Network Working Group B. Haberman
Internet-Draft Johns Hopkins University
Intended status: Informational J. Hall
Expires: November 15, 2018 CDT
J. Livingood
Comcast
May 14, 2018

Proposed Structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA), Version 2.0 (for Discussion)
draft-hall-iasa2-struct-02

Abstract

The IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) was originally established in 2005. In the 13 years from 2005 to 2018, the needs of the IETF have evolved in ways that require changes to its administrative structure. The purpose of this document is to outline a proposed new “IASA 2.0” structure. The proposal is for the work of the IETF’s administrative and fundraising tasks to be conducted by a new administrative organization, the IETF Administration Limited Liability Corporation (“LLC”). Under the proposal, the Internet Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) will be eliminated, and its oversight and advising functions transferred to the new LLC Board.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on November 15, 2018.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.


Table of Contents

1. Introduction

The IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) was originally established in 2005. In the 13 years from 2005 to 2018, the needs of the IETF have evolved in ways that require changes to its administrative structure. The purpose of this document is to outline a proposed new “IASA 2.0” structure. The proposal is for the work of the IETF’s administrative and fundraising tasks to be conducted by a new administrative organization, the IETF Administration Limited Liability Corporation (“LLC”). Under the proposal, the Internet Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) will be eliminated, and its oversight and advising functions transferred to the new LLC Board. This document explores all of the details involved in the proposal.

[I-D.haberman-iasa20dt-recs] discusses the challenges facing the current structure as well as several options for reorganizing the IETF’s administration under different legal structures. This document outlines how such an organization will be structured and describes how the organization will fit together with existing and new IETF community structures.

This document outlines some details of a potential “IASA 2.0” arrangement. Some of the details of the organizational structure are dependent on the choice of legal structure, but others are not. The point of this document is to solicit community input about how to address the challenges identified in [I-D.haberman-iasa20dt-recs]. Ultimately, if the IETF community decides to make changes to IASA, those changes will subsequently be documented in a replacement of RFC 4071 (BCP 101) and RFC 4371.

The proposal in this document is to transfer most of the responsibilities that RFC 4071 currently assigns to the Internet Administrative Director (IAD) and Internet Society (ISOC) to the newly created LLC. The IAOC would be eliminated, and its oversight and advising functions transferred to the LLC Board. It would be the job of LLC to meet the administrative needs of the IETF and ensure that LLC and IASA 2.0 is meeting the needs of the IETF community.

Eliminating the IAOC means that there will need to be another way for trustees to be appointed for the IETF Trust. The details of how this is done are outlined in (PLACEHOLDER: FILL IN WITH I-D NAME IN FUTURE UPDATE).

The proposal in this document is depicted visually in [Diagrams] showing the IETF Trust and [Diagrams-no-trust] not showing the IETF Trust. (NOTE: DIAGRAMS WILL BE UPDATED AS CONSENSUS FURTHER DEVELOPS, IN A FUTURE UPDATE)

2. Scope Limitation

The document does not propose any changes to anything related to the oversight or steering of the standards process as currently conducted by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) and Internet Architecture Board (IAB), the appeals chain, the process for making and organizations involved in confirming IETF and IAB appointments, the IETF Nominations Committee (NomCom), the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF), or ISOC’s memberships in or support of other organizations.

If the community decides to make changes to IASA along the lines sketched out in this document, normative changes to IETF processes will need to be documented in an RFC. Additional legal documents (e.g., certificate of formation, operating agreement, transition and shared services agreement) relating to the legal entity would provide the official, legal definitions of processes, roles, etc. Section 5 sketches some initial thoughts about transition; publishing a detailed transition plan would likely also be useful.

2.1. Operating Agreement with the Internet Society

The Operating Agreement (OA) is also out of scope for this document. The OA will be developed between the IETF and ISOC and is expected to include all critical terms, while still enabling maximum unilateral flexibility for the LLC Board. Thus, it is anticipated that the OA will include only basic details about how the Board manages itself or manages LLC staff, so that the LLC Board has flexibility to make changes without amending the OA. The LLC Board can independently develop policy or procedures documents that fill gaps.

3. Key Differences from the IASA 1.0 Structure

4. IETF Administration LLC

4.1. General LLC Responsibilities

The LLC will be established to provide administrative support to the IETF. It will have no authority over the standards development activities of the IETF.

The proposed responsibilities of the LLC are:

The manner by which these responsibilities under the LLC are organized is intended to address the problems described in Sections 3.1.1., 3.1.2, and 3.1.3 of [I-D.haberman-iasa20dt-recs]. Specifically, this is intended to bring greater clarity around roles, responsibilities, representation, decision-making, and authority.

In addirion, by having the LLC manage the IETF’s finances and conduct the IETF’s fundraising, confusion about who is responsible for representing the IETF to sponsors and who directs the uses of sponsorship funds will be eliminated. Finally, having the LLC reside in a defined, distinct legal entity, and taking responsibility for operations, will enable the organization to execute its own contracts without the need for review and approval by ISOC.

4.2. LLC Working Principles

The LLC will be expected to conduct its work according to the following proposed principles:

The transparency and responsiveness principles are designed to address the concern outlined in Section 3.3 of [I-D.haberman-iasa20dt-recs] about the need for improved timeliness of sharing of information and decisions and seeking community comments. The issue of increased transparency was important throughout the IASA 2.0 process, with little to no dissent. It was recognized that there will naturally be a confidentiality requirement about some aspects of hotel contracting, personnel matters, and other narrow areas.

4.3. LLC Board Responsibilities

The LLC Board will be responsible for conducting oversight of LLC’s execution of its responsibilities, as described in Section 4.1. This includes the responsibility to:

The board will be an oversight body, with responsibilities limited to those listed above. It will not directly conduct any of the IETF’s administrative work, which is the day-to-day job of the Executive Director at their team.

The role of the LLC Board will be to ensure that the strategy and conduct of LLC is consistent with the IETF’s needs – both its concrete needs and its needs for transparency and accountability. The board is not intended to directly define the IETF’s needs; to the extent that is required, the IETF community should document its needs in consensus-based RFCs (e.g., as the community is aiming to do in [I-D.ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process]) and provide more detailed input via consultations with the LLC Board (such as takes place on email discussion lists or at IETF meetings).

The description below outlines the composition of the LLC Board, selection of LLC Board members, and related details.

4.4. Executive Director and Staff Responsibilities

The LLC shall be led by an Executive Director chosen by the board. The Executive Director will determine what other staff and contractors are required by the LLC. Allowing for the division of responsibilities among multiple staff members and contractors should hopefully address some of the concerns raised in Section 3.2 (Lack of Resources) and Section 3.4 (Funding/Operating Model Mismatch and Rising Costs) of [I-D.haberman-iasa20dt-recs].

Based on the amount of work currently undertaken by the IAD and others involved in the IETF administration who are not currently in contracted roles, it is anticipated that the Executive Director may need to hire multiple additional staff members. For example, there will likely be a need for resources to manage fundraising, to manage the various contractors that are engaged to fulfill the IETF’s administrative needs, and to support outreach and communications.

The IETF currently benefits from the use of contractors for accounting, finance, meeting planning, administrative assistance, legal counsel, tools, and web site support, as well as other services related to the standards process (RFC Editor and IANA). The IETF budget currently reflects specific support from ISOC for communications and fundraising as well as some general support for accounting, finance, legal, and other services. The division of responsibilities between staff and contractors will be at the discretion of the Executive Director and his or her staff.

The IETF has a long history of community involvement in the execution of certain administrative functions, in particular development of IETF tools, the NOC’s operation of the meeting network, and some outreach and communications activities conducted by the EDU and Mentoring Directorate. The LLC staff would be expected to respect the IETF community’s wishes about community involvement in these and other functions going forward as long as the staff feels that they can meet the otherwise-stated needs of the community. Establishing the framework to allow the LLC to staff each administrative function as appropriate may require the IETF community to document its consensus expectations in areas where no documentation currently exists (see Section 5).

In summary, the LLC Executive Director, with support from the team that they alone direct and lead, will be responsible for: * Developing and refining an annual budget and other strategic financial planning documents at the direction of the LLC Board. * Executing on the annual budget, including reporting to the LLC Board regularly with forecasts and actual performance to budget. * Hiring and/or contracting the necessary resources to meet their goals, within the defined limits of their authority and within the approved budget. This includes managing and leading any such resources, including performing regular performance reviews. * Following the pre-approval guidelines set forth by the LLC Board for contracts or other decisions that have financial costs that exceed a certain threshold of significance. Such threshold will be set reasonably high so that the need for such approvals is infrequent and only occurs when something is truly significant or otherwise exceptional. It is important to ensure that the Executive Director is sufficiently empowered to perform their job on a day to day basis, being held accountable for meeting high level goals rather than micromanaged. * Regularly updating the LLC board on operations and other notable issues as reasonable and appropriate. * Ensuring that all staff and/or other resources comply with any applicable policies established or approved by the LLC Board, such as ethics guidelines and/or a code of conduct.

4.5. Board Design Goals

A goal of this proposed board composition is to balance the need for the LLC to be accountable to the IETF community with the need for this board to have the expertise necessary to oversee a small non-profit corporation. The Board is smaller than the current IAOC and the other leadership bodies of the IETF, in part to keep the board focused on its rather limited set of strategic responsibilities as noted in Section 4.3.

This board structure, with limited strategic responsiblilities noted in Section 4.3 and limited size, together with the staff responsibilities noted in Section 4.4, is designed to overcome the challenges described in Section 3.1.4 of [I-D.haberman-iasa20dt-recs] concerning oversight. This establishes a clear line of oversight over staff performance: the Board oversees the Executive Director’s performance and has actual legal authority to remove a non-performing Executive Director. The Executive Director is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the LLC.

Finally, the board would be expected to operate transparently, to further address the concern raised in Section 3.3 of [I-D.haberman-iasa20dt-recs]. The default transparency rule arrived at during the IASA 2.0 design process is detailed above in in Section 4.2. The Board will need to establish how it will meet that commitment.

4.6. Board Composition

(-02 Draft Note: Consider this a placeholder until such time as WG consensus is more apparent)

The structure of the Board of Directors of the LLC shall be composed of up to seven people as follows: * 1 IETF Chair or delegate selected by the IESG * 1 Appointed by the ISOC Board of Trustees * 3 Appointed by the IETF NomCom, confirmed by the IESG * 2 Appointed by the LLC board itself, confirmed by IAB

4.7. LLC Board Director Term Length

(-02 Draft Note: Consider this a placeholder until such time as WG consensus is more apparent)

The term length for a Director shall be three years in length, with possible exceptions for the terms for the first full formation of the LLC Board in order to establish staggered terms, and for any appointments to fill a vacancy.

4.8. LLC Board Director Limit

(-02 Draft Note: Consider this a placeholder until such time as WG consensus is more apparent)

A director may serve no more than 6 consecutive years on the Board. This is to ensure a healthy regular introduction of new ideas and energy onto the Board, and to mitigate any potential long-term risk of ossification or conflict.

4.9. LLC Board Director Removal

(-02 Draft Note: No content as of yet)

4.10. Filling a LLC Board Director Vacancy

(-02 Draft Note: Consider this a placeholder until such time as WG consensus is more apparent)

It shall be the responsibility of each respective body that appointed a Director that vacates the Board to appoint a new Director to fill tht vacancy. For example, if a Director appointed by the NomCom departs the Board prior to the end of their term for whatever reason, then it is the responsibility of the NomCom as the original appointing body to designate a replacement that will serve out the remainder of the term of the departed Director/.

4.11. Initial Interim Board

(-02 Draft Note: Consider this a placeholder until such time as WG consensus is more apparent)

It is possible that an initial interim Board may be necessary in order to legally form and bootstrap the LLC. Should this be the case, then there will be a time and scope limitation for this initial interim Board after which the First Full Board will be in place.

4.12. First Full Board

(-02 Draft Note: Consider this a placeholder until such time as WG consensus is more apparent)

4.13. Board Positions

(-02 Draft Note: Consider this a placeholder until such time as WG consensus is more apparent)

Following the formation of the first full LLC Board, and at each subsequent annual meeting of the LLC Board, the Directors shall elect by a majority vote of the LLC Board a Director to serve as Board Chair. The Board may also form committees of the Board and/or define other roles for LLC Board members as necessary.

5. Transition Considerations

Conducting a transition as envisioned in this document would encompass many different aspects and would require action from the IETF community, the IAOC, the IAD, ISOC, a newly hired LLC Executive Director and staff, and newly appointed LLC Board members. This document sketches some thoughts on the subset of tasks that would entail some IETF community involvement or review (as opposed to, say, the transfer of administrative assets).

There are a number of tasks under this proposal that would require an initial bootstrap:

Once the Executive Director and any additional staff are hired, it would be expected for LLC to:

At the same time, there may be areas where the IETF community needs to document its consensus, e.g., expectations about community involvement in NOC or tools efforts.

6. Initial Tasks of the Board

The first regular board of the LLC, which may come after a potential interim board to bootstrap the formation of the LLC, shall focus on tasks including: * Determine how the LLC will engage with the community, share information, ensure openness to feedback, and to vet this proposal with the community.

7. Acknowledgments

Thanks to Jari Arkko, Richard Barnes, Alissa Cooper, Sean Turner and the IASA 2.0 Working Group for discussions of possible structures, and to the attorneys of Morgan Lewis and Brad Biddle for legal advice.

8. Informative References

[Diagrams] Barnes, R., "IASA 2.0 Strawman Diagram", n.d..
[Diagrams-no-trust] Barnes, R., "IASA 2.0 Strawman Diagram, IETF Trust Not Shown", n.d..
[I-D.haberman-iasa20dt-recs] Haberman, B., Arkko, J., Daigle, L., Livingood, J., Hall, J. and E. Rescorla, "IASA 2.0 Design Team Recommendations", Internet-Draft draft-haberman-iasa20dt-recs-02, April 2018.
[I-D.ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process] Lear, E., "IETF Plenary Meeting Venue Selection Process", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15, May 2018.
[ietf101-slides] Hall, J., "IASA 2.0 IETF-101 Slides", n.d..
[ML-memo] Morgan Lewis, "Options for New Organization to Conduct IETF Administrative Support Activities", February 2018.

Authors' Addresses

Brian Haberman Johns Hopkins University EMail: brian@innovationslab.net
Joseph Lorenzo Hall CDT EMail: joe@cdt.org
Jason Livingood Comcast EMail: Jason_Livingood@comcast.com