INTERNET-DRAFT D. Eastlake Intended status: Proposed Standard Futurewei Technologies Z. Li S. Zhuang Huawei Technologies Expires: April 18, 2021 October 19, 2020 EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP Abstract A principal feature of EVPN is the ability to support multihoming from a customer equipment (CE) to multiple provider edge equipment (PE) with all-active links. This draft specifies a mechanism to simplify PEs used with VXLAN tunnels and enhance VXLAN Active-Active reliability. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Distribution of this document is unlimited. Comments should be sent to the BESS working group mailing list . Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 1] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP Table of Contents 1. Introduction............................................3 1.1 Terminology and Acronyms...............................3 2. VXLAN Gateway High Reliability..........................4 3. Detailed Problem and Solution Requirement...............6 4. The Bypass VXLAN Extended Community Attribute...........7 5. Control Plane Processing................................9 6. Data Packet Processing................................10 6.1 Layer 2 Unicast Packet Forwarding.....................10 6.1.1 Uplink..............................................10 6.1.2 Downlink............................................10 6.2 BUM Packet Forwarding................................11 7. IANA Considerations....................................12 7.1 IPv4 Specific.........................................12 7.2 IPv6 Specific.........................................12 8. Security Considerations................................13 Acknowledgements..........................................13 Contributors..............................................14 Normative References......................................14 Informative References....................................14 D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 2] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP 1. Introduction A principal feature of EVPN is the ability to support multihoming from a customer equipment (CE) to multiple provider edge equipment (PE) with links used in the all-active redundancy mode. That mode is where a device is multihomed to a group of two or more PEs and where all PEs in such a redundancy group can forward traffic to/from the multihomed device or network for a given VLAN [RFC7209]. This draft specifies a VXLAN gateway mechanism to simplify PE processing in the multi-homed case and enhance VXLAN Active-Active reliability. 1.1 Terminology and Acronyms The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. This document uses the following acronyms and terms: All-Active Redundancy Mode - When a device is multihomed to a group of two or more PEs and when all PEs in such redundancy group can forward traffic to/from the multihomed device or network for a given VLAN. BUM - Broadcast, Unknown unicast, and Multicast. CE - Customer Edge equipment. DCI - Data Center Interconnect. ESI - Ethernet Segment Identifier - A unique non-zero identifier that identifies an Ethernet segment. NVE - Network Virtualization Edge. PE - Provider Edge equipment. Single-Active Redundancy Mode - When a device or a network is multihomed to a group of two or more PEs and when only a single PE in such a redundancy group can forward traffic to/from the multihomed device or network for a given VLAN. VTEP - VXLAN Tunnel End Point. VXLAN - Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network [RFC7348]. D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 3] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP 2. VXLAN Gateway High Reliability One example of the current situation would be a DCI (data center interconnect) using VXLAN tunnels that is multihomed for reliability as show in Figure 1. Each PE as a VXLAN Tunnel End Point (VTEP) uses a different IP adress. Thus each PE must process EVPN updates based on the ESIs [RFC7432]. ......... . DCI . +----------+ . . +----------+ | PE +---------------------+ PE | |VTEP IP-1 +--- . VXLAN . ---+VTEP IP-3 | +----------+ \ .Tunnels. / +----------= / | ----- ----- | \ +--+ | . \ / . | +--+ |CE| | . X . | |CE| +--+ | . / \ . | +--+ \ | ----- ----- | / +----------+ / . VXLAN . \ +----------+ | PE +--- .Tunnels. ---+ PE | |VTEP IP-2 +---------------------+VTEP IP-4 | +----------+ . . +----------+ ......... Figure 1. Current Situtation The situation is greatly simplified if the set of VTEPs connected to a particular Ethernet segment all use the same anycast IP address. PEs no longer need to conern themselves with whether a remote CE is single or multi-homed. The situation is as shown in Figure 2. The IP address within each VTEP group is synchronized by messages within that group. D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 4] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP ......... . DCI . +----------+ . . +----------+ | Anycast | . . | Anycast | |VTEP IP-1 +--- . . ---+VTEP IP-2 | +----------+ \ . . / +----------= / ^ \ . . / ^ \ +--+ | \. ./ | +--+ |CE| Sy|nc >-------< Sy|nc |CE| +--+ | /. VXLAN .\ | +--+ \ v / . Tunnel. \ v / +----------+ / . . \ +----------+ | Anycast +--- . . ---+ Anycast | |VTEP IP-1 | . . |VTEP IP-2 | +----------+ . . +----------+ ......... Figure 2. Situtation Using Anycast D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 5] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP 3. Detailed Problem and Solution Requirement In the scenario illustrated in Figure 3, where an enterprise site and a data center are interconnected, the VPN gateways (PE1 and PE2) and the enterprise site (CPE) are connected through a VXLAN tunnel to provide L2/L3 services between the enterprise site (CPE) and data center. The data center gateway (CE1) is dual-homed to PE1 and PE2 to access the VXLAN network, which enhances network access reliability. When one PE fails, services can be rapidly switched to the other PE, minimizing the impact on services. As shown in Figure 3, PE1 and PE2 use a virtual address as a Network Virtualization Edge (NVE) interface address at the network side, namely, the Anycast VTEP address. In this way, the CPE is aware of only one remote NVE interface and establishes a VXLAN tunnel with the virtual address. The packets from the CPE can reach CE1 through either PE1 or PE2. However, single-homed CEs may exist, such as CE2 and CE3. As a result, after reaching a PE, the packets from the CPE may need to be forwarded by the other PE to a single-homed CE. Therefore, a bypass VXLAN tunnel needs to be established between PE1 and PE2. An EVPN peer relationship is established between PE1 and PE2. Different addresses, namely, bypass VTEP addresses, are configured for PE1 and PE2 so that they can establish a bypass VXLAN tunnel. +-----+ ---------------- | CPE | ^ +-----+ | / \ | / \ VXLAN Tunnel / \ | / \ | / Anycast \ v +-----+ VTEP +-----+ --------- | PE1 |------| PE2 | +-----+ +-----+ /\ /\ / \ / \ / \ Trunk / \ / \ / \ / +\---/+ \ / | \ / | \ / +--+--+ \ / | \ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ | CE2 | | CE1 | | CE3 | +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ Figure 3. Basic networking of the VXLAN active-active scenario D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 6] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP 4. The Bypass VXLAN Extended Community Attribute This sections specifies the extensions to meet the requirements given in Section 3 and enhance VXLAN active-active reliability. This document specifies two new BGP extended communities, the IPv4 and IPv6 Bypass VXLAN Extended Communities. These extended communities are IPv4-address-specific or IPv6-address-specific, depending on whether the VTEP address to be accommodated is IPv4 or IPv6. In the new extended communities, the 4-byte or 16-byte global administrator field encodes the IPv4 or IPv6 address that is the VTEP address and the 2-byte local administrator field is formatted as shown in Figures 4 and 5. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type=0x01 | Sub-Type=TBA1 | IPv4 Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv4 Address (cont.) | Flags | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 4. IPv4-address-specific Bypass VXLAN Extended Community 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type=0x00/0x40| Sub-Type=TBA2 | Target IPv6 Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Target IPv6 Address (cont.) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Target IPv6 Address (cont.) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Target IPv6 Address (cont.) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Target IPv6 Address (cont.) | Flags | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 5. IPv6-address-specific Bypass VXLAN Extended Community Where Type: 0x01 = type for transitive IPv4 specific use. 0x00 = type for transitive IPv6 specific use. 0x40 = type for non-transitive IPv6 specific use. Sub-Type: TBA1 = subtype for IPv4 specific use. TBA2 = subtype for IPv6 specific use. D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 7] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP IPv4/IPv6: An address of that type. Flags: MUST be sent as zero and ignored on receipt. Reserved: MUST be sent as zero and ignored on receipt. D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 8] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP 5. Control Plane Processing Using the topology in Figure 3: 1) PE2 sends a multicast route to PE1. The source address of the route is the Anycast VTEP address shared by PE1 and PE2. The route carries the bypass VXLAN extended community attribute, including the bypass VTEP address of PE1. 2) After receiving the multicast route from PE2, PE1 considers that an Anycast relationship be established with PE2. This is because the source address (Anycast VTEP address) of the route is the same as the local virtual address of PE1 and the route carries the bypass VTEP extended community attribute. Based on the bypass VXLAN extended attribute of the route, PE1 establishes a bypass VXLAN tunnel to PE2. 3) PE1 learns the MAC address of the CEs through upstream packets from the CEs and advertises them as routes to PE2 through BGP EVPN. The routes carry the ESI of the links accessed by the CEs, and information about the VLANs that the CE access, and the bypass VXLAN extended community attribute. 4) PE1 learns the MAC address of the CPE through downstream packets at the network side, specifies that the next-hop address of the MAC route can be iterated to a static VXLAN tunnel, and advertises the route to PE2. The next-hop address of the MAC route cannot be changed. D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 9] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP 6. Data Packet Processing This section describes how Layer 2 unicast and BUM (Broadcast, Unknown unicast, and Multicast) packets are forwarded. A description of how Layer 3 packets transmitted on the same subnet and Layer 3 packets transmitted across subnets cases are forwarded will be provided in a furture version of this document. 6.1 Layer 2 Unicast Packet Forwarding The following two subsections discuss Layer 2 unicast forwarding in the topology shown in Figure 3. 6.1.1 Uplink After receiving Layer 2 unicast packets destined for the CPE from CE1, CE2, and CE3, PE1 and PE2 search for their local MAC address table to obtain outbound interfaces, perform VXLAN encapsulation on the packets, and forward them to the CPE. 6.1.2 Downlink After receiving a Layer 2 unicast packet sent by the CPE to CE1, PE1 performs VXLAN decapsulation on the packet, searches the local MAC address table for the destination MAC address, obtains the outbound interface, and forwards the packet to CE1. After receiving a Layer 2 unicast packet sent by the CPE to CE2, PE1 performs VXLAN decapsulation on the packet, searches the local MAC address table for the destination MAC address, obtains the outbound interface, and forwards the packet to CE2. After receiving a Layer 2 unicast packet sent by the CPE to CE3, PE1 performs VXLAN decapsulation on the packet, searches the local MAC address table for the destination MAC address, and forwards it to PE2 over the bypass VXLAN tunnel. After the packet reaches PE2, PE2 searches the destination MAC address, obtains the outbound interface, and forwards the packet to CE3. The process for PE2 to forward packets from the CPE is the same as that for PE1 to forward packets from the CPE with the roles of CE2 and CE3 swapped. D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 10] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP 6.2 BUM Packet Forwarding Using the topology in Figure 3, if the destination address of a BUM packet from the CPE is the Anycast VTEP address of PE1 and PE2, the BUM packet may be forwarded to either PE1 or PE2. If the BUM packet reaches PE2, PE2 sends a copy of the packet to CE3 and CE1. In addition, PE2 sends a copy of the packet to PE1 through the bypass VXLAN tunnel between PE1 and PE2. After the copy of the packet reaches PE1, PE1 sends it to CE2, not to the CPE or CE1. In this way, CE1 receives only one copy of the packet. Using the topology in Figure 3, after a BUM packet from CE2 reaches PE1, PE1 sends a copy of the packet to CE1 and the CPE. In addition, PE1 sends a copy of the packet to PE2 through the bypass VXLAN tunnel between PE1 and PE2. After the copy of the packet reaches PE2, PE2 sends it to CE3, not to the CPE or CE1. Using the topology in Figure 3, after a BUM packet from CE1 reaches PE1, PE1 sends a copy of the packet to CE2 and the CPE. In addition, PE1 sends a copy of the packet to PE2 through the bypass VXLAN tunnel between PE1 and PE2. After the copy of the packet reaches PE2, PE2 sends it to CE3, not to the CPE or CE1. D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 11] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP 7. IANA Considerations IANA is requested to assign two new Extended Community attribute SubTypes as follows: 7.1 IPv4 Specific Sub-Type Value Name Reference -------------- ------------------------------- ---------- TBA1 Bypass VXLAN Extended Community [this doc] 7.2 IPv6 Specific Sub-Type Value Name Reference -------------- ------------------------------- ---------- TBA2 Bypass VXLAN Extended Community [this doc] D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 12] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP 8. Security Considerations TBD For general EVPN Security Considerations, see [RFC7432]. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the following for their comments and review of this document: TBD D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 13] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP Contributors The following individuals made significant contributions to this document: Haibo Wang Huawei Technologies Huawei Bldg., No. 156 Beiqing Road Beijing 100095 China Email: rainsword.wang@huawei.com Normative References [RFC2119] - Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC7432] - Sajassi, A., Ed., Aggarwal, R., Bitar, N., Isaac, A., Uttaro, J., Drake, J., and W. Henderickx, "BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN", RFC 7432, DOI 10.17487/RFC7432, February 2015, . [RFC8174] - Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . Informative References [RFC7209] - Sajassi, A., Aggarwal, R., Uttaro, J., Bitar, N., Henderickx, W., and A. Isaac, "Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)", RFC 7209, DOI 10.17487/RFC7209, May 2014, . [RFC7348] - Mahalingam, M., Dutt, D., Duda, K., Agarwal, P., Kreeger, L., Sridhar, T., Bursell, M., and C. Wright, "Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks", RFC 7348, DOI 10.17487/RFC7348, August 2014, . D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 14] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP Authors' Addresses Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd Futurewei Technologies 2386 Panormaic Circle Apopka, FL 32703 USA Phone: +1-508-333-2270 Email: d3e3e3@gmail.com Zhenbin Li Huawei Technologies Huawei Bld., No.156 Beiqing Rd. Beijing 100095 China Email: lizhenbin@huawei.com Shunwan Zhuang Huawei Technologies Huawei Bld., No.156 Beiqing Rd. Beijing 100095 China Email: zhuangshunwan@huawei.com D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 15] INTERNET-DRAFT EVPN VXLAN Bypass VTEP Copyright, Disclaimer, and Additional IPR Provisions Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. The definitive version of an IETF Document is that published by, or under the auspices of, the IETF. Versions of IETF Documents that are published by third parties, including those that are translated into other languages, should not be considered to be definitive versions of IETF Documents. The definitive version of these Legal Provisions is that published by, or under the auspices of, the IETF. Versions of these Legal Provisions that are published by third parties, including those that are translated into other languages, should not be considered to be definitive versions of these Legal Provisions. For the avoidance of doubt, each Contributor to the IETF Standards Process licenses each Contribution that he or she makes as part of the IETF Standards Process to the IETF Trust pursuant to the provisions of RFC 5378. No language to the contrary, or terms, conditions or rights that differ from or are inconsistent with the rights and licenses granted under RFC 5378, shall have any effect and shall be null and void, whether published or posted by such Contributor, or included with or in such Contribution. D. Eastlake, Z. Li, & S. Zhuang [Page 16]