Internet-Draft PCEP for LSP Performance Measurement February 2026
Gandhi, et al. Expires 24 August 2026 [Page]
Workgroup:
PCE Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-gandhi-pce-pm-11
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
R. Gandhi
Cisco Systems, Inc.
B. Wen
Comcast
C. Barth
HPE
D. Dhody
Huawei Technologies

PCEP Extensions for Performance Measurements for SR-TE and MPLS-TE LSPs with Stateful PCE

Abstract

In certain networks, network performance data such as packet loss, delay, and delay variation, as well as bandwidth utilization, are critical measures for Traffic Engineering (TE). These data provide operators with the characteristics of their networks for the performance evaluation required to ensure the Service-Level Agreements (SLAs).

The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Clients' (PCCs') requests. The Stateful PCE extensions allow stateful control of Traffic Engineering LSPs for Segment Routing (SR) and RSVP using PCEP.

This document describes PCEP extensions for enabling and reporting end-to-end performance measurements and liveness detection for both PCE-Initiated and PCC-Initiated LSPs for SR-TE over MPLS and IPv6 data planes and MPLS-TE to an Active Stateful PCE.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 24 August 2026.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

[RFC5440] describes the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) as a communication mechanism between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a Path Computation Element (PCE), or between PCE and PCE, that enables computation of Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs).

[RFC8231] specifies extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of an LSP. It describes two modes of operation - Passive Stateful PCE and Active Stateful PCE. Further, [RFC8281] describes the setup, maintenance, and teardown of PCE-Initiated LSPs for the Stateful PCE model. In this document, the focus is on the Active Stateful PCE where the LSPs are controlled by the PCE, for both PCE-Initiated and PCC-Initiated LSPs.

PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing (SR) [RFC8664] specifies extensions to the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) that allow a stateful PCE to compute and initiate Traffic Engineering (TE) paths, as well as a PCC to request a path subject to certain constraints and optimization criteria for Segment Routing. [RFC9603] extends PCEP for Segment Routing for the IPv6 data plane.

In certain networks, such as financial information networks, network performance data such as packet loss, delay and delay variation, and bandwidth utilization are critical measures for traffic engineering. The protocol extensions have been defined to advertise link performance metrics; see [RFC7471], [RFC8570], [RFC7823] and [RFC8571]. These data provide operators with the characteristics of their networks for performance evaluation that is required to ensure the Service-Level Agreements (SLAs).

[RFC8233] defines the PCEP extensions for LSP path computation using packet loss, delay, and delay variation as path selection metrics. Such path computations use link metrics for packet loss and delay and do not provide end-to-end metrics of the TE LSPs. The end-to-end metrics of an LSP may be very different from the path computation results due to many factors, such as queuing, etc. There is a need to monitor whether the traffic sent over the established LSPs exceeds the requested metric bounds such as end-to-end delay and loss. The Stateful PCE may need to take some action (such as tearing down or re-optimizing the LSP) when the performance requirement is not met. [RFC8762] defines protocol extensions needed for measuring packet loss, delay, and delay variation and can be used for end-to-end performance measurement of an LSP.

This document describes PCEP extensions for enabling and reporting end-to-end performance measurements (PM) such as packet loss, delay, delay variation, bandwidth utilization, as well as liveness detection for both PCE-Initiated and PCC-Initiated LSPs for SR-TE over MPLS and IPv6 data planes and MPLS-TE using RSVP to an Active Stateful PCE.

Note that the specification of the use of the reported packet loss, delay, delay variation, bandwidth utilization measurements, and liveness detection by a Stateful PCE is outside the scope of this document.

1.1. Auto-bandwidth Considerations

The auto-bandwidth feature allows a head-end LSR PCC to automatically adjust the LSP bandwidth reservation based on the traffic demand of an LSP. Auto-bandwidth requested bandwidth computation can be implemented on a PCC or a Stateful PCE.

[RFC8733] describes the PCEP extensions for auto-bandwidth, where the requested bandwidth for the LSP is computed by the PCC and reported to the Stateful PCE. There is a benefit in pushing the responsibility for deciding when auto-bandwidth adjustments are needed to the PCC as this distributes the load of monitoring the bandwidth utilization of the LSPs down to the PCCs and frees up the PCE for path computations. In addition, it reduces the load on PCEP communications for reporting the bandwidth utilization of the LSP.

However, exactly when to adjust an LSP bandwidth could be better left to a Stateful PCE. That is, a PCE could be flexible in its interpretation of thresholds enabling it to trigger auto-bandwidth adjustment early if it believes there is a good reason (for example, performing a set of parallel path recomputations) or late (for example, when it knows that an adjustment would be disruptive to the network). When the auto-bandwidth computation is delegated to the PCC, the PCC cannot see the impact on other LSPs in the network, and the PCE cannot tell whether the request to adjust the LSP bandwidth is critical or not. The bandwidth utilization reporting defined in this document can be used by the PCE to do computations to determine whether auto-bandwidth adjustments are needed or desirable before performing the path computations.

2. Conventions Used in This Document

2.1. Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

2.2. Terminology

The reader is assumed to be familiar with the terminology defined in [RFC5440], [RFC8231], [RFC8281], [RFC8408], and [RFC7471].

Label Switched Path (LSP):

Note that the base PCEP specification [RFC4655] originally defined the use of the PCE architecture for MPLS and GMPLS networks with Label Switched Paths (LSPs) instantiated using the RSVP-TE signaling protocol. Over time, support for additional path setup types, such as the SR-TE Path Setup Type [RFC8664] and the SRv6 Path Setup Type [RFC9603], have been introduced. As specified in [RFC9603], the term "LSP" used in the PCEP specifications would be equivalent to an SRv6 path (represented as a list of SRv6 segments) in the context of supporting SRv6 in PCEP using the SRv6 Path Setup Type.

2.3. Measurement Units

The measurement unit for the delay value is defined in [RFC7471], Section 4.1.5.

The measurement unit for the loss value is defined in [RFC7471], Section 4.4.5.

The utilized bandwidth [RFC7471] is encoded in IEEE floating-point format in bytes per second as described in [IEEE.754.1985].

All average values are calculated as rolling averages.

3. Overview of the PCEP Extensions

The high-level overview of the PCEP extensions defined in this document for requesting and reporting end-to-end performance measurements, bandwidth utilization, and liveness detection of the LSPs for SR-TE over MPLS and IPv6 data planes as well as MPLS-TE using RSVP is shown in Figure 1.

                        ---------
                       |         |
                       | Stateful|
                       |   PCE   |
                       |         |
                        ---------
                          |    ^
  MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY  |    |  MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY
                          |    |
  MEASUREMENT ATTRIBUTES  |    |  MEASUREMENT ATTRIBUTES
                          |    |  (For delegated LSPs)
                          |    |
                          |    |  MEASUREMENT REPORTS
                          v    |     (Optional)
                        ---------
                       |         |
                       |   PCC   |
                       |         |
                        ---------
Figure 1: Overview of the PCEP Extensions

The following list provides the high-level overview of the PCEP extensions defined in this document:

3.1. Report Thresholds

When explicitly configured, a report threshold (absolute or percentage) parameter is used to trigger an immediate reporting of the delay and loss metrics and bandwidth utilization, bypassing the periodic report interval. A threshold is used to detect a sudden change in the performance measurement metric of an LSP. In order to detect that a measured value has crossed the threshold, the measured (delay/loss) metric is compared with the previously reported value. If the change (increase or decrease) in the value is above the threshold (absolute or percentage), the measurement from the current interval is reported immediately.

All thresholds in this document could be represented in both absolute values and percentages, and could be used together. This is provided to accommodate the cases where the metric values may become very large or very small over time. For example, an operator may use the percentage threshold to handle small to large metric values and absolute values to handle very large metric values. The metrics are reported when either one of the two thresholds, the absolute or the percentage, is crossed.

When using the percentage threshold, if the metric changes rapidly at very low values, it may trigger frequent reporting due to the crossing of the percentage threshold. This can lead to unnecessary scale issues in the network. This is suppressed by setting the minimum-threshold parameter along with the percentage threshold. The metric value is only reported if the value crosses both the percentage threshold and the minimum-threshold parameters.

The metrics are still reported at the end of the report interval even if they were reported due to the threshold crossing. Refer to [RFC7471], Section 5, for additional considerations.

4. Sub-TLVs for Measurement Attributes

This section specifies the generic sub-TLVs that provide various configurable parameters for reporting measurements to a Stateful PCE. These sub-TLVs are carried in various measurement attributes TLVs defined in this document.

The following sub-TLVs are defined:

 Type   Length   Name
 -------------------------------------------------------
 1      4        Measurement-Enable sub-TLV
 2      4        Transmit-Interval sub-TLV
 3      8        Measurement-Protocol sub-TLV
 4      4        Measurement-Interval sub-TLV
 5      8        Report-Threshold sub-TLV
 6      8        Report-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV
 7      4        Report-Interval sub-TLV
 8      8        Report-Upper-Bound sub-TLV

The Measurement-Enable sub-TLV MUST be added to the LSPA Object when the measurement feature is enabled for the LSP. All other sub-TLVs are optional and any unrecognized sub-TLV MUST be silently ignored. If a sub-TLV of the same type appears more than once, only the first occurrence is processed and all others MUST be ignored. If sub-TLVs are not present, the default values based on the local policy are assumed.

4.1. Measurement-Enable sub-TLV

The Measurement-Enable sub-TLV specifies that the given measurement feature is enabled. The format of this sub-TLV is shown in Figure 2.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |           Type=1              |           Length=4            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                             Flags                             |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: Measurement-Enable sub-TLV Format

The Type is 1, Length is 4 bytes, and the value comprises flags (32 bits) for enabling various measurement features.

Unassigned flags are considered reserved, they MUST be set to 0 when sent and MUST be ignored when received. The flags define various performance measurement types in this document.

4.2. Transmit-Interval sub-TLV

The Transmit-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in milliseconds for the test packet transmission. The format of this sub-TLV is shown in Figure 3.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |           Type=2              |           Length=4            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                       Transmit-Interval                       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3: Transmit-Interval sub-TLV Format

The Type is 2, Length is 4 bytes, and the value comprises a 4-byte time interval, the valid range is from 1 to 604800, in milliseconds. The default value is 1 second. The Transmit-Interval MUST NOT be greater than the Measurement-Interval and the Report-Interval.

4.3. Measurement-Protocol sub-TLV

The Measurement-Protocol sub-TLV specifies that the given measurement protocol type and mode are enabled. The format of this sub-TLV is shown in Figure 4.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |           Type=3              |           Length=8            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                    Measurement-Protocol                       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                    Measurement-Mode                           |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4: Measurement-Protocol sub-TLV Format

The Type is 3, Length is 8 bytes, and the value comprises the protocol type and mode for performance measurement.

Measurement protocol type value can be set to: (1) STAMP protocol [RFC8762], or (2) TWAMP protocol [RFC5357], or (3) MPLS-PM protocol [RFC6374].

Measurement mode can be set to: (1) one-way, or (2) two-way, or (3) loopback.

The performance measurement procedures using STAMP defined in [I-D.ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-srv6] and [I-D.ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls] can be used for SR LSPs for the IPv6 and MPLS data planes, respectively. Similarly, the performance measurement procedures using MPLS-PM defined in [RFC9779] can be used for MPLS LSPs.

4.4. Measurement-Interval sub-TLV

The Measurement-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in seconds for the measurement. The format of this sub-TLV is shown in Figure 5.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |           Type=4              |           Length=4            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                    Measurement-Interval                       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 5: Measurement-Interval sub-TLV Format

The Type is 4, Length is 4 bytes, and the value comprises a 4-byte time interval, the valid range is from 1 to 604800, in seconds. The default value is 300 seconds. The Measurement-Interval MUST NOT be greater than the Report-Interval.

4.5. Report-Threshold sub-TLV

The Report-Threshold sub-TLV specifies the threshold value used to trigger an immediate reporting of the measurements bypassing the report-interval. The format of this sub-TLV is shown in Figure 6.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |           Type=5              |           Length=4            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                         Report-Threshold                      |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 6: Report-Threshold sub-TLV Format

The Type is 5, Length is 8 bytes, and the value comprises:

  • Report-Threshold: 32-bit absolute threshold value. By default, report-threshold is not set and threshold check based reporting is disabled.

4.6. Report-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV

The Report-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV specifies the threshold value used to trigger an immediate reporting of the measurements bypassing the report-interval. The format of this sub-TLV is shown in Figure 7.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |           Type=6              |           Length=8            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |  Percentage |          RESERVED                               |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                        Minimum-Threshold                      |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 7: Report-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV Format

The Type is 6, Length is 8 bytes, and the value comprises:

  • Percentage: 7-bit threshold value, encoded in percentage as an integer from 1 to 100.

    By default, report-threshold-percentage is not set and threshold check based reporting is disabled.

  • RESERVED: It MUST be set to zero when sent and MUST be ignored when received.

  • Minimum-Threshold: The 32-bit absolute Minimum-Threshold value. The increase or decrease should be at least or above this value.

4.7. Report-Interval sub-TLV

The Report-Interval sub-TLV specifies the time interval in seconds when measured values are to be reported. The format of this sub-TLV is shown in Figure 8.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |           Type=7              |           Length=4            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                         Report-Interval                       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 8: Report-Interval sub-TLV Format

The Type is 7, Length is 4 bytes, and the value comprises a 4-byte time interval, the valid range is from 0 to 604800, in seconds. The default value is 3600 seconds. The value 0 is used to disable the periodic reporting of the measurements.

4.8. Report-Upper-Bound sub-TLV

The Report-Upper-Bound sub-TLV specifies the upper bound value and lower bound value used to trigger an immediate reporting of the measurements when crossed. This may also result in the PCC taking an immediate local action on the LSP. The format of this sub-TLV is shown in Figure 9.

Anomaly flag is set to true in the reported measurement when the upper bound threshold is crossed in the up direction and set to false in the reported measurement when the lower bound threshold is crossed in the down direction.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |           Type=8              |           Length=8            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                       Report-Upper-Bound                      |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                       Report-Lower-Bound                      |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 9: Report-Upper-Bound sub-TLV Format

The Type is 8, Length is 8 bytes, and the value comprises:

  • Report-Upper-Bound: 32-bit absolute value.

    By default, upper bound is not set.

  • Report-Lower-Bound: 32-bit absolute value.

    By default, lower bound is not set. The lower bound value MUST be less than the upper bound value.

5. PCEP Extensions for Delay Measurement

5.1. Delay Measurement Capability Advertisement

During the PCEP Initialization phase, PCEP Speakers (PCE or PCC) advertise their support for DELAY-MEASUREMENT. A PCEP Speaker (PCE or PCC) includes the DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV in the OPEN Object to advertise its support for PCEP Delay-Measurement extensions. The presence of the DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV in the OPEN Object (in the Open message) indicates that the Delay Measurement capability is supported as described in this document. Additional procedures are defined as follows:

  • The PCEP protocol extensions for Delay Measurement MUST NOT be used if one or both PCEP Speakers have not included the DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV in their respective Open message.

  • If a PCEP speaker supports the extensions of this document but did not advertise this capability, then upon receipt of the DELAY-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV in the LSPA object, it SHOULD generate a PCErr with error-type 19 (Invalid Operation), error-value TBD21 (Delay-Measurement capability was not advertised) and terminate the PCEP session.

  • Similarly, the PCEP speaker SHOULD generate error-value TBD23 (Two-Way Measurement capability was not advertised), TBD24 (One-Way Measurement capability was not advertised) and TBD25 (Loopback Measurement capability was not advertised) upon receipt of the DELAY-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV in the LSPA object with Two-Way, One-Way, and Loopback request, respectively, when it did not advertise this capability.

  • If a PCEP speaker supports the extensions of this document but did not advertise this capability, then upon receipt of the DELAY-MEASUREMENT object, it SHOULD generate a PCErr with error-type 19 (Invalid Operation), error-value TBD21 (Delay-Measurement capability was not advertised) and terminate the PCEP session.

5.1.1. DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV

The DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV is an optional TLV for use in the OPEN Object for Delay Measurement via PCEP capability advertisement. The format of this TLV is shown in Figure 10.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |       PCEP TLV Type=TBD1      |           Length=4            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                             Flags                       |L|T|O|
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 10: DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV Format

The Type of the TLV is TBD1 and it has a fixed length of 4 bytes.

The value comprises a single field - Flags (32 bits):

  • O (One-way Delay Metric - 1 bit): if set to 1 by a PCC, the O Flag indicates that the PCC allows reporting of one-way delay metric information; if set to 1 by a PCE, the O Flag indicates that the PCE is capable of receiving one-way delay metric information from the PCC.

  • T (Two-way Delay Metric - 1 bit): if set to 1 by a PCC, the T Flag indicates that the PCC allows reporting of two-way delay metric information; if set to 1 by a PCE, the T Flag indicates that the PCE is capable of receiving two-way delay metric information from the PCC.

  • L (Loopback Delay Metric - 1 bit): if set to 1 by a PCC, the L Flag indicates that the PCC allows reporting of loopback delay metric information; if set to 1 by a PCE, the L Flag indicates that the PCE is capable of receiving loopback delay metric information from the PCC.

Unassigned bits are considered reserved. They MUST be set to 0 when sent and MUST be ignored when received.

Advertisement of the DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV implies support for delay measurement, as well as the objects, TLVs and procedures defined in this document. Either the O, T or L flag MUST be set to 1 in the TLV.

5.2. DELAY-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV

The DELAY-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV provides the configurable parameters of the delay measurement feature.

The format of the DELAY-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV is shown in Figure 11.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |       PCEP TLV Type=TBD5      |           Length              |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                                                               |
 //                           sub-TLVs                          //
 |                                                               |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 11: DELAY-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV Format

PCEP TLV Type is defined as follows:

 Type      Name
 ----------------------------------------------------------
 TBD5      DELAY-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES

Length: The Length field defines the length of the value portion in bytes, as per [RFC5440].

Value: Comprises of one or more sub-TLVs as described in Section 4 of this document.

The following sub-sections describe the parameters that are currently defined to be carried within this TLV. Any other parameters not defined for this TLV MUST be ignored.

5.2.1. Delay Measurement Enable

The Measurement-Enable sub-TLV specifies the delay metric mode enabled using the following flags:

 Bit     Description
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 31      One-Way Delay Metric Enabled
 30      Two-Way Delay Metric Enabled
 29      Loopback Delay Metric Enabled

5.2.2. Delay Measurement Protocol

The Measurement-Protocol sub-TLV specifies that the given protocol type and mode are enabled for delay measurement.

5.2.3. Delay Measurement Transmit Interval

The Transmit-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in milliseconds for the delay measurement test packet transmission.

5.2.4. Delay Measurement Interval

The Measurement-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in seconds for the delay metrics computation for the LSP.

5.2.5. Delay Measurement Report Threshold

The Report-Threshold sub-TLV specifies the threshold value used to trigger an immediate reporting of the delay metrics bypassing the report-interval.

  • Report-Threshold: Delay in microseconds, encoded as a 24-bit integer, as defined in [RFC7471].

The same report-threshold is used for all delay metric values.

5.2.6. Delay Measurement Report Threshold Percentage

The Report-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV specifies the threshold value used to trigger an immediate reporting of the metrics bypassing the report-interval.

The same report-threshold-percentage is used for all delay metric values.

5.2.7. Delay Measurement Report Interval

The Report-Interval sub-TLV specifies the time interval in seconds when measured delay values are to be reported.

5.2.8. Delay Measurement Upper Bound and Lower Bound

The Report-Upper-Bound sub-TLV specifies the upper bound and lower bound delay values in microseconds, and is used to trigger an immediate reporting of the delay values when crossed. This may also result in the PCC taking an immediate local action on the LSP.

5.3. DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object For Reporting

The DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object with Object-Class (Value TBD9) is defined in this document to report the delay measurement of an LSP. The format of this Object is shown in Figure 12.

When the LSP is enabled with the delay measurement feature, the PCC SHOULD include the DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object to report the measured delay values to the PCE in the PCRpt message. The PCC SHOULD report average delay, min/max delay, and delay variations to the PCE in the PCRpt message, as well as the anomaly state in the Anomaly (A) flag based on the attributes signaled.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Class=TBD9    |   OT  |Res|P|I|   Object Length (bytes)       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                                                               |
 //                        (Object body)                        //
 |                                                               |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 12: DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object Format

Object Length (16 bits): Specifies the total object length including the header, in bytes, as per [RFC5440].

Object-Types (OT) are defined as follows:

 Object-Type  Length   Name
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 1            8        Delay Measurement Status
 2            8        One-Way Delay Metric Value
 3            12       One-Way Delay Metric Min/Max Values
 4            8        One-Way Delay Variation Metric Value
 5            8        Two-Way Delay Metric Value
 6            12       Two-Way Delay Metric Min/Max Values
 7            8        Two-Way Delay Variation Metric Value
 8            8        Loopback Delay Metric Value
 9            12       Loopback Delay Metric Min/Max Values
 10           8        Loopback Delay Variation Metric Value

All delay values are reported in microseconds, encoded as a 24-bit integer, as defined in [RFC7471]. When set to the maximum value 16,777,215 (16.777215 sec), the delay is at least that value and may be larger.

The object body formats are defined as shown in Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, and Figure 16.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |     RESERVED                                  |  Status       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 13: DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object For Reporting Delay Measurement Status
  • Delay Measurement Status: Indicates the Status of Delay Measurement as: (1) Active, (2) Failed, (3) Errored.

  • RESERVED: This field is reserved for future use. It MUST be set to 0 when sent and MUST be ignored when received.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |A|   RESERVED  |            Delay Value Average                |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 14: DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object For Reporting One-Way, Two-Way and Loopback Average
  • One-way Delay Value Average: Average Delay of the LSP in one (forward) direction.

  • Two-way Delay Value Average: Average Delay of the LSP in both forward and reverse directions.

  • Loopback Delay Value Average: Average Delay of the LSP in both forward and reverse directions.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |A|   RESERVED  |            Delay Value Minimum                |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |A|   RESERVED  |            Delay Value Maximum                |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 15: DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object For Reporting One-Way, Two-Way and Loopback Min/Max
  • One-Way Delay Value Minimum/Maximum: Minimum and Maximum values of the Delay of the LSP in one (forward) direction.

  • Two-Way Delay Value Minimum/Maximum: Minimum and Maximum values of the Delay of the LSP in both forward and reverse directions.

  • Loopback Delay Value Minimum/Maximum: Minimum and Maximum values of the Delay of the LSP in both forward and reverse directions.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |A|   RESERVED  |            Delay Variation Value              |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 16: DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object For Reporting One-Way, Two-Way and Loopback Variation
  • One-way Delay Variation Value: Average Delay Variation of the LSP in the forward direction.

  • Two-way Delay Variation Value: Average Delay Variation of the LSP in both forward and reverse directions.

  • Loopback Delay Variation Value: Average Delay Variation of the LSP in both forward and reverse directions.

6. PCEP Extensions for Loss Measurement

6.1. Loss Measurement Capability Advertisement

During the PCEP Initialization Phase, PCEP Speakers (PCE or PCC) advertise their support for LOSS-MEASUREMENT. A PCEP Speaker includes the LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV in the OPEN Object to advertise its support for PCEP Loss-Measurement extensions. The presence of the LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV in the OPEN Object (in the Open message) indicates that the Loss Measurement capability is supported as described in this document. Additional procedures are defined as follows:

  • The PCEP protocol extensions for Loss Measurement MUST NOT be used if one or both PCEP Speakers have not included the LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV in their respective Open message.

  • If a PCEP speaker supports the extensions of this document but did not advertise this capability, then upon receipt of the LOSS-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV in the LSPA object, it SHOULD generate a PCErr with error-type 19 (Invalid Operation), error-value TBD22 (Loss-Measurement capability was not advertised) and terminate the PCEP session.

  • Similarly, the PCEP speaker SHOULD generate error-value TBD23 (Two-Way Measurement capability was not advertised), TBD24 (One-Way Measurement capability was not advertised) and TBD25 (Loopback Measurement capability was not advertised) upon receipt of the LOSS-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV in the LSPA object with two-way, one-way and loopback measurement request, respectively, when it did not advertise this capability.

  • Further, the PCEP speaker SHOULD generate error-value TBD26 (Inferred Mode Loss Measurement capability was not advertised) and TBD27 (Direct Mode Loss Measurement capability was not advertised) upon receipt of the LOSS-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV in the LSPA object with Inferred Mode loss measurement request and Direct Mode loss measurement request, respectively, when it did not advertise this capability.

  • If a PCEP speaker supports the extensions of this document but did not advertise this capability, then upon receipt of the LOSS-MEASUREMENT object, it SHOULD generate a PCErr with error-type 19 (Invalid Operation), error-value TBD22 (Loss-Measurement capability was not advertised) and terminate the PCEP session.

6.1.1. LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV

The LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV is an optional TLV for use in the OPEN Object for Loss Measurement via PCEP capability advertisement. Its format is shown in Figure 17.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |       PCEP TLV Type=TBD2      |           Length=4            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                             Flags                   |N|I|L|T|O|
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 17: LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV Format

The Type of the TLV is TBD2 and it has a fixed length of 4 bytes.

The value comprises a single field - Flags (32 bits):

  • O (One-Way Metric - 1 bit): if set to 1 by a PCC, the O Flag indicates that the PCC allows reporting of one-way loss metric information; if set to 1 by a PCE, the O Flag indicates that the PCE is capable of receiving one-way loss metric information from the PCC.

  • T (Two-Way Metric - 1 bit): if set to 1 by a PCC, the T Flag indicates that the PCC allows reporting of two-way loss metric information; if set to 1 by a PCE, the T Flag indicates that the PCE is capable of receiving two-way loss metric information from the PCC.

  • L (Loopback Metric - 1 bit): if set to 1 by a PCC, the L Flag indicates that the PCC allows reporting of loopback loss metric information; if set to 1 by a PCE, the L Flag indicates that the PCE is capable of receiving loopback loss metric information from the PCC.

  • I (Inferred Loss Measurement Mode - 1 bit): if set to 1 by a PCC, the I Flag indicates that the PCC allows reporting of inferred mode loss measurement information; if set to 1 by a PCE, the I Flag indicates that the PCE is capable of receiving inferred mode loss measurement information from the PCC.

  • N (Direct Loss Measurement Mode - 1 bit): if set to 1 by a PCC, the N Flag indicates that the PCC allows reporting of direct mode loss measurement information; if set to 1 by a PCE, the N Flag indicates that the PCE is capable of receiving direct mode loss measurement information from the PCC.

Unassigned bits are considered reserved. They MUST be set to 0 when sent and MUST be ignored when received.

Advertisement of the LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV implies support for loss measurement, as well as the objects, TLVs and procedures defined in this document. Either the O, T or L flag MUST be set to 1 in the TLV. Similarly, either the I or N flag MUST be set to 1 in the TLV.

6.2. LOSS-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV

The LOSS-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV provides the configurable parameters of the loss measurement feature.

The format of the LOSS-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV is shown in Figure 18.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |       PCEP TLV Type=TBD6      |           Length              |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                                                               |
 //                           sub-TLVs                          //
 |                                                               |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 18: LOSS-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV Format

PCEP TLV Type is defined as follows:

 Type      Name
 ----------------------------------------------------------
 TBD6      LOSS-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES

Length: The Length field defines the length of the value portion in bytes, as per [RFC5440].

Value: Comprises of one or more sub-TLVs as described in Section 4 of this document.

The following sub-sections describe the parameters that are currently defined to be carried within this TLV. Any other parameters not defined for this TLV MUST be ignored.

6.2.1. Loss Measurement Enable

The Measurement-Enable sub-TLV specifies the loss Metric mode enabled using the following flags:

 Bit      Description
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
 28       One-Way Loss Metric Enabled
 27       Two-Way Loss Metric Enabled
 26       Loopback Loss Metric Enabled
 25       Inferred Loss Metric Enabled
 24       Direct Loss Metric Enabled

6.2.2. Loss Measurement Protocol

The Measurement-Protocol sub-TLV specifies that the given protocol type and mode are enabled for loss measurement.

6.2.3. Loss Measurement Transmit Interval

The Transmit-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in milliseconds for the loss measurement test packet transmission.

6.2.4. Loss Measurement Interval

The Measurement-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in seconds for the loss metric computation for the LSP.

6.2.5. Loss Measurement Report Threshold

The Report-Threshold sub-TLV specifies the threshold value used to trigger an immediate reporting of the loss metrics bypassing the report-interval.

  • Report-Threshold: This 24-bit field identifies the packet loss as a percentage of the total packets sent or received. The encoding is as per [RFC7471].

The same report-threshold is used for all loss metric values.

6.2.6. Loss Measurement Report Threshold Percentage

The Report-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV specifies the threshold value used to trigger an immediate reporting of the loss metrics bypassing the report-interval.

The same report-threshold-percentage is used for all loss metric values.

6.2.7. Loss Measurement Report Interval

The Report-Interval sub-TLV specifies the time interval in seconds when measured loss values are to be reported.

6.2.8. Loss Measurement Upper Bound and Lower Bound

The Report-Upper-Bound sub-TLV specifies the upper bound and lower bound values in percentage packet loss, and is used to trigger an immediate reporting of the packet loss values when crossed. This may also result in the PCC taking an immediate local action on the LSP.

6.3. LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object For Reporting

The LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object with Object-Class (Value TBD10) is defined in this document to report the packet loss measurement of an LSP. The format of this Object is shown in Figure 19.

When the LSP is enabled with the loss measurement feature, the PCC SHOULD include the LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object to report the measured packet loss to the PCE in the PCRpt message, as well as the anomaly state in the Anomaly (A) flag.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Class=TBD10   |   OT  |Res|P|I|   Object Length (bytes)       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                                                               |
 //                        (Object body)                        //
 |                                                               |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 19: LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object Format

Object Length (16 bits): Specifies the total object length including the header in bytes, as per [RFC5440].

Object-Types (OT) are defined as follows:

 Object-Type  Length   Name
 -------------------------------------------------------------
 1            8        Loss Measurement Status
 2            8        Tx Packets-Lost
 3            8        Rx Packets-Lost
 4            12       Total Packets-Sent-Received

The object body format for Loss Measurement Status is shown in Figure 20.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |     RESERVED                                  |  Status       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 20: LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object For Reporting Loss Measurement Status
  • Loss Measurement Status: Indicates the Status of Loss Measurement as: (1) Active, (2) Failed, (3) Errored.

  • RESERVED: This field is reserved for future use. It MUST be set to 0 when sent and MUST be ignored when received.

The object body format for Packets-Lost is shown in Figure 21.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |A|   RESERVED  |            Packets-Lost                       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 21: LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object For Reporting Packets Lost
  • Packets-Lost: This 24-bit field identifies the packet loss as a percentage of the total packets transmitted, encoded as per [RFC7471].

  • RESERVED: This field is reserved for future use. It MUST be set to 0 when sent and MUST be ignored when received.

The object body format for Total Packets Sent and Received is shown in Figure 22.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                Total Packets Sent                             |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                Total Packets Received                         |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 22: LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object For Reporting Total Packets Sent and Received
  • Total Packets Sent: This 32-bit field identifies the total packets sent.

  • Total Packets Received: This 32-bit field identifies the total packets received.

7. PCEP Extensions for Bandwidth Utilization

7.1. Bandwidth Utilization Capability Advertisement

During the PCEP Initialization Phase, PCEP Speakers (PCE or PCC) advertise their support for bandwidth utilization reporting. A PCEP Speaker includes the "BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-CAPABILITY" TLV in the OPEN Object to advertise its support for PCEP extensions. The presence of the "BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-CAPABILITY" TLV in the OPEN Object (in the Open message) indicates that the bandwidth utilization reporting is supported as described in this document. Additional procedures are defined as follows:

  • The PCEP protocol extensions for bandwidth utilization MUST NOT be used if one or both PCEP Speakers have not included the "BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-CAPABILITY" TLV in their respective Open message.

  • If a PCEP speaker supports the extensions of this document but did not advertise this capability, then upon receipt of the BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-ATTRIBUTES TLV in the LSPA object, it SHOULD generate a PCErr with error-type 19 (Invalid Operation), error- value TBD28 (Bandwidth utilization capability was not advertised) and terminate the PCEP session.

  • If a PCEP speaker supports the extensions of this document but did not advertise this capability, then upon receipt of the BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION object of type TBD12, it SHOULD generate a PCErr with error-type 19 (Invalid Operation), error-value TBD28 (Bandwidth utilization capability was not advertised) and terminate the PCEP session.

7.1.1. BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-CAPABILITY TLV

The BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-CAPABILITY TLV is an optional TLV for use in the OPEN Object for Bandwidth Utilization reporting via PCEP capability advertisement. Its format is shown in Figure 23.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |       PCEP TLV Type=TBD3      |           Length=4            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                             Flags                             |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 23: BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-CAPABILITY TLV Format

The Type of the TLV is TBD3 and it has a fixed length of 4 bytes.

The value comprises a single field - Flags (32 bits). Currently, no flags are defined for this TLV.

Unassigned bits are considered reserved. They MUST be set to 0 when sent and MUST be ignored when received.

Advertisement of the BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-CAPABILITY TLV implies support for bandwidth utilization reporting, as well as the objects, TLVs and procedures defined in this document.

7.2. BW-UTILIZATION-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV

The BW-UTILIZATION-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV provides the configurable parameters of the bandwidth utilization feature.

The format of the BW-UTILIZATION-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV is shown in Figure 24.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |       PCEP TLV Type=TBD7      |           Length              |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                                                               |
 //                           sub-TLVs                          //
 |                                                               |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 24: BW-UTILIZATION-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV Format

PCEP TLV Type is defined as follows:

 Type      Name
 ----------------------------------------------------------
 TBD7      BW-UTILIZATION-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES

Length: The Length field defines the length of the value portion in bytes, as per [RFC5440].

Value: Comprises of one or more sub-TLVs as described in Section 4 of this document.

For reporting bandwidth utilization, the last reported MaxSampleBw (see [RFC8733]) value is compared with the MaxSampleBW from the current interval to detect the threshold crossing.

The following sub-sections describe the parameters that are currently defined to be carried within this TLV. Any other parameters not defined for this TLV MUST be ignored.

7.2.1. Bandwidth Utilization Measurement Enable

The Measurement-Enable sub-TLV specifies that the bandwidth utilization reporting is enabled using the following flag:

 Bit     Description
 ------------------------------------------------------------------
 23      Bandwidth Utilization Reporting Enabled

7.2.2. Bandwidth Utilization Measurement Interval

The Measurement-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in seconds for the bandwidth samples collection for the LSP.

7.2.3. Bandwidth Utilization Report Threshold

The Report-Threshold sub-TLV is used to decide if the bandwidth samples collected so far should be immediately reported bypassing the report-interval.

  • Threshold: The absolute threshold bandwidth value in 32-bits, encoded in IEEE floating-point format as described in [IEEE.754.1985], expressed in bytes per second.

7.2.4. Bandwidth Utilization Report Threshold Percentage

The Report-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV is used to decide if the bandwidth samples collected so far should be immediately reported bypassing the report-interval.

7.2.5. Bandwidth Utilization Report Interval

The Report-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in seconds when the collected bandwidth samples are to be reported to the PCE. The number of bandwidth samples in the report interval is computed using the measurement interval.

7.2.6. Bandwidth Utilization Upper Bound and Lower Bound

The Report-Upper-Bound sub-TLV specifies the upper bound and lower bound bandwidth values encoded in IEEE floating-point format as described in [IEEE.754.1985], expressed in bytes per second, and is used to trigger an immediate reporting when crossed. This may also result in the PCC taking an immediate local action on the LSP.

7.3. BANDWIDTH Object For Reporting

A new object-type for the existing BANDWIDTH Object (Object-Class 5) is defined to report the bandwidth utilization of an LSP.

When the LSP is enabled with the bandwidth utilization reporting, the PCC SHOULD include the BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION Object to report the bandwidth utilization of the LSP to the PCE in the PCRpt message.

The object-type is TBD12, the object length is variable with multiples of 4 bytes.

The object body format is shown in Figure 25.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                        BwSample1                              |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                           ...                                 |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                        BwSampleN                              |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 25: BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION Object Body Format For Reporting Bandwidth
  • BwSample: The utilized bandwidth, (the average BwSample collected at the end of each measurement-interval) encoded in IEEE floating-point format as described in [IEEE.754.1985], expressed in bytes per second.

8. PCEP Extensions for Liveness Detection Using PM

8.1. Liveness Detection Using PM

During the PCEP Initialization Phase, PCEP Speakers (PCE or PCC) advertise their support for LIVENESS-DETECTION. A PCEP Speaker includes the LIVENESS-DETECTION-CAPABILITY TLV in the OPEN Object to advertise its support for PCEP Liveness-Detection extensions. The presence of the LIVENESS-DETECTION-CAPABILITY TLV in the OPEN Object (in the Open message) indicates that the liveness detection capability is supported as described in this document. Additional procedure is defined as following:

  • The PCEP protocol extensions for Liveness Detection MUST NOT be used if one or both PCEP Speakers have not included the LIVENESS-DETECTION-CAPABILITY TLV in their respective Open message.

  • If a PCEP speaker supports the extensions of this document but did not advertise this capability, then upon receipt of the LIVENESS-DETECTION-ATTRIBUTES TLV in the LSPA object, it SHOULD generate a PCErr with error-type 19 (Invalid Operation), error-value TBD29 (Liveness-Detection capability was not advertised) and terminate the PCEP session.

8.1.1. LIVENESS-DETECTION-CAPABILITY TLV

The LIVENESS-DETECTION-CAPABILITY TLV is an optional TLV for use in the OPEN Object for Liveness Detection via PCEP capability advertisement. Its format is shown in Figure 26.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |       PCEP TLV Type=TBD4      |           Length=4            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                             Flags                             |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 26: LIVENESS-DETECTION-CAPABILITY TLV Format

The Type of the TLV is TBD4 and it has a fixed length of 4 bytes.

The value comprises a single field - Flags (32 bits):

Unassigned bits are considered reserved. They MUST be set to 0 when sent and MUST be ignored when received.

Advertisement of the LIVENESS-DETECTION-CAPABILITY TLV implies support for liveness detection, as well as the objects, TLVs and procedures defined in this document.

8.2. LIVENESS-DETECTION-ATTRIBUTES TLV

The LIVENESS-DETECTION-ATTRIBUTES TLV provides the configurable parameters of the liveness detection feature.

The format of the LIVENESS-DETECTION-ATTRIBUTES TLV is shown in Figure 27.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |       PCEP TLV Type=TBD8      |           Length              |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                                                               |
 //                           sub-TLVs                          //
 |                                                               |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 27: LIVENESS-DETECTION-ATTRIBUTES TLV Format

PCEP TLV Type is defined as follows:

 Type     Name
 ----------------------------------------------------------
 TBD8     LIVENESS-DETECTION-ATTRIBUTES

Length: The Length field defines the length of the value portion in bytes, as per [RFC5440].

Value: Comprises of one or more sub-TLVs as described in Section 4 of this document.

The following sub-sections describe the parameters that are currently defined to be carried within this TLV. Any other parameters not defined for this TLV MUST be ignored.

8.2.1. Liveness Detection Enable

The Measurement-Enable sub-TLV specifies the liveness detection enabled using the following flags:

 Bit      Description
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
 22       Liveness Detection Enabled

8.2.2. Liveness Detection Protocol

The Measurement-Protocol sub-TLV specifies that the given protocol type and loopback mode are enabled for liveness detection.

8.2.3. Liveness Detection Transmit Interval

The Transmit-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in milliseconds for the liveness detection loss test packet transmission.

8.2.4. Liveness Detection Interval

The Measurement-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in seconds for the liveness failure detection. The measurement interval MUST be a multiple of transmit interval.

8.3. LIVENESS-DETECTION Object For Reporting

The LIVENESS-DETECTION Object with Object-Class (Value TBD11) is defined in this document to report the liveness state of an LSP. The format of this Object is shown in Figure 28.

When the LSP is enabled with the liveness detection feature, the PCC SHOULD include the LIVENESS-DETECTION Object to report the liveness state.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Class=TBD11   |   OT  |Res|P|I|   Object Length (bytes)       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |                                                               |
 //                        (Object body)                        //
 |                                                               |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 28: LIVENESS-DETECTION Object Format

Object Length (16 bits): Specifies the total object length including the header, in bytes [RFC5440].

Object-Types (OT) are defined as follows:

 Object-Type  Length   Name
 -------------------------------------------------------------
 1            8        Liveness State

The object body format for Liveness Detection State is shown in Figure 29.

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |     RESERVED                                  |  State        |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 29: LIVENESS-DETECTION Object Format For Reporting Liveness State
  • Liveness Detection State: Indicates the State of Liveness Detection as: (1) Up, (2) Down, (3) Errored.

  • RESERVED: This field is reserved for future use. It MUST be set to 0 when sent and MUST be ignored when received.

9. PCEP Procedure

The following procedure is defined for the extensions to different PCEP messages for reporting performance measurements and liveness detection.

9.1. MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLVs

  • For a PCE-Initiated LSP [RFC8281] with reporting features enabled, the corresponding MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV for each measurement MUST be included in the LSPA Object with the PCInitiate message.

  • For a PCE-Initiated LSP [RFC8281] with reporting features enabled, the corresponding MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV for each measurement is carried in the PCUpd message in the LSPA Object in order to make updates to the attributes such as the Report-Interval.

  • For a PCC-Initiated LSP with reporting features enabled, when the LSP is delegated to the PCE, the corresponding MEASUREMENT- ATTRIBUTES TLV for each measurement MUST be included in the LSPA Object of the PCRpt message.

  • The various MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLVs are encoded in all PCEP messages for the LSP with reporting features enabled, the absence of the corresponding MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLV indicates that the PCEP speaker wishes to disable the feature.

9.2. MEASUREMENT Objects

When an LSP is enabled with a measurement reporting feature, the PCC SHOULD include the corresponding MEASUREMENT Object to report the measured values to the PCE in the PCRpt message [RFC8231].

The format of the "actual_attribute-list" in the PCRpt message is modified as follows:

      <actual_attribute-list>::=[<BANDWIDTH>]
                                [<DELAY-MEASUREMENT>]
                                [<LOSS-MEASUREMENT>]
                                [<LIVENESS-DETECTION>]
                                [<metric-list>]

Similarly, this message is modified for the LSPs with multiple ERO/RRO objects to be present in the "intended-path::=" and "actual-path::=" as defined in [I-D.ietf-pce-multipath].

10. Scaling Considerations

It should be noted that when measurement reporting is deployed under LSP scaling, it can lead to frequent reporting updates to the PCE. Operators are advised to set the values of various measurement reporting parameters appropriate for the deployed LSP scale.

If a PCE gets overwhelmed, it can notify the PCC to temporarily suspend the reporting of the measurements as described below.

10.1. The PCNtf Message

As per [RFC5440], the PCEP Notification message (PCNtf) can be sent by a PCEP speaker to notify its peer of a specific event. A PCEP speaker SHOULD notify its PCEP peer that it is overwhelmed, and on receipt of such notification, the peer SHOULD NOT send any PCEP messages related to measurement reporting. If a PCEP message related to measurement reporting is received, it MUST be silently ignored.

  • When a PCEP speaker is overwhelmed, it SHOULD notify its peer by sending a PCNtf message with Notification Type = TBD13 (PM Overwhelm State) and Notification Value = 1 (Entering PM overwhelm state).

  • Optionally, the OVERLOADED-DURATION TLV [RFC5440] MAY be included that specifies the time period during which no further PCEP messages related to PM should be sent.

  • When the PCEP speaker is no longer in the overwhelmed state and is available to process the PM reporting, it SHOULD notify its peer by sending a PCNtf message with Notification Type = TBD13 (PM Overwhelm State) and Notification Value = 2 (Clearing PM overwhelm state).

11. Security Considerations

This document defines new MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLVs, CAPABILITY TLVs and MEASUREMENT Objects for reporting loss, delay measurements, liveness detection, and bandwidth utilization that do not add additional security concerns beyond those discussed in [RFC5440], [RFC8231], [RFC8281] and [RFC8664].

Some deployments may find the reporting of the performance measurement, liveness detection, and bandwidth utilization information as extra sensitive as it could be used to influence the LSP path computation and LSP setup with an adverse effect. Additionally, snooping of PCEP messages with such data or using PCEP messages for network reconnaissance, may give an attacker sensitive information about the operations of the network. Thus, such deployments should employ suitable PCEP security mechanisms like the TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) [RFC5925] or Transport Layer Security [RFC8253].

12. Manageability Considerations

12.1. Control of Function and Policy

The performance measurement reporting SHOULD be controlled per TE tunnel (at the PCC or PCE) and the values for feature attributes e.g. measurement-interval, report-interval, report-threshold SHOULD be configurable by an operator.

12.2. Information and Data Models

A Management Information Base (MIB) module for modeling PCEP is described in [RFC7420]. However, one may prefer a mechanism for configuration using the PCEP YANG data model [RFC9826]. These SHOULD be enhanced to provide controls and indicators for supporting the performance measurement reporting feature. Support for various configuration knobs as well as for counters of messages sent/received containing the TLVs (defined in this document) SHOULD be added.

12.3. Verify Correct Operations

Mechanisms defined in this document do not imply any new operational verification requirements in addition to those already listed in [RFC5440].

12.4. Requirements on Other Protocols

Mechanisms defined in this document do not add any new requirements on other protocols.

12.5. Impact on Network Operations

In order to avoid any unacceptable impact on network operations, an implementation SHOULD allow a limit to be placed on the number of LSPs that can be enabled with the performance measurement reporting feature. An implementation MAY allow a limit to be placed on the rate of measurement reporting messages sent by a PCEP speaker and received by a peer. An implementation MAY also allow sending a notification when a PCEP speaker is overwhelmed or the rate of messages reaches a threshold.

13. IANA Considerations

13.1. Measurement Capability TLV Types

This document defines the following new PCEP TLVs; IANA is requested to make the following allocations from the "PCEP TLV Type Indicators" registry. http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-tlv-type-indicators

 Type      Name                                 Reference
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 TBD1      DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY         [This document]
 TBD2      LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY          [This document]
 TBD3      BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-CAPABILITY     [This document]
 TBD4      LIVENESS-DETECTION-CAPABILITY        [This document]

13.1.1. Flag Fields for MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLVs

IANA is requested to create a registry to manage the Flag field of the DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV, LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV and BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION-CAPABILITY TLV.

New bit numbers are allocated only by an IETF Review action [RFC8126]. Each bit should be tracked using the following qualities:

    • Bit number (counting from bit 0 as the most significant bit)

    • Capability description

    • Defining RFC

The following values are defined in this document for the Flag field for -

DELAY-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV:

 Bit       Description                            Reference
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 31        One-way Delay Measurement              [This document]
 30        Two-way Delay Measurement              [This document]
 29        Loopback Delay Measurement             [This document]

LOSS-MEASUREMENT-CAPABILITY TLV:

 Bit       Description                            Reference
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 31        One-Way Loss Measurement               [This document]
 30        Two-Way Loss Measurement               [This document]
 29        Loopback Loss Measurement              [This document]
 28        Inferred Loss Measurement Mode         [This document]
 27        Direct Loss Measurement Mode           [This document]

13.2. MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLVs

This document defines the following new PCEP TLV Types; IANA is requested to make the following TLV type allocations from the "PCEP TLV Type Indicators" registry. http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-tlv-type-indicators

 Type      Name                                    Reference
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
 TBD5      DELAY-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES            [This document]
 TBD6      LOSS-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES             [This document]
 TBD7      BW-UTILIZATION-MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES   [This document]
 TBD8      LIVENESS-DETECTION-ATTRIBUTES           [This document]

13.2.1. The Sub-TLVs For MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES TLVs

IANA is requested to create a "MEASUREMENT-ATTRIBUTES Sub-TLV Types" sub-registry in the "PCEP TLV Type Indicators" registry. New sub-TLVs are allocated only by an IETF Review action [RFC8126].

This document defines the following sub-TLV types:

 Type     Name                                 Reference
 -------------------------------------------------------------
 0        Reserved                             [This document]
 1        Measurement-Enable sub-TLV           [This document]
 2        Transmit-Interval sub-TLV            [This document]
 3        Measurement-Protocol sub-TLV         [This document]
 4        Measurement-Interval sub-TLV         [This document]
 5        Report-Threshold sub-TLV             [This document]
 6        Report-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV  [This document]
 7        Report-Interval sub-TLV              [This document]
 8        Report-Upper-Bound sub-TLV           [This document]
 9-       Unassigned                           [This document]
 65535
13.2.1.1. Flag Fields in Measurement-Enable sub-TLV

IANA is requested to create a registry to manage the Flag field of the Measurement-Enable sub-TLV.

New bit numbers are allocated only by an IETF Review action [RFC8126]. Each bit should be tracked with the following qualities:

    • Bit number (counting from bit 0 as the most significant bit)

    • Capability description

    • Defining RFC

The following values are defined in this document for the Flag field.

 Bit    Description                              Reference
 ---------------------------------------------------------------
 31     One-Way Delay Measurement Enabled        [This document]
 30     Two-Way Delay Measurement Enabled        [This document]
 29     Loopback Delay Measurement Enabled       [This document]

 28     One-Way Loss Measurement Enabled         [This document]
 27     Two-Way Loss Measurement Enabled         [This document]
 26     Loopback Loss Measurement Enabled        [This document]
 25     Inferred Loss Measurement Enabled        [This document]
 24     Direct Loss Measurement Enabled          [This document]

 23     Bandwidth Utilization Reporting Enabled  [This document]

 22     Liveness Detection Enabled               [This document]

13.3. Measurement Object-Class

This document defines Object-Class for the following Objects; IANA is requested to make the following allocations from the "PCEP Objects" registry. http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-objects

 Object-Class  Name                             Reference
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 TBD9          DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object         [This document]
 TBD10         LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object          [This document]
 TBD11         LIVENESS-DETECTION Object        [This document]

13.3.1. DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object-Types

IANA is requested to create a "DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object-Types" sub-registry for the DELAY-MEASUREMENT Object (Object-class TBD9).

This document defines the following object-types:

 Object-Type Name                                    Reference
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 0        Reserved                                   [This document]
 1        Delay Measurement Status                   [This document]
 2        One-Way Delay Measurement Value            [This document]
 3        One-Way Delay Measurement Min/Max Values   [This document]
 4        One-Way Delay Variation Measurement Value  [This document]
 5        Two-Way Delay Measurement Value            [This document]
 6        Two-Way Delay Measurement Min/Max Values   [This document]
 7        Two-Way Delay Variation Measurement Value  [This document]
 8        Loopback Delay Measurement Value           [This document]
 9        Loopback Delay Measurement Min/Max Values  [This document]
 10       Loopback Delay Variation Measurement Value [This document]

13.3.2. LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object-Types

IANA is requested to create a "LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object-Types" sub-registry for the LOSS-MEASUREMENT Object (Object-class TBD10).

This document defines the following object-types:

 Object-Type Name                               Reference
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 0           Reserved                           [This document]
 1           Loss Measurement Status            [This document]
 2           Tx Packets-Lost                    [This document]
 3           Rx Packets-Lost                    [This document]
 4           Total Packets-Sent-Received        [This document]

13.3.3. BANDWIDTH Object-Type

This document defines a new Object-Type for the existing BANDWIDTH object (Object-Class 5, [RFC5440]); IANA is requested to make the following allocation from the "PCEP Objects" registry. http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-objects

 Object-Type Name                               Reference
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 TBD12       BANDWIDTH-UTILIZATION Object       [This document]

13.4. PCE Error Codes

This document defines two new error-values for PCErr with error-code 19 (Invalid Operation). IANA is requested to make the following allocations.

 Error-Value  Name                                   Reference
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 TBD21        Delay-Measurement capability
                               was not advertised    [This document]
 TBD22        Loss-Measurement capability
                               was not advertised    [This document]
 TBD23        Two-Way Measurement capability
                               was not advertised    [This document]
 TBD24        One-Way Measurement capability
                               was not advertised    [This document]
 TBD25        Loopback Measurement capability
                               was not advertised    [This document]
 TBD26        Inferred Mode Loss Measurement capability
                               was not advertised    [This document]
 TBD27        Direct Mode Loss Measurement capability
                               was not advertised    [This document]
 TBD28        Bandwidth Utilization capability
                               was not advertised    [This document]
 TBD29        Liveness Detection capability
                               was not advertised    [This document]

13.5. Notification Object-Type

IANA is requested to allocate new Notification Types and Notification Values within the "Notification Object" sub-registry of the PCEP Numbers registry, as follows:

 Type       Meaning                                Reference
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
 TBD13      PM Overwhelm State                     [This document]

            Notification-value=1:  Entering PM overwhelm state
            Notification-value=2:  Clearing PM overwhelm state

14. References

14.1. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC5440]
Vasseur, JP., Ed. and JL. Le Roux, Ed., "Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)", RFC 5440, DOI 10.17487/RFC5440, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5440>.
[RFC8126]
Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8231]
Crabbe, E., Minei, I., Medved, J., and R. Varga, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE", RFC 8231, DOI 10.17487/RFC8231, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8231>.
[RFC8281]
Crabbe, E., Minei, I., Sivabalan, S., and R. Varga, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for PCE-Initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model", RFC 8281, DOI 10.17487/RFC8281, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8281>.

14.2. Informative References

[I-D.ietf-pce-multipath]
Koldychev, M., Sivabalan, S., Saad, T., Beeram, V. P., Bidgoli, H., Peng, S., and S. Sidor, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-pce-multipath-19, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-multipath-19>.
[I-D.ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls]
Gandhi, R., Filsfils, C., Janssens, B., Chen, M., and R. F. Foote, "Performance Measurement Using Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) for Segment Routing over the MPLS Data Plane", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls-00, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls-00>.
[I-D.ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-srv6]
Gandhi, R., Filsfils, C., Janssens, B., Chen, M., and R. F. Foote, "Performance Measurement Using Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) for Segment Routing over the IPv6 (SRv6) Data Plane", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-srv6-00, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-srv6-00>.
[IEEE.754.1985]
IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic", IEEE ANSI/IEEE 754-1985, DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.1985.82928, , <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/30711>.
[RFC4655]
Farrel, A., Vasseur, J.-P., and J. Ash, "A Path Computation Element (PCE)-Based Architecture", RFC 4655, DOI 10.17487/RFC4655, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4655>.
[RFC5357]
Hedayat, K., Krzanowski, R., Morton, A., Yum, K., and J. Babiarz, "A Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)", RFC 5357, DOI 10.17487/RFC5357, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5357>.
[RFC5925]
Touch, J., Mankin, A., and R. Bonica, "The TCP Authentication Option", RFC 5925, DOI 10.17487/RFC5925, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5925>.
[RFC6374]
Frost, D. and S. Bryant, "Packet Loss and Delay Measurement for MPLS Networks", RFC 6374, DOI 10.17487/RFC6374, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6374>.
[RFC7420]
Koushik, A., Stephan, E., Zhao, Q., King, D., and J. Hardwick, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Management Information Base (MIB) Module", RFC 7420, DOI 10.17487/RFC7420, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7420>.
[RFC7471]
Giacalone, S., Ward, D., Drake, J., Atlas, A., and S. Previdi, "OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions", RFC 7471, DOI 10.17487/RFC7471, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7471>.
[RFC7823]
Atlas, A., Drake, J., Giacalone, S., and S. Previdi, "Performance-Based Path Selection for Explicitly Routed Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Using TE Metric Extensions", RFC 7823, DOI 10.17487/RFC7823, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7823>.
[RFC8233]
Dhody, D., Wu, Q., Manral, V., Ali, Z., and K. Kumaki, "Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) to Compute Service-Aware Label Switched Paths (LSPs)", RFC 8233, DOI 10.17487/RFC8233, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8233>.
[RFC8253]
Lopez, D., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Wu, Q., and D. Dhody, "PCEPS: Usage of TLS to Provide a Secure Transport for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)", RFC 8253, DOI 10.17487/RFC8253, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8253>.
[RFC8408]
Sivabalan, S., Tantsura, J., Minei, I., Varga, R., and J. Hardwick, "Conveying Path Setup Type in PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Messages", RFC 8408, DOI 10.17487/RFC8408, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8408>.
[RFC8570]
Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Giacalone, S., Ward, D., Drake, J., and Q. Wu, "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions", RFC 8570, DOI 10.17487/RFC8570, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8570>.
[RFC8571]
Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Tantsura, J., and C. Filsfils, "BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering Performance Metric Extensions", RFC 8571, DOI 10.17487/RFC8571, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8571>.
[RFC8664]
Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W., and J. Hardwick, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing", RFC 8664, DOI 10.17487/RFC8664, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8664>.
[RFC8733]
Dhody, D., Ed., Gandhi, R., Ed., Palle, U., Singh, R., and L. Fang, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for MPLS-TE Label Switched Path (LSP) Auto-Bandwidth Adjustment with Stateful PCE", RFC 8733, DOI 10.17487/RFC8733, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8733>.
[RFC8762]
Mirsky, G., Jun, G., Nydell, H., and R. Foote, "Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol", RFC 8762, DOI 10.17487/RFC8762, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8762>.
[RFC9603]
Li, C., Ed., Kaladharan, P., Sivabalan, S., Koldychev, M., and Y. Zhu, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for IPv6 Segment Routing", RFC 9603, DOI 10.17487/RFC9603, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9603>.
[RFC9779]
Gandhi, R., Ed., Filsfils, C., Voyer, D., Salsano, S., and M. Chen, "Performance Measurement for Segment Routing Networks with the MPLS Data Plane", RFC 9779, DOI 10.17487/RFC9779, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9779>.
[RFC9826]
Dhody, D., Ed., Beeram, V., Hardwick, J., and J. Tantsura, "A YANG Data Model for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)", RFC 9826, DOI 10.17487/RFC9826, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9826>.

Appendix A. Example Use Cases

This section describes a non-exhaustive list of examples of deployment use cases of PM for LSPs when deployed in a network with the PCE. A Network Management System (NMS) may also be deployed in the network capable of receiving and processing streaming telemetry of PM metrics and may interact with the PCC and PCE for the PM as described in use cases 3, 4, and 5.

Use case 1: PCE Enables PM on the PCC and PCC Takes Action

PCE -----> PCC

In this use case, the PCE sets the upper bound threshold condition for LSPs at the PCC. The PCC takes a local action when the condition is met. The action could be based on a local policy or a policy set by the PCE. The steps involved are -

Use case 2: PCC Reports PM Metrics to the PCE, PCE Takes Action

PCE <----- PCC

In this use case, the PCC reports the PM metrics and parameters to the PCE and the PCE may take an immediate local (reactive) action based on the PM metrics. The steps involved are -

Use case 3: PCE Enables PM on the PCC, PCC Sends PM Metrics to NMS

PCE -----> PCC -----> NMS

The steps involved are -

Use case 4: NMS Enables PM on the PCC, PCC Sends PM Metrics to the PCE

PCE <----- PCC <----- NMS

The steps involved are -

Use case 5: NMS Enables PM on the PCC, PCC Sends PM Metrics to NMS

PCE ----> PCC <-----> NMS -----> PCE

The steps involved are -

Acknowledgments

TBA.

Authors' Addresses

Rakesh Gandhi
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Canada
Bin Wen
Comcast
Colby Barth
HPE
Dhruv Dhody
Huawei Technologies
India