPN can be a number from 1 to 4095 and TS are numbered from 1 to 4095, although the actual maximum values depend on the type of server layer ODU. For example, a server layer ODU4 provides 80 time slots (numbered from 1 to 80) and the TPN values can be any number from 1 to 80. The OTN Label Range represents the values for the TPN and TS that are available for ODUk LSPs to be setup over a given OTN Link. The OTN Label Range is defined by the label-restriction list, defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types], which, for OTN, should be augmented using the otn-label-range-info grouping. Each entry in the label-restriction list represents either the range of the available TPN values or the range of the available TS values: the range-type attribute in the otn-label-range-info grouping defines the type of range for each entry of the list. Each entry of the label-restriction list, as defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types], defines a label-start, a label-end, a label-step and a range-bitmap. The label-start and label-end definitions for OTN should be augmented using the otn-label-start-end grouping. The label-step definition for OTN should be augmented using the otn-label-step grouping. It is expected that the otn- label-step will always be equal to its default value (i.e., 1), which is defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types]. Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 5] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 As described in [RFC7139], in some cases, the TPN assignment rules is flexible (e.g., ODU4 Link) while in other cases the TPN assignment rules are fixed (e.g., ODU1 Link). In the former case, both TPN and TS ranges are reported, while in the latter case, the TPN range is not reported to indicate that the TPN shall be set equal to the TS number assigned to the ODUk LSP. As described in [RFC7139], in some cases, the TPN assignment rules depends on the TS Granularity (e.g., ODU2 or ODU3 Links). Different entries in the label-restriction list will report different TPN ranges for each TS granularity supported by the link, as indicated by the tsg attribute in the otn-label-range-info grouping. As described in [RFC7139], in some cases, the TPN ranges are different for different types of ODUk LSPs. For example, on an ODU2 Link with 1,25G TS granularity, there is TPN range 1-4 for ODU1 and another TPN range 1-8 in common for ODU0 and ODUflex. Different entries in the label-restriction list will report different TPN ranges for different set of ODUk types, as indicated by the odu-type- list in the otn-label-range-info grouping. Appendix A provides some examples of how the TPN and TS label ranges described in Table 3 and Table 4 of [RFC7139] can be represented in YANG using the groupings defined in this document. 4.4. ODUflex ODUflex is a type of ODU which has a flexible bit rate which should be configured when setting up an ODUflex LSP. [ITU-Tg709], defines six types of ODUflex: ODUflex(CBR), ODUflex(GFP), ODUflex(GFP,n,k), ODUflex(IMP), ODUflex(IMP,s) and ODUflex(FlexE-aware). The main difference between these types of ODUflex is the formula used to calculate the nominal bit rate of the ODUflex, as described in Table 7-2 of [ITU-Tg709]. A choice has been defined to describe these cases: Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 6] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 +--rw (oduflex-type)? +--:(generic) | +--rw nominal-bit-rate uint64 +--:(cbr) | +--rw client-type identityref +--:(gfp-n-k) | +--rw gfp-n uint8 | +--rw gfp-k? l1-types:gfp-k +--:(flexe-client) | +--rw flexe-client | l1-types:flexe-client-rate +--:(flexe-aware) | +--rw flexe-aware-n uint16 +--:(packet) +--rw opuflex-payload-rate uint64 The (generic) case has been added to allow defining the ODUflex nominal bit rate independently from the type of ODUflex. This could be useful for forward compatibility in the transit domain/nodes where the setup of ODUflex LSPs does not depend from the ODUflex type. In order to simplify interoperability it is recommended to use (generic) case only when needed and to use the ODUflex specific type case whenever possible. The (cbr) case is used for Constant Bit Rate (CBR) client signals. The client-type indicates which is the CBR client signal carried by the ODUflex and, implicitly, also the client signal bit rate which is used to calculate the ODUflex(CBR) nominal bit rate as described in Table 7-2 of [ITU-Tg709]. The (gfp-n-k) case is used for GFP-F mapped client signals based on ODUk.ts and n 1.25G tributary slots. The gfp-k defines the nominal bit-rate of the ODUk.ts which, together with the value of gfp-n, is used to calculated the ODUflex(GFP,n,k) nominal bit rate as described in Table 7-8 and Table L-7 of [ITU-Tg709] . With few exceptions, shown in Table L-7 of [ITU-Tg709], the nominal bit-rate of the ODUk.ts could be inferred from the value of n, as shown in Table 7-8 of [ITU-Tg709] and therefore the gfp-k is optional. The (flexe-client) case is used for IMP mapped FlexE Client signals, The flexe-client represents the type of FlexE Client carried by the ODUflex which implicitly defines the value of s used to calculate the ODUflex(s) nominal bit rate as described in Table 7-2 of [ITU-Tg709]. The '10G' and '40G' enumeration values are used for 10G and 40G FlexE Clients to implicitly define the values of s=2 and s=8. For the n x Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 7] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 25G FlexE Clients the value of n is used to defines the value of s=5 x n. The (flexe-aware) case is used for FlexE-aware client signals. The flexe-aware-n represents the value n (n = n1 + n2 + ... + np) which is used to calculate the ODUflex(FlexE-aware) nominal bit rate as described in Table 7-2 of [ITU-Tg709]. When (packet) case is used for both the GFP-F mapped client signals and the IMP mapped client signals. The opuflex-payload-rate is either the GFP-F encapsulated packet client nominal bit rate or the 64b/66b encoded packet client nominal bit rate. The calculation of ODUflex(GFP) nominal bit rate is defined in section 12.2.5 of [ITU-Tg709], and the calculation of ODUflex(IMP) nominal bit rate is defined in section 12.2.6 of [ITU-Tg709]. The same formula is used in both cases. Section 5.1 and 5.2 of [RFC7139] defines two rules to compute the number of tributary slots to be allocated to ODUflex(CBR) and ODUflex(GFP) LSPs when carried over an HO-ODUk link. According to section 19.6 of [ITU-Tg709], the rules in section 5.2 applies only to ODUflex(GFP,n,k) while the rules defined in section 5.1 applies to any other ODUflex type, including but not being limited to ODUflex(CBR). Section 20.5 of [ITU-Tg709] defines the rules to compute the number of tributary slots to be allocated to ODUflex LSPs when carried over an ODUCn link. Following the [ITU-Tg709] definitions, the rules defined for ODUflex(GFP,n,k) are used only when the (gfp-n-k) case is used. In all the other cases, including the (generic) case, the rules defined any other ODUflex type are used. The number of available ODUs, defined for each ODUk type, including ODUflex, together with the number of available time-slots, reported as part of the OTN label range, provides sufficient information to infer the OTN link bandwidth availability for ODUflex LSPs. This information is independent from the ODUflex type. 4.4.1. Resizable ODUflex Resizable ODUflex is a special type of ODUflex that supports the procedures defined in [ITU-Tg7044] for hitless resizing of the ODUflex nominal bit rate. Two odu-type identities have been defined for ODUflex: o The ODUflex identity, which is used with any type of non-resizable ODUflex, as defined in Table 7-2 of [ITU-Tg709]. Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 8] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 o The ODUflex-resizable identity, which used only with resizable ODUflex(GFP,n,k). These two identities are used to identify whether an ODUflex(GFP,n,k) LSP shall or not support the [ITU-Tg7044] hitless resizing procedures as well as whether an OTN link supports only the setup of non- resizable ODUflex LSPs or also the setup of resizable ODUflex(GFP,n,k) LSP but with different capabilities (e.g., a lower number of LSPs). 5. YANG Code for Layer1 Types file "ietf-layer1-types@2020-05-13.yang" module ietf-layer1-types { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-layer1-types"; prefix "l1-types"; organization "IETF CCAMP Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editor: Haomian Zheng Editor: Italo Busi "; description "This module defines Layer 1 types. The model fully conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA). Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision "2020-05-13" { Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 9] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 description "Initial Version"; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types"; // RFC Editor: replace XXXX with actual RFC number, update date // information and remove this note } typedef otn-tpn { type uint16 { range "1..4095"; } description "Tributary Port Number for OTN. "; reference "RFC7139: GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks."; } typedef otn-ts { type uint16 { range "1..4095"; } description "Tributary Slot for OTN. "; reference "RFC7139: GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks."; } typedef otn-label-range-type { type enumeration { enum trib-slot { description "Defines a range of OTN tributary slots. "; } enum trib-port { description "Defines a range of OTN tributary ports. "; } } description "Defines the type of OTN label range: TS or TPN. "; } typedef gfp-k { type enumeration { enum 2 { Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 10] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 description "The ODU2.ts rate (1,249,177.230 kbit/s) is used to compute the rate of an ODUflex(GFP,n,2). "; } enum 3 { description "The ODU3.ts rate (1,254,470.354 kbit/s) is used to compute the rate of an ODUflex(GFP,n,3). "; } enum 4 { description "The ODU4.ts rate (1,301,467.133 kbit/s) is used to compute the rate of an ODUflex(GFP,n,4). "; } } description "The ODUk.ts used to compute the rate of an ODUflex(GFP,n,k)"; reference "Table 7-8 and L-7 of G.709"; } typedef flexe-client-rate { type union { type uint16; type enumeration { enum "10G" { description "Represents a 10G FlexE Client signal (s=2)"; } enum "40G" { description "Represents a 40G FlexE Client signal (s=8)"; } } } description "The FlexE Client signal rate (s x 5,156,250.000 kbit/s) used to compute the rate of an ODUflex(IMP, s). Valid values for s are s=2 (10G), s=4 (40G) and s=5 x n (n x 25G). In the first two cases an enumeration value (either 10G or 40G) is used, while in the latter case the value of n is used"; reference "Table 7-2 of G.709"; } identity tributary-slot-granularity { Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 11] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 description "Tributary slot granularity"; reference "G.709/Y.1331, February 2016: Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network (OTN)"; } identity tsg-1.25G { base tributary-slot-granularity; description "1.25G tributary slot granularity"; } identity tsg-2.5G { base tributary-slot-granularity; description "2.5G tributary slot granularity"; } identity tsg-5G { base tributary-slot-granularity; description "5G tributary slot granularity"; } identity odu-type { description "Base identity for the type of ODU protocol."; } identity ODU0 { base odu-type; description "ODU0 protocol (1.24Gb/s). "; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity ODU1 { base odu-type; description "ODU1 protocol (2.49Gb/s)."; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity ODU1e { base odu-type; description "ODU1e protocol (10.35Gb/s)."; Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 12] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 reference "RFC7963/ITU-T G.sup43"; } identity ODU2 { base odu-type; description "ODU2 protocol (10.03Gb/s)."; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity ODU2e { base odu-type; description "ODU2e protocol (10.39Gb/s)."; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity ODU3 { base odu-type; description "ODU3 protocol (40.31Gb/s)."; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity ODU3e1 { base odu-type; description "ODU3e1 protocol (41.77Gb/s)."; reference "RFC7963/ITU-T G.sup43"; } identity ODU3e2 { base odu-type; description "ODU3e2 protocol (41.78Gb/s)."; reference "RFC7963/ITU-T G.sup43"; } identity ODU4 { base odu-type; description "ODU4 protocol (104.79Gb/s)."; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity ODUflex { base odu-type; description Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 13] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "ODUflex protocol (flexibile bit rate, not resizable). It could be used for any type of ODUflex, including ODUflex(CBR), ODUflex(GFP), ODUflex(GFP,n,k), ODUflex(IMP,s), ODUflex(IMP) and ODUflex(FlexE-aware)."; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity ODUflex-resizable { base odu-type; description "ODUflex protocol (flexibile bit rate, resizable). It could be used only for ODUflex(GFP,n,k)."; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709 and ITU-T G.7044"; } identity client-signal { description "Base identity from which specific client signals for the tunnel are derived"; } identity ETH-1Gb { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of 1GbE"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity ETH-10Gb-LAN { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of ETH-10Gb-LAN (10.3 Gb/s)"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709/IEEE 802.3 Clause 49"; } identity ETH-10Gb-WAN { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of ETH-10Gb-WAN (9.95 Gb/s)"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709/IEEE 802.3 Clause 50"; } identity ETH-40Gb { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of 40GbE"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 14] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 identity ETH-100Gb { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of 100GbE"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity STM-1 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of STM-1"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity STM-4 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of STM-4"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity STM-16 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of STM-16"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity STM-64 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of STM-64"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity STM-256 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of STM-256"; reference "RFC7139/ITU-T G.709"; } identity OC-3 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of OC3"; reference "Telcordia GR-253-CORE"; } Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 15] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 identity OC-12 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of OC12"; reference "Telcordia GR-253-CORE"; } identity OC-48 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of OC48"; reference "Telcordia GR-253-CORE"; } identity OC-192 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of OC192"; reference "Telcordia GR-253-CORE"; } identity OC-768 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of OC768"; reference "Telcordia GR-253-CORE"; } identity FC-100 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of Fibre Channel FC-100"; reference "RFC4328/RFC7139"; } identity FC-200 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of Fibre Channel FC-200"; reference "RFC4328/RFC7139"; } identity FC-400 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of Fibre Channel FC-400"; reference "RFC4328/RFC7139"; } Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 16] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 identity FC-800 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of Fibre Channel FC-800"; reference "RFC4328/RFC7139"; } identity FC-1200 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of Fibre Channel FC-1200"; reference "RFC4328/RFC7139"; } identity FC-1600 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of Fibre Channel FC-1600"; reference "RFC4328/RFC7139"; } identity FC-3200 { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of Fibre Channel FC-3200"; reference "RFC4328/RFC7139"; } identity FICON-4G { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of Fibre Connection 4G"; reference "RFC4328/RFC7139"; } identity FICON-8G { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of Fibre Connection 8G"; reference "RFC4328/RFC7139"; } identity coding-func { description "Base identity from which coding function is derived."; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 17] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 identity ETH-1000X { base "coding-func"; description "PCS clause 36 coding function that corresponds to 1000BASE-X"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity ETH-10GW { base "coding-func"; description "PCS clause 49 and WIS clause 50 coding func that corresponds to 10GBASE-W (WAN PHY)"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity ETH-10GR { base "coding-func"; description "PCS clause 49 coding function that corresponds to 10GBASE-R (LAN PHY)"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity ETH-40GR { base "coding-func"; description "PCS clause 82 coding function that corresponds to 40GBASE-R"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity ETH-100GR { base "coding-func"; description "PCS clause 82 coding function that corresponds to 100GBASE-R"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity optical-interface-func { description "base identity from which optical-interface-function is derived."; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity SX-PMD-1000 { Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 18] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 base "optical-interface-func"; description "SX-PMD-clause-38 Optical Interface function for 1000BASE-X PCS-36"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity LX-PMD-1000 { base "optical-interface-func"; description "LX-PMD-clause-38 Optical Interface function for 1000BASE-X PCS-36"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity LX10-PMD-1000 { base "optical-interface-func"; description "LX10-PMD-clause-59 Optical Interface function for 1000BASE-X PCS-36"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity BX10-PMD-1000 { base "optical-interface-func"; description "BX10-PMD-clause-59 Optical Interface function for 1000BASE-X PCS-36"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity LW-PMD-10G { base "optical-interface-func"; description "LW-PMD-clause-52 Optical Interface function for 10GBASE-W PCS-49-WIS-50"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity EW-PMD-10G { base "optical-interface-func"; description "EW-PMD-clause-52 Optical Interface function for 10GBASE-W PCS-49-WIS-50"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity LR-PMD-10G { Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 19] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 base "optical-interface-func"; description "LR-PMD-clause-52 Optical Interface function for 10GBASE-R PCS-49"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity ER-PMD-10G { base "optical-interface-func"; description "ER-PMD-clause-52 Optical Interface function for 10GBASE-R PCS-49"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity LR4-PMD-40G { base "optical-interface-func"; description "LR4-PMD-clause-87 Optical Interface function for 40GBASE-R PCS-82"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity ER4-PMD-40G { base "optical-interface-func"; description "ER4-PMD-clause-87 Optical Interface function for 40GBASE-R PCS-82"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity FR-PMD-40G { base "optical-interface-func"; description "FR-PMD-clause-89 Optical Interface function for 40GBASE-R PCS-82"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity LR4-PMD-100G { base "optical-interface-func"; description "LR4-PMD-clause-88 Optical Interface function for 100GBASE-R PCS-82"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity ER4-PMD-100G { Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 20] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 base "optical-interface-func"; description "ER4-PMD-clause-88 Optical Interface function for 100GBASE-R PCS-82"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity service-performance-metric { description "Base identity of service-specific performance metric"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity one-way-delay { base "service-performance-metric"; description "one way delay."; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity one-way-errored-second { base "service-performance-metric"; description "one way errored second"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity one-way-severely-errored-second { base "service-performance-metric"; description "one way severely errored second"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity one-way-unavailable-second { base "service-performance-metric"; description "one way unavailable second"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } identity one-way-availability { base "service-performance-metric"; description "one way availability"; reference "MEF63: Subscriber Layer 1 Service Attributes"; } grouping otn-link-bandwidth { description "link bandwidth attributes for OTN"; list odulist { key "odu-type"; description Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 21] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "OTN bandwidth definition"; leaf odu-type { type identityref { base odu-type; } description "ODU type"; } leaf number { type uint16; description "Number of ODUs"; } } } grouping otn-path-bandwidth { description "path bandwidth attributes for OTN"; leaf odu-type { type identityref { base odu-type; } description "ODU type"; } choice oduflex-type { when "odu-type = 'ODUflex' or 'ODUflex-resizable'" { description "applicable when odu-type is ODUflex or ODUflex-resizable"; } description "Types of ODUflex used to compute the ODUflex nominal bit rate."; reference "Table 7-2 of G.709"; case generic { leaf nominal-bit-rate { type uint64; units "bps"; mandatory true; description "Nominal ODUflex bit rate."; } } case cbr { leaf client-type { type identityref { base client-signal; } mandatory true; Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 22] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 description "The CBR client signal for an ODUflex(CBR)."; } } case gfp-n-k { leaf gfp-n { type uint8 { range "1..80"; } mandatory true; description "The value of n for an ODUflex(GFP,n,k)."; reference "Tables 7-8 and L-7 of G.709"; } leaf gfp-k { type gfp-k; description "The value of k for an ODUflex(GFP,n,k). If omitted, it is calculated from the value of gfp-n as described in Table 7-8 of G.709"; reference "Tables 7-8 and L-7 of G.709"; } } case flexe-client { leaf flexe-client { type flexe-client-rate; mandatory true; description "The rate of the FlexE-client for an ODUflex(IMP,s)."; } } case flexe-aware { leaf flexe-aware-n { type uint16; mandatory true; description "The rate of FlexE-aware client signal for ODUflex(FlexE-aware)"; } } case packet { leaf opuflex-payload-rate { type uint64; units "Kbps"; mandatory true; description Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 23] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "Either the GFP-F encapsulated packet client nominal bit rate for an ODUflex(GFP) or the 64b/66b encoded packet client nominal bit rate for an ODUflex(IMP)."; } } } } grouping otn-label-range-info { description "label range information for OTN, is dependent on the range-type, must be used together with the following groupings: otn-label-start-end and otn-label-step. "; leaf range-type { type otn-label-range-type; description "The type of range (e.g., TPN or TS) to which the label range applies"; } leaf tsg { type identityref { base tributary-slot-granularity; } description "Tributary slot granularity (TSG) to which the label range applies. This leaf shall be present when the range-type is TS; This leaf can be omitted when mapping an ODUk over an OTUk Link. In this case the range-type is tpn, with only one entry (ODUk), and the tpn range has only one value (1)."; reference "G.709/Y.1331, February 2016: Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network (OTN)"; } leaf-list odu-type-list { type identityref { base odu-type; } description "List of ODU types to which the label range applies. An Empty odu-type-list means that the label range applies to all the supported ODU types."; } leaf priority { type uint8; description "Priority in Interface Switching Capability Descriptor (ISCD)."; reference "RFC4203."; Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 24] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 } } grouping otn-label-start-end { description "The OTN label-start or label-end used to specify an OTN label range. this grouping is dependent on the range-type, must be used together with the following groupings: otn-label-range-info and otn-label-step."; choice range-type { description "OTN label range type, either TPN range or TS range"; case trib-port { leaf otn-tpn { when "../../../range-type = 'trib-port'" { description "valid only when range-type represented by trib-port"; } type otn-tpn; description "Tributary Port Number."; reference "RFC7139: GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks."; } } case trib-slot { leaf otn-ts { when "../../../range-type = 'trib-slot'" { description "valid only when range-type represented by trib-slot"; } type otn-ts; description "Tributary Slot Number."; reference "RFC7139: GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks."; } } } } grouping otn-label-hop { description "OTN Label. "; reference "RFC7139, section 6. "; leaf otn-tpn { type otn-tpn; Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 25] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 description "Tributary Port Number."; reference "RFC7139: GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks."; } leaf tsg { type identityref { base tributary-slot-granularity; } description "Tributary slot granularity."; reference "G.709/Y.1331, February 2016: Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network (OTN)"; } leaf ts-list { type string { pattern "([1-9][0-9]{0,3}(-[1-9][0-9]{0,3})?" + "(,[1-9][0-9]{0,3}(-[1-9][0-9]{0,3})?)*)"; } description "A list of available tributary slots ranging between 1 and 4095. If multiple values or ranges are given, they all must be disjoint and must be in ascending order. For example 1-20,25,50-1000."; reference "RFC 7139: GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks"; } } grouping otn-label-step { description "Label step for OTN, is dependent on the range-type, must be used together with the following groupings: otn-label-range-info and otn-label-start-end. "; choice range-type { description "OTN label range type, either TPN range or TS range"; case trib-port { leaf otn-tpn { when "../../../range-type = 'trib-port'" { description "valid only when range-type represented by trib-port"; } type otn-tpn; description Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 26] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "Label step which represents possible increments for Tributary Port Number."; reference "RFC7139: GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks."; } } case trib-slot { leaf otn-ts { when "../../../range-type = 'trib-slot'" { description "valid only when range-type represented by trib-slot"; } type otn-ts; description "Label step which represents possible increments for Tributary Slot Number."; reference "RFC7139: GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks."; } } } } } 6. Security Considerations The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446]. The NETCONF access control model [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content. The YANG module in this document defines layer 1 type definitions (i.e., typedef, identity and grouping statements) in YANG data modeling language to be imported and used by other layer 1 technology-specific modules. When imported and used, the resultant schema will have data nodes that can be writable, or readable. The Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 27] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 access to such data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. The security considerations spelled out in the YANG 1.1 specification [RFC7950] apply for this document as well. 7. IANA Considerations It is proposed that IANA should assign new URIs from the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688] as follows: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-layer1-types Registrant Contact: The IESG XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. This document registers following YANG modules in the YANG Module Names registry [RFC7950]. name: ietf-layer1-types namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-layer1-types prefix: l1-types reference: RFC XXXX 8. Acknowledgements The authors and the working group give their sincere thanks for Robert Wilton for the YANG doctor review, and Tom Petch for his comments during the model and document development. 9. Contributors Dieter Beller Nokia Email: dieter.beller@nokia.com Sergio Belotti Nokia Email: sergio.belotti@nokia.com Yanlei Zheng China Unicom Email: zhengyanlei@chinaunicom.cn Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 28] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 Aihua Guo Futurewei Technologies Email: aihuaguo@futurewei.com Young Lee Samsung Email: younglee.tx@gmail.com Lei Wang China Mobile Email: wangleiyj@chinamobile.com Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Telefonica Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com Xufeng Liu Volta Networks Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com Yunbin Xu CAICT Email: xuyunbin@caict.ac.cn Anurag Sharma Google Email: ansha@google.com Rajan Rao Infinera Email: rrao@infinera.com Victor Lopez Telefonica Email: victor.lopezalvarez@telefonica.com Yunbo Li China Mobile Email: liyunbo@chinamobile.com 10. References 10.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types] Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., and I. Bryskin, "Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types", draft-ietf-teas- yang-te-types-13 (work in progress), November 2019. Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 29] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 [ITU-Tg7044] International Telecommunication Union, "Hitless adjustment of ODUflex(GFP)", ITU-T G.7044, October 2011. [ITU-Tg709] International Telecommunication Union, "Interfaces for the optical transport network", ITU-T G.709, March 2020. [ITU-Tgsup43] International Telecommunication Union, "Transport of IEEE 10GBASE-R in optical transport networks (OTN)", ITU-T G.sup43, February 2011. [MEF63] Metro Ethernet Forum, "Subscriber Layer1 Service Attributes Technical Specification", MEF 63, August 2018. [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, . [RFC7139] Zhang, F., Ed., Zhang, G., Belotti, S., Ceccarelli, D., and K. Pithewan, "GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks", RFC 7139, DOI 10.17487/RFC7139, March 2014, . [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, . [RFC7963] Ali, Z., Bonfanti, A., Hartley, M., and F. Zhang, "RSVP-TE Extension for Additional Signal Types in G.709 Optical Transport Networks (OTNs)", RFC 7963, DOI 10.17487/RFC7963, August 2016, . [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, . Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 30] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 [RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, . [RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, . [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, . [Telcordia] Telcordia, "Synchronous Optical Network Transport Systems: Common Generic Criteria, Issue 5", Telcordia GR-253-CORE, October 2009. 10.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-ccamp-client-signal-yang] Zheng, H., Guo, A., Busi, I., Snitser, A., Lazzeri, F., Xu, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, X., and G. Fioccola, "A YANG Data Model for Transport Network Client Signals", draft-ietf- ccamp-client-signal-yang-02 (work in progress), May 2020. [I-D.ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang] Lee, Y., Lee, K., Zheng, H., Dhody, D., Dios, O., and D. Ceccarelli, "A YANG Data Model for L1 Connectivity Service Model (L1CSM)", draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-11 (work in progress), March 2020. [I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang] Zheng, H., Busi, I., Liu, X., Belotti, S., and O. Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Optical Transport Network Topology", draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-10 (work in progress), March 2020. [I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-tunnel-model] Zheng, H., Busi, I., Belotti, S., Lopezalvarez, V., and Y. Xu, "OTN Tunnel YANG Model", draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-tunnel- model-10 (work in progress), March 2020. Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 31] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 [I-D.ietf-ccamp-transport-nbi-app-statement] Busi, I., King, D., Zheng, H., and Y. Xu, "Transport Northbound Interface Applicability Statement", draft-ietf- ccamp-transport-nbi-app-statement-10 (work in progress), November 2019. [I-D.ietf-netmod-artwork-folding] Watsen, K., Auerswald, E., Farrel, A., and Q. WU, "Handling Long Lines in Inclusions in Internet-Drafts and RFCs", draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-12 (work in progress), January 2020. [RFC7062] Zhang, F., Ed., Li, D., Li, H., Belotti, S., and D. Ceccarelli, "Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of G.709 Optical Transport Networks", RFC 7062, DOI 10.17487/RFC7062, November 2013, . [RFC7138] Ceccarelli, D., Ed., Zhang, F., Belotti, S., Rao, R., and J. Drake, "Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks", RFC 7138, DOI 10.17487/RFC7138, March 2014, . Appendix A. Examples of OTN Label Ranges This appendix provides some examples of how the TPN and TS label ranges described in Table 3 and Table 4 of [RFC7139] can be represented in YANG using the groupings defined in this document. It also considers the OTUk links in addition to HO-ODUk links. The JSON code examples provided in this appendix provides some embedded comments following the conventions in section 3.2 of [I- D.ietf-ccamp-transport-nbi-app-statement] and have been folded using the tool in [I-D.ietf-netmod-artwork-folding]. ========== NOTE: '\\' line wrapping per BCP XXX (RFC XXXX) ========== { "examples of label-restrictions for different OTN Links": [ { "// ": "HO-ODU1 or OTU1 Link", "label-restrictions": { "label-restriction": [ { "index ": 1, Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 32] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "// ___NOT-PRESENT___ tsg": "", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU1 ]", "// ___DEFAULT___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": 1, "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since no TS range and no TSG are \ \reported for ODU1, the link is an OTU1 Link. TS allocation is not n\ \eeded and TPN shall be set to '1' for mapping ODU1 over OTU1. This \ \entry is not present if the OTN Link is an HO-ODU1 Link." }, { "index ": 2, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-slot", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU0 ]", "// ts-range": "1-2", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since no TPN range is reportd for\ \ ODU0 with 1.25G TSG, the TPN allocation rule is fixed (TPN = TS#) \ \for mapping LO-ODU0 over HO-ODU1 with 1.25G TSG. See Table 4 of [RF\ \C7139]." } ] } }, { "// ": "HO-ODU2 or OTU2 Link", "label-restrictions": { "label-restriction": [ { "index ": 1, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "// ___NOT-PRESENT___ tsg": "", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU2 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": 1, "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since no TS range and no TSG are \ \reported for ODU2, the link is an OTU2 Link. TS allocation is not n\ \eeded and TPN shall be set to '1' for mapping ODU2 over OTU2. This \ \entry is not present if the OTN Link is an HO-ODU2 Link." }, { "index ": 2, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-slot", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G", Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 33] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "odu-type-list": "[ ODUFlex-cbr, ODUFlex-gfp, ODU0, ODU1\ \ ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// ts-range": "1-8" }, { "index ": 3, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G ", "odu-type-list": "[ ODUFlex-cbr, ODUFlex-gfp, ODU0 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": "1-8", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since this TPN range is reported \ \for ODUflex and ODU0 with 1.25G TSG, the TPN assignment rule is fle\ \xible within a common range for mapping LO-ODUflex and LO-ODU0 over\ \ HO-ODU2 with 1.25G TSG. See Table 4 of [RFC7139]." }, { "index ": 4, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU1 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": "1-4", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since this TPN range is reported \ \for ODU1 with 1.25G TSG, the TPN assignment rule is flexible within\ \ a common range for mapping LO-ODU1 over HO-ODU2 with 1.25G TSG. Se\ \e Table 4 of [RFC7139]." }, { "index ": 5, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-slot", "tsg": "tsg-2.5G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU1 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// ts-range": "1-4", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since no TPN range is reported fo\ \r ODU1 with 2.5G TSG, the TPN allocation rule is fixed (TPN = TS#) \ \for mapping LO-ODU1 over HO-ODU2 with 2.5G TSG. See Table 3 of [RFC\ \7139]." } ] } }, { Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 34] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "// ": "HO-ODU3 or OTU3 Link", "label-restrictions": { "label-restriction": [ { "index ": 1, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "// ___NOT-PRESENT___ tsg": "", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU3 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": 1, "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since no TS range and no TSG are \ \reported for ODU3, the link is an OTU3 Link. TS allocation is not n\ \eeded and TPN shall be set to '1' for mapping ODU3 over OTU3. This \ \entry is not present if the OTN Link is an HO-ODU3 Link." }, { "index ": 2, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-slot", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODUFlex-cbr, ODUFlex-gfp, ODU0, ODU1\ \, ODU2, ODU2e ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// ts-range": "1-32" }, { "index ": 3, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODUFlex-cbr, ODUFlex-gfp, ODU0, ODU2\ \e ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": "1-32", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since this TPN range is reported \ \for ODUflex, ODU0 and ODU2e with 1.25G TSG, the TPN assignment rule\ \ is flexible within a common range for mapping LO-ODUflex, LO-ODU0 \ \and LO-ODU2e over HO-ODU3 with 1.25G TSG. See Table 4 of [RFC7139]." }, { "index ": 4, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU1 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": "1-16", Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 35] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since this TPN range is reported \ \for ODU1 with 1.25G TSG, the TPN assignment rule is flexible within\ \ a common range for mapping LO-ODU1 over HO-ODU3 with 1.25G TSG. Se\ \e Table 4 of [RFC7139]." }, { "index ": 5, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU2 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": "1-4", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since this TPN range is reported \ \for ODU2 with 1.25G TSG, the TPN assignment rule is flexible within\ \ a common range for mapping LO-ODU2 over HO-ODU3 with 1.25G TSG. Se\ \e Table 4 of [RFC7139]." }, { "index ": 6, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-slot", "tsg": "tsg-2.5G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU1, ODU2 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// ts-range": "1-16" }, { "index ": 7, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "tsg": "tsg-2.5G ", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU2 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": "1-4", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since this TPN range is reported \ \for ODU2 with 2.5G TSG, the TPN assignment rule is flexible within \ \a common range for mapping LO-ODU2 over HO-ODU3. Since no TPN range\ \ is reported for ODU1 with 2.5G TSG, the TPN allocation rule is fix\ \ed (TPN = TS#) for mapping LO-ODU1 over HO-ODU3 with 2.5G TSG. See \ \Table 3 of [RFC7139]." } ] } }, { "// ": "HO-ODU4 or OTU4 Link", "label-restrictions": { Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 36] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "label-restriction": [ { "index ": 1, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "// ___NOT-PRESENT___ tsg": "", "odu-type-list": "[ ODU4 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": 1, "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since no TS range and no TSG are \ \reported for ODU4, the link is an OTU4 Link. TS allocation is not n\ \eeded and TPN shall be set to '1' for mapping ODU4 over OTU4. This \ \entry is not present if the OTN Link is an HO-ODU4 Link." }, { "index ": 2, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-slot", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODUFlex-cbr, ODUFlex-gfp, ODU0, ODU1\ \, ODU2, ODU2e, ODU3 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// ts-range": "1-80" }, { "index ": 3, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "tsg": "tsg-1.25G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODUFlex-cbr, ODUFlex-gfp, ODU0, ODU1\ \, ODU2, ODU2e, ODU3 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": "1-80", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since this TPN range is reported \ \for any LO-ODUj with 1.25G TSG, the TPN assignment rule is flexible\ \ within a common range for mapping any LO-ODUj over HO-ODU4 with 1.\ \25G TSG. See Table 4 of [RFC7139]." } ] } }, { "// ": "ODUC1 Link", "label-restrictions": { "label-restriction": [ { "index ": 1, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 37] Internet-Draft A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types May 2020 "range-type": "label-range-trib-slot", "tsg": "tsg-5G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODUFlex-cbr, ODUFlex-gfp, ODU0, ODU1\ \, ODU2, ODU2e, ODU3, ODU4 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// ts-range": "1-20", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since the TS range is specified f\ \or any ODUk, the OTN Link is an ODUCn Link." }, { "index ": 2, "// ___DEFAULT___ restriction": "inclusive", "range-type": "label-range-trib-port", "tsg": "tsg-5G", "odu-type-list": "[ ODUFlex-cbr, ODUFlex-gfp, ODU0, ODU1\ \, ODU2, ODU2e, ODU3, ODU4 ]", "// ___ DEFAULT ___ priority": 7, "// tpn-range": "1-10", "// ___ COMMENT ___": "Since this TPN range is reported \ \for any ODUk with 5G TSG, the TPN assignment rule is flexible withi\ \n a common range for mapping any ODUk over ODUCn with 5G TSG." } ] } } ] } Authors' Addresses Haomian Zheng Huawei Technologies H1, Huawei Xiliu Beipo Village, Songshan Lake Dongguan, Guangdong 523808 China Email: zhenghaomian@huawei.com Italo Busi Huawei Technologies Milan Italy Email: Italo.Busi@huawei.com Zheng & Busi Expires November 14, 2020 [Page 38]