Benchmarking Methodology WG Rajiv Asati Internet Draft Cisco Updates: 2544 (if approved) Carlos Pignataro Intended status: Informational Cisco Expires: August 2010 Fernando Calabria Cisco Cesar Olvera Consulintel February 19, 2010 Device Reset Characterization draft-asati-bmwg-reset-03 Abstract An operational forwarding device may need to be re-started (automatically or manually) for a variety of reasons, an event that we call a "reset" in this document. Since there may be an interruption in the forwarding operation during a reset, it is useful to know how long a device takes to begin forwarding packets again. This document specifies a methodology for characterizing reset during benchmarking of forwarding devices, and provides clarity and consistency in reset test procedures beyond what's specified in RFC2544. It therefore updates RFC2544. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html This Internet-Draft will expire on August 19, 2010. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...................................................4 1.1. Scope.....................................................4 2. Key Words to Reflect Requirements..............................5 3. Reset Test.....................................................5 3.1. Hardware Reset............................................5 3.1.1. Routing Processor (RP) / Routing Engine reset........6 3.1.1.1. RP Failure for a single-RP device (mandatory)...6 3.1.1.2. RP Failure for a multiple-RP device (optional)..7 3.1.2. Line Card (LC) Removal and Insertion (mandatory).....9 3.2. Software Reset...........................................11 3.2.1. Operating System (OS) reset (mandatory).............11 3.2.2. Process reset (optional)............................13 3.3. Power interruption.......................................15 3.3.1. Power Interruption (mandatory)......................15 4. Security Considerations.......................................16 5. IANA Considerations...........................................17 6. Acknowledgments...............................................17 7. References....................................................18 7.1. Normative References.....................................18 7.2. Informative References...................................18 Authors' Addresses...............................................19 Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 1. Introduction An operational forwarding device (or one of its components) may need to be re-started for a variety of reasons, an event that we call a "reset" in this draft. Since there may be an interruption in the forwarding operation during a reset, it is useful to know how long a device takes to begin forwarding packets again. However, the answer to this question is no longer simple and straight-forward as the modern forwarding devices employ many hardware advancements (distributed forwarding, etc.) and software advancements (graceful restart, etc.) that influence the recovery time after the reset. Additionally, there are other factors that influence the recovery time after the reset: 1. Type of reset - Hardware (line-card crash, etc.) vs. Software (protocol reset, process crash, etc.) or even complete power failures 2. Manual vs. Automatic reset 3. Local vs. Remote reset 4. Scale - Number of line cards present vs. in-use 5. Scale - Number of physical and logical interfaces 6. Scale - Number of routing protocol instances This document specifies a methodology for characterizing reset during benchmarking of forwarding devices, and provides clarity and consistency in reset procedures beyond what's specified in [RFC2544]. These procedures may be used by other benchmarking documents such as [RFC2544], [RFC5180], [RFC5695], etc. This document updates Section 26.6 of [RFC2544]. 1.1. Scope This document focuses on only the reset criterion of benchmarking, and presumes that it would be beneficial to [RFC2544], [RFC5180], [RFC5695], and other BMWG benchmarking efforts. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 2. Key Words to Reflect Requirements The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. RFC 2119 defines the use of these key words to help make the intent of standards track documents as clear as possible. While this document uses these keywords, this document is not a standards track document. 3. Reset Test This section contains the description of the tests that are related to the characterization of DUT's (Device Under Test) / SUT's (System Under Test) speed to recover from a reset. There are three types of reset considered in this document: 1. Hardware resets 2. Software resets 3. Power interruption Section 3.1 describes various hardware resets, whereas Section 3.2 describes various software resets. Additionally, Section 3.3 describes power interruption tests. These sections define and characterize these resets. Additionally, since device specific implementations may vary for hardware and software type resets, it is desirable to classify each test case as "mandatory" or "optional". 3.1. Hardware Reset A test designed to characterize the time it takes a DUT to recover from the hardware reset. A "hardware reset" generally involves the re-initialization of one or more physical components in the DUT, but not the entire DUT. A hardware reset is executed by the operator for example by physical removal of a physical component, by pressing on a "reset" button for Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 the component, or could even be triggered from the command line interface. For routers that do not contain separate Routing Processor and Line Card modules, the hardware reset tests are not performed since they are not relevant; instead, the power interruption tests are mandatory to be performed (see Section 3.3) in these cases. 3.1.1. Routing Processor (RP) / Routing Engine reset The Routing Processor (RP) is the DUT module that is primarily concerned with Control Plane functions. 3.1.1.1. RP Failure for a single-RP device (mandatory) Objective To characterize the speed at which a DUT recovers from a Route processor hardware reset in a single RP environment. Procedure First, ensure that the RP is in a permanent state to which it will return to after the reset, by performing some or all of the following operational tasks: save the current DUT configuration, specify boot parameters, ensure the appropriate software files are available, or perform additional Operating System or hardware related task. Second, ensure that the DUT is able to forward the traffic for at least 15 seconds before any test activities are performed. The traffic should use the minimum frame size possible on the media used in the testing and rate should be sufficient for the DUT to attain the maximum forwarding throughput. This enables a finer granularity in the recovery time measurement. Third, perform the Route Processor (RP) hardware reset at this point. This entails for example physically removing the RP to later re-insert it, or triggering a hardware reset by other means (e.g., command line interface, physical switch, etc.) Finally, the characterization is completed by measuring the frame loss and recovery time from the moment the RP is re-initialized or reinserted. Reporting format Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 The reset results are reported in a simple statement including the frame loss and recovery times. For each test case, it is RECOMMENDED that the following parameters be reported in these units: Parameter Units or Examples Throughput Frames per second and bits per second Loss Frames Time Seconds, with sufficient resolution to convey meaningful info Protocol IPv4, IPv6, MPLS, etc. Frame Size Octets Port Media Ethernet, GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), POS (Packet over SONET), etc. Port Speed 10 Gbps, 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. Interface Encap. Ethernet, Ethernet VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. The reporting of results MUST regard repeatability considerations from Section 4 of [RFC2544]. It is RECOMMENDED to perform multiple trials and report average results. 3.1.1.2. RP Failure for a multiple-RP device (optional) Objective To characterize the speed at which a "secondary" Route Processor (sometimes referred to as "backup" RP) of a DUT becomes active after a "primary" (or "active") Route Processor hardware reset. This process is often referred to as "RP Switchover". The characterization in this test should be done for the default DUT Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 behavior as well as a DUT's non-default configuration that minimizes frame loss. Procedure This test characterizes "RP Switchover". Many implementations allow for optimized switchover capabilities that minimize the downtime during the actual switchover. This test consists of two sub-cases from a switchover characteristics standpoint: First, a default behavior (with no switchover-specific configurations); and second, a non-default behavior with switchover configuration to minimize frame loss. Therefore, the procedures hereby described are executed twice, and reported separately. First, ensure that the RPs are in a permanent state such that the secondary will be activated to the same state as the active is, by performing some or all of the following operational tasks: save the current DUT configuration, specify boot parameters, ensure the appropriate software files are available, or perform additional Operating System or hardware related task. Second, ensure that the DUT is able to forward the traffic for at least 15 seconds before any test activities are performed. The traffic should use the minimum frame size possible on the media used in the testing and rate should be sufficient for the DUT to attain the maximum forwarding throughput. This enables a finer granularity in the recovery time measurement. Third, perform the primary Route Processor (RP) hardware reset at this point. This entails for example physically removing the RP, or triggering a hardware reset by other means (e.g., command line interface, physical switch, etc.) Is up to the Operator to decide if the active RP needs to be re-inserted after a grace period or not. Finally, the characterization is completed by measuring the complete frame loss and recovery time from the moment the active RP is hardware-reset. Reporting format The reset results are reported twice, one for the default switchover behavior and the other for the non-default one. For each, the report consists of a simple statement including the frame loss and recovery times, as well as any specific redundancy scheme in place. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 For each test case, it is RECOMMENDED that the following parameters be reported in these units: Parameter Units or Examples Throughput Frames per second and bits per second Loss Frames Time Seconds, with sufficient resolution to convey meaningful info Protocol IPv4, IPv6, MPLS, etc. Frame Size Octets Port Media Ethernet, GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), POS (Packet over SONET), etc. Port Speed 10 Gbps, 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. Interface Encap. Ethernet, Ethernet VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. The reporting of results MUST regard repeatability considerations from Section 4 of [RFC2544]. It is RECOMMENDED to perform multiple trials and report average results. 3.1.2. Line Card (LC) Removal and Insertion (mandatory) The Line Card (LC) is the DUT component that is responsible with packet forwarding. Objective To characterize the speed at which a DUT recovers from a Line Card removal and insertion event. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 Procedure For this test, the Line Card that is being hardware-reset MUST be on the forwarding path and all destinations MUST be directly connected. First, complete some or all of the following operational tasks: save the current DUT configuration, specify boot parameters, ensure the appropriate software files are available, or perform additional Operating System or hardware related task. Second, ensure that the DUT is able to forward the traffic for at least 15 seconds before any test activities are performed. The traffic should use the minimum frame size possible on the media used in the testing and rate should be sufficient for the DUT to attain the maximum forwarding throughput. This enables a finer granularity in the recovery time measurement. Third, perform the Line Card (LC) hardware reset at this point. This entails for example physically removing the LC to later re- insert it, or triggering a hardware reset by other means (e.g., command line interface, physical switch, etc.) Finally, the characterization is completed by measuring the frame loss and recovery time from the moment the LC is reinitialized or reinserted. Reporting Format The reset results are reported in a simple statement including the frame loss and recovery times. For each test case, it is RECOMMENDED that the following parameters be reported in these units: Parameter Units or Examples Throughput Frames per second and bits per second Loss Frames Time Seconds, with sufficient resolution to convey meaningful info Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 Protocol IPv4, IPv6, MPLS, etc. Frame Size Octets Port Media Ethernet, GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), POS (Packet over SONET), etc. Port Speed 10 Gbps, 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. Interface Encap. Ethernet, Ethernet VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. The reporting of results MUST regard repeatability considerations from Section 4 of [RFC2544]. It is RECOMMENDED to perform multiple trials and report average results. 3.2. Software Reset To characterize the speed at which a DUT recovers from the software reset. In contrast to a "hardware reset", a "software reset" involves only the re-initialization of the execution, data structures, and partial state within the software running on the DUT module(s). A software reset is initiated for example from the DUT's Command Line Interface (CLI). 3.2.1. Operating System (OS) reset (mandatory) Objective To characterize the speed at which a DUT recovers from an Operating System (OS) software reset. Procedure First, complete some or all of the following operational tasks: save the current DUT configuration, specify software boot parameters, ensure the appropriate software files are available, or perform additional Operating System task. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 Second, ensure that the DUT is able to forward the traffic for at least 15 seconds before any test activities are performed. The traffic should use the minimum frame size possible on the media used in the testing and rate should be sufficient for the DUT to attain the maximum forwarding throughput. This enables a finer granularity in the recovery time measurement. Third, trigger an Operating System re-initialization in the DUT, by operational means such as use of the DUT's Command Line Interface (CLI) or other management interface. Finally, the characterization is completed by measuring the complete frame loss and recovery time from the moment the reset instruction was given until the Operating System finished the reload and re-initialization (inferred by the re-establishing of traffic). Reporting format The reset results are reported in a simple statement including the frame loss and recovery times. For each test case, it is RECOMMENDED that the following parameters be reported in these units: Parameter Units or Examples Throughput Frames per second and bits per second Loss Frames Time Seconds, with sufficient resolution to convey meaningful info Protocol IPv4, IPv6, MPLS, etc. Frame Size Octets Port Media Ethernet, GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), POS (Packet over SONET), etc. Port Speed 10 Gbps, 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 Interface Encap. Ethernet, Ethernet VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. The reporting of results MUST regard repeatability considerations from Section 4 of [RFC2544]. It is RECOMMENDED to perform multiple trials and report average results. 3.2.2. Process reset (optional) Objective To characterize the speed at which a DUT recovers from a software process reset. Such speed may depend upon the number and types of process running in the DUT and which ones are tested. Different implementations of forwarding devices include various common processes. A process reset should be performed only in the processes most relevant to the tester. Procedure First, complete some or all of the following operational tasks: save the current DUT configuration, specify software parameters or environmental variables, or perform additional Operating System task. Second, ensure that the DUT is able to forward the traffic for at least 15 seconds before any test activities are performed. The traffic should use the minimum frame size possible on the media used in the testing and rate should be sufficient for the DUT to attain the maximum forwarding throughput. This enables a finer granularity in the recovery time measurement. Third, trigger a process reset for each process running in the DUT and considered for testing from a management interface (e.g., by means of the Command Line Interface (CLI), etc.) Finally, the characterization for each individual process is completed by measuring the complete frame loss and recovery time from the moment the reset instruction was given until the Operating System finished the reload and re-initialization (inferred by the re-establishing of traffic). Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 Reporting format The reset results are reported in a simple statement including the frame loss and recovery times for each process running in the DUT and tested. Given the implementation nature of this test, details of the actual process tested should be included along with the statement. For each test case, it is RECOMMENDED that the following parameters be reported in these units: Parameter Units or Examples Throughput Frames per second and bits per second Loss Frames Time Seconds, with sufficient resolution to convey meaningful info Protocol IPv4, IPv6, MPLS, etc. Frame Size Octets Port Media Ethernet, GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), POS (Packet over SONET), etc. Port Speed 10 Gbps, 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. Interface Encap. Ethernet, Ethernet VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. The reporting of results MUST regard repeatability considerations from Section 4 of [RFC2544]. It is RECOMMENDED to perform multiple trials and report average results. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 3.3. Power interruption "Power interruption" refers to the complete loss of power on the DUT. It can be viewed as a special case of a hardware reset, triggered by the loss of the power supply to the DUT or its components, and is characterized by the re-initialization of all hardware and software in the DUT. 3.3.1. Power Interruption (mandatory) Objective To characterize the speed at which a DUT recovers from a complete loss of electric power or complete power interruption. This test simulates a complete power failure or outage, and should be indicative of the DUT/SUT's behavior during such event. Procedure First, ensure that the entire DUT is at a permanent state to which it will return to after the power interruption, by performing some or all of the following operational tasks: save the current DUT configuration, specify boot parameters, ensure the appropriate software files are available, or perform additional Operating System or hardware related task. Second, ensure that the DUT is able to forward the traffic for at least 15 seconds before any test activities are performed. The traffic should use the minimum frame size possible on the media used in the testing and rate should be sufficient for the DUT to attain the maximum forwarding throughput. This enables a finer granularity in the recovery time measurement. Third, interrupt the power (AC or DC) that feeds the corresponding DUT's power supplies at this point. This entails for example physically removing the power supplies in the DUT to later re- insert them, or simply disconnecting or switching off their power feeds (AC or DC as applicable). The actual power interruption should last at least 15 seconds. Finally, the characterization is completed by measuring the frame loss and recovery time from the moment the power is restored or the power supplies reinserted in the DUT. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 Reporting format The reset results are reported in a simple statement including the frame loss and recovery times. For each test case, it is RECOMMENDED that the following parameters be reported in these units: Parameter Units or Examples Throughput Frames per second and bits per second Loss Frames Time Seconds, with sufficient resolution to convey meaningful info Protocol IPv4, IPv6, MPLS, etc. Frame Size Octets Port Media Ethernet, GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), POS (Packet over SONET), etc. Port Speed 10 Gbps, 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. Interface Encap. Ethernet, Ethernet VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. The reporting of results MUST regard repeatability considerations from Section 4 of [RFC2544]. It is RECOMMENDED to perform multiple trials and report average results. 4. Security Considerations Benchmarking activities, as described in this memo, are limited to technology characterization using controlled stimuli in a laboratory Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 environment, with dedicated address space and the constraints specified in the sections above. The benchmarking network topology will be an independent test setup and MUST NOT be connected to devices that may forward the test traffic into a production network or misroute traffic to the test management network. Furthermore, benchmarking is performed on a "black-box" basis, relying solely on measurements observable external to the DUT/SUT. Special capabilities SHOULD NOT exist in the DUT/SUT specifically for benchmarking purposes. Any implications for network security arising from the DUT/SUT SHOULD be identical in the lab and in production networks. There are no specific security considerations within the scope of this document. 5. IANA Considerations There is no IANA consideration for this document. 6. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Ron Bonica, who motivated us to write this document. The authors would also like to thank Al Morton and Andrew Yourtchenko for providing review, suggestions, and valuable input. This document was prepared using 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 7. References 7.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2544] Bradner, S. and McQuaid, J., "Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices", RFC 2544, March 1999. 7.2. Informative References [RFC5180] Popoviciu, C., et al, "IPv6 Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices", RFC 5180, May 2008. [RFC5695] Akhter, A., Asati, R., and C. Pignataro, "MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows", RFC 5695, November 2009. Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Reset Characterization February 2010 Authors' Addresses Rajiv Asati Cisco Systems 7025-6 Kit Creek Road RTP, NC 27709 USA Email: rajiva@cisco.com Carlos Pignataro Cisco Systems 7200-12 Kit Creek Road RTP, NC 27709 USA Email: cpignata@cisco.com Fernando Calabria Cisco Systems 7200-12 Kit Creek Road RTP, NC 27709 USA Email: fcalabri@cisco.com Cesar Olvera Consulintel Joaquin Turina, 2 Pozuelo de Alarcon, Madrid, E-28224 Spain Phone: +34 91 151 81 99 Email: cesar.olvera@consulintel.es Asati, et al. Expires August 19, 2010 [Page 19]