Network Working Group Tim Howes INTERNET DRAFT Netscape Communications Corp. OBSOLETES: RFC 1960 October, 1996 Expire in six months A String Representation of LDAP Search Filters 1. Status of this Memo This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working docu- ments of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as ``work in progress.'' To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the ``1id-abstracts.txt'' listing contained in the Internet- Drafts Shadow Directories on ds.internic.net (US East Coast), nic.nordu.net (Europe), ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast), or munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim). 2. Abstract The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [1] defines a network representation of a search filter transmitted to an LDAP server. Some applications may find it useful to have a common way of representing these search filters in a human-readable form. This document defines a human-readable string format for representing LDAP search filters. This document replaces RFC 1960, extending the string LDAP filter defin- ition to include support for LDAP version 3 extended match filters. 3. LDAP Search Filter Definition An LDAPv3 search filter is defined in [1] as follows: Filter ::= CHOICE { and [0] SET OF Filter, or [1] SET OF Filter, not [2] Filter, equalityMatch [3] AttributeValueAssertion, substrings [4] SubstringFilter, greaterOrEqual [5] AttributeValueAssertion, Howes [Page 1] INTERNET DRAFT October 1996 lessOrEqual [6] AttributeValueAssertion, present [7] AttributeType, approxMatch [8] AttributeValueAssertion, extensibleMatch [9] MatchingRuleAssertion } SubstringFilter ::= SEQUENCE { type AttributeType, SEQUENCE OF CHOICE { initial [0] LDAPString, any [1] LDAPString, final [2] LDAPString } } AttributeValueAssertion ::= SEQUENCE { attributeType AttributeType, attributeValue AttributeValue } MatchingRuleAssertion ::= SEQUENCE { matchingRule [1] MatchingRuleID OPTIONAL, type [2] AttributeType OPTIONAL, matchValue [3] AssertionValue, dnAttributes [4] BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE } AttributeType ::= LDAPString AttributeValue ::= OCTET STRING MatchingRuleID ::= LDAPString LDAPString ::= OCTET STRING where the LDAPString above is limited to the IA5 character set. The AttributeType is a string representation of the attribute type name and is defined in [1]. The AttributeValue OCTET STRING has the form defined in [2]. The Filter is encoded for transmission over a network using the Basic Encoding Rules defined in [3], with simplifications described in [1]. 4. String Search Filter Definition The string representation of an LDAP search filter is defined by the following grammar. It uses a prefix format. ::= '(' ')' Howes [Page 2] INTERNET DRAFT October 1996 ::= | | | ::= '&' ::= '|' ::= '!' ::= | ::= | | | ::= ::= | | | ::= '=' ::= '~=' ::= '>=' ::= '<=' ::= ( NULL | ) [ ':dn' ] [ ':' ] ':=' ::= | ::= '=*' ::= '=' ::= NULL | ::= '*' ::= NULL | '*' ::= NULL | is a string representing an AttributeType, and has the format defined in [1]. is a string representing an AttributeValue, or part of one, and has the form defined in [2]. If a must contain one of the characters '*' or '(' or ')' or '\', these characters should be escaped by preceding them with the backslash '\' character. Note that although both the and productions can produce the 'attr=*' construct, this construct is used only to denote a presence filter. is a dotted string representation of an object identifier (e.g., "1.2.3.4") identifying a matching rule to use when comparing . is a name given to a matching rule, as defined in [2]. One of or is required in the production. 5. Examples This section gives a few examples of search filters written using this notation. (cn=Babs Jensen) (!(cn=Tim Howes)) (&(objectClass=Person)(|(sn=Jensen)(cn=Babs J*))) (o=univ*of*mich*) (o=Parentheses r all your parenthetical needs)) Howes [Page 3] INTERNET DRAFT October 1996 The following two examples illustrate the use of extensible matching. (cn:1.2.3.4.5:=Fred Flintstone) (sn:dn:2.4.6.8.10:=Barney Rubble) (o:dn:=Ace Industry) The second example illustrates the use of the ":dn" notation to indicate that matching rule "2.4.6.8.10" should be used when making comparisons, and that the attributes of an entry's distinguished name should be con- sidered part of the entry when evaluating the match. The third example denotes an equality match, except that DN components should be considered part of the entry when doing the match. 6. Security Considerations Security considerations are not discussed in this document. 7. Bibliography [1] Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3), M. Wahl, T. Howes, S. Kille, Internet Draft draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-protocol-03.txt, October 1996. [2] Lightweight Directory Access Protocol: Standard and Pilot Attribute Definitions, M. Wahl, A. Coulbeck, T. Howes, S. Kille, Internet Draft draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-attributes-03.txt, October 1996. [3] Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1). CCITT Recommendation X.209, 1988. 8. Author's Address Tim Howes Netscape Communications Corp. 501 E. Middlefield Road Mountain View, CA 94043 USA +1 415 937-3419 howes@netscape.com Howes [Page 4]