Network Working Group Brian Bidulock INTERNET-DRAFT OpenSS7 Corporation June 18, 2006 Expires in December 2006 Application Server Process (ASP) Extension (ASPEXT) Framework for Signalling User Adaptation Layers Status of this Memo By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress". The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire in December 2006. Copyright Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). Abstract This Internet-Draft describes ASP Extensions (ASPEXT) for Signalling User Adaptation Protocols [IUA-BIS], [DUA], [V5UA], [GR303UA00], [M2UA], [M3UA-BIS], [SUA], [ISUA], [TUA], which permits cooperating Signalling Peer Processes (SPPs) to indicate to each other the specific protocol extensions that each supports. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 1 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 Contents A complete table of contents, list of tables and illustrations, and change history appears at the end of this document. 1. Introduction 1.1. Scope This Internet-Draft provides parameters and procedures in extension to the parameters and procedures of the Signalling User Adaptation Layers (UAs) [IUA-BIS], [DUA], [V5UA], [GR303UA00], [M2UA], [M3UA- BIS], [SUA], [ISUA], [TUA], for the purpose of supporting a framework for extending the parameters and procedures of these Adaptation Layers. UA implementations with ASPEXT are intended to be compatible with UA implementations not supporting this configuration. 1.2. Abbreviations AS --Application Server. ASP --Application Server Process. ASPCONG --ASP Congestion Extension. ASPEXT --ASP Extensions. CAP --CAMEL Application Protocol. CORID --Correlation Id Extension DE --IPSP Double-Ended Model IANA --Internet Assigned Numbers Authority I-D --Internet-Draft IETF --Internet Engineering Task Force IP --Internet Protocol. IPSP --IP Signalling Point. LOADGRP --Load Grouping Extension LOADSEL --Load Selection Extension M2PA --SS7 MTP2-User Peer-to-Peer Adaptation Layer. PC --SS7 Point Code. SCCP --Signalling Connection Control Part. SCN --Switched Circuit Network. SCP --Signalling Control Point. SCTP --Stream Control Transmission Protocol. SE --IPSP Single-Ended Model SG --Signalling Gateway. SGP --Signalling Gateway Process. SIGTRAN --IETF Signalling Transport WG SPP --Signalling Peer Process. SS7 --Signalling System No. 7. SSP --Service Switching Point. SUA --SS7 SCCP-User Adpatation Layer. TCAP --Transaction Capabilities Application Part. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 2 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 TUA --SS7 TCAP-User Adaptation Layer. UA --User Adaptation Layer. WG --Working Group 1.3. Terminology ASPEXT adds the following terms to the terminology presented in the UA documents: ASP Extension (ASPEXT) - An extension to one or more of the the UAs that requires identification of the capabilities of the SPP to support the extension as part of its requirements. Signalling Peer Process (SPP) - refers to an ASP, SGP or IPSP. Signalling User Adaptation Layer (UA) - one or more of the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) [RFC2960] ISDN Signalling User Adaptation Layers [IUA-BIS], [DUA], [V5UA], [GR303UA00] or SS7 Signalling User Adaptation Layers [M2UA], [M3UA-BIS], [SUA], [ISUA], [TUA]. supporting the concept of ASP Management<1>. 1.4. Overview There is a need to provide extensions for the Signalling User Adaptation Layer protocols that require interworking between Signalling Peer Processes (SPPs) implementing a specific extension and SPPs not implementing the extension. ASPEXT provides parameters and procedures that allow Signalling Peer Processes (SPPs) implementing a given set of extensions to indicate its support to other SPPs as well as to discover the support for extensions provided by peer SPPs. 1.4.1. Existing Extension Management The existing UA procedures<2> make no provisions for the management of extensions. Any mechanism that an SPP might use to determine the extension support of peer SPPs depends upon implementation dependent configuration information or protocols between SPPs. For example, if an ASP implements and extension that requires that the ASP have knowledge of whether a peer SGP supports the extension, the ASP would have to be configured with this SGP-specific information, or would need to use some implementation-dependent mechanism to determine this information. The lack of an IETF procedure for managing extension support represents a deficiency of the existing UA procedures<2> that detracts from interoperability between separate implementations of SPP peers. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 3 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 1.4.2. ASP Extension Management ASPEXT provide support for the following: + Support for an SPP indicating to peer SPPs the extensions that are supported. + Support for an SPP discovering what extensions are supported by peer SPPs. + Support for an SPP supporting ASPEXT interworking with an SPP that does not support ASPEXT. Notes for Section 1 <1> Currently all SS7 Signalling User Adaptation Layers support ASP Management with the exception of M2PA [M2PA]. <2> See, for example, Section 4 of the specific UA document [M3UA- BIS], [SUA], [ISUA], [TUA]. 2. Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 3. Protocol Elements ASPEXT provides the following parameters and the messages in which they are included in addition to the parameters of the UAs.<1> 3.1. Parameters ASPEXT provides the following parameters in addition to the parameters defined for the UAs.<1> 3.1.1. ASP Extensions The ASP Extensions parameter is a common parameter used in the ASPUP and ASPUP ACK messages to identify the extension capabilities of the ASP (ASPUP) and the extension capabilities of the SGP or IPSP (ASPUP ACK). The ASP Extensions parameter is formatted as follows: <2> B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 4 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag = 0xXXXX | Length = 8 | +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ | ASP Extension #1 | +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ | ASP Extension #2 | +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ \ . \ / . / \ . \ / / +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ | ASP Extension #n | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ The ASP Extensions parameter contains one or more of the following fields: ASP Extension field: 32-bits (unsigned integer) The ASP Extension field contains an IANA registered extension identifier number that identifies the extension supported by the ASP in an ASPUP or an extension supported by the SGP or IPSP in an ASPUP ACK. Examples of valid values for the ASP Extension field are as follows: 0 None 1 Protocol Limits Extension [SGINFO] 2 Load Selection Extension [LOADSEL] 3 Load Grouping Extension [LOADGRP] 4 Correlation Id and Heartbeat Extension [CORID] 5 Registration Extension [REGEXT] 6 Session Identification Extension [SESSID] 7 Dynamic Registration Option 8 Double-Ended (DE) IPSP Model Option [M3UA-BIS] 9 ASP Congestion Extension [ASPCONG] - (All other values are IETF reserved.) Each occurrence of an ASP Extension field indicates that the sending SPP supports the specified extension. The ASP Extension parameter MUST contain at least one ASP Extension value. An ASP Extension field containing the value "None" MUST be the only ASP Extension field included in the ASP Extension parameter. 3.2. Messages ASPEXT extends the following messages defined for the UAs.<1> B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 5 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 3.2.1. ASP Up (ASPUP) ASPEXT supplements the ASPUP message by permitting the following optional parameters to be included in the message: Extension Parameters ----------------------------------------- ASP Extensions Optional The format of the resulting ASPUP message is as follows: <3> 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag = 0x0011 | Length = 8 | +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ | ASP Identifier | +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | Tag = 0xXXXX | Length = 8 | +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ \ \ / ASP Extensions / \ \ +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | Tag = 0x0004 | Length | +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ \ \ / Info String / \ \ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To indicate its support for a specific extension, the ASP MUST include the specific extension number in the ASP Extensions parameter in the ASPUP message. No other changes to the ASPUP message format are provided by this extension. 3.2.2. ASP Up Acknowledgment (ASPUP ACK) ASPEXT supplements the ASPUP ACK message by permitting the following optional parameters to be included in the message: Extension Parameters ----------------------------------------- ASP Extensions Optional The format of the resulting ASPUP ACK message is as follows: <4> B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 6 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag = 0xXXXX | Length = 8 | +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ \ \ / ASP Extensions / \ \ +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | Tag = 0x0004 | Length | +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ \ \ / Info String / \ \ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To indicate its support for a specific extension, SGP and IPSP MUST include the specific extension number in the ASP Extensions parameter in the ASPUP ACK message. No other changes to the ASPUP ACK message format are provided by this extension. Notes for Section 3 <1> See, for example, Section 3 of the specific UA document [M3UA- BIS], [SUA], [ISUA], [TUA]. <2> EDITOR'S NOTE:- The parameter tag values shown as 0xXXXX will be assigned by IANA within the common parameter range of the SIGTRAN UAs and may change its value in further versions of this document. <3> EDITOR'S NOTE:- The parameter tag values shown as 0xXXXX will be assigned by IANA within the common parameter range of the SIGTRAN UAs and may change its value in further versions of this document. <4> EDITOR'S NOTE:- The parameter tag values shown as 0xXXXX will be assigned by IANA within the common parameter range of the SIGTRAN UAs and may change its value in further versions of this document. 4. Procedures The following procedures are provided in extension to the UA procedures by ASPEXT. 4.1. ASP Management Procedures B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 7 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 4.1.1. ASP Up Procedures In extension of the "ASP Up Procedures" of the UAs<2>, ASPEXT provides the following procedures: Whenever an ASP, as part of the normal UA procedures, sends an ASP Up (ASPUP) message to an SGP or IPSP it MAY include the ASP Extensions parameter indicating the extensions supported by the ASP. Upon receiving an ASP Up (ASPUP) message from an ASP that contains the ASP Extensions parameter, an SGP or IPSP supporting ASPEXT MUST register the ASP's support of the specified extensions and MUST place an ASP Extensions parameter of its own in the responding ASP Up Acknowledgment (ASPUP ACK) indicating which of the extensions provided in the ASPUP are supported. If an SGP or IPSP supporting ASPEXT receives an ASPUP message that does not contain an ASP Extensions parameter, the SGP or IPSP MAY assume that the ASP does not support any extensions, or MAY rely on internal configuration data to determine the extensions supported by the ASP. The SGP or IPSP SHOULD NOT include the ASP Extensions parameter in the responding ASPUP ACK message. Upon receiving an ASP Up Acknowledgment (ASPUP ACK) containing an ASP Extensions parameter, an ASP supporting ASPEXT MUST register the SGP or IPSP's support of the specified extensions. If an SPP supporting ASPEXT receives an ERR message indicating the ASP Extensions parameter as an "Invalid Parameter" in response to an ASPUP or ASPUP ACK message, the SPP SHOULD re-attempt sending the ASPUP or ASPUP ACK message without the ASP Extensions parameter. 4.1.2. ASP Down Procedures In extension to the "ASP Down Procedure" of the UAs<2>, ASPEXT provides the following procedures: Whenever an ASP, as part of the normal UA procedures, sends an ASP Down (ASPDN) message to an SGP or IPSP, the ASP supporting ASPEXT SHOULD clear any ASP Extensions previously registered while the ASP was in the ASP-UP state for the SGP. Upon sending an ASP Down Acknowledgment (ASPDN ACK), either in response to an ASPDN or unsolicited, an SGP supporting ASPEXT SHOULD clear any ASP Extensions previously registered while the ASP was in the ASP-UP state at the SGP. 5. Examples 5.1. Both ASP and SGP/IPSP support ASP Extensions Figure 1 illustrates an example where both the ASP and the SGP or IPSP support ASPEXT. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 8 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 ASP SGP/IPSP | | (1) | SCTP Association Established | |<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->| | | (2) | ASPUP (Extensions: LOADSEL, CORID) | |---------------------------------------->| | | (3) | ASPUP ACK (Extensions: LOADSEL) | |<--------------------------------------->| | | (4) | | | | Figure 1. Both ASP and SGP/IPSP support ASP Extensions The example sequence of events for the example illustrated in Figure 1 is as follows: (1) An SCTP Association is established or the ASP is otherwise in the ASP-DOWN state. (2) The ASP sends an ASPUP message to the SGP or IPSP containing an ASP Extensions parameter identifying (for example) two extensions: Load Selection [LOADSEL] and Correlation Id/Heartbeat [CORID]; indicating the ASP's support for these two extensions requiring interworking support. (3) The SGP or IPSP responds with an ASPUP ACK message containing an ASP Extensions parameter identifying (for example) support for only one extension: Load Selection [LOADSEL] (4) The ASP and SGP/IPSP register the peer's support (or lack of support) for the LOADSEL and CORID extensions and modify subsequent procedures accordingly. 5.2. Interworking Examples 5.2.1. ASP supports ASP Extensions, SGP/IPSP does not Figure 2 and 3 illustrate an example where the ASP supports ASPEXT but the SGP or IPSP does not. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 9 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 ASP SGP/IPSP | | (1) | SCTP Association Established | |<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->| | | (2) | ASPUP (Extensions: LOADSEL, CORID) | |---------------------------------------->| | | (3) | ASPUP ACK | |<--------------------------------------->| | | (4) | | | | Figure 2. ASP supports ASP Extensions, SGP/IPSP ignores The example sequence of events for the example illustrated in Figure 2 is as follows: (1) An SCTP Association is established or the ASP is otherwise in the ASP-DOWN state. (2) The ASP sends an ASPUP message to the SGP or IPSP containing an ASP Extensions parameter identifying (for example) two extensions: Load Selection [LOADSEL] and Correlation Id/Heartbeat [CORID]; indicating the ASP's support for these two extensions requiring interworking support. (3) The SGP or IPSP ignores the ASP Extensions parameter in the ASPUP and responds with an ASPUP ACK message containing no ASP Extensions parameter. (4) The ASP either assumes that the SGP or IPSP does not support the LOADSEL or CORID extensions, or relies upon configuration data to indicate the SGP or IPSP's support for these extensions. The ASP modifies its subsequent procedures with regard to the extension accordingly. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 10 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 ASP SGP/IPSP | | (1) | SCTP Association Established | |<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->| | | (2) | ASPUP (Extensions: LOADSEL, CORID) | |---------------------------------------->| | | (3) | ERR("Invalid Parameter") | |<--------------------------------------->| | | (4) | ASPUP | |---------------------------------------->| | | (5) | ASPUP ACK | |<--------------------------------------->| | | (6) | | | | Figure 3. ASP supports ASP Extensions, SGP/IPSP refuses The example sequence of events for the example illustrated in Figure 3 is as follows: (1) An SCTP Association is established or the ASP is otherwise in the ASP-DOWN state. (2) The ASP sends an ASPUP message to the SGP or IPSP containing an ASP Extensions parameter identifying (for example) two extensions: Load Selection [LOADSEL] and Correlation Id/Heartbeat [CORID]; indicating the ASP's support for these two extensions requiring interworking support. (3) The SGP or IPSP refuses to accept the ASP Extensions parameter in the ASPUP message and responds with an ERR("Invalid Parameter") message indicating such. (4) The ASP re-attempts by sending an ASPUP message without an ASP Extensions parameter. (5) The SGP or IPSP responds with an ASPUP ACK message containing no ASP Extensions parameter. (6) The ASP either assumes that the SGP or IPSP does not support the LOADSEL or CORID extensions, or relies upon configuration data to indicate the SGP or IPSP's support for these extensions. The ASP modifies its subsequent procedures with regard to the extension accordingly. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 11 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 5.2.2. SGP/IPSP supports ASP Extensions, ASP does not Figure 4 illustrates an example where the SGP or IPSP supports ASPEXT but the ASP does not. ASP SGP/IPSP | | (1) | SCTP Association Established | |<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->| | | (2) | ASPUP | |---------------------------------------->| | | (3) | ASPUP ACK | |<--------------------------------------->| | | (4) | | | | Figure 4. SGP/IPSP supports ASP Extensions, ASP ignores The example sequence of events for the example illustrated in Figure 4 is as follows: (1) An SCTP Association is established or the ASP is otherwise in the ASP-DOWN state. (2) The ASP sends an ASPUP message to the SGP or IPSP not containing an ASP Extensions parameter. (3) The SGP or IPSP responds with an ASPUP ACK message not containing an ASP Extensions parameter. (4) The SGP either assumes that the ASP does not support the CORID extensions, or relies upon configuration data to indicate the ASP's support for these extensions. The SGP modifies its subsequent procedures with regard to the extension accordingly. 6. Security ASPEXT does not introduce any new security risks or considerations that are not already inherent in the UA [IUA-BIS], [DUA], [V5UA], [GR303UA00], [M2UA], [M3UA-BIS], [SUA], [ISUA], [TUA]. Please see the SIGTRAN security document [SIGSEC] for security considerations and recommendations that are applicable to each of these UAs. It is possible that an attacker or malicious endpoint might manipulate the ASP Extensions parameter in an attempt to cause denial of service attacks on either an SGP or ASP. However, because each extension has a fall back procedure which provides for interworking without the ASPEXT capability, ASPEXT introduces no further threat if the endpoint adheres to the following rule: B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 12 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 Although an endpoint has registered an ASP extension against a peer endpoint, the registering endpoint SHOULD take this information as advisory and continue to effect interworking and fullback procedures in the event that the information in the ASP Extensions parameter is malicious, in error, or invalid. 7. IANA Considerations 7.1. Extensions ASPEXT provides an additional ASP Extensions message parameter to the common parameter range of the SIGTRAN UAs [IUA-BIS], [DUA], [V5UA], [GR303UA00], [M2UA], [M3UA-BIS], [SUA], [ISUA], [TUA]: (a) The parameter is named the ASP Extensions parameter. (b) The structure of the ASP Extensions parameter field conforms to the UA general TLV format and is described in detail in Section 3.1.1. (c) The detailed definition of each component of the ASP Extensions parameter values is described in Section 3.1.1. (d) This document also provides a detailed description of the intended use of the ASP Extensions<1> parameter, and in which messages the ASP Extensions parameter should appear, how many times, and when. 7.2. Protocol Extensions UA protocols may be extended through IANA in three ways: + through definition of additional message classes; + through definition of additional message types; and, + through definition of additional message parameters. The definition and used of new message classes, types and parameters is an integral part of the SIGTRAN adaptation layers. Thus, these extensions are assigned by IANA through an IETF Consensus action [RFC2434]. The proposed extension MUST in no way adversely affect the general working of the protocol. To permit interoperability of implementations supporting a particular extension with implementation not supporting that extension, a UA Extension number can be assigned to a protocol extension in accordance with this document. A new registry will be created by IANA to allow: B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 13 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 7.2.1. IETF Defined UA Protocol Extension In additional to the documentation required for each message class, message type and message parameter extension, the documentation of the UA Protocol Extension number MUST include the following information: (a) A long and short name for the Extension. (b) A detailed description of the the purpose of the Extension. (c) A detailed description of the Message Classes, Types and Parameters provided by the extension. (d) A detailed description of the interworking between UA implementations supporting the Extension and UA implementations not supporting the Extension. Notes for Section 7 <1> EDITOR'S NOTE:- The ASP Extensions parameter tag value shown throughout this document as 0xXXXX will be assigned by IANA within the common parameter range of the SIGTRAN UAs and may change its value in further versions of this document. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 14 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 0. Revision History This section provides historical information on the changes made to this draft. This section will be removed from the document when the document is finalized. 0.4. Changes from Version 0.3 to Version 0.4 + updated to IETF boilerplate for first and last page. + updated references, version numbers and dates. + added ASPCONG extension. + resubmitted to sync with IETF numbers 0.3. Changes from Version 0.2 to Version 0.3 + updated references, version numbers and dates. 0.2. Changes from Version 0.1 to Version 0.2 + added list of abbreviations. + moved change history. + updated references. + split references. + updated version numbers and dates. + updated security section. + moved notes to end of document. + added CVS change log. + added dynamic registration and DE IPSP model from IG [M3UA-BIS] as extensions. 0.1. Changes from Version 0.0 to Version 0.1 + added this history section, + updated references, + updated version numbers and dates, + updated postscript diagrams, + updated author's address. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 15 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 0.0.0. Change Log $Log: draft-bidulock-sigtran-aspext-04.me,v $ Revision 0.9.2.4 2006/06/18 20:53:35 brian - preparing for draft rerelease Revision 0.9.2.3 2005/10/17 11:53:45 brian - updated drafts for republication Revision 0.9.2.2 2005/05/14 08:33:18 brian - copyright header correction Revision 0.9.2.1 2004/03/16 05:10:39 brian - Added drafts and figures. Revision 0.8.2.4 2003/08/01 12:23:15 brian Added abbreviations, updated format. Revision 0.8.2.3 2003/07/29 00:35:06 brian Finalizing latest round of drafts. Revision 0.8.2.2 2003/07/28 13:12:20 brian Reformatting. Revision 0.8.2.1 2003/07/27 22:10:12 brian A few formatting changes. Revision 0.8 2003/07/26 19:28:45 brian Added new draft verions. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 16 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 R. References R.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels," RFC 2119 - BCP 14, The Internet Society (March 1997). [IUA-BIS] Morneault, K., Rengasami, S., Kalla, M. and Sidebottom, G., "ISDN Q.921-User Adaptation Layer," draft-ietf-sigtran- rfc3057bis-00.txt, The Internet Society (May 2003). Work In Progress. [M2UA] Morneault, K., Dantu, R., Sidebottom, G., Bidulock, B. and Heitz, J., "Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 2 (MTP2) - User Adaptation Layer," RFC 3331, Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (September, 2002). [M3UA-BIS] Pastor, J., Morneault, K., "Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 3 (MTP3)-User Adaptation Layer (M3UA)," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (October 2005). Work In Progress [SUA] Loughney, J., Sidebottom, G., Coene, L., Verwimp, G., Keller, J. and Bidulock, B., "Signalling Connection Control Part User Adaptation Layer (SUA)," RFC 3868, Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (October, 2004). [RFC2960] Stewart, R., Xie, Q., Morneault, K., Sharp, C., Schwarzbauer, H. J., Taylor, T., Rytina, I., Kalla, H., Zhang, L. and Paxson, V., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)," RFC 2960, The Internet Society (February 2000). [SIGSEC] Loughney, J., Tuexen, M. and Pastor-Balbas, J., "Security Considerations for Signaling Transport (SIGTRAN) Protocols," RFC 3788, Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (June 2004). [RFC2434] Narten, T., Alvestrand, H. T., "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs," RFC 2434, The Internet Society (October, 1998). R.2. Informative References [DUA] Mukundan, R., Mangalpally, N., Morneault, K. and Vydyam, A., "Digital Private Network Signaling System (DPNSS)/Digital Access Signaling System 2 (DASS 2) Extensions to the IUA Protocol," RFC 4129, Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (August 2005). B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 17 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 [V5UA] Weilandt, E., Khanchandani, N. and Rao, S., "V5.2-User Adaption Layer (V5UA)," RFC 3807, Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (June 2004). [GR303UA00] Mukundan, R., Morneault, K., "GR-303 extensions to the IUA Protocol," draft-ietf-sigtran-gr303ua-00.txt, Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (December 2002). Work In Progress [ISUA] Bidulock, B., "SS7 ISUP-User Adaptation Layer (ISUA)," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (June 18, 2006). Work In Progress. [TUA] Bidulock, B., "SS7 TCAP-User Adaptation Layer (TUA)," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (June 18, 2006). Work In Progress. [M2PA] George, T., Bidulock, B., Dantu, R., Schwarzbauer, H. J. and Morneault, K., "Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 2 (MTP2)-User Peer-to-Peer Adaptation Layer (M2PA)," RFC 4165, Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (September 2005). [SGINFO] Bidulock, B., "Signalling Gateway (SG) Information Support," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (June 18, 2006). Work In Progress. [LOADSEL] Bidulock, B., "Load Selection Extension for Signalling User Adaptation Layers (LOADSEL)," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (June 18, 2006). Work In Progress. [LOADGRP] Bidulock, B., "Load Grouping Extension for Signalling User Adaptation Layers (LOADGRP)," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (June 18, 2006). Work In Progress. [CORID] Bidulock, B., "Correlation Id and Heartbeat Procedures Supporting Lossless Fail-Over," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (June 18, 2006). Work In Progress. [REGEXT] Bidulock, B., "Registration Extensions for SS7 Signalling User Adaptation Layers," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (June 18, 2006). Work In Progress. [SESSID] Bidulock, B., "Session Identification for SS7 Signalling User Adaptation Layers," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 18 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 Group (June 18, 2006). Work In Progress. [ASPCONG] Bidulock, B., "ASP Congestion," , Internet Engineering Task Force - Signalling Transport Working Group (October 16, 2005). Work In Progress. Author's Addresses Brian Bidulock OpenSS7 Corporation 1469 Jeffreys Crescent Edmonton, AB T6L 6T1 Canada Phone: +1-780-490-1141 Email: bidulock@openss7.org URL: http//www.openss7.org/ This Internet draft expires December 2006. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 19 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 List of Illustrations Figure 1. Both ASP and SGP/IPSP support ASP Extensions .......... 9 Figure 2. ASP supports ASP Extensions, SGP/IPSP ignores ......... 10 Figure 3. ASP supports ASP Extensions, SGP/IPSP refuses ......... 11 Figure 4. SGP/IPSP supports ASP Extensions, ASP ignores ......... 12 Table of Contents Status of this Memo ............................................. 1 Copyright ....................................................... 1 Abstract ........................................................ 1 Contents ........................................................ 2 1 Introduction .................................................. 2 1.1 Scope ....................................................... 2 1.2 Abbreviations ............................................... 2 1.3 Terminology ................................................. 3 1.4 Overview .................................................... 3 1.4.1 Existing Extension Management ............................. 3 1.4.2 ASP Extension Management .................................. 4 Notes for Section 1 ............................................. 4 2 Conventions ................................................... 4 3 Protocol Elements ............................................. 4 3.1 Parameters .................................................. 4 3.1.1 ASP Extensions ............................................ 4 3.2 Messages .................................................... 5 3.2.1 ASP Up (ASPUP) ............................................ 6 3.2.2 ASP Up Acknowledgment (ASPUP ACK) ......................... 6 Notes for Section 3 ............................................. 7 4 Procedures .................................................... 7 4.1 ASP Management Procedures ................................... 7 4.1.1 ASP Up Procedures ......................................... 8 4.1.2 ASP Down Procedures ....................................... 8 5 Examples ...................................................... 8 5.1 Both ASP and SGP/IPSP support ASP Extensions ................ 8 5.2 Interworking Examples ....................................... 9 5.2.1 ASP supports ASP Extensions, SGP/IPSP does not ............ 9 5.2.2 SGP/IPSP supports ASP Extensions, ASP does not ............ 12 6 Security ...................................................... 12 7 IANA Considerations ........................................... 13 7.1 Extensions .................................................. 13 7.2 Protocol Extensions ......................................... 13 7.2.1 IETF Defined UA Protocol Extension ........................ 14 Notes for Section 7 ............................................. 14 0 Revision History .............................................. 15 0.4 Changes from Version 0.3 to Version 0.4 ..................... 15 0.3 Changes from Version 0.2 to Version 0.3 ..................... 15 0.2 Changes from Version 0.1 to Version 0.2 ..................... 15 0.1 Changes from Version 0.0 to Version 0.1 ..................... 15 0.0.0 Change Log ................................................ 16 R References .................................................... 17 R.1 Normative References ........................................ 17 B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 20 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 R.2 Informative References ...................................... 17 Author's Addresses .............................................. 19 List of Illustrations ........................................... 20 Table of Contents ............................................... 20 B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 21 Internet Draft UA ASPEXT June 18, 2006 Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf- ipr@ietf.org. Disclaimer of Validity This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. B. Bidulock Version 0.4 Page 22