Benchmarking Methodology Working Group B. Balarajah Internet-Draft Obsoletes: 3511 (if approved) C. Rossenhoevel Intended status: Informational EANTC AG Expires: 25 April 2023 B. Monkman NetSecOPEN 22 October 2022 Benchmarking Methodology for Network Security Device Performance draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance-15 Abstract This document provides benchmarking terminology and methodology for next-generation network security devices including next-generation firewalls (NGFW) and next-generation intrusion prevention systems (NGIPS). The main areas covered in this document are test terminology, test configuration parameters, and benchmarking methodology for NGFW and NGIPS. (It is assumed that readers have a working knowledge of these devices and the security functionality they contain.) This document aims to improve the applicability, reproducibility, and transparency of benchmarks and to align the test methodology with today's increasingly complex layer 7 security- centric network application use cases. As a result, this document makes RFC3511 obsolete. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 25 April 2023. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.1. Testbed Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.2. DUT/SUT Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.2.1. Security Effectiveness Configuration . . . . . . . . 12 4.3. Test Equipment Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.3.1. Client Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 4.3.2. Backend Server Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.3.3. Traffic Flow Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4.3.4. Traffic Load Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5. Testbed Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 6. Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.2. Detailed Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 6.3. Benchmarks and Key Performance Indicators . . . . . . . . 23 7. Benchmarking Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7.1. Throughput Performance with Application Traffic Mix . . . 25 7.1.1. Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7.1.2. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 7.1.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 7.1.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . 28 7.2. TCP/HTTP Connections Per Second . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 7.2.1. Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 7.2.2. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 7.2.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 7.2.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . 31 7.3. HTTP Throughput . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7.3.1. Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7.3.2. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7.3.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7.3.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . 35 7.4. HTTP Transaction Latency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 7.4.1. Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 7.4.2. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 7.4.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.4.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . 38 7.5. Concurrent TCP/HTTP Connection Capacity . . . . . . . . . 39 7.5.1. Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 7.5.2. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 7.5.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 7.5.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . 41 7.6. TCP/QUIC Connections per Second with HTTPS Traffic . . . 42 7.6.1. Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 7.6.2. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 7.6.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 7.6.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . 45 7.7. HTTPS Throughput . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 7.7.1. Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 7.7.2. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 7.7.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 7.7.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . 48 7.8. HTTPS Transaction Latency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 7.8.1. Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 7.8.2. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 7.8.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 7.8.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . 51 7.9. Concurrent TCP/QUIC Connection Capacity with HTTPS Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 7.9.1. Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 7.9.2. Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 7.9.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 7.9.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . 55 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 10. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Appendix A. Test Methodology - Security Effectiveness Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 A.1. Test Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 A.2. Testbed Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 A.3. Test Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 A.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters . . . . . . . . . . 60 A.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters . . . . . . . 60 A.4. Test Results Validation Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 A.5. Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 A.6. Test Procedures and Expected Results . . . . . . . . . . 62 A.6.1. Step 1: Background Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 A.6.2. Step 2: CVE Emulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Appendix B. DUT/SUT Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 1. Introduction 18 years have passed since IETF initially recommended test methodology and terminology for firewalls ([RFC3511]). Firewalls have evolved significantly from the days of simple ACL filters. As the underlying technology progresses and improves, recommending test methodology and terminology for firewalls, requirements, and expectations for network security elements has increased tremendously. Security function implementations have evolved and diversified into intrusion detection and prevention, threat management, analysis of encrypted traffic, and more. In an industry of growing importance, well-defined and reproducible key performance indicators (KPIs) are increasingly needed to enable fair and reasonable comparison of network security functions. These reasons led to the creation of a new next-generation network security device benchmarking document, which makes [RFC3511] obsolete. Measurement of performance for processing of IP fragmented traffic (see Section 5.9 of [RFC3511]) was not included in this document since IP fragmentation does today not commonly occur in traffic anymore, unlike it might have been at the time when [RFC3511] was written. It should also be noted that [RFC2647] retains significant value and has been consulted frequently while creating this document. For a more detailed explanation of what an NGFW is see the Wikipedia article [Wiki-NGFW]. 2. Requirements The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119], [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 3. Scope This document provides testing terminology and testing methodology for modern and next-generation network security devices that are configured in Active ("Inline", see Figure 1 and Figure 2) mode. It covers the validation of security effectiveness configurations of network security devices, followed by performance benchmark testing. This document focuses on advanced, realistic, and reproducible testing methods. Additionally, it describes testbed environments, test tool requirements, and test result formats. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 The performance testing methodology described in this document is not intended for security devices/systems that rely on machine learning or behavioral analysis. If such features are present in a Device Under Test/System Under Test (DUT/SUT), they should be disabled. 4. Test Setup The test setup defined in this document applies to all benchmarking tests described in Section 7. The test setup MUST be contained within an Isolated Test Environment (see Section 3 of [RFC6815]). 4.1. Testbed Configuration Testbed configuration MUST ensure that any performance implications that are discovered during the benchmark testing aren't due to the inherent physical network limitations such as the number of physical links and forwarding performance capabilities (throughput and latency) of the network devices in the testbed. For this reason, this document recommends avoiding external devices such as switches and routers in the testbed wherever possible. In some deployment scenarios, the network security devices (DUT/SUT) are connected to routers and switches, which will reduce the number of entries in MAC or ARP/ND (Address Resolution Protocol/ Neighbor Discovery) tables of the DUT/SUT. If MAC or ARP/ND tables have many entries, this may impact the actual DUT/SUT performance due to MAC and ARP/ND table lookup processes. This document also recommends using test equipment with the capability of emulating layer 3 routing functionality instead of adding external routers in the testbed. The testbed setup Option 1 (Figure 1) is the RECOMMENDED testbed setup for the benchmarking test. +-----------------------+ +-----------------------+ | +-------------------+ | +-----------+ | +-------------------+ | | | Emulated Router(s)| | | | | | Emulated Router(s)| | | | (Optional) | +----- DUT/SUT +-----+ (Optional) | | | +-------------------+ | | | | +-------------------+ | | +-------------------+ | +-----------+ | +-------------------+ | | | Clients | | | | Servers | | | +-------------------+ | | +-------------------+ | | | | | | Test Equipment | | Test Equipment | +-----------------------+ +-----------------------+ Figure 1: Testbed Setup - Option 1 Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 If the test equipment used is not capable of emulating OSI layer 3 routing functionality or if the number of used ports is mismatched between the test equipment and the DUT/SUT (need for test equipment port aggregation), the test setup can be configured as shown in Figure 2. +-------------------+ +-----------+ +--------------------+ |Aggregation Switch/| | | | Aggregation Switch/| | Router +------+ DUT/SUT +------+ Router | | | | | | | +----------+--------+ +-----------+ +--------+-----------+ | | | | +-----------+-----------+ +-----------+-----------+ | | | | | +-------------------+ | | +-------------------+ | | | Emulated Router(s)| | | | Emulated Router(s)| | | | (Optional) | | | | (Optional) | | | +-------------------+ | | +-------------------+ | | +-------------------+ | | +-------------------+ | | | Clients | | | | Servers | | | +-------------------+ | | +-------------------+ | | | | | | Test Equipment | | Test Equipment | +-----------------------+ +-----------------------+ Figure 2: Testbed Setup - Option 2 4.2. DUT/SUT Configuration The same DUT/SUT configuration MUST be used for all benchmarking tests described in Section 7. Since each DUT/SUT will have its own unique configuration, users MUST configure their devices with the same parameters and security features that would be used in the actual deployment of the device or a typical deployment. The DUT/SUT MUST be configured in "Inline" mode so that the traffic is actively inspected by the DUT/SUT. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Table 2 and Table 3 below describe the RECOMMENDED and OPTIONAL sets of network security features for NGFW and NGIPS, respectively. If the recommended security features are not enabled in the DUT/SUT for any reason, the reason MUST be reported with the benchmarking test results. For example, one reason for not enabling the anti-virus feature in NGFW may be that this security feature was not required for a particular customer deployment scenario. It MUST be also noted in the benchmarking test report that not enabling the specific recommended security features may impact the performance of the DUT/ SUT. The selected security features MUST be consistently enabled on the DUT/SUT for all benchmarking tests described in Section 7. To improve repeatability, a summary of the DUT/SUT configuration including a description of all enabled DUT/SUT features MUST be published with the benchmarking results. The following table provides a brief description of the security features and these are approximate taxonomies of features commonly found in currently deployed NGFW and NGIDS. The features provided by specific implementations may be named differently and not necessarily have configuration settings that align with the taxonomy. +================+================================================+ | DUT/SUT | Description | | Features | | +================+================================================+ | TLS Inspection | DUT/SUT intercepts and decrypts inbound HTTPS | | | traffic between servers and clients. Once the | | | content inspection has been completed, DUT/SUT | | | encrypts the HTTPS traffic with ciphers and | | | keys used by the clients and servers. For | | | TLS1.3, the DUT works as a middlebox (proxy) | | | and it holds the certificates and Pre-Shared | | | Keys (PSK) that are trusted by the client and | | | represent the identity of the real server. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | IDS/IPS | DUT/SUT detects and blocks exploits targeting | | | known and unknown vulnerabilities across the | | | monitored network. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | Anti-Malware | DUT/SUT detects and prevents the transmission | | | of malicious executable code and any | | | associated communications across the monitored | | | network. This includes data exfiltration as | | | well as command and control channels. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | Anti-Spyware | Anti-Spyware is a subcategory of Anti Malware. | | | Spyware transmits information without the | Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 | | user's knowledge or permission. DUT/SUT | | | detects and blocks initial infection or | | | transmission of data. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | Anti-Botnet | DUT/SUT detects and blocks traffic to or from | | | botnets. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | Anti-Evasion | DUT/SUT detects and mitigates attacks that | | | have been obfuscated in some manner. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | Web Filtering | DUT/SUT detects and blocks malicious websites | | | including defined classifications of websites | | | across the monitored network. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | DLP | DUT/SUT detects and prevents data breaches and | | | data exfiltration, or it detects and blocks | | | the transmission of sensitive data across the | | | monitored network. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | Certificate | DUT/SUT validates certificates used in | | Validation | encrypted communications across the monitored | | | network. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | Logging and | DUT/SUT logs and reports all traffic at the | | Reporting | flow level across the monitored network. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | Application | DUT/SUT detects known applications as defined | | Identification | within the traffic mix selected across the | | | monitored network. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ | DPI | DUT/SUT inspects the content of the data | | | packet. | +----------------+------------------------------------------------+ Table 1: Security Feature Description Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 +============================+=============+==========+ | DUT/SUT (NGFW) Features | RECOMMENDED | OPTIONAL | +============================+=============+==========+ | TLS Inspection | x | | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | IDS/IPS | x | | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Anti-Spyware | x | | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Anti-Virus | x | | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Anti-Botnet | x | | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Anti-Evasion | x | | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Web Filtering | | x | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Data Loss Protection (DLP) | | x | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | DDoS Protection | | x | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Certificate Validation | | x | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Application Identification | x | | +----------------------------+-------------+----------+ Table 2: NGFW Security Features +==============================+=============+==========+ | DUT/SUT (NGIPS) Features | RECOMMENDED | OPTIONAL | +==============================+=============+==========+ | TLS Inspection | x | | +------------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Anti-Malware | x | | +------------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Anti-Spyware | x | | +------------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Anti-Botnet | x | | +------------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Application Identification | x | | +------------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) | x | | +------------------------------+-------------+----------+ | Anti-Evasion | x | | +------------------------------+-------------+----------+ Table 3: NGIPS Security Features Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Note: With respect to TLS Inspection, there are scenarios where it will be optional. Below is a summary of the DUT/SUT configuration: * DUT/SUT MUST be configured in "inline" mode. * "Fail-Open" behavior MUST be disabled. * All RECOMMENDED security features are enabled. * Logging and reporting MUST be enabled. DUT/SUT SHOULD log all traffic at the flow level (5-tuple). If the DUT/SUT is designed to log all traffic at different levels (e.g. IP packet levels), it is acceptable to conduct tests. However, this MUST be noted in the test report. Logging to an external device is permissible. * Geographical location filtering SHOULD be configured. If the DUT/ SUT is not designed to perform geographical location filtering, it is acceptable to conduct tests without this feature. However, this MUST be noted in the test report. * Application Identification and Control MUST be configured to trigger applications from the defined traffic mix. In addition, a realistic number of access control rules (ACL) SHOULD be configured on the DUT/SUT where ACLs are configurable and reasonable based on the deployment scenario. For example, it is acceptable not to configure ACLs in an NGIPS since NGIPS devices do not require the use of ACLs in most deployment scenarios. This document determines the number of access policy rules for four different classes of DUT/SUT: Extra Small (XS), Small (S), Medium (M), and Large (L). A sample DUT/SUT classification is described in Appendix B. The Access Control Rules (ACL) defined in Figure 3 MUST be configured from top to bottom in the correct order as shown in the table. This is due to ACL types listed in specificity decreasing order, with "block" first, followed by "allow", representing a typical ACL-based security policy. The ACL entries MUST be configured with routable IP prefixes by the DUT/SUT, where applicable. (Note: There will be differences between how security vendors implement ACL decision- making.) The configured ACL MUST NOT block the test traffic used for the benchmarking tests. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 +---------------+ | DUT/SUT | | Classification| | # Rules | +-----------+-----------+--------------------+------+---+---+---+---+ | | Match | | | | | | | | Rules Type| Criteria | Description |Action| XS| S | M | L | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Application|Application| Any application | block| 5 | 10| 20| 50| |layer | | not included in | | | | | | | | | the measurement | | | | | | | | | traffic | | | | | | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Transport |SRC IP and | Any SRC IP prefix | block| 25| 50|100|250| |layer |TCP/UDP | used and any DST | | | | | | | |DST ports | ports not used in | | | | | | | | | the measurement | | | | | | | | | traffic | | | | | | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |IP layer |SRC/DST IP | Any SRC/DST IP | block| 25| 50|100|250| | | | subnet not used | | | | | | | | | in the measurement | | | | | | | | | traffic | | | | | | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Application|Application| Half of the | allow| 10| 10| 10| 10| |layer | | applications | | | | | | | | | included in the | | | | | | | | | measurement traffic| | | | | | | | |(see the note below)| | | | | | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Transport |SRC IP and | Half of the SRC | allow| >1| >1| >1| >1| |layer |TCP/UDP | IPs used and any | | | | | | | |DST ports | DST ports used in | | | | | | | | | the measurement | | | | | | | | | traffic | | | | | | | | | (one rule per | | | | | | | | | subnet) | | | | | | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |IP layer |SRC IP | The rest of the | allow| >1| >1| >1| >1| | | | SRC IP prefix | | | | | | | | | range used in the | | | | | | | | | measurement | | | | | | | | | traffic | | | | | | | | | (one rule per | | | | | | | | | subnet) | | | | | | +-----------+-----------+--------------------+------+---+---+---+---+ Figure 3: DUT/SUT Access List Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Note 1: Based on the test customer's specific use case, the testers can increase the number of rules. Note 2: If half of the applications included in the test traffic is less than 10, the missing number of ACL entries (dummy rules) can be configured for any application traffic not included in the test traffic. Note 3: In the event, the DUT/SUT is designed to not use ACLs it is acceptable to conduct tests without them. However, this MUST be noted in the test report. 4.2.1. Security Effectiveness Configuration The selected security features (defined in Table 2 and Table 3) of the DUT/SUT MUST be configured effectively to detect, prevent, and report the defined security vulnerability sets. This section defines the selection of the security vulnerability sets from the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) list for testing. The vulnerability set should reflect a minimum of 500 CVEs from no older than 10 calendar years to the current year. These CVEs should be selected with a focus on in-use software commonly found in business applications, with a Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Severity of High (7-10). This document is primarily focused on performance benchmarking. However, it is RECOMMENDED to validate the security features configuration of the DUT/SUT by evaluating the security effectiveness as a prerequisite for performance benchmarking tests defined in section 7. In case the benchmarking tests are performed without evaluating security effectiveness, the test report MUST explain the implications of this. The methodology for evaluating security effectiveness is defined in Appendix A. 4.3. Test Equipment Configuration In general, test equipment allows configuring parameters in different protocol layers. Extensive proof of concept tests conducted to support preparation of this document showed that benchmarking results are strongly affected by the choice of protocol stack parameters; especially OSI layer 4 transport protocol parameters. For more information on how TCP and QUIC parameters will impact performance review [fastly]. To achieve reproducible results that will be representative for real deployment scenarios, careful specification and documentation of the parameters are required. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 This section specifies common test equipment configuration parameters applicable for all benchmarking tests defined in Section 7. Any benchmarking test specific parameters are described under the test setup section of each benchmarking test individually. 4.3.1. Client Configuration This section specifies which parameters should be considered while configuring emulated client endpoints in the test equipment. Also, this section specifies the RECOMMENDED values for certain parameters. The values are the defaults typically used in most of the client operating system types. Pre-standard evaluations have shown that it is possible to set a wide range of arbitrary parameters for OSI layer 4 transport protocols on test equipment leading to client-specific results optimization; however, only well-defined common parameter sets help to establish meaningful and comparable benchmarking results. For these reasons, this document recommends specific sets of transport protocol parameters to be configured on test equipment used for benchmarking. 4.3.1.1. TCP Stack Attributes The TCP stack of the emulated client endpoints MUST fulfill the TCP requirements defined in [RFC9293] (See Appendix B.). In addition, this section specifies the RECOMMENDED values for TCP parameters configured using the following parameters: The IPv4 and IPv6 Maximum Segment Size (MSS) are set to 1460 bytes and 1440 bytes respectively. TX and RX initial receive window sizes are set to 65535 bytes. The client's initial congestion window should not exceed 10 times the MSS. Delayed ACKs are permitted and the maximum client delayed ACK should not exceed 10 times of the MSS before a forced ACK also, the maximum delayed ACK timer is allowed to be set to 200 ms. Up to three retries are allowed before a timeout event is declared. TCP PSH flag is set to high in all traffic. The source port range is in the range of 1024 - 65535. The clients initiate TCP connections via a three-way handshake (SYN, SYN/ACK, ACK) and close TCP connections via either a TCP three-way close (FIN, FIN/ACK, ACK) or a TCP four-way close (FIN, ACK, FIN, ACK). Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 4.3.1.2. QUIC Specification QUIC stack emulation on the test equipment MUST conform to [RFC9000] and [RFC9001]. This section specifies the RECOMMENDED values for certain QUIC parameters to be configured on test equipment used for benchmarking purposes only. QUIC Stream type (defined in section 2.1 of [RFC9000]) is set to "Client-Initiated, Bidirectional". 0-RTT and early data are Disabled. QUIC Connection termination method is Immediate close (section 10.2 of [RFC9000]. Flow control is enabled. UDP payloads are set to datagram size of 1232 bytes for IPv6 and 1252 bytes for IPv4. In addition, transport parameters and default values defined in section 18.2 of [RFC9000] are RECOMMENDED to configure on test equipment. Also, this document references Appendixes B.1 and B.2 of [RFC9002] for congestion control related constants and variables. Any configured QUIC and UDP parameter(s) MUST be documented in the test report. 4.3.1.3. Client IP Address Space The client IP space contains the following attributes. * If multiple IP blocks are used, they MUST be consist of multiple unique, discontinuous static address blocks. * A default gateway MAY be used. * The DSCP (differentiated services code point) marking should be set to DF (Default Forwarding) '000000' on IPv4 Type of Service (ToS) field and IPv6 traffic class field. * Extension header(s) MAY be used for IPv6 clients. If multiple extension headers are needed for traffic emulation, this document references [RFC8200] to choose the correct order of the extension headers within an IPv6 packet. Testing with extension header(s) may impact the performance of the DUT. The extension headers MUST be documented and reported. The following equation can be used to define the total number of client IP addresses that need to be configured on the test equipment. Desired total number of client IP addresses = Target throughput [Mbit/s] / Average throughput per IP address [Mbit/s] As shown in the example list below, the value for "Average throughput per IP address" can be varied depending on the deployment and use case scenario. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 (Example 1) DUT/SUT deployment scenario 1 : 6-7 Mbit/s per IP (e.g. 1,400-1,700 IPs per 10Gbit/s of throughput) (Example 2) DUT/SUT deployment scenario 2 : 0.1-0.2 Mbit/s per IP (e.g. 50,000-100,000 IPs per 10Gbit/s of throughput) Client IP addresses MUST be distributed between IPv4 and IPv6 based on deployment and use case scenario. The following options MAY be considered for a selection of ratios for both IP addresses and traffic load distribution. (Option 1) 100 % IPv4, no IPv6 (Option 2) 80 % IPv4, 20% IPv6 (Option 3) 50 % IPv4, 50% IPv6 (Option 4) 20 % IPv4, 80% IPv6 (Option 5) no IPv4, 100% IPv6 Note: IANA has assigned IP address ranges for testing purposes as described in Section 8. If the test scenario requires more IP addresses or subnets than IANA has assigned, this document recommends using private IPv4 address ranges or Unique Local Address (ULA) IPv6 address ranges for the testing. 4.3.1.4. Emulated Web Browser Attributes The client (emulated web browser) contains attributes that will materially affect the traffic load. The objective is to emulate modern, typical browser attributes to improve the relevance of the result set for typical deployment scenarios. The emulated browser MUST negotiate HTTP version 1.1 or higher. The emulated browser SHOULD advertise a User-Agent header. The emulated browser MUST enforce content length validation. HTTP header compression MAY be set to enable. If HTTP header compression is configurable in the test equipment, it MUST be documented if it was enabled or disabled. Depending on test scenarios and chosen HTTP version, the emulated browser MAY open multiple TCP or QUIC connections per Server endpoint IP at any time depending on how many sequential transactions need to be processed. For HTTP/2 traffic emulation, the emulated browser opens multiple concurrent streams per connection (multiplexing). For HTTPS requests, the emulated browser MUST send "h2" protocol identifier using the TLS extension Application Layer Protocol Negotiation Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 (ALPN). The following default values (see [Undertow]) are the RECOMMENDED setting for certain HTTP/2 parameters to be configured on test equipment used for benchmarking purposes only: * Maximum Frame size: 16384 bytes * Initial Window size: 65535 bytes * HPACK Header table size: 4096 bytes * Server PUSH enable: false (Note: in [Undertow] the default setting is true. However, for testing purposes, this document recommends setting the value false for server push.) This document refers to [RFC9113] for further details of HTTP/2. If any additional parameters are used to configure the test equipment, they MUST be documented. For HTTP/3 traffic emulation, the emulated browsers initiate secure QUIC connections using TLS 1.3 ([RFC9001] describes how TLS is used to secure QUIC). This document refers to [RFC9114] for HTTP/3 specifications. The specification for transport protocol parameters is defined in Section 4.3.1.2. QPACK configuration settings such as MAX_TABLE_CAPACITY and QPACK_BLOCKED_STREAMS are set to zero (default) as defined in [RFC9204]. Any HTTP/3 parameters used for test equipment configuration MUST be documented. For encrypted traffic, the following attributes are defined as the negotiated encryption parameters. The test clients MUST use TLS version 1.2 or higher. The TLS record size MAY be optimized for the HTTPS response object size up to a record size of 16 KBytes. If Server Name Indication (SNI) is required (especially if the server is identified by a domain name), the client endpoint MUST send TLS extension Server Name Indication (SNI) information when opening a security tunnel. Each client connection MUST perform a full TLS handshake and session reuse or resumption MUST be disabled. (Note: Real web browsers use session reuse or resumption. However, for testing purposes, this feature must not be used to measure the DUT/ SUT performance in the worst-case scenario.) The following TLS 1.2 supported ciphers and keys are RECOMMENDED for HTTPS based benchmarking tests defined in Section 7. 1. ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 with Prime256v1 (Signature Hash Algorithm: ecdsa_secp256r1_sha256 and Supported group: secp256r1) 2. ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 with RSA 2048 (Signature Hash Algorithm: rsa_pkcs1_sha256 and Supported group: secp256r1) Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 3. ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 with Secp384r1 (Signature Hash Algorithm: ecdsa_secp384r1_sha384 and Supported group: secp384r1) 4. ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 with RSA 4096 (Signature Hash Algorithm: rsa_pkcs1_sha384 and Supported group: secp384r1) Note: The above ciphers and keys were those commonly used for enterprise-grade encryption cipher suites for TLS 1.2 as of the time of publication (2022). Individual certification bodies should use ciphers and keys that reflect evolving use cases. These choices MUST be documented in the resulting test reports with detailed information on the ciphers and keys used along with reasons for the choices. IANA recommends the following cipher suites for use with TLS 1.3 defined in [RFC8446]. 1. TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 2. TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 3. TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 4. TLS_AES_128_CCM_SHA256 4.3.2. Backend Server Configuration This section specifies which parameters should be considered while configuring emulated backend servers using test equipment. 4.3.2.1. TCP Stack Attributes The TCP stack on the server-side MUST be configured similar to the client-side configuration described in Section 4.3.1.1 4.3.2.2. QUIC Specification The QUIC parameters on the server-side MUST be configured similar to the client-side configuration. Any configured QUIC Parameter(s) MUST be documented in the report. 4.3.2.3. Server Endpoint IP Addressing The sum of the server IP space MUST contain the following attributes. * The server IP blocks MUST consist of unique, discontinuous static address blocks with one IP per server Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) endpoint per test port. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 * A default gateway is permitted. The DSCP (differentiated services code point) marking is set to DF (Default Forwarding) '000000' on IPv4 Type of Service (ToS) field and IPv6 traffic class field. Extension header(s) for the IPv6 server is permitted. If multiple extension headers are required, this document referenced [RFC8200] to choose the correct order of the extension headers within an IPv6 packet. * The server IP address distribution between IPv4 and IPv6 MUST be identical to the client IP address distribution ratio. Note: The IANA has assigned IP address blocks for the testing purpose as described in Section 8. If the test scenario requires more IP addresses or address blocks than the IANA assigned, this document recommends using private IPv4 address ranges or Unique Local Address (ULA) IPv6 address ranges for the testing. 4.3.2.4. HTTP / HTTPS Server Pool Endpoint Attributes The HTTP 1.1 and HTTP/2 server pools listen on TCP ports 80 and 443 for HTTP and HTTPS. HTTP/3 server pool listens on UDP port 443 or any port. The server MUST emulate the same HTTP version (HTTP 1.1 or HTTP/2 or HTTP/3) and settings chosen by the client (emulated web browser). For the HTTPS server, TLS 1.2 or higher MUST be used with a maximum record size of 16 KByte. Ticket resumption or session ID reuse MUST NOT be used for TLS 1.2 and also session Ticket or session cache MUST NOT be used for TLS 1.3. The server MUST serve a certificate to the client. Cipher suite and key size on the server- side MUST be configured similar to the client-side configuration described in Section 4.3.1.4. 4.3.3. Traffic Flow Definition This section describes the traffic pattern between client and server endpoints. At the beginning of the test, the server endpoint initializes and will be ready to accept connection states including initialization of the TCP or QUIC stack as well as bound HTTP and HTTPS servers. When a client endpoint is needed, it will initialize and be given attributes such as a MAC and IP address. The behavior of the client is to sweep through the given server IP space, generating a recognizable service by the DUT. Sequential and pseudorandom sweep methods are acceptable. The method used MUST be stated in the final report. Thus, a balanced mesh between client endpoints and server endpoints will be generated in a client IP and port to server IP and port combination. Each client endpoint performs the same actions as other endpoints, with the difference being the source IP of the client endpoint and the target server IP pool. The client MUST use the server IP address or FQDN in the host Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 header. 4.3.3.1. Description of Intra-Client Behavior Client endpoints are independent of other clients that are concurrently executing. When a client endpoint initiates traffic, this section describes how the client steps through different services. Once the test is initialized, the client endpoints randomly hold (perform no operation) for a few milliseconds for better randomization of the start of client traffic. Each client (HTTP 1.1 or HTTP/2) will either open a new TCP connection or connect to an HTTP persistent connection still open to that specific server. HTTP/3 clients will open UDP streams within QUIC connections. At any point that the traffic profile may require encryption, a TLS encryption tunnel will form presenting the URL or IP address request to the server. If using SNI, the server MUST then perform an SNI name check with the proposed FQDN compared to the domain embedded in the certificate. Only when correct, will the server process the HTTPS response object. The initial response object to the server is based on benchmarking tests described in Section 7. Multiple additional sub-URLs (response objects on the service page) MAY be requested simultaneously. This MAY be to the same server IP as the initial URL. Each sub-object will also use a canonical FQDN and URL path. 4.3.4. Traffic Load Profile The loading of traffic is described in this section. The loading of a traffic load profile has five phases: Init, ramp up, sustain, ramp down, and collection. 1. Init phase: Testbed devices including the client and server endpoints should negotiate layer 2-3 connectivity such as MAC learning and ARP/ND. Only after successful MAC learning or ARP/ ND SHALL the test iteration move to the next phase. No measurements are made in this phase. The minimum recommended time for the Init phase is 5 seconds. During this phase, the emulated clients MUST NOT initiate any sessions with the DUT/SUT, in contrast, the emulated servers should be ready to accept requests from DUT/SUT or emulated clients. 2. Ramp up phase: The test equipment MUST start to generate the test traffic. It MUST use a set of the approximate number of unique client IP addresses to generate traffic. The traffic MUST ramp up from zero to desired target objective. The target objective is defined for each benchmarking test. The duration for the ramp up phase MUST be configured long enough that the test equipment does not overwhelm the DUT/SUTs stated performance metrics Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 defined in Section 6.3 namely, TCP or QUIC Connections Per Second, Inspected Throughput, Concurrent TCP or QUIC Connections, and Application Transactions Per Second. No measurements are made in this phase. 3. Sustain phase: Starts when all required clients are active and operating at their desired load condition. In the sustain phase, the test equipment MUST continue generating traffic to a constant target value for a constant number of active clients. The minimum RECOMMENDED time duration for sustain phase is 300 seconds. This is the phase where measurements occur. The test equipment MUST measure and record statistics continuously. The sampling interval for collecting the raw results and calculating the statistics MUST be less than 2 seconds. 4. Ramp down phase: The test traffic slows down from the target number to 0, and no measurements are made. 5. Collection phase: The last phase is administrative and will occur when the test equipment merges and collates the report data. 5. Testbed Considerations This section describes steps for a reference test (pre-test) that control the test environment including test equipment, focusing on physical and virtualized environments and as well as test equipment. Below are the RECOMMENDED steps for the reference test. 1. Perform the reference test either by configuring the DUT/SUT in the most trivial setup (fast forwarding) or without the presence of the DUT/SUT. 2. Generate traffic from traffic generator. Choose a traffic profile used for the HTTP or HTTPS throughput performance test with the smallest object size. 3. Ensure that any ancillary switching or routing functions added in the test equipment do not limit the performance by introducing network metrics such as packet loss and latency. This is specifically important for virtualized components (e.g., vSwitches, vRouters). 4. Verify that the generated traffic (performance) of the test equipment matches and reasonably exceeds the expected maximum performance of the DUT/SUT. 5. Record the network performance metrics packet loss and latency introduced by the test environment (without DUT/SUT). Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 6. Assert that the testbed characteristics are stable during the entire test session. Several factors might influence stability specifically, for virtualized testbeds. For example, additional workloads in a virtualized system, load balancing, and movement of virtual machines during the test, or simple issues such as additional heat created by high workloads leading to an emergency CPU performance reduction. The reference test MUST be performed before the benchmarking tests (described in section 7) start. 6. Reporting This section describes how the benchmarking test report should be formatted and presented. It is RECOMMENDED to include two main sections in the report: the introduction and the detailed test results sections. 6.1. Introduction The following attributes should be present in the introduction section of the test report. 1. The time and date of the execution of the tests 2. Summary of testbed software and hardware details a. DUT/SUT hardware/virtual configuration * This section should clearly identify the make and model of the DUT/SUT * The port interfaces, including speed and link information * If the DUT/SUT is a Virtual Network Function (VNF), host (server) hardware and software details, interface acceleration type such as DPDK and SR-IOV, used CPU cores, used RAM, resource sharing (e.g. Pinning details and NUMA Node) configuration details, hypervisor version, virtual switch version * details of any additional hardware relevant to the DUT/SUT such as controllers b. DUT/SUT software * Operating system name Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 * Version * Specific configuration details (if any) c. DUT/SUT enabled features * Configured DUT/SUT features (see Table 2 and Table 3) * Attributes of the above-mentioned features * Any additional relevant information about the features d. Test equipment hardware and software * Test equipment vendor name * Hardware details including model number, interface type * Test equipment firmware and test application software version * If the test equipment is a virtual solution, the host (server) hardware and software details, interface acceleration type such as DPDK and SR-IOV, used CPU cores, used RAM, resource sharing (e.g. Pinning details and NUMA Node) configuration details, hypervisor version, virtual switch version e. Key test parameters * Used cipher suites and keys * IPv4 and IPv6 traffic distribution * Number of configured ACL * TCP, UDP stack parameter if tested * QUIC, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 parameters if tested f. Details of application traffic mix used in the benchmarking test "Throughput Performance with Application Traffic Mix" (Section 7.1) * Name of applications and layer 7 protocols * Percentage of emulated traffic for each application and layer 7 protocols Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 * Percentage of encrypted traffic and used cipher suites and keys (The RECOMMENDED ciphers and keys are defined in Section 4.3.1.4) * Used object sizes for each application and layer 7 protocols 3. Results Summary / Executive Summary a. Results should be presented with an introduction section documenting the summary of results in a prominent, easy to read block. 6.2. Detailed Test Results In the result section of the test report, the following attributes should be present for each benchmarking test. a. KPIs MUST be documented separately for each benchmarking test. The format of the KPI metrics MUST be presented as described in Section 6.3. b. The next level of detail should be graphs showing each of these metrics over the duration (sustain phase) of the test. This allows the user to see the measured performance stability changes over time. 6.3. Benchmarks and Key Performance Indicators This section lists key performance indicators (KPIs) for overall benchmarking tests. All KPIs MUST be measured during the sustain phase of the traffic load profile described in Section 4.3.4. Also, the KPIs MUST be measured from the result output of test equipment. * Concurrent TCP Connections The aggregate number of simultaneous connections between hosts across the DUT/SUT, or between hosts and the DUT/SUT (defined in [RFC2647]). * Concurrent QUIC Connections The aggregate number of simultaneous connections between hosts across the DUT/SUT. * TCP Connections Per Second Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 The average number of successfully established TCP connections per second between hosts across the DUT/SUT, or between hosts and the DUT/SUT. As described in Section 4.3.1.1, the TCP connections are initiated by clients via a TCP three-way handshake (SYN, SYN/ACK, ACK). Then the TCP session data is sent and then the TCP sessions are closed via either a TCP three-way close (FIN, FIN/ACK, ACK) or a TCP four-way close (FIN, ACK, FIN, ACK). The TCP sessions MUST NOT be closed by RST. * QUIC Connections Per Second The average number of successfully established QUIC connections per second between hosts across the DUT/SUT. As described in Section 4.3.1.2, the QUIC connections are initiated by clients. Then the data is sent and then the QUIC sessions are closed by "immediate close" method. Since QUIC specification defined in Section 4.3.1.2 recommends disabling 0-RTT and early data, this KPI focused on 1-RTT handshake. If required, 0-RTT can be also measured in separate test runs while enabling 0-RTT and early data in the test equipment. * Application Transactions Per Second The average number of successfully completed transactions per second. For a particular transaction to be considered successful, all data MUST have been transferred in its entirety. In case of HTTP(S) transactions, it MUST have a valid status code (200 OK). * TLS Handshake Rate The average number of successfully established TLS connections per second between hosts across the DUT/SUT, or between hosts and the DUT/SUT. For TLS1.3 the handshake rate can be measured with 0-RTT or 1-RTT handshake. The transport protocol can be either TCP or QUIC. * Inspected Throughput The number of bits per second of examined and allowed traffic a network security device is able to transmit to the correct destination interface(s) in response to a specified offered load. The throughput benchmarking tests defined in Section 7 SHOULD measure the average Layer 2 throughput value when the DUT/SUT is "inspecting" traffic. It is also acceptable to measure other OSI Layer throughput. However, the measured layer (e.g. Layer 3 Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 throughput) MUST be noted in the report and the user MUST be aware of the implication while comparing the throughput performance of multiple DUT/SUTs measured in different OSI Layers. This document recommends presenting the inspected throughput value in Gbit/s rounded to two places of precision with a more specific Kbit/s in parenthesis. * Time to First Byte (TTFB) TTFB is the elapsed time between the start of sending the TCP SYN packet or QUIC initial Client Hello from the client and the client receiving the first packet of application data from the server via DUT/SUT. The benchmarking tests HTTP Transaction Latency (Section 7.4) and HTTPS Transaction Latency (Section 7.8) measure the minimum, average and maximum TTFB. The value should be expressed in milliseconds. * URL Response time / Time to Last Byte (TTLB) URL Response time / TTLB is the elapsed time between the start of sending the TCP SYN packet or QUIC initial Client Hello from the client and the client receiving the last packet of application data from the server via DUT/SUT. The benchmarking tests HTTP Transaction Latency (Section 7.4) and HTTPS Transaction Latency (Section 7.8) measure the minimum, average and maximum TTLB. The value should be expressed in milliseconds. 7. Benchmarking Tests This section mainly focuses on the benchmarking tests with HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2 traffic which uses TCP as the transport protocol. In particular, this section does not define specific benchmarking tests for QUIC or HTTP/3 related KPIs. However, the test methodology defined in the benchmarking tests TCP/QUIC Connections Per Second with HTTPS Traffic (Section 7.6), HTTPS Transaction Latency (Section 7.8), HTTPS Throughput (Section 7.7), and Concurrent TCP/ QUIC Connection Capacity with HTTPS Traffic (Section 7.9) can be used to test QUIC or HTTP/3 related KPIs. The throughput performance test with the application traffic mix defined in Section 7.1 can be performed with any other application traffic including HTTP/3. 7.1. Throughput Performance with Application Traffic Mix 7.1.1. Objective Using a relevant application traffic mix, determine the sustainable inspected throughput supported by the DUT/SUT. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Based on the test customer's specific use case, testers can choose the relevant application traffic mix for this test. The details about the traffic mix MUST be documented in the report. At least the following traffic mix details MUST be documented and reported together with the test results: Name of applications and layer 7 protocols Percentage of emulated traffic for each application and layer 7 protocol Percentage of encrypted traffic and used cipher suites and keys (The RECOMMENDED ciphers and keys are defined in Section 4.3.1.4.) Used object sizes for each application and layer 7 protocols 7.1.2. Test Setup Testbed setup MUST be configured as defined in Section 4. Any benchmarking test specific testbed configuration changes MUST be documented. 7.1.3. Test Parameters In this section, the benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. 7.1.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. Any configuration changes for this specific benchmarking test MUST be documented. In case the DUT/SUT is configured without TLS inspection, the test report MUST explain the implications of this to the relevant application traffic mix encrypted traffic. 7.1.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The following parameters MUST be documented for this benchmarking test: Client IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Server IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.2.3 Traffic distribution ratio between IPv4 and IPv6 defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Target inspected throughput: Aggregated line rate of the interface(s) used in the DUT/SUT or the value defined based on the requirement for a specific deployment scenario Initial throughput: 10% of the "Target inspected throughput" Note: Initial throughput is not a KPI to report. This value is configured on the traffic generator and used to perform Step 1: "Test Initialization and Qualification" described under Section 7.1.4. One of the ciphers and keys defined in Section 4.3.1.4 are RECOMMENDED to use for this benchmarking test. 7.1.3.3. Traffic Profile Traffic profile: This test MUST be run with a relevant application traffic mix profile. 7.1.3.4. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole sustain phase of the traffic load profile. a. Number of failed application transactions MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 transactions) of total attempted transactions. b. Number of Terminated TCP connections due to unexpected TCP RST sent by DUT/SUT MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated TCP connections. c. If HTTP/3 is used, the number of failed QUIC connections due to unexpected HTTP/3 error codes MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated QUIC connections. 7.1.3.5. Measurement The following KPI metrics MUST be reported for this benchmarking test: Mandatory KPIs (benchmarks): Inspected Throughput and Application Transactions Per Second Note: TTLB MUST be reported along with the object size used in the traffic profile. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Optional TCP stack related KPIs: TCP Connections Per Second, TLS Handshake Rate, TTFB (minimum, average, and maximum), TTLB (minimum, average, and maximum) Optional QUIC stack related KPIs: QUIC connection per second and concurrent QUIC connections 7.1.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedures are designed to measure the inspected throughput performance of the DUT/SUT at the sustaining period of the traffic load profile. The test procedure consists of three major steps: Step 1 ensures the DUT/SUT is able to reach the performance value (initial throughput) and meets the test results validation criteria when it was very minimally utilized. Step 2 determines whether the DUT/SUT is able to reach the target performance value within the test results validation criteria. Step 3 determines the maximum achievable performance value within the test results validation criteria. This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IP types: IPv4 only, IPv6 only, and IPv4 and IPv6 mixed traffic distribution. 7.1.4.1. Step 1: Test Initialization and Qualification Verify the link status of all connected physical interfaces. All interfaces are expected to be in "UP" status. Configure the traffic load profile of the test equipment to generate test traffic at the "Initial throughput" rate as described in Section 7.1.3.2. The test equipment MUST follow the traffic load profile definition as described in Section 4.3.4. The DUT/SUT MUST reach the "Initial throughput" during the sustain phase. Measure all KPI as defined in Section 7.1.3.5. The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet all the test results validation criteria defined in Section 7.1.3.4. If the KPI metrics do not meet the test results validation criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT be continued to step 2. 7.1.4.2. Step 2: Test Run with Target Objective Configure test equipment to generate traffic at the "Target inspected throughput" rate defined in Section 7.1.3.2. The test equipment MUST follow the traffic load profile definition as described in Section 4.3.4. The test equipment MUST start to measure and record all specified KPIs. Continue the test until all traffic profile phases are completed. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Within the test results validation criteria, the DUT/SUT is expected to reach the desired value of the target objective ("Target inspected throughput") in the sustain phase. Follow step 3, if the measured value does not meet the target value or does not fulfill the test results validation criteria. 7.1.4.3. Step 3: Test Iteration Determine the achievable average inspected throughput within the test results validation criteria. The final test iteration MUST be performed for the test duration defined in Section 4.3.4. 7.2. TCP/HTTP Connections Per Second 7.2.1. Objective Using HTTP traffic, determine the sustainable TCP connection establishment rate supported by the DUT/SUT under different throughput load conditions. To measure connections per second, test iterations MUST use different fixed HTTP response object sizes (the different load conditions) defined in Section 7.2.3.2. 7.2.2. Test Setup Testbed setup MUST be configured as defined in Section 4. Any specific testbed configuration changes (number of interfaces and interface type, etc.) MUST be documented. 7.2.3. Test Parameters In this section, benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. 7.2.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. Any configuration changes for this specific benchmarking test MUST be documented. 7.2.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The following parameters MUST be documented for this benchmarking test: Client IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Server IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.2.3 Traffic distribution ratio between IPv4 and IPv6 defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Target connections per second: Initial value from product datasheet or the value defined based on the requirement for a specific deployment scenario Initial connections per second: 10% of "Target connections per second" (Note: Initial connections per second is not a KPI to report. This value is configured on the traffic generator and used to perform Step1: "Test Initialization and Qualification" described under Section 7.2.4.) The client MUST negotiate HTTP and close the connection with FIN immediately after the completion of one transaction. In each test iteration, the client MUST send a GET request requesting a fixed HTTP response object size. The RECOMMENDED response object sizes are 1, 2, 4, 16, and 64 KByte. 7.2.3.3. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The Test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole sustain phase of the traffic load profile. a. Number of failed application transactions (receiving any HTTP response code other than 200 OK) MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 transactions) of total attempted transactions. b. Number of terminated TCP connections due to unexpected TCP RST sent by DUT/SUT MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated TCP connections. c. During the sustain phase, traffic MUST be forwarded at a constant rate (considered as a constant rate if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than 5%). d. Concurrent TCP connections MUST be constant during steady state and any deviation of concurrent TCP connections MUST be less than 10%. This confirms the DUT opens and closes TCP connections at approximately the same rate. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 30] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.2.3.4. Measurement TCP Connections Per Second MUST be reported for each test iteration (for each object size). 7.2.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedure is designed to measure the TCP connections per second rate of the DUT/SUT at the sustaining period of the traffic load profile. The test procedure consists of three major steps: Step 1 ensures the DUT/SUT is able to reach the performance value (Initial connections per second) and meets the test results validation criteria when it was very minimally utilized. Step 2 determines whether the DUT/SUT is able to reach the target performance value within the test results validation criteria. Step 3 determines the maximum achievable performance value within the test results validation criteria. This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IP types: IPv4 only, IPv6 only, and IPv4 and IPv6 mixed traffic distribution. 7.2.4.1. Step 1: Test Initialization and Qualification Verify the link status of all connected physical interfaces. All interfaces are expected to be in "UP" status. Configure the traffic load profile of the test equipment to establish "Initial connections per second" as defined in Section 7.2.3.2. The traffic load profile MUST be defined as described in Section 4.3.4. The DUT/SUT MUST reach the "Initial connections per second" before the sustain phase. The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet all the test results validation criteria defined in Section 7.2.3.3. If the KPI metrics do not meet the test results validation criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT continue to "Step 2". 7.2.4.2. Step 2: Test Run with Target Objective Configure test equipment to establish the target objective ("Target connections per second") defined in Section 7.2.3.2. The test equipment MUST follow the traffic load profile definition as described in Section 4.3.4. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 31] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 During the ramp up and sustain phase of each test iteration, other KPIs such as inspected throughput, concurrent TCP connections, and application transactions per second MUST NOT reach the maximum value the DUT/SUT can support. The test results for specific test iterations MUST NOT be reported as valid results if the above mentioned KPI (especially inspected throughput) reaches the maximum value. (Example: If the test iteration with 64 KByte of HTTP response object size reached the maximum inspected throughput limitation of the DUT/SUT, the test iteration MAY be interrupted and the result for 64 KByte must not be reported.) The test equipment MUST start to measure and record all specified KPIs. Continue the test until all traffic profile phases are completed. Within the test results validation criteria, the DUT/SUT is expected to reach the desired value of the target objective ("Target connections per second") in the sustain phase. Follow step 3, if the measured value does not meet the target value or does not fulfill the test results validation criteria. 7.2.4.3. Step 3: Test Iteration Determine the achievable TCP connections per second within the test results validation criteria. 7.3. HTTP Throughput 7.3.1. Objective Determine the sustainable inspected throughput of the DUT/SUT for HTTP transactions varying the HTTP response object size. 7.3.2. Test Setup Testbed setup MUST be configured as defined in Section 4. Any specific testbed configuration changes (number of interfaces and interface type, etc.) MUST be documented. 7.3.3. Test Parameters In this section, benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. 7.3.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. Any configuration changes for this specific benchmarking test MUST be documented. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 32] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.3.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The following parameters MUST be documented for this benchmarking test: Client IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Server IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.2.3 Traffic distribution ratio between IPv4 and IPv6 defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Target inspected throughput: Aggregated line rate of the interface(s) used in the DUT/SUT or the value defined based on the requirement for a specific deployment scenario Initial throughput: 10% of "Target inspected throughput" Note: Initial throughput is not a KPI to report. This value is configured on the traffic generator and used to perform Step 1: "Test Initialization and Qualification" described under Section 7.3.4. Number of HTTP response object requests (transactions) per connection: 10 RECOMMENDED HTTP response object size: 1, 16, 64, 256 KByte, and mixed objects defined in Table 4. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 33] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 +=====================+============================+ | Object size (KByte) | Number of requests/ Weight | +=====================+============================+ | 0.2 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ | 6 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ | 8 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ | 9 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ | 10 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ | 25 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ | 26 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ | 35 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ | 59 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ | 347 | 1 | +---------------------+----------------------------+ Table 4: Mixed Objects 7.3.3.3. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole sustain phase of the traffic load profile. a. Number of failed application transactions (receiving any HTTP response code other than 200 OK) MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 transactions) of attempt transactions. b. Traffic MUST be forwarded at a constant rate (considered as a constant rate if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than 5%). c. Concurrent TCP connections MUST be constant during steady state and any deviation of concurrent TCP connections MUST be less than 10%. This confirms the DUT opens and closes TCP connections at approximately the same rate. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 34] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.3.3.4. Measurement Inspected Throughput and HTTP Transactions per Second MUST be reported for each object size. 7.3.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedure is designed to measure HTTP throughput of the DUT/ SUT. The test procedure consists of three major steps: Step 1 ensures the DUT/SUT is able to reach the performance value (Initial throughput) and meets the test results validation criteria when it was very minimal utilized. Step 2 determines whether the DUT/SUT is able to reach the target performance value within the test results validation criteria. Step 3 determines the maximum achievable performance value within the test results validation criteria. This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IPv4 and IPv6 traffic distribution and HTTP response object sizes. 7.3.4.1. Step 1: Test Initialization and Qualification Verify the link status of all connected physical interfaces. All interfaces are expected to be in "UP" status. Configure the traffic load profile of the test equipment to establish "Initial inspected throughput" as defined in Section 7.3.3.2. The traffic load profile MUST be defined as described in Section 4.3.4. The DUT/SUT MUST reach the "Initial inspected throughput" during the sustain phase. Measure all KPI as defined in Section 7.3.3.4. The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet the test results validation criteria "a" defined in Section 7.3.3.3. The test results validation criteria "b" and "c" are OPTIONAL for step 1. If the KPI metrics do not meet the test results validation criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT be continued to "Step 2". 7.3.4.2. Step 2: Test Run with Target Objective Configure test equipment to establish the target objective ("Target inspected throughput") defined in Section 7.3.3.2. The test equipment MUST start to measure and record all specified KPIs. Continue the test until all traffic profile phases are completed. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 35] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Within the test results validation criteria, the DUT/SUT is expected to reach the desired value of the target objective in the sustain phase. Follow step 3, if the measured value does not meet the target value or does not fulfill the test results validation criteria. 7.3.4.3. Step 3: Test Iteration Determine the achievable inspected throughput within the test results validation criteria and measure the KPI metric Transactions per Second. The final test iteration MUST be performed for the test duration defined in Section 4.3.4. 7.4. HTTP Transaction Latency 7.4.1. Objective Using HTTP traffic, determine the HTTP transaction latency when DUT is running with sustainable HTTP transactions per second supported by the DUT/SUT under different HTTP response object sizes. Test iterations MUST be performed with different HTTP response object sizes in two different scenarios. One with a single transaction and the other with multiple transactions within a single TCP connection. For consistency, both the single and multiple transaction tests MUST be configured with the same HTTP version Scenario 1: The client MUST negotiate HTTP and close the connection with FIN immediately after the completion of a single transaction (GET and RESPONSE). Scenario 2: The client MUST negotiate HTTP and close the connection FIN immediately after the completion of 10 transactions (GET and RESPONSE) within a single TCP connection. 7.4.2. Test Setup Testbed setup MUST be configured as defined in Section 4. Any specific testbed configuration changes (number of interfaces and interface type, etc.) MUST be documented. 7.4.3. Test Parameters In this section, benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 36] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.4.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. Any configuration changes for this specific benchmarking test MUST be documented. 7.4.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The following parameters MUST be documented for this benchmarking test: Client IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Server IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.2.3 Traffic distribution ratio between IPv4 and IPv6 defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Target objective for scenario 1: 50% of the connections per second measured in benchmarking test TCP/HTTP Connections Per Second (Section 7.2) Target objective for scenario 2: 50% of the inspected throughput measured in benchmarking test HTTP Throughput (Section 7.3) Initial objective for scenario 1: 10% of "Target objective for scenario 1" Initial objective for scenario 2: 10% of "Target objective for scenario 2" Note: The Initial objectives are not a KPI to report. These values are configured on the traffic generator and used to perform Step1: "Test Initialization and Qualification" described under Section 7.4.4. HTTP transaction per TCP connection: Test scenario 1 with a single transaction and test scenario 2 with 10 transactions. HTTP with GET request requesting a single object. The RECOMMENDED object sizes are 1, 16, and 64 KByte. For each test iteration, the client MUST request a single HTTP response object size. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 37] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.4.3.3. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The Test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole sustain phase of the traffic load profile. a. Number of failed application transactions (receiving any HTTP response code other than 200 OK) MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 transactions) of attempt transactions. b. Number of terminated TCP connections due to unexpected TCP RST sent by DUT/SUT MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated TCP connections. c. During the sustain phase, traffic MUST be forwarded at a constant rate (considered as a constant rate if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than 5%). d. Concurrent TCP connections MUST be constant during steady state and any deviation of concurrent TCP connections MUST be less than 10%. This confirms the DUT opens and closes TCP connections at approximately the same rate. e. After ramp up the DUT MUST achieve the "Target objective" defined in Section 7.4.3.2 and remain in that state for the entire test duration (sustain phase). 7.4.3.4. Measurement TTFB (minimum, average, and maximum) and TTLB (minimum, average, and maximum) MUST be reported for each object size. 7.4.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedure is designed to measure TTFB or TTLB when the DUT/ SUT is operating close to 50% of its maximum achievable connections per second or inspected throughput. The test procedure consists of two major steps: Step 1 ensures the DUT/SUT is able to reach the initial performance values and meets the test results validation criteria when it was very minimally utilized. Step 2 measures the latency values within the test results validation criteria. This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IP types (IPv4 only, IPv6 only, and IPv4 and IPv6 mixed traffic distribution), HTTP response object sizes, and single and multiple transactions per connection scenarios. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 38] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.4.4.1. Step 1: Test Initialization and Qualification Verify the link status of all connected physical interfaces. All interfaces are expected to be in "UP" status. Configure the traffic load profile of the test equipment to establish the "Initial objective" as defined in Section 7.4.3.2. The traffic load profile MUST be defined as described in Section 4.3.4. The DUT/SUT MUST reach the "Initial objective" before the sustain phase. The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet all the test results validation criteria defined in Section 7.4.3.3. If the KPI metrics do not meet the test results validation criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT be continued to "Step 2". 7.4.4.2. Step 2: Test Run with Target Objective Configure test equipment to establish the "Target objective" defined in Section 7.4.3.2. The test equipment MUST follow the traffic load profile definition as described in Section 4.3.4. The test equipment MUST start to measure and record all specified KPIs. Continue the test until all traffic profile phases are completed. Within the test results validation criteria, the DUT/SUT MUST reach the desired value of the target objective in the sustain phase. Measure the minimum, average, and maximum values of TTFB and TTLB. 7.5. Concurrent TCP/HTTP Connection Capacity 7.5.1. Objective Determine the number of concurrent TCP connections that the DUT/ SUT sustains when using HTTP traffic. 7.5.2. Test Setup Testbed setup MUST be configured as defined in Section 4. Any specific testbed configuration changes (number of interfaces and interface type, etc.) MUST be documented. 7.5.3. Test Parameters In this section, benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 39] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.5.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. Any configuration changes for this specific benchmarking test MUST be documented. 7.5.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The following parameters MUST be noted for this benchmarking test: Client IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Server IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.2.3 Traffic distribution ratio between IPv4 and IPv6 defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Target concurrent connection: Initial value from product datasheet or the value defined based on the requirement for a specific deployment scenario. Initial concurrent connection: 10% of "Target concurrent connection" Note: Initial concurrent connection is not a KPI to report. This value is configured on the traffic generator and used to perform Step1: "Test Initialization and Qualification" described under Section 7.5.4. Maximum connections per second during ramp up phase: 50% of maximum connections per second measured in benchmarking test TCP/ HTTP Connections per second (Section 7.2) Ramp up time (in traffic load profile for "Target concurrent connection"): "Target concurrent connection" / "Maximum connections per second during ramp up phase" Ramp up time (in traffic load profile for "Initial concurrent connection"): "Initial concurrent connection" / "Maximum connections per second during ramp up phase" The client MUST negotiate HTTP and each client MAY open multiple concurrent TCP connections per server endpoint IP. Each client sends 10 GET requests requesting 1 KByte HTTP response object in the same TCP connection (10 transactions/TCP connection) and the delay (think time) between each transaction MUST be X seconds. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 40] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 X = ("Ramp up time" + "steady state time") /10 The established connections MUST remain open until the ramp down phase of the test. During the ramp down phase, all connections MUST be successfully closed with FIN. 7.5.3.3. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The Test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole sustain phase of the traffic load profile. a. Number of failed application transactions (receiving any HTTP response code other than 200 OK) MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 transactions) of total attempted transactions. b. Number of terminated TCP connections due to unexpected TCP RST sent by DUT/SUT MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated TCP connections. c. During the sustain phase, traffic MUST be forwarded at a constant rate (considered as a constant rate if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than 5%). 7.5.3.4. Measurement Average Concurrent TCP Connections MUST be reported for this benchmarking test. 7.5.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedure is designed to measure the concurrent TCP connection capacity of the DUT/SUT at the sustaining period of the traffic load profile. The test procedure consists of three major steps: Step 1 ensures the DUT/SUT is able to reach the performance value (Initial concurrent connection) and meets the test results validation criteria when it was very minimally utilized. Step 2 determines whether the DUT/SUT is able to reach the target performance value within the test results validation criteria. Step 3 determines the maximum achievable performance value within the test results validation criteria. This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IPv4 and IPv6 traffic distributions. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 41] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.5.4.1. Step 1: Test Initialization and Qualification Verify the link status of all connected physical interfaces. All interfaces are expected to be in "UP" status. Configure test equipment to establish "Initial concurrent TCP connections" defined in Section 7.5.3.2. Except ramp up time, the traffic load profile MUST be defined as described in Section 4.3.4. During the sustain phase, the DUT/SUT MUST reach the "Initial concurrent TCP connections". The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet all the test results validation criteria defined in Section 7.5.3.3. If the KPI metrics do not meet the test results validation criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT be continued to "Step 2". 7.5.4.2. Step 2: Test Run with Target Objective Configure test equipment to establish the target objective ("Target concurrent TCP connections"). The test equipment MUST follow the traffic load profile definition (except ramp up time) as described in Section 4.3.4. During the ramp up and sustain phase, the other KPIs such as inspected throughput, TCP connections per second, and application transactions per second MUST NOT reach the maximum value the DUT/SUT can support. The test equipment MUST start to measure and record KPIs defined in Section 7.5.3.4. Continue the test until all traffic profile phases are completed. Within the test results validation criteria, the DUT/SUT is expected to reach the desired value of the target objective in the sustain phase. Follow step 3, if the measured value does not meet the target value or does not fulfill the test results validation criteria. 7.5.4.3. Step 3: Test Iteration Determine the achievable concurrent TCP connections capacity within the test results validation criteria. 7.6. TCP/QUIC Connections per Second with HTTPS Traffic Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 42] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.6.1. Objective Using HTTPS traffic, determine the sustainable TLS session establishment rate supported by the DUT/SUT under different throughput load conditions. Test iterations MUST include common cipher suites and key strengths as well as forward looking stronger keys. Specific test iterations MUST include ciphers and keys defined in Section 7.6.3.2. For each cipher suite and key strengths, test iterations MUST use a single HTTPS response object size defined in Section 7.6.3.2 to measure connections per second performance under a variety of DUT/SUT security inspection load conditions. 7.6.2. Test Setup Testbed setup MUST be configured as defined in Section 4. Any specific testbed configuration changes (number of interfaces and interface type, etc.) MUST be documented. 7.6.3. Test Parameters In this section, benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. 7.6.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. Any configuration changes for this specific benchmarking test MUST be documented. 7.6.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The following parameters MUST be documented for this benchmarking test: Client IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Server IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.2.3 Traffic distribution ratio between IPv4 and IPv6 defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Target connections per second: Initial value from product datasheet or the value defined based on the requirement for a specific deployment scenario. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 43] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Initial connections per second: 10% of "Target connections per second" (Note: Initial connections per second is not a KPI to report. This value is configured on the traffic generator and used to perform Step1: "Test Initialization and Qualification" described under Section 7.6.4.) RECOMMENDED ciphers and keys defined in Section 4.3.1.4 The client MUST negotiate HTTPS and close the connection without error immediately after the completion of one transaction. In each test iteration, the client MUST send a GET request requesting a fixed HTTPS response object size. The RECOMMENDED object sizes are 1, 2, 4, 16, and 64 KByte. 7.6.3.3. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole test duration. a. Number of failed application transactions (receiving any HTTP response code other than 200 OK) MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 transactions) of attempt transactions. b. Number of terminated TCP connections due to unexpected TCP RST sent by DUT/SUT MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated TCP connections. If HTTP/3 is used, the number of terminated QUIC connections due to unexpected errors MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated QUIC connections. c. During the sustain phase, traffic MUST be forwarded at a constant rate (considered as a constant rate if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than 5%). d. Concurrent TCP connections generation rate MUST be constant during steady state and any deviation of concurrent TCP connections MUST be less than 10%. If HTTP/3 is used, the concurrent QUIC connections generation rate MUST be constant during steady state and any deviation of concurrent QUIC connections MUST be less than 10%. This confirms the DUT opens and closes connections at approximately the same rate. 7.6.3.4. Measurement If HTTP 1.1 or HTTP/2 is used, TCP connections per second MUST be reported for each test iteration (for each object size). Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 44] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 If HTTP/3 is used, QUIC connections per second MUST be measured and reported for each test iteration (for each object size). The KPI metric TLS Handshake Rate can be measured in the test using 1 KByte object size. 7.6.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedure is designed to measure the TCP or QUIC connections per second rate of the DUT/SUT at the sustaining period of the traffic load profile. The test procedure consists of three major steps: Step 1 ensures the DUT/SUT is able to reach the performance value (Initial connections per second) and meets the test results validation criteria when it was very minimally utilized. Step 2 determines whether the DUT/SUT is able to reach the target performance value within the test results validation criteria. Step 3 determines the maximum achievable performance value within the test results validation criteria. This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IPv4 and IPv6 traffic distributions. 7.6.4.1. Step 1: Test Initialization and Qualification Verify the link status of all connected physical interfaces. All interfaces are expected to be in "UP" status. Configure the traffic load profile of the test equipment to establish "Initial connections per second" as defined in Section 7.6.3.2. The traffic load profile MUST be defined as described in Section 4.3.4. The DUT/SUT MUST reach the "Initial connections per second" before the sustain phase. The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet all the test results validation criteria defined in Section 7.6.3.3. If the KPI metrics do not meet the test results validation criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT be continued to "Step 2". 7.6.4.2. Step 2: Test Run with Target Objective Configure test equipment to establish "Target connections per second" as defined in Section 7.6.3.2. The test equipment MUST follow the traffic load profile definition as described in Section 4.3.4. During the ramp up and sustain phase, other KPIs such as inspected throughput, concurrent TCP/QUIC connections, and application transactions per second MUST NOT reach the maximum value the DUT/SUT Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 45] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 can support. The test results for the specific test iteration MUST NOT be reported as valid results, if the above mentioned KPI (especially inspected throughput) reaches the maximum value. (Example: If the test iteration with 64 KByte of HTTPS response object size reached the maximum inspected throughput limitation of the DUT, the test iteration MAY be interrupted, and the result for 64 KByte should not be reported). The test equipment MUST start to measure and record all specified KPIs. Continue the test until all traffic profile phases are completed. Within the test results validation criteria, the DUT/SUT is expected to reach the desired value of the target objective ("Target connections per second") in the sustain phase. Follow step 3, if the measured value does not meet the target value or does not fulfill the test results validation criteria. 7.6.4.3. Step 3: Test Iteration Determine the achievable connections per second within the test results validation criteria. 7.7. HTTPS Throughput 7.7.1. Objective Determine the sustainable inspected throughput of the DUT/SUT for HTTPS transactions varying the HTTPS response object size. Test iterations MUST include common cipher suites and key strengths as well as forward looking stronger keys. Specific test iterations MUST include the ciphers and keys defined in Section 7.7.3.2. 7.7.2. Test Setup Testbed setup MUST be configured as defined in Section 4. Any specific testbed configuration changes (number of interfaces and interface type, etc.) MUST be documented. 7.7.3. Test Parameters In this section, benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 46] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.7.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. Any configuration changes for this specific benchmarking test MUST be documented. 7.7.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The following parameters MUST be documented for this benchmarking test: Client IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Server IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.2.3 Traffic distribution ratio between IPv4 and IPv6 defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Target inspected throughput: Aggregated line rate of the interface(s) used in the DUT/SUT or the value defined based on the requirement for a specific deployment scenario. Initial throughput: 10% of "Target inspected throughput" Note: Initial throughput is not a KPI to report. This value is configured on the traffic generator and used to perform Step1: "Test Initialization and Qualification" described under Section 7.7.4. Number of HTTPS response object requests (transactions) per connection: 10 RECOMMENDED ciphers and keys defined in Section 4.3.1.4 RECOMMENDED HTTPS response object size: 1, 16, 64, 256 KByte, and mixed objects defined in Table 4 under Section 7.3.3.2. 7.7.3.3. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole sustain phase of the traffic load profile. a. Number of failed Application transactions (receiving any HTTP response code other than 200 OK) MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 transactions) of attempt transactions. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 47] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 b. Traffic MUST be generated at a constant rate (considered as a constant rate if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than 5%). c. Concurrent generated TCP connections MUST be constant during steady state and any deviation of concurrent TCP connections MUST be less than 10%. If HTTP/3 is used, the concurrent generated QUIC connections MUST be constant during steady state and any deviation of concurrent QUIC connections MUST be less than 10%. This confirms the DUT opens and closes connections at approximately the same rate. 7.7.3.4. Measurement Inspected Throughput and HTTPS Transactions per Second MUST be reported for each object size. 7.7.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedure consists of three major steps: Step 1 ensures the DUT/SUT is able to reach the performance value (Initial throughput) and meets the test results validation criteria when it was very minimally utilized. Step 2 determines whether the DUT/SUT is able to reach the target performance value within the test results validation criteria. Step 3 determines the maximum achievable performance value within the test results validation criteria. This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IPv4 and IPv6 traffic distribution and HTTPS response object sizes. 7.7.4.1. Step 1: Test Initialization and Qualification Verify the link status of all connected physical interfaces. All interfaces are expected to be in "UP" status. Configure the traffic load profile of the test equipment to establish "Initial throughput" as defined in Section 7.7.3.2. The traffic load profile MUST be defined as described in Section 4.3.4. The DUT/SUT MUST reach the "Initial throughput" during the sustain phase. Measure all KPI as defined in Section 7.7.3.4. The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet the test results validation criteria "a" defined in Section 7.7.3.3. The test results validation criteria "b", and "c" are OPTIONAL for step 1. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 48] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 If the KPI metrics do not meet the test results validation criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT be continued to "Step 2". 7.7.4.2. Step 2: Test Run with Target Objective Configure test equipment to establish the target objective ("Target inspected throughput") defined in Section 7.7.3.2. The test equipment MUST start to measure and record all specified KPIs. Continue the test until all traffic profile phases are completed. Within the test results validation criteria, the DUT/SUT is expected to reach the desired value of the target objective in the sustain phase. Follow step 3, if the measured value does not meet the target value or does not fulfill the test results validation criteria. 7.7.4.3. Step 3: Test Iteration Determine the achievable average inspected throughput within the test results validation criteria. The final test iteration MUST be performed for the test duration defined in Section 4.3.4. 7.8. HTTPS Transaction Latency 7.8.1. Objective Using HTTPS traffic, determine the HTTPS transaction latency when DUT/SUT is running with sustainable HTTPS transactions per second supported by the DUT/SUT under different HTTPS response object sizes. Scenario 1: The client MUST negotiate HTTPS and close the connection immediately after the completion of a single transaction (GET and RESPONSE). Scenario 2: The client MUST negotiate HTTPS and close the connection immediately after the completion of 10 transactions (GET and RESPONSE) within a single TCP or QUIC connection. 7.8.2. Test Setup Testbed setup MUST be configured as defined in Section 4. Any specific testbed configuration changes (number of interfaces and interface type, etc.) MUST be documented. 7.8.3. Test Parameters In this section, benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 49] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.8.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. Any configuration changes for this specific benchmarking test MUST be documented. 7.8.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The following parameters MUST be documented for this benchmarking test: Client IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Server IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.2.3 Traffic distribution ratio between IPv4 and IPv6 defined in Section 4.3.1.3 RECOMMENDED cipher suites and key sizes defined in Section 4.3.1.4 Target objective for scenario 1: 50% of the connections per second measured in benchmarking test TCP/QUIC Connections per Second with HTTPS Traffic (Section 7.6) Target objective for scenario 2: 50% of the inspected throughput measured in benchmarking test HTTPS Throughput (Section 7.7) Initial objective for scenario 1: 10% of "Target objective for scenario 1" Initial objective for scenario 2: 10% of "Target objective for scenario 2" Note: The Initial objectives are not a KPI to report. These values are configured on the traffic generator and used to perform Step1: "Test Initialization and Qualification" described under Section 7.8.4. HTTPS transaction per TCP or QUIC connection: Test scenario 1 with a single transaction and scenario 2 with 10 transactions HTTPS with GET request requesting a single object. The RECOMMENDED object sizes are 1, 16, and 64 KByte. For each test iteration, the client MUST request a single HTTPS response object size. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 50] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.8.3.3. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The Test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole sustain phase of the traffic load profile. a. Number of failed application transactions (receiving any HTTP response code other than 200 OK) MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 transactions) of attempt transactions. b. Number of terminated TCP connections due to unexpected TCP RST sent by DUT/SUT MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated TCP connections. If HTTP/3 is used, the number of terminated QUIC connections due to unexpected errors MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated QUIC connections. c. During the sustain phase, traffic MUST be forwarded at a constant rate (considered as a constant rate if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than 5%). d. Concurrent TCP or QUIC connections MUST be constant during steady state and any deviation of concurrent TCP connections MUST be less than 10%. If HTTP/3 is used, the concurrent generated QUIC connections MUST be constant during steady state and any deviation of concurrent QUIC connections MUST be less than 10%. This confirms the DUT opens and closes connections at approximately the same rate. e. After ramp up the DUT/SUT MUST achieve the "Target objective" defined in the parameter Section 7.8.3.2 and remain in that state for the entire test duration (sustain phase). 7.8.3.4. Measurement TTFB (minimum, average, and maximum) and TTLB (minimum, average, and maximum) MUST be reported for each object size. 7.8.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedure is designed to measure TTFB or TTLB when the DUT/ SUT is operating close to 50% of its maximum achievable connections per second or inspected throughput. The test procedure consists of two major steps: Step 1 ensures the DUT/SUT is able to reach the initial performance values and meets the test results validation criteria when it was very minimally utilized. Step 2 measures the latency values within the test results validation criteria. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 51] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IP types (IPv4 only, IPv6 only, and IPv4 and IPv6 mixed traffic distribution), HTTPS response object sizes, and single, and multiple transactions per connection scenarios. 7.8.4.1. Step 1: Test Initialization and Qualification Verify the link status of all connected physical interfaces. All interfaces are expected to be in "UP" status. Configure the traffic load profile of the test equipment to establish the "Initial objective" as defined in Section 7.8.3.2. The traffic load profile MUST be defined as described in Section 4.3.4. The DUT/SUT MUST reach the "Initial objective" before the sustain phase. The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet all the test results validation criteria defined in Section 7.8.3.3. If the KPI metrics do not meet the test results validation criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT be continued to "Step 2". 7.8.4.2. Step 2: Test Run with Target Objective Configure test equipment to establish the "Target objective" defined in Section 7.8.3.2. The test equipment MUST follow the traffic load profile definition as described in Section 4.3.4. The test equipment MUST start to measure and record all specified KPIs. Continue the test until all traffic profile phases are completed. Within the test results validation criteria, the DUT/SUT MUST reach the desired value of the target objective in the sustain phase. Measure the minimum, average, and maximum values of TTFB and TTLB. 7.9. Concurrent TCP/QUIC Connection Capacity with HTTPS Traffic 7.9.1. Objective Determine the number of concurrent TCP/QUIC connections the DUT/SUT sustains when using HTTPS traffic. 7.9.2. Test Setup Testbed setup MUST be configured as defined in Section 4. Any specific testbed configuration changes (number of interfaces and interface type, etc.) MUST be documented. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 52] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.9.3. Test Parameters In this section, benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. 7.9.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. Any configuration changes for this specific benchmarking test MUST be documented. 7.9.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The following parameters MUST be documented for this benchmarking test: Client IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.1.3 Server IP address ranges defined in Section 4.3.2.3 Traffic distribution ratio between IPv4 and IPv6 defined in Section 4.3.1.3 RECOMMENDED cipher suites and key sizes defined in Section 4.3.1.4 Target concurrent connections: Initial value from product datasheet or the value defined based on the requirement for a specific deployment scenario. Initial concurrent connections: 10% of "Target concurrent connections" Note: Initial concurrent connection is not a KPI to report. This value is configured on the traffic generator and used to perform Step1: "Test Initialization and Qualification" described under Section 7.9.4. Connections per second during ramp up phase: 50% of maximum connections per second measured in benchmarking test TCP/QUIC Connections per second with HTTPS Traffic (Section 7.6) Ramp up time (in traffic load profile for "Target concurrent connections"): "Target concurrent connections" / "Maximum connections per second during ramp up phase" Ramp up time (in traffic load profile for "Initial concurrent connections"): "Initial concurrent connections" / "Maximum connections per second during ramp up phase" Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 53] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 The client MUST perform HTTPS transactions with persistence and each client can open multiple concurrent connections per server endpoint IP. Each client sends 10 GET requests requesting 1 KByte HTTPS response objects in the same TCP/QUIC connections (10 transactions/connection) and the delay (think time) between each transaction MUST be X seconds. X = ("Ramp up time" + "steady state time") /10 The established connections MUST remain open until the ramp down phase of the test. During the ramp down phase, all connections MUST be successfully closed with FIN. 7.9.3.3. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The Test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole sustain phase of the traffic load profile. a. Number of failed application transactions (receiving any HTTP response code other than 200 OK) MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 transactions) of total attempted transactions. b. Number of terminated TCP connections due to unexpected TCP RST sent by DUT/SUT MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated TCP connections. If HTTP/3 is used, the number of terminated QUIC connections due to unexpected errors MUST be less than 0.001% (1 out of 100,000 connections) of total initiated QUIC connections c. During the sustain phase, traffic MUST be forwarded at a constant rate (considered as a constant rate if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than 5%). 7.9.3.4. Measurement Average Concurrent TCP or QUIC Connections MUST be reported for this benchmarking test. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 54] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 7.9.4. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedure is designed to measure the concurrent TCP connection capacity of the DUT/SUT at the sustaining period of the traffic load profile. The test procedure consists of three major steps: Step 1 ensures the DUT/SUT is able to reach the performance value (Initial concurrent connection) and meets the test results validation criteria when it was very minimally utilized. Step 2 determines whether the DUT/SUT is able to reach the target performance value within the test results validation criteria. Step 3 determines the maximum achievable performance value within the test results validation criteria. This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IPv4 and IPv6 traffic distributions. 7.9.4.1. Step 1: Test Initialization and Qualification Verify the link status of all connected physical interfaces. All interfaces are expected to be in "UP" status. Configure test equipment to establish "Initial concurrent TCP connections" defined in Section 7.9.3.2. Except ramp up time, the traffic load profile MUST be defined as described in Section 4.3.4. During the sustain phase, the DUT/SUT MUST reach the "Initial concurrent connections". The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet the test results validation criteria "a", and "b" defined in Section 7.9.3.3. If the KPI metrics do not meet the test results validation criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT be continued to "Step 2". 7.9.4.2. Step 2: Test Run with Target Objective Configure test equipment to establish the target objective ("Target concurrent connections"). The test equipment MUST follow the traffic load profile definition (except ramp up time) as described in Section 4.3.4. During the ramp up and sustain phase, the other KPIs such as inspected throughput, TCP or QUIC connections per second, and application transactions per second MUST NOT reach the maximum value that the DUT/SUT can support. The test equipment MUST start to measure and record KPIs defined in Section 7.9.3.4. Continue the test until all traffic profile phases are completed. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 55] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Within the test results validation criteria, the DUT/SUT is expected to reach the desired value of the target objective in the sustain phase. Follow step 3, if the measured value does not meet the target value or does not fulfill the test results validation criteria. 7.9.4.3. Step 3: Test Iteration Determine the achievable concurrent TCP/QUIC connections within the test results validation criteria. 8. IANA Considerations This document makes no specific request of IANA. The IANA has assigned IPv4 and IPv6 address blocks in [RFC6890] that have been registered for special purposes. The IPv6 address block 2001:2::/48 has been allocated for the purpose of IPv6 Benchmarking [RFC5180] and the IPv4 address block 198.18.0.0/15 has been allocated for the purpose of IPv4 Benchmarking [RFC2544]. This assignment was made to minimize the chance of conflict in case a testing device were to be accidentally connected to the part of the Internet. 9. Security Considerations The primary goal of this document is to provide benchmarking terminology and methodology for next-generation network security devices for use in a laboratory isolated test environment. However, readers should be aware that there is some overlap between performance and security issues. Specifically, the optimal configuration for network security device performance may not be the most secure, and vice-versa. Testing security platforms with working exploits and malware carries risks. Ensure proper access controls are implemented to prevent unintended exposure to vulnerable networks or systems. The cipher suites recommended in this document are for test purposes only. The cipher suite recommendation for a real deployment is outside the scope of this document. Security assessment of an NGFW/NGIPS product could also include an analysis whether any type of uncommon traffic characteristics would have a significant impact on performance. Such performance impacts would allow an attacker to use such specifically crafted traffic as a DoS attack to reduce the remaining performance available to other traffic through the NGFW/NGIPS. Such uncommon traffic characteristics might include for example IP fragmented traffic, specific type of application traffic, or uncommonly high HTTP transaction rate traffic. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 56] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 10. Contributors The following individuals contributed significantly to the creation of this document: Alex Samonte, Amritam Putatunda, Aria Eslambolchizadeh, Chao Guo, Chris Brown, Cory Ford, David DeSanto, Jurrie Van Den Breekel, Michelle Rhines, Mike Jack, Ryan Liles, Samaresh Nair, Stephen Goudreault, Tim Carlin, and Tim Otto. 11. Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge the members of NetSecOPEN for their participation in the creation of this document. Additionally, the following members need to be acknowledged: Anand Vijayan, Chris Marshall, Jay Lindenauer, Michael Shannon, Mike Deichman, Ryan Riese, and Toulnay Orkun. 12. References 12.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . 12.2. Informative References [fastly] Oku, K. and J. Iyengar, "Can QUIC match TCP's computational efficiency?", 30 April 2020, . [RFC2544] Bradner, S. and J. McQuaid, "Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices", RFC 2544, DOI 10.17487/RFC2544, March 1999, . [RFC2647] Newman, D., "Benchmarking Terminology for Firewall Performance", RFC 2647, DOI 10.17487/RFC2647, August 1999, . Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 57] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 [RFC3511] Hickman, B., Newman, D., Tadjudin, S., and T. Martin, "Benchmarking Methodology for Firewall Performance", RFC 3511, DOI 10.17487/RFC3511, April 2003, . [RFC5180] Popoviciu, C., Hamza, A., Van de Velde, G., and D. Dugatkin, "IPv6 Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices", RFC 5180, DOI 10.17487/RFC5180, May 2008, . [RFC6815] Bradner, S., Dubray, K., McQuaid, J., and A. Morton, "Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful", RFC 6815, DOI 10.17487/RFC6815, November 2012, . [RFC6890] Cotton, M., Vegoda, L., Bonica, R., Ed., and B. Haberman, "Special-Purpose IP Address Registries", BCP 153, RFC 6890, DOI 10.17487/RFC6890, April 2013, . [RFC8200] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", STD 86, RFC 8200, DOI 10.17487/RFC8200, July 2017, . [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, . [RFC9000] Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000, DOI 10.17487/RFC9000, May 2021, . [RFC9001] Thomson, M., Ed. and S. Turner, Ed., "Using TLS to Secure QUIC", RFC 9001, DOI 10.17487/RFC9001, May 2021, . [RFC9002] Iyengar, J., Ed. and I. Swett, Ed., "QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control", RFC 9002, DOI 10.17487/RFC9002, May 2021, . [RFC9113] Thomson, M., Ed. and C. Benfield, Ed., "HTTP/2", RFC 9113, DOI 10.17487/RFC9113, June 2022, . Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 58] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 [RFC9114] Bishop, M., Ed., "HTTP/3", RFC 9114, DOI 10.17487/RFC9114, June 2022, . [RFC9204] Krasic, C., Bishop, M., and A. Frindell, Ed., "QPACK: Field Compression for HTTP/3", RFC 9204, DOI 10.17487/RFC9204, June 2022, . [RFC9293] Eddy, W., Ed., "Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)", STD 7, RFC 9293, DOI 10.17487/RFC9293, August 2022, . [Undertow] "An in depth overview of HTTP/2", . [Wiki-NGFW] "", . Appendix A. Test Methodology - Security Effectiveness Evaluation A.1. Test Objective This test methodology verifies the DUT/SUT is able to detect, prevent, and report the vulnerabilities. In this test, background test traffic will be generated to utilize the DUT/SUT. In parallel, a number of malicious traffic will be sent to the DUT/SUT as encrypted and as well as clear text payload formats using a traffic generator. Section 4.2.1 defines the selection of the malicious traffic from the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) list for testing. The following KPIs are measured in this test: * Number of blocked CVEs * Number of bypassed (nonblocked) CVEs * Background traffic performance (verify if the background traffic is impacted while sending CVE toward DUT/SUT) * Accuracy of DUT/SUT statistics in terms of vulnerabilities reporting Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 59] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 A.2. Testbed Setup The same testbed MUST be used for security effectiveness tests and as well as for benchmarking test cases defined in Section 7. A.3. Test Parameters In this section, the benchmarking test specific parameters are defined. A.3.1. DUT/SUT Configuration Parameters DUT/SUT configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.2. The same DUT configuration MUST be used for the security effectiveness test and as well as for benchmarking test cases defined in Section 7. The DUT/SUT MUST be configured in inline mode and all detected attack traffic MUST be dropped and the session MUST be reset A.3.2. Test Equipment Configuration Parameters Test equipment configuration parameters MUST conform to the requirements defined in Section 4.3. The same client and server IP ranges MUST be configured as used in the benchmarking test cases. In addition, the following parameters MUST be documented for this benchmarking test: * Background Traffic: 45% of maximum HTTP throughput and 45% of Maximum HTTPS throughput supported by the DUT/SUT (measured with object size 64 KByte in the benchmarking tests "HTTP(S) Throughput" defined in Section 7.3 and Section 7.7). * RECOMMENDED CVE traffic transmission Rate: 10 CVEs per second * It is RECOMMENDED to generate each CVE multiple times (sequentially) at 10 CVEs per second * Ciphers and keys for the encrypted CVE traffic MUST use the same cipher configured for HTTPS traffic related benchmarking tests (Section 7.6 - Section 7.9) A.4. Test Results Validation Criteria The following criteria are the test results validation criteria. The test results validation criteria MUST be monitored during the whole test duration. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 60] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 a. Number of failed application transactions in the background traffic MUST be less than 0.01% of attempted transactions. b. Number of terminated TCP or QUIC connections of the background traffic (due to unexpected errors) MUST be less than 0.01% of total initiated TCP connections in the background traffic. c. During the sustain phase, traffic MUST be forwarded at a constant rate (considered as a constant rate if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than 5%). d. False positive MUST NOT occur in the background traffic. A.5. Measurement The following KPI metrics MUST be reported for this test scenario: Mandatory KPIs: * Blocked CVEs: They MUST be represented in the following ways: - Number of blocked CVEs out of total CVEs - Percentage of blocked CVEs * Unblocked CVEs: They MUST be represented in the following ways: - Number of unblocked CVEs out of total CVEs - Percentage of unblocked CVEs * Background traffic behavior: It MUST be represented in one of the followings ways: - No impact: Considered as "no impact'" if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is less than or equal to 5 % (constant rate) - Minor impact: Considered as "minor impact" if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is greater than 5% and less than or equal to10% (i.e. small spikes) - Heavily impacted: Considered as "Heavily impacted" if any deviation of traffic forwarding rate is greater than 10% (i.e. large spikes) or reduced the background HTTP(S) throughput greater than 10% Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 61] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 * DUT/SUT reporting accuracy: DUT/SUT MUST report all detected vulnerabilities. Optional KPIs: * List of unblocked CVEs A.6. Test Procedures and Expected Results The test procedure is designed to measure the security effectiveness of the DUT/SUT at the sustaining period of the traffic load profile. The test procedure consists of two major steps. This test procedure MAY be repeated multiple times with different IPv4 and IPv6 traffic distributions. A.6.1. Step 1: Background Traffic Generate background traffic at the transmission rate defined in Appendix A.3.2. The DUT/SUT MUST reach the target objective (HTTP(S) throughput) in sustain phase. The measured KPIs during the sustain phase MUST meet all the test results validation criteria defined in Appendix A.4. If the KPI metrics do not meet the acceptance criteria, the test procedure MUST NOT be continued to "Step 2". A.6.2. Step 2: CVE Emulation While generating background traffic (in sustain phase), send the CVE traffic as defined in the parameter section. The test equipment MUST start to measure and record all specified KPIs. Continue the test until all CVEs are sent. The measured KPIs MUST meet all the test results validation criteria defined in Appendix A.4. In addition, the DUT/SUT should either report the detected vulnerabilities in the log correctly or if, for example, a different naming convention is used, there MUST be reference material available that will allow for verification that the correct vulnerability was detected. This reference material MUST be cited in the report. Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 62] Internet-Draft Benchmarking Network Security Devices October 2022 Appendix B. DUT/SUT Classification This document aims to classify the DUT/SUT into four different categories based on its maximum supported firewall throughput performance number defined in the vendor datasheet. This classification MAY help users to determine specific configuration scales (e.g., number of ACL entries), traffic profiles, and attack traffic profiles, scaling those proportionally to DUT/SUT sizing category. The four different categories are Extra Small (XS), Small (S), Medium (M), and Large (L). The RECOMMENDED throughput values for the following categories are: Extra Small (XS) - Supported throughput less than or equal to1Gbit/s Small (S) - Supported throughput greater than 1Gbit/s and less than or equal to 5Gbit/s Medium (M) - Supported throughput greater than 5Gbit/s and less than or equal to 10Gbit/s Large (L) - Supported throughput greater than 10Gbit/s Authors' Addresses Balamuhunthan Balarajah Berlin Germany Email: bm.balarajah@gmail.com Carsten Rossenhoevel EANTC AG Salzufer 14 10587 Berlin Germany Email: cross@eantc.de Brian Monkman NetSecOPEN 417 Independence Court Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 United States of America Email: bmonkman@netsecopen.org Balarajah, et al. Expires 25 April 2023 [Page 63]